Spanish islands want influencers gone after seeking help in promoting
"We're going to Ibiza!" Or are we?
If the 'we' refers to influencers then the answer is a resounding 'no': social media-dependent selfie-takers have been told by tourism officials on Spain's Balearic Islands to make themselves scarce following complaints of overcrowding.
Reported by local and international media, the rebuff comes in the wake of the picturesque but secluded Calo des Moro being swamped with phone-waving holidaymakers apparently tripping over each other to gurn into the lens for selfies with the tiny Majorca cove as a backdrop.
While Calo des Moro can hold around 100 people at a time, it has been deluged by up to 4,000 visitors a day - leading in turn to anger among residents of the Balearic Islands, which include Menorca and Ibiza.
The rush of selfie-hunters came about after officials turned to social media influencers to try promote parts of the Balearics thought to be less popular and less visited than the beach resorts and nightclubs the islands are known for.
However, the move backfired after spots such as the Calo des Moro were overwhelmed, leading to Spain's latest backlash against tourists.
Last year, residents of the Balearics protested against so-called overtourism on the islands, which are economically reliant on tourism.
Recent years have seen anti-tourism protests in places as far apart as Bali in Indonesia and Malaga in Spain, where city officials felt it necessary in September last year to tell scantily clad visitors to wear more clothes when ambling downtown.
A month earlier, a team of Australian scientists warned that "the hunt for the perfect selfie" has been causing "disruptions to the breeding and feeding patterns of animals and the trampling of endangered plant species."
In work published in the journal Science of The Total Environment, the team listed orchids, which selfie-takers appear to be particularly taken by, as vulnerable to the trend as they end up getting trampled and pulled.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time Business News
6 hours ago
- Time Business News
Why Ziptrak Blinds Are the Perfect Outdoor Shading Solution
If you're looking to improve your outdoor living space, you've probably come across Ziptrak® blinds. And there's a good reason for that—they've become the go-to outdoor shading solution for Australian homes. Whether you want to entertain year-round, block out wind and rain, or create more privacy, Ziptrak blinds are a game-changer. As someone who's installed them in my own alfresco area and recommended them to clients, I can confidently say they offer a unique blend of convenience, durability, and aesthetic appeal. Ziptrak blinds are track-guided outdoor blinds that glide smoothly and stop at any height. They're designed to enclose outdoor areas like patios, pergolas, balconies, and verandahs—creating a protected space without the need for zips, pulleys, or cords. One of the standout features is the patented spring-balanced system, which means you can easily raise or lower the blinds with one hand. No need to fumble with ropes or pulleys. Personal Insight: When we first installed them, I was skeptical about the no-crank design. But it turned out to be one of my favourite aspects—smooth, easy, and child-safe. Ziptrak blinds are built for Australia's unpredictable weather: Block harsh sun in summer Keep out wind and rain in winter Add insulation and reduce heat loss on cold evenings You can choose from clear PVC or mesh fabrics depending on whether you want maximum visibility or airflow. High-quality mesh options can block up to 95% of UV rays, helping protect your furniture and flooring. This can also reduce heat transfer, meaning your indoor areas stay cooler—cutting down on air conditioning use. No matter how unique your outdoor area is, Ziptrak blinds are made to measure. You can choose from a range of: Colours Fabrics (clear PVC or high-density mesh) Pelmet and bottom bar styles This customisation ensures a seamless, integrated look that enhances your home's façade. If you live in a built-up area or have neighbours close by, Ziptrak mesh blinds create an effective visual barrier without completely blocking the view from your side. With powder-coated aluminium tracks and stainless-steel components, Ziptrak blinds are built for longevity. They're also low maintenance—just a simple wipe down every few weeks keeps them looking like new. ConsWhy It's Not a DealbreakerHigher cost than generic blindsLong-term value and quality offset itProfessional installation recommendedEnsures perfect fit and smooth operationNot suitable for high-wind zones unless reinforcedWind bars and mesh upgrades available Before Ziptrak, our outdoor area was unusable in the colder months and unbearably hot in summer. After installing charcoal mesh blinds: We gained an extra living room outdoors Guests stay comfortable, rain or shine We reduced sun glare in adjacent indoor rooms It truly transformed how we use our home. If you're after a solution tailored for WA's climate, suppliers offering zip track blinds Perth locals trust can help guide you to the best fabric and fit for your outdoor space. For other homeowners across the country, zip track blinds remain one of the most popular choices for seamlessly blending function with style. Are Ziptrak blinds weatherproof? Yes. When installed correctly, they provide excellent protection from sun, wind, rain, and even insects. Can I install Ziptrak blinds myself? While DIY kits are available, professional installation is recommended for best results—especially if you're enclosing multiple sides or dealing with uneven surfaces. How do you clean Ziptrak blinds? Use mild soap and water with a soft cloth or sponge. Avoid abrasive cleaners and high-pressure hoses. What's the difference between PVC and mesh fabric? PVC: Clear, blocks wind and rain completely Mesh: Breathable, filters sunlight and maintains airflow Are they worth the investment? Absolutely. Ziptrak blinds extend your usable space, improve comfort, and add value to your home. If you're serious about enhancing your outdoor lifestyle, Ziptrak blinds are an investment that pays off in comfort, convenience, and curb appeal. They're not just blinds—they're an upgrade to how you live and entertain. From battling summer heat to enjoying quiet winter mornings outside, Ziptrak blinds offer year-round benefits that cheaper alternatives simply can't match. TIME BUSINESS NEWS
Yahoo
19 hours ago
- Yahoo
Aukus: Could Trump sink Australia's submarine plans?
Australia's defence minister woke up to a nightmare earlier this week - and it's one that has been looming ever since the United States re-elected Donald Trump as president in November. A landmark trilateral agreement between the US, UK and Australia - which would give the latter cutting-edge nuclear submarine technology in exchange for more help policing China in the Asia-Pacific - was under review. The White House said on Thursday it wanted to make sure the so-called Aukus pact was "aligned with the president's America First agenda". It's the latest move from Washington that challenges its long-standing friendship with Canberra, sparking fears Down Under that, as conflict heats up around the globe, Australia may be left standing without its greatest ally. "I don't think any Australian should feel that our ally is fully committed to our security at this moment," says Sam Roggeveen, who leads the security programme at Australia's Lowy Institute think tank. On paper, Australia is the clear beneficiary of the Aukus agreement, worth £176bn ($239bn; A$368bn). The technology underpinning the pact belongs to the US, and the UK already has it, along with their own nuclear-powered subs. But those that are being jointly designed and built by the three countries will be an improvement. For Australia, this represents a pivotal upgrade to military capabilities. The new submarine model will be able to operate further and faster than the country's existing diesel-engine fleet, and allow it to carry out long-range strikes against enemies for the first time. It is a big deal for the US to share what has been described as the "crown jewel" of its defence technology, and no small thing for the UK to hand over engine blueprints either. But arming Australia has historically been viewed by Washington and Downing Street as essential to preserving peace in the Asia-Pacific region, which is far from their own. It's about putting their technology and hardware in the right place, experts say. But when the Aukus agreement was signed in 2021, all three countries had very different leaders - Joe Biden in the US, Boris Johnson in the UK and Scott Morrison in Australia. Today, when viewed through the increasingly isolationist lens Trump is using to examine his country's global ties, some argue the US has far less to gain from the pact. Under Secretary of Defence Policy Elbridge Colby, a previous critic of Aukus, will lead the White House review into the agreement, with a Pentagon official telling the BBC the process was to ensure it meets "common sense, America First criteria". Two of the criteria they cite are telling. One is a demand that allies "step up fully to do their part for collective defence". The other is a purported need to ensure that the US arms industry is adequately meeting the country's own needs first. The Trump administration has consistently expressed frustration at allies, including Australia, who they believe aren't pulling their weight with defence spending. They also say America is struggling to produce enough nuclear-powered submarines for its own forces. "Why are we giving away this crown jewel asset when we most need it?" Colby himself had said last year. The Australian government, however, is presenting a calm front. It's only natural for a new administration to reassess the decisions of its predecessor, officials say, noting that the new UK Labor government had a review of Aukus last year too. "I'm very confident this is going to happen," Defence Minister Richard Marles said of the pact, in an interview with the Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC). But there's little doubt the review would be causing some early jolts of panic in Canberra. "I think angst has been inseparable from Aukus since its beginning… The review itself is not alarming. It's just everything else," Euan Graham, from the Australian Strategic Policy Institute, tells the BBC. There is growing concern across Australia that America cannot be relied upon. "[President Donald Trump's] behaviour, over these first months of this term, I don't think should fill any observer with confidence about America's commitment to its allies," Mr Roggeveen says. "Trump has said, for instance, that Ukraine is mainly Europe's problem because they are separated by a big, beautiful ocean. Well of course, there's a big, beautiful ocean separating America from Asia too." Washington's decision to slap large tariffs on Australian goods earlier this year did not inspire confidence either, with Prime Minister Anthony Albanese saying it was clearly "not the act of a friend". Albanese has stayed quiet on the Aukus review so far, likely holding his breath for a face-to-face meeting with Trump on the sidelines of the G7 summit in Canada next week. This is a chat he's still desperately trying to get the US president to agree to. But several former prime ministers have rushed to give their two cents. Scott Morrison, the conservative leader who negotiated the Aukus pact in 2021, said the review should not be "over-interpreted" and scoffed at the suggestion another country could meet Australia's security needs. "The notion… is honestly delusional," he told ABC radio. Malcolm Turnbull, who was behind the French submarine contract that Morrison dramatically tore up in favour of Aukus, said Australia needs to "wake up", realise it's a "bad deal" which the US could renege on at any point, and make other plans before it is too late. Meanwhile, Paul Keating, a famously sharp-tongued advocate for closer ties with China, said this "might very well be the moment Washington saves Australia from itself". "Aukus will be shown for what it always has been: a deal hurriedly scribbled on the back of an envelope by Scott Morrison, along with the vacuous British blowhard Boris Johnson and the confused President Joe Biden." The whiff of US indecision over Aukus feeds into long-term criticism in some quarters that Australia is becoming too reliant on the country. Calling for Australia's own inquiry, the Greens, the country's third-largest political party, said: "We need an independent defence and foreign policy, that does not require us to bend our will and shovel wealth to an increasingly erratic and reckless Trump USA." There's every chance the US turns around in a few weeks and recommits to the pact. At the end of the day, Australia is buying up to five nuclear-powered submarines at a huge expense, helping keep Americans employed. And the US has plenty of time - just under a decade - to sort out their supply issues and provide them. "[The US] also benefit from the wider aspects of Aukus - all three parties get to lift their boat jointly by having a more interoperable defence technology and ecosystem," Mr Graham adds. Even so, the anxiety the review has injected into the relationship is going to be hard to erase completely – and has only inflamed disagreements over Aukus in Australia. But there's also a possibility Trump does want to rewrite the deal. "I can easily see a future in which we don't get the Virginia class boats," Mr Roggeveen says, referring to the interim submarines. That would potentially leave Australia with its increasingly outdated fleet for another two decades, vulnerable while the new models are being designed and built. What happens in the event the US does leave the Aukus alliance completely? At this juncture, few are sounding that alarm. The broad view is that, for the US, countering China and keeping the Pacific in their sphere of influence is still crucial. Mr Roggeveen, though, says that when it comes to potential conflict in the Pacific, the US hasn't been putting their money where its mouth is for years. "China's been engaged in the biggest build-up of military power of any country since the end of the Cold War and the United States' position in Asia basically hasn't changed," he says. If the US leaves, Aukus could very well become an awkward Auk – but could the UK realistically offer enough for Australia to sustain the agreement? And if the whole thing falls apart and Australia is left without submarines, who else could it turn to? France feels like an unlikely saviour, given the previous row there, but Australia does have options, Mr Roggeveen says: "This wouldn't be the end of the world for Australian defence." Australia is "geographically blessed", he says, and with "a reasonable defence budget and a good strategy" could sufficiently deter China, even without submarines. "There's this phrase you hear occasionally, that the danger is on our doorstep. Well, it's a big doorstep if that is true… Beijing is closer to Berlin than it is to Sydney." "There is this mental block in Australia and also this emotional block - a fear of abandonment, this idea that we can't defend ourselves alone. But we absolutely can if we have to." What is Aukus, the submarine deal between Australia, the UK and US? Submarine deal sends powerful message to China The laidback Australian city key to countering China Donald Trump is looming over Australia's election
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Princess Eugenie Embraces Summertime Florals in Rebecca Vallance Dress at the ‘Thirty Six for Coral' Art Exhibition in France
Princess Eugenie traveled to Nice, France, for the 'Thirty Six for Coral' art exhibition on Thursday. The British royal family member attended the event and made remarks ahead of the exhibit supporting coral preservation and global sustainability. For the special occasion, Princess Eugenie opted for a design wholly evocative of the summertime season. The royal wore a sleeveless midi dress courtesy of Rebecca Vallance, featuring a bouquet of blue orchids cascading across the fabric. More from WWD How Timothée Chalamet Popularized the 'Old Money Haircut' for Men With a Modern Spin on Timeless Elegance Princess Diana's Trooping the Colour Looks Through the Years: Suiting Up in Catherine Walker, Going Monochrome in Jan Van Velden and More Hailey Bieber's Rhode Earned $20 Million in Media Exposure After E.l.f. Beauty Acquired the Brand for $1 Billion The Rebecca Vallance midi dress featured a playful blue orchid vine print design crafted from a premium linen blend. The dress' silhouette included a collared halter neckline with a structured lapel, and a fitted bodice with cinched waist for added definition. Adorning the waist was a rope belt. Rebecca Vallance's design also included a sleek, low-open back. Princess Eugenie completed her look with stain, open-toe mules courtesy of Staud. Princess Eugenie has long been an advocate for sustainability and global preservation. In April 2024, the British royal attended a fashion sustainability panel in London, wearing a design courtesy of Gabriela Hearst, a designer who's made sustainability a cornerstone of her eponymous label's mission. Rebecca Vallance is a brand that strives for sustainability, sharing a similar vocation with Hearst. The Australian fashion label endeavors to meet ethical sourcing standards as part of its practices, per the brand's sustainability statement. Given her stance on sustainable efforts and conservation, Princess Eugenie's style choices — which include wearing designs by Rebecca Vallance and Gabriela Hearst — reflect the British royal's dedication to global preservation, making her fashion part of a broader movement. View Gallery Launch Gallery: Princess Eugenie's Royal Wedding in Photos Best of WWD Princess Diana's Trooping the Colour Looks Through the Years: Suiting Up in Catherine Walker, Going Monochrome in Jan Van Velden and More Princess Beatrice's Looks at Royal Ascot Through the Years, Photos Princess Beatrice's Royal Ascot Looks Through the Years: Favoring Florals in Zimmermann, Going Classic in Black-and-white Jonathan Simkhai and More
