logo
KIC's Park Says Treasuries Remain Core Portfolio

KIC's Park Says Treasuries Remain Core Portfolio

Bloomberg15 hours ago
CC-Transcript
00:00One of the big questions that's come up this year was, you know, the role of US treasuries and whether or not, you know, people have overinvested or overallocated into Treasuries as the sovereign wealth fund. I know you guys have exposure to U.S. Treasuries. How are you looking at your holdings right now? And are you happy with your exposure to U.S. Treasuries? In the country, though, we are happy to invest, with an investment in the U.S. Treasury in a sense that the U.S. Treasury bond keeps are very strong, that liquidity and stable returns. And also, regardless of any sort of market volatilities, we are expecting a stable and the solid returns in the short term. So for the time being, we maintain our portfolio, the Treasury bond, as are our two core portfolios. But in the longer term we are mindful of any risks from the supply, supply change from the investors and also to the... Some are on policy uncertainties long term. Do you need to be rethinking that? How are you looking at your exposure to U.S. Treasuries longer term and how are you looking at potential alternatives to U.S. treasuries? Are there alternatives? We are now reconsidering our asset allocation. We understand that our long term returns are largely depend on our asset allocation. So among the total fixed income investments, we are also interested in investing to the credit and credit bond and other other to the structural bonds, along with the U.S. Treasury. And also more fundamentally, we are now considering to our asset allocation between the fixed income to the global equity. Do you see alternatives to public fixed income and would you be increasing you're looking to increase your weighting into things like private credit, for example, in private private lending? And is that what role do you see that part playing in your portfolio? That's a little bit. I'll start with the... The investment in fixed income. Now the we diversify our portfolio to alternative investments, including, as you said, private equity, the private credit and the infrastructure. So the more we believe the alternative investment, it will be our core assets in our portfolio in the longer term. So we are we plan to invest continuously, fairly and steadily pace the philosophy behind alternatives or going into, say, private credit, for example, is that is that because of returns or is that because of predictability and stability? What role why are you doing that? Well, always to the edge to support investment. Our key objective is the diversification of the asset. So the higher return is also very the is our top priority. But at the same time, the stability is is our one of the key objective is to manage our portfolio. So we understand alternative investment is very goal upon a long term investment. So we expect more reasonable risk return profile compared to the traditional investment, public investment. So among the alternative assets or we are trying to diversify our portfolios, as you mentioned, the private credit is is to the growing industry and also to we we are interested in investment in infrastructure where you already have a New York office, just a cloud that's been in for 15 years. But you have plans to is it to branch out a specific part of the fund that looks at us out of New York? What's what are you looking to do specifically there and why? Strengthening the function and the role of the overseas offices is these are all key objectives. Do you have a timeline of when you plan to do that? And do you have an initial. Amount in mind that you're looking to invest specifically there in in alternatives? The U.S. is already our largest the place for our alternative investment. And later this year, we are trying to establish a new dedicated pond which will the how big is it fund is we we are starting from the very small side and at the same time it's relative for us sovereign wealth fund if you can give guidance but but what's smallest. Yeah. Is is a smaller size it's it's compared to our to the typical investment in our country, investment to the size is very small but we want identify the very good investment opportunities in all states. So that's why we establish that this dedicate pond in New York and then we are doubling the performance of this operation, and then we can expand both inside and also in other details such where is it? Is it accurate to say that see is going overweight on the US as far as private markets go? And if that is accurate, tell us tell us why and how and do you do you have any concerns about your exposure to the US dollar, for example? Our exposure to U.S. is a heavy, but compared to other investors, I think our exposure to U.S. is at the reasonable level at this moment and also to hedge our longer term is investor rather than responding to just short term the volatility. We are trying to focus on that more long term growth potential and the structural trend that says we expect U.S. market trends continue, especially in tech sector. So hopefully we can see more opportunities. You mentioned China and some of the I guess some of the opportunities that you are looking at there. I know you have some exposure there as well. Could you elaborate more on that? Like what what future opportunities do you see in in China, whether it is public or private markets? And what would it take for you to then, I guess, establish an office to your point, by to then increase your on the ground capabilities? Yeah. In terms of Chinese market, it's a little bit tricky and it's complicated to invest in Chinese market. Is that an economic consideration and a geopolitical comparison force? And the Chinese tech sector is very promising. At the same time, Chinese private property market and macro condition is a little bit unclear. Also, I just say that in the political point of view, no, we see the the rivalry and the tension between the U.S. and China. So we have to concede at this point and we expect this trend to will be continuing for the time being. So now we are also seeing some fundamental change over world economic order. So now from the globalization tool, where we have more protectionism and supply chain disruption. So every countries are trying to protect their industries. Key industries, including air and high tech, is one of them.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Columbia Will Pay $9 Million to Settle Lawsuit Over U.S. News Ranking
Columbia Will Pay $9 Million to Settle Lawsuit Over U.S. News Ranking

New York Times

time42 minutes ago

  • New York Times

Columbia Will Pay $9 Million to Settle Lawsuit Over U.S. News Ranking

Columbia University has agreed to pay $9 million to settle a class-action lawsuit brought by students who claimed they had been overcharged for their educations as a result of incorrect data that they said the school had provided to U.S. News & World Report to artificially inflate its national ranking. The lawsuit stemmed from a 2022 scandal over how Columbia earned a No. 2 spot in the magazine's annual 'Best Colleges' rankings that year, acing a process that is a powerful driver of prestige and applications for American universities. Believing there were flaws in the data underpinning the university's score, a Columbia mathematician investigated and published a blog post asserting that several key figures were 'inaccurate, dubious or highly misleading.' The discrepancies caused Columbia to drop to No. 18 in the rankings. The next year, Columbia opted out of the rankings all together. The proposed settlement, which was filed in Federal District Court in Manhattan on Monday, did not require Columbia to formally admit wrongdoing. But the university said in a statement on Tuesday that it 'deeply regrets deficiencies in prior reporting.' The settlement agreement covers some 22,000 former undergraduate students who attended Columbia College, Columbia Engineering, or Columbia's School of General Studies between 2016 and 2022 and will be eligible to apply for a slice of the award. If all the students applied, taking into account likely lawyers' fees, they would each receive about $273. The lawsuit claimed that Columbia had artificially inflated its ranking by consistently reporting false data, including that 83 percent of its classes had fewer than 20 students. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

Ultra Mobile raised its data caps without a price increase
Ultra Mobile raised its data caps without a price increase

The Verge

timean hour ago

  • The Verge

Ultra Mobile raised its data caps without a price increase

T-Mobile is bringing some of its Uncarrier energy to Ultra Mobile, the carrier's international-focused MVNO that operates on its network. It announced that its plans now have slightly higher data caps and more international perks, but with the same prices as before for new and existing subscribers — a rare thing to see these days. The plan with the most notable increase in data cap is its $39 per month tier, which jumps from 15GB to 24GB per month. It also includes 5GB of data you can use in Mexico before international data roaming charges kick in. If you're accustomed to churning through a ton of data every month, its $59 per month unlimited (talk, text, and data) plan is stuffed with more goodies. It includes a combined $20 in international calling and data roaming credits, plus 25GB to use as a mobile hotspot (it previously included 20GB). You'll also get 100 minutes to call 'nearly anywhere,' and either 500 texts or 500MB of roaming data to use while traveling abroad before you have to pay extra. Whichever plan is best for your budget, Ultra Mobile stands out from Mint Mobile and Metro (other T-Mobile-owned MVNOs), as well as other major carriers, by offering more perks for people who call and text folks in countries outside the US. In addition to unlimited talk and text to Mexico, Canada, and the UK, Ultra allows free calls to landlines and mobile phones in China, India, Australia, and many other countries. Plus, all of its plans support Wi-Fi calling, which makes it easy to take calls even if local coverage is spotty.

Why Dupe Lawsuits Like LuluLemon's Are Rare—And Hard To Win
Why Dupe Lawsuits Like LuluLemon's Are Rare—And Hard To Win

Forbes

timean hour ago

  • Forbes

Why Dupe Lawsuits Like LuluLemon's Are Rare—And Hard To Win

Topline Luxury athletic wear brand Lululemon has sued Costco in federal court and accused the big box store of selling products that purposefully rip off some its most popular items for a fraction of the price—the latest lawsuit to come out of an increasingly prevalent 'dupe culture' that has left big-name companies with little recourse against brands that produce copycat products for less. A customer enters a Lululemon store in Corte Madera, California. Getty Images Key Facts In a lawsuit filed in California, Lululemon accused Costco of selling and, in one case, manufacturing knockoffs of its Scuba sweatshirts, Define jackets and ABC pants. The complaint alleged trade dress infringement, unfair competition under the Lanham Act, patent infringement and violation of the California Unfair Business Practices Act, and asks that Lululemon be compensated for the lost profits and "significant harm" done to its brands and reputation. Costco, which did not respond to request for comment from Forbes on Tuesday, could be forced to pay up if Lululemon prevails, but winning a trademark infringement lawsuit over dupe products is a tall order. Dozens of successful brands have sued over the increasing production of dupes in the last several years, but proving a product was copied isn't enough to win—the original producer must also show that the copycat product could actually 'dupe' customers into believing the knockoffs are the real thing. The onus of proving the copycat product actually confused customers and impacted the original manufacturer's business falls on the originating company, New York trademark lawyer Karl Zielaznick told Forbes, and it's very hard to prove: 'Customers often know that they aren't buying a $5,000 watch for $100… They know it's a different, dupe product,' he said. Get Forbes Breaking News Text Alerts: We're launching text message alerts so you'll always know the biggest stories shaping the day's headlines. Text 'Alerts' to (201) 335-0739 or sign up here. Key Background The prevalence of 'dupe culture' has skyrocketed in the last decade, largely thanks to TikTok, as customers search for and buy products that are cheaper, almost identical versions of high-end items. As opposed to generations before who "may have shopped for knockoffs on the sly," Jennifer Baker of creator management platform Grin told The Guardian, young people are now happy to buy knockoff products and share their finds with the world. TikTok videos with #dupe hashtag have racked up more than 6 billion views, and shoppers can easily find counterfeits for everything from a $600 hair tool to a $40 face wash. Because shoppers are happily and knowingly buying the fake products, nobody is actually being duped into thinking knock-offs are the real thing, Zielaznick explained, which makes it much harder to prove brand confusion. Surprising Fact In December, the e.l.f. Cosmetics company admitted in federal court that it created a mascara product called the Lash 'N Roll specifically meant to mimic the Hook N' Roll brush of Benefit Cosmetics' Roller Lash mascara, which has produced $278 million in revenue from U.S. sales since 2015. E.l.f released its product in 2022, and the two mascaras are packaged and marked similarly. Despite the admission and similarities, a judge ruled that the e.l.f. product did not infringe on the trademark or trade dress of Benefit Cosmetics because it was very unlikely customers would ever actually confuse the two products. To win, Benefit would have had to prove e.l.f. had managed to actually dupe buyers, which the company failed to do. Crucial Quote 'It's not enough to have someone admit they looked at or were inspired by your product,' Zielaznick said. 'You have to be able to prove in some other way that this is harming you. There has to be a true attempt by the dupe manufacturer to deceive, and it's very hard to prove that that intent exists.' What To Watch For The verdict in pending trademark lawsuits. Snack giant Mondelez International has sued grocery chain Aldi over claims the store is mimicking the packaging of cookies like Oreo, Chips Ahoy! and Nutter Butter with the intention of confusing customers. Williams-Sonoma is suing a website called which allows shoppers to search for products that look eerily similar to something they liked online, and American Eagle is suing Amazon over claims it ripped off branding from the Aerie clothing line to confuse online shoppers. Deckers, the parent company of Ugg, is suing Quince for alleged trademark infringement related to a copycat version of its UGG Classic Ultra Mini boots. Further Reading Forbes Do Trademarks Still Matter In 2025? Forbes Earth, Wind & Firing Off: A Cautionary Tale Of Trademark Infringement In The Music Industry Forbes Nike Stole Company's Trademark, Then Tried To Bury It In Legal Bills, Court-Ordered Report Says

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store