logo
Stitt's Oklahoma DOGE portal sought to find savings. People used it instead to troll Republicans.

Stitt's Oklahoma DOGE portal sought to find savings. People used it instead to troll Republicans.

Yahoo09-05-2025
Gov. Kevin Stitt announced DOGE-OK during the State of the State Address on Feb. 3. (Photo by Kyle Phillips/For Oklahoma Voice)
OKLAHOMA CITY — Dozens of people suggested that state government could be made more efficient without state Superintendent Ryan Walters and Gov. Kevin Stitt, according to submissions made to a statewide portal that asks the public for ideas about how to save money.
In all, of the 90 submissions made to the Oklahoma Division of Government Efficiency portal around half targeted Walters, Stitt, and other Republicans leaders, including those serving in state's congressional delegation, according to Oklahoma Voice's analysis of portal submissions, which were released in response to an Open Records request.
Submitters were particularly critical of Republicans' policies, including spending public money to pay for private school education, attempts to incorporate 'religion in schools and government,' and for removing options for state employees to work from home.
Better known as 'DOGE-OK,' the Stitt-led initiative is modeled after President Donald Trump's federal Department of Government Efficiency. It requested submissions from the public in what a spokesperson for Stitt said is intended to be a 'jumping off point' to find savings within the state government. Stitt's office did not return a request for comment on if any submissions have been used to inform savings yet.
DOGE-OK has reported finding over $51 million in savings in state government spending since its launch in February, though none of the existing savings appeared to align with the public suggestions in the portal.
Stitt's DOGE effort is separate from the Oklahoma House portal launched in December. House lawmakers said submissions to that portal informed budget conversations, but also included 'spam' targeted at a statewide elected official legislators refused to name.
Some submissions to Stitt's portal though appeared to be legitimate attempts at pointing out perceived inefficiencies. These included complaints about the Oklahoma Turnpike Authority, too many public relations contracts at state agencies and recommendations to consolidate some of the state's law enforcement agencies.
At least two individuals identified themselves as current or former state employees. They critiqued inefficiencies in the current process for purchasing orders and asked that the state revert to a previous process.
One submitter suggested using artificial intelligence to gather public records for those requesting them from the state.
Another recommended providing Department of Corrections officers with tablets to scan inmate IDs to 'allow for quicker, safer, and more accurate completion of counts.'
Another suggested that the Oklahoma Tax Commission unnecessarily spends 'a lot of time and money going after tax balances that may not be collectable from many years ago.'
But around half of the submissions targeted Walters, Stitt, or other Republican leaders, including U.S. senators James Lankford and Markwayne Mullin, U.S. Rep. Stephanie Bice and anyone who is serving on the DOGE-OK team.
One person suggested Walters and Stitt not be paid a salary. At least one called for the increased deportation of undocumented immigrants though didn't include any specifics.
Some submissions contained expletives or were left blank.
Another commenter questioned the need for an 'entire new agency' to tell existing ones to be more efficient and criticized the creation of DOGE-OK as duplicating efforts and 'inventing a whole bureaucracy.'
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

California pushes partisan plan for new Democratic districts to counter Texas in fight for US House
California pushes partisan plan for new Democratic districts to counter Texas in fight for US House

Chicago Tribune

time13 minutes ago

  • Chicago Tribune

California pushes partisan plan for new Democratic districts to counter Texas in fight for US House

LOS ANGELES — California Gov. Gavin Newsom said Thursday his state will hold a Nov. 4 special election to seek approval of redrawn districts intended to give Democrats five more U.S. House seats in the fight for control of Congress. The move is a direct response to a similar Republican-led effort in Texas, pushed by President Donald Trump as his party seeks to maintain its slim House majority in the midterm elections. The nation's two most populous states have emerged as the center of a partisan turf war in the House that could spiral into other states — as well as the courts — in what amounts to a proxy war ahead of the 2026 elections. Texas lawmakers are considering a new map that could help them send five more Republicans to Washington. Democrats who so far have halted a vote by leaving the state announced Thursday that they will return home if Texas Republicans end their current special session and California releases its own recast map proposal. Both were expected to happen Friday. However, Texas Republican Gov. Greg Abbott is expected to call another special session to push through new maps. Texas House Democrats planning their departure from Illinois and back to AustinIn Los Angeles, Newsom staged what amounted to a campaign kickoff rally for the as-yet unreleased new maps with the state's Democratic leadership in a downtown auditorium packed with union members, legislators and abortion rights supporters. Newsom and other speakers veered from discussing the technical grist of reshaping districts — known as redistricting — and instead depicted the looming battle as a conflict with all things Trump, tying it explicitly to the fate of American democracy. 'We can't stand back and watch this democracy disappear district by district all across the country,' Newsom said. 'We are not bystanders in this world. We can shape the future.' An overarching theme was the willingness to stand up to Trump, a cheer-inducing line for Democrats as the party looks to regroup from its 2024 losses. 'Donald Trump, you have poked the bear and we will punch back,' said Newsom, a possible 2028 presidential contender. Thursday's announcement marks the first time any state beyond Texas has officially waded into the mid-decade redistricting fight. The Texas plan was stalled when minority Democrats fled to Illinois, New York and Massachusetts on Aug. 3 to stop the Legislature from passing any bills. Elsewhere, leaders from red Florida to blue New York are threatening to write new maps. In Missouri, a document obtained by The Associated Press shows the state Senate received a $46,000 invoice to activate six redistricting software licenses and provide training for up to 10 staff members. In California, lawmakers must officially declare the special election, which they plan to do next week after voting on the new maps. Democrats hold supermajorities in both chambers — enough to act without any Republican votes — and Newsom said he's not worried about winning the required support from two-thirds of lawmakers to advance the maps. Newsom encouraged other Democratic-led states to get involved. 'We need to stand up — not just California. Other blue states need to stand up,' Newsom said. Republicans hold a 219-212 majority in the U.S. House, with four vacancies. New maps are typically drawn once a decade after the census is conducted. Many states, including Texas, give legislators the power to draw maps. California is among states that rely on an independent commission that is supposed to be nonpartisan. The California map would take effect only if a Republican state moves forward, and it would remain through the 2030 elections. After that, Democrats say they would return mapmaking power to the independent commission approved by voters more than a decade ago. Some people already have said they would sue to block the effort, and influential voices including former California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger may campaign against it. 'Gavin Newsom's latest stunt has nothing to do with Californians and everything to do with consolidating radical Democrat power, silencing California voters, and propping up his pathetic 2028 presidential pipe dream,' National Republican Congressional Committee spokesperson Christian Martinez said in a statement. 'Newsom's made it clear: he'll shred California's Constitution and trample over democracy — running a cynical, self-serving playbook where Californians are an afterthought and power is the only priority.' California Democrats hold 43 of the state's 52 House seats, and the state has some of the most competitive House seats. Outside Newsom's news conference Thursday, U.S. Border Patrol agents conducted patrols, drawing condemnation from the governor and others. 'We're here making Los Angeles a safer place since we don't have politicians that will do that,' Gregory Bovino, chief of the patrol's El Centro, California, sector, told a reporter with KTTV in Los Angeles. He said he didn't know Newsom was inside nearby.

Over Half of Americans Don't Trust Trump on Ukraine, Russia War: Poll
Over Half of Americans Don't Trust Trump on Ukraine, Russia War: Poll

Newsweek

time14 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

Over Half of Americans Don't Trust Trump on Ukraine, Russia War: Poll

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Over half of U.S. adults are not confident that President Donald Trump can make "wise decisions" when it comes to the Ukraine and Russia war, a new survey from the Pew Research Center shows on Thursday. Newsweek reached out to the White House via email for additional comment. Why It Matters The poll's findings frame public expectations ahead of a high-profile bilateral meeting on Friday between Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin, aimed at discussing a potential ceasefire in Ukraine and broader U.S.-Russia issues, including Arctic cooperation. What To Know The Pew Research Center survey found 59 percent of U.S. adults were either "not too confident" or "not at all confident" that President Trump could make wise decisions about the Russia-Ukraine war; 40 percent expressed at least some confidence. The poll interviewed 3,554 U.S. adults between August 4 and August 10 with a margin of error of 1.8 percent. The survey also shows key partisan differences: a substantial majority of Democrats say that the U.S. has a responsibility to help Ukraine, with 66 percent, compared to 35 percent of Republicans. This number is up from 23 percent in a March survey, however. The public also expressed views on U.S. assistance: Pew found 29 percent said the U.S. was not providing enough support to Ukraine, and 18 percent said it was providing too much, while 50 percent of Americans said the U.S. had a responsibility to help Ukraine defend itself, and 47 percent said it did not. President Donald Trump and Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenskyy can be seen meeting in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, D.C., February 28, 2025. (Photo by SAUL LOEB / AFP) (Photo by SAUL... President Donald Trump and Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenskyy can be seen meeting in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, D.C., February 28, 2025. (Photo by SAUL LOEB / AFP) (Photo by SAUL LOEB/AFP via Getty Images) More What People Are Saying Democratic Representative Jason Crow of Colorado on X this week: "Everyone wants Russia to stop its aggression & for an end to the war in Ukraine. But Trump keeps handing Vladimir Putin victories. Meeting in the U.S., without Ukraine at the table, is exactly what a dictator like Putin wants." Trump on Truth Social on Wednesday: "Very unfair media is at work on my meeting with Putin. Constantly quoting fired losers and really dumb people like John Bolton, who just said that, even though the meeting is on American soil, 'Putin has already won.' What's that all about? We are winning on EVERYTHING. The Fake News is working overtime (No tax on overtime!)." The president continued: "If I got Moscow and Leningrad free, as part of the deal with Russia, the Fake News would say that I made a bad deal! But now they've been caught. Look at all of the real news that's coming out about their CORRUPTION. They are sick and dishonest people, who probably hate our Country. But it doesn't matter because we are winning on everything!!! MAGA" What Happens Next Trump and Putin are scheduled to meet on Friday at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in Anchorage. Observers said the outcome could influence U.S. relationships with allies, Kyiv's negotiating position and congressional appetite for future assistance to Ukraine.

Pentagon belatedly defends Driscoll against Loomer attacks
Pentagon belatedly defends Driscoll against Loomer attacks

Politico

time14 minutes ago

  • Politico

Pentagon belatedly defends Driscoll against Loomer attacks

He also 'stands by every single Medal of Honor recipient,' Wilson said. 'They are all heroes in our eyes and that includes Flo Groberg.' Hegseth, who is prolific on both his personal and official X accounts, has not commented about Loomer's posts. Loomer, in an interview this week before the Pentagon comments, said she and Hegseth had spoken, but would not say whether the conversation involved Driscoll. 'I'm not telling Pete Hegseth how to do his job,' Loomer said. 'He's a good leader in the sense that he's not just ignoring [issues I raise] and saying, 'Oh, well, it doesn't matter.'' The conservative activist, in her rant against Driscoll, also complained that he hired former Biden cyber policy official Jen Easterly for a part-time teaching position. Easterly is a West Point graduate who served in uniform for two decades. The Army secretary isn't normally consulted on hiring decisions at West Point, but Driscoll ordered the offer rescinded after a previous Loomer post and called for a review of how appointments at the academy are made. She also lashed out at Groberg — who was honored by the Army's social media account for his heroism — for being 'an immigrant who voted for Hillary Clinton.' Loomer didn't back down from her criticism of Driscoll, an Army combat vet and longtime Republican. 'When is this guy going to realize that he doesn't have the political acumen or the political knowledge of the MAGA movement?' she said in the interview, adding she wasn't trying to get him fired. She also suggested Driscoll's close friendship with Vice President JD Vance, who know each other from their time at Yale Law School, has helped deflect some criticism. 'Is being friends with the vice president a qualification in today's world?' she said. 'I personally thought that there would be a higher bar aside from just being really good friends with the vice president.' The Defense Department's support came too late from some in the Pentagon, who were frustrated that leaders didn't defend the combat heroes more quickly. 'A medal of honor recipient shouldn't need defending, but leadership has let this slide,' said a defense official, who was granted anonymity to speak candidly. The Pentagon, when asked for comment, wouldn't say whether Hegseth agreed with Loomer's criticisms. 'Secretary Hegseth appreciates Ms. Loomer's outside public advocacy,' Pentagon spokesperson Joel Valdez said. 'He has total confidence in Army Secretary Driscoll.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store