
US to begin revoking visas of ‘Chinese' students, says Secretary of State Marco Rubio
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio on Wednesday announced that the Trump administration will begin revoking visas of Chinese students, including those with ties to the Chinese Communist Party or studying in 'critical fields.'
In a post on X, Rubio, said, 'The US will begin revoking visas of Chinese students, including those with connections to the Chinese Communist Party or studying in critical fields.'
The U.S. will begin revoking visas of Chinese students, including those with connections to the Chinese Communist Party or studying in critical fields.
— Secretary Marco Rubio (@SecRubio) May 28, 2025
The announcement follows a series of actions this week, adding to the growing uncertainty for international students, who are already facing mounting pressure under the Trump administration. This move is certain to intensify anxiety for Chinese students in the US, and spur recriminations in China.
This isn't the first time a crackdown has been ordered against Chinese students. In 2020, officials during the first Trump administration decided to cancel the visas of thousands of Chinese graduate students and researchers who had direct ties to military universities in China.
China sends the second-largest group of international students to the United States, and many universities rely on Chinese and other international students paying full tuition for a substantial part of their annual revenue.
A report published by the State Department and the Institute of International Education, a nonprofit group, revealed that the total number of international students at US colleges and universities reached an all-time high of more than 1.1 million (1,126,690) international students in 2023/2024, a 7% increase from the previous academic year.
China, followed by India, accounted for the second-largest share of these students enrolled in American higher education institutions during the 2023–24 term.
In a related move, Rubio also announced that the State Department will impose new visa restrictions on foreign officials and individuals accused of censoring Americans abroad.
'It is unacceptable for foreign officials to issue or threaten arrest warrants on US citizens or US residents for social media posts on American platforms while physically present on US soil,' he said in a statement.
He added that 'it is similarly unacceptable for foreign officials to demand that American tech platforms adopt global content moderation policies or engage in censorship activity that reaches beyond their authority and into the United States.'
In the most recent crackdown against Harvard, US President Donald Trump proposed a cap on foreign students at Harvard, asking the Ivy League to limit its foreign students intake to 15 per cent.
The administration further plans to cancel all remaining contracts with Harvard University, worth about $100 million, according to a letter seen by The New York Times. Trump also threatened to cut three billion dollars of grant money to Harvard, and and giving it to trade schools.
The clampdown on Harvard follows an earlier decision by the administration to revoke Harvard University's ability to enrol international students, accusing it of perpetuating an 'unsafe' campus environment for Jews, promoting 'pro-Hamas sympathies', and employing 'racial' diversity, equity and inclusion policies.
(With inputs from New York Times)
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Economic Times
16 minutes ago
- Economic Times
US Supreme Court lets Trump revoke 'parole' status for over 5,00,000 migrants
President Donald Trump Synopsis The US Supreme Court has permitted the Trump administration to revoke the temporary legal status of many migrants. This decision impacts Venezuelan, Cuban, Haitian, and Nicaraguan individuals. It puts on hold a judge's order that had blocked the administration's move. This potentially exposes many to deportation while the case continues in lower courts. The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday let President Donald Trump's administration revoke the temporary legal status of hundreds of thousands of Venezuelan, Cuban, Haitian and Nicaraguan migrants living in the United States, bolstering the Republican president's drive to step up deportations. ADVERTISEMENT The court put on hold a federal judge's order halting the administration's move to end the immigration "parole" granted to 532,000 of these migrants by Trump's predecessor Joe Biden, potentially exposing many of them to rapid removal, while the case plays out in lower courts. Two of the court's three liberal justices, Ketanji Brown Jackson and Sonia Sotomayor, dissented from the decision. Immigration parole is a form of temporary permission under American law to be in the country for "urgent humanitarian reasons or significant public benefit," allowing recipients to live and work in the United States. Biden, a Democrat, used parole as part of his administration's approach by to deter illegal immigration at the U.S.-Mexican border. Trump called for ending humanitarian parole programs in an executive order signed on January 20, his first day back in office. The Department of Homeland Security subsequently moved to terminate them in March, cutting short the two-year parole grants. The administration said revoking the parole status would make it easier to place migrants in a fast-track deportation process called "expedited removal." The case is one of many that Trump's administration has brought in an emergency fashion to the nation's highest judicial body seeking to undo decisions by judges impeding his sweeping policies, including several targeting immigrants. ADVERTISEMENT The Supreme Court on May 19 let Trump end a deportation protection called temporary protected status that had been granted under Biden to about 350,000 Venezuelans living in the United States, while that legal dispute plays out. In a bid to reduce illegal border crossings, Biden starting in 2022 allowed Venezuelans who entered the United States by air to request a two-year parole if they passed security checks and had a U.S. financial sponsor. Biden expanded that process to Cubans, Haitians and Nicaraguans in 2023 as his administration grappled with high levels of illegal immigration from those nationalities. ADVERTISEMENT The plaintiffs, a group of migrants granted parole and Americans who serve as their sponsors, sued administration officials claiming the administration violated federal law governing the actions of government agencies. Boston-based U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani in April found that the law governing such parole did not allow for the program's blanket termination, instead requiring a case-by-case review. The Boston-based 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals declined to put Talwani's decision on hold. ADVERTISEMENT In its filing, the Justice Department told the Supreme Court that Talwani's order had upended "critical immigration policies that are carefully calibrated to deter illegal entry," effectively "undoing democratically approved policies that featured heavily in the November election" that returned Trump to the presidency. The plaintiffs told the Supreme Court they would face grave harm if their parole is cut short given that the administration has indefinitely suspended processing their pending applications for asylum and other immigration relief. They said they would be separated from their families and immediately subject to expedited deportation "to the same despotic and unstable countries from which they fled, where many will face serious risks of danger, persecution and even death." (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel) (Catch all the US News, UK News, Canada News, International Breaking News Events, and Latest News Updates on The Economic Times.) Download The Economic Times News App to get Daily International News Updates. NEXT STORY


The Print
20 minutes ago
- The Print
Pak becomes signatory to Hong Kong-based International Organisation for Mediation
Dar, addressing the ceremony, appreciated the Chinese leadership for its wisdom in developing and consistently leading efforts in establishing the IOMed and fostering a global community with a shared future, the statement added. 'Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar, today signed, on behalf of Pakistan, the Convention on the establishment of International Organisation for Mediation (IOMed) in Hong Kong, Special Administrative Region of People's Republic of China,' the Foreign Office said in a statement. Islamabad, May 30 (PTI) Pakistan on Friday became a signatory to the Hong Kong-based International Organisation for Mediation, a Chinese initiative to promote its international standing. He added that the creation of IOMed underscores the indispensability and significance of multilateralism as the centrepiece for international peace, stability, and development. 'IOMeD also offers new opportunities and fresh hopes to build a more inclusive, more just and more equitable world. As one of the founding members of IOMed, Pakistan would continue to be an active voice in this noble mission,' the statement quoted him as saying. The deputy PM underlined Pakistan's strong commitment to the promotion of peace and security as well as development and elaborated on the critical importance of advancing and preserving multilateralism. In the speech, Dar also accused India of violating international law through its 'acts of aggression against Pakistan and its unlawful holding in abeyance of the Indus Waters Treaty (IWT)'. Dar called for the resolution of the longstanding Jammu and Kashmir dispute under the UN Security Council resolutions. Tensions between India and Pakistan escalated after the Pahalgam terror attack in which 26 people were killed, with India carrying out precision strikes on terror infrastructure in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir in the early hours of May 7. Pakistan attempted to attack Indian military bases on May 8, 9, and 10. The Indian side responded strongly to the Pakistani actions. The on-ground hostilities ended with an understanding of stopping the military actions following talks between the directors general of military operations of both sides on May 10. India, soon after the April 22 terrorist attack in Pahalgam, announced abeyance of the IWT among other punitive measures. The IWT was signed in 1960 by the two countries to address the water dispute between them and to share the waters of the six main rivers of the Indus basin. The Foreign Office said that the idea for the establishment of the IOMed was one of the key outcomes of the 2nd Belt and Road Forum held in Beijing in April 2019. China initiated discussions for the establishment of IOMed in 2021, and invited Pakistan to join negotiations as one of its founding members. It further stated that the organisation is open to all countries; is based on respect for the sovereignty, core interests and legitimate concerns of every country; aims to promote dialogue and trust between parties concerned based on equality; and desires inclusion of various legal systems, and their mediators. Dar in a message on X stated that he also met 'with my Dear Friend H. E. Foreign Minister Wang Yi in Hong Kong within a span of 10 days'. 'Congratulated him on successful signing ceremony of the Convention establishing International Organisation for Mediation (IOMed), a groundbreaking initiative by China with transformational impact,' he said. He further said: 'The meeting was especially delightful as we reviewed with satisfaction the progress made since our last meeting. More milestones to follow!' Separately, Dar met with Hong Kong Chief Executive John Lee and congratulated him on the successful establishment of IOMed while highlighting Hong Kong's unique role as a global hub linking East and West and its growing significance in international mediation. PTI SH GSP GSP This report is auto-generated from PTI news service. ThePrint holds no responsibility for its content.
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
26 minutes ago
- First Post
‘Relations on positive trajectory': Pakistan to appoint ambassador to Kabul After China-brokered thaw with Afghanistan
The breakthrough came during trilateral talks in Beijing this month where China is believed to have played a key role in bridging differences, leading to an agreement between Pakistan and Afghanistan to upgrade diplomatic ties, according to a report read more Pakistan Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar, Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi, and Acting Foreign Minister of Afghanistan Amir Khan Muttaqi in Beijing on May 21. X/@MIshaqDar50 Days after the foreign ministers of Afghanistan, China, and Pakistan met in Beijing, Pakistan on Friday announced that it will upgrade its diplomatic relations with Afghanistan by appointing a new ambassador. According to a PTI report_,_ the breakthrough came during trilateral talks in Beijing this month where China is believed to have played a key role in bridging differences, leading to an agreement between Pakistan and Afghanistan to upgrade diplomatic ties. Announcing the decision on X, Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar wrote, 'Pakistan-Afghanistan relations are on positive trajectory after my very productive visit to Kabul with Pakistan delegation on 19th April 2025. To maintain this momentum, I am pleased to announce the decision of the Government of Pakistan to upgrade the level of its Chargé d'Affaires in Kabul to the level of Ambassador.' Pakistan-Afghanistan relations are on positive trajectory after my very productive visit to Kabul with Pakistan delegation on 19th April 2025. To maintain this momentum, I am pleased to announce the decision of the Government of Pakistan to upgrade the level of its Chargé… — Ishaq Dar (@MIshaqDar50) May 30, 2025 STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'I am confident this step would further contribute towards enhanced engagement, deepen Pak-Afghan cooperation in economic, security, CT & trade areas and promote further exchanges between two fraternal countries,' he added. Pakistan had initially welcomed the Taliban's takeover of Kabul in 2021, hoping the new regime would address its security concerns. However, things didn't go as Islamabad wanted, with cross-border attacks by Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) militants surging sharply. As tensions escalated, relations deteriorated, and Islamabad began accusing Kabul of sheltering TTP fighters and demanded decisive action against them. Meanwhile, According to The Express Tribune report, Afghanistan interim ForeignMinister Amir Khan Muttaqi is likely to travel to Islamabad soon on a first visit in two years, highlighting the growing high-level exchanges between the two neighbours in recent weeks. 'He will visit Pakistan soon. Dates are being worked out,' the newspaper quoted a diplomatic source as saying on Thursday. According to the source, the Afghan side has accepted the invitation, and the upcoming visit will span three days — not just a single day — allowing for comprehensive discussions on bilateral ties. In April, Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar visited Kabul, the first by a Pakistani minister in three years, which helped ease tensions between the two countries. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Sources said Muttaqi's visit is part of broader efforts to boost high-level engagement. A roadmap for regular official and ministerial exchanges was drawn up during a visit to Kabul by a Pakistani delegation led by Special Envoy Ambassador Muhammad Sadiq in March. The Afghan Taliban's recent actions against groups threatening Pakistan have played a key role in fostering this renewed diplomatic momentum. In another major sign suggesting a shift in its approach was a statement by senior Afghan Taliban commander Saeedullah Saeed who, on Wednesday, warned militant factions against unauthorised jihad, particularly in Pakistan. Speaking at a police passing-out ceremony, Saeed said that fighting in any country, including Pakistan, without the explicit command of the Amir is not permissible. 'Joining various groups to wage jihad abroad does not make one a true mujahid,' PTI quoted him as saying. 'Only the Amir of the state has the authority to declare jihad — not individuals or groups.' Saeed emphasised that those carrying out attacks independently or moving between regions to conduct operations cannot be classified as legitimate fighters under Islamic law. 'Jihad based on personal ego or group loyalty is considered 'fasad' (corruption), not legitimate resistance,' he added. He further stated that the Afghan leadership prohibited unauthorised entry into Pakistan, and any such act constitutes disobedience. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'Groups attacking in the name of jihad are defying both Shariah and the authority of the Afghan Emirate,' he said. His public statement is seen as a result of recent efforts both by Pakistan and China urging the Kabul administration to change its approach towards these groups. Sources said Pakistan would continue to encourage the Taliban government to carry out such measures. In return for these steps, Pakistan and China are willing to support Kabul both economically and diplomatically. With inputs from agencies