logo
‘Relations on positive trajectory': Pakistan to appoint ambassador to Kabul After China-brokered thaw with Afghanistan

‘Relations on positive trajectory': Pakistan to appoint ambassador to Kabul After China-brokered thaw with Afghanistan

First Posta day ago

The breakthrough came during trilateral talks in Beijing this month where China is believed to have played a key role in bridging differences, leading to an agreement between Pakistan and Afghanistan to upgrade diplomatic ties, according to a report read more
Pakistan Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar, Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi, and Acting Foreign Minister of Afghanistan Amir Khan Muttaqi in Beijing on May 21. X/@MIshaqDar50
Days after the foreign ministers of Afghanistan, China, and Pakistan met in Beijing, Pakistan on Friday announced that it will upgrade its diplomatic relations with Afghanistan by appointing a new ambassador.
According to a PTI report_,_ the breakthrough came during trilateral talks in Beijing this month where China is believed to have played a key role in bridging differences, leading to an agreement between Pakistan and Afghanistan to upgrade diplomatic ties.
Announcing the decision on X, Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar wrote, 'Pakistan-Afghanistan relations are on positive trajectory after my very productive visit to Kabul with Pakistan delegation on 19th April 2025. To maintain this momentum, I am pleased to announce the decision of the Government of Pakistan to upgrade the level of its Chargé d'Affaires in Kabul to the level of Ambassador.'
Pakistan-Afghanistan relations are on positive trajectory after my very productive visit to Kabul with Pakistan delegation on 19th April 2025. To maintain this momentum, I am pleased to announce the decision of the Government of Pakistan to upgrade the level of its Chargé… — Ishaq Dar (@MIshaqDar50) May 30, 2025
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
'I am confident this step would further contribute towards enhanced engagement, deepen Pak-Afghan cooperation in economic, security, CT & trade areas and promote further exchanges between two fraternal countries,' he added.
Pakistan had initially welcomed the Taliban's takeover of Kabul in 2021, hoping the new regime would address its security concerns. However, things didn't go as Islamabad wanted, with cross-border attacks by Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) militants surging sharply.
As tensions escalated, relations deteriorated, and Islamabad began accusing Kabul of sheltering TTP fighters and demanded decisive action against them.
Meanwhile, According to The Express Tribune report, Afghanistan interim ForeignMinister Amir Khan Muttaqi is likely to travel to Islamabad soon on a first visit in two years, highlighting the growing high-level exchanges between the two neighbours in recent weeks.
'He will visit Pakistan soon. Dates are being worked out,' the newspaper quoted a diplomatic source as saying on Thursday.
According to the source, the Afghan side has accepted the invitation, and the upcoming visit will span three days — not just a single day — allowing for comprehensive discussions on bilateral ties.
In April, Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar visited Kabul, the first by a Pakistani minister in three years, which helped ease tensions between the two countries.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Sources said Muttaqi's visit is part of broader efforts to boost high-level engagement. A roadmap for regular official and ministerial exchanges was drawn up during a visit to Kabul by a Pakistani delegation led by Special Envoy Ambassador Muhammad Sadiq in March.
The Afghan Taliban's recent actions against groups threatening Pakistan have played a key role in fostering this renewed diplomatic momentum.
In another major sign suggesting a shift in its approach was a statement by senior Afghan Taliban commander Saeedullah Saeed who, on Wednesday, warned militant factions against unauthorised jihad, particularly in Pakistan.
Speaking at a police passing-out ceremony, Saeed said that fighting in any country, including Pakistan, without the explicit command of the Amir is not permissible.
'Joining various groups to wage jihad abroad does not make one a true mujahid,' PTI quoted him as saying.
'Only the Amir of the state has the authority to declare jihad — not individuals or groups.'
Saeed emphasised that those carrying out attacks independently or moving between regions to conduct operations cannot be classified as legitimate fighters under Islamic law.
'Jihad based on personal ego or group loyalty is considered 'fasad' (corruption), not legitimate resistance,' he added.
He further stated that the Afghan leadership prohibited unauthorised entry into Pakistan, and any such act constitutes disobedience.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
'Groups attacking in the name of jihad are defying both Shariah and the authority of the Afghan Emirate,' he said.
His public statement is seen as a result of recent efforts both by Pakistan and China urging the Kabul administration to change its approach towards these groups.
Sources said Pakistan would continue to encourage the Taliban government to carry out such measures. In return for these steps, Pakistan and China are willing to support Kabul both economically and diplomatically.
With inputs from agencies

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Delhi High Court dismisses plea against demolition of Pakistani Hindu refugee camp
Delhi High Court dismisses plea against demolition of Pakistani Hindu refugee camp

Time of India

time31 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Delhi High Court dismisses plea against demolition of Pakistani Hindu refugee camp

New Delhi: dismissed a petition seeking a direction to Delhi Development Authority not to disturb or demolish the Pakistani Hindu refugee camp at Majnu ka Tilla until an alternative piece of land is allotted to the residents. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now A single-judge bench of Justice Dharmesh Sharma observed that the Pakistani refugees could not be rehabilitated under the DUSIB policy due to their foreign nationality status. "Needless to state, the effect of the acceptance of such an application would be that the aggrieved refugees shall be deemed citizens of India and would be able to enjoy all rights and benefits available to any ordinary citizen of India," it said. The court rejected the plea filed by Ravi Ranjan Singh, stating that he and other similarly placed refugees have no right to continue occupying the area. It vacated the interim relief granted in March last year. Singh also requested that DDA be directed to make embankments along the Yamuna so that such colonies and religious structures might be protected, as was the case with the Akshardham temple and Commonwealth Games Village, and that the sanctity of the river might also be maintained. The court impressed upon the petitioner and the other refugees to first acquire Indian citizenship under Section 10A of . It added that the aggrieved parties could approach the member secretary, Delhi State Legal Services Authority, for help. The court observed that even Indian citizens couldn't claim alternate allotment as an absolute right, particularly in cases concerning specially prohibited areas like zone O of Delhi, i.e., Tired of too many ads? go ad free now the Yamuna floodplain. The bench noted the camp was situated on the Yamuna floodplain and National Green Tribunal had directed to several govt agencies to repossess such areas and take steps to restore the river's ecological health. The court further added that its efforts to engage with the authorities to facilitate the refugees' rehabilitation didn't succeed due bureaucratic buck-passing, particularly on the part of Centre.

Civil defence mock drill held across 33 Gujarat districts
Civil defence mock drill held across 33 Gujarat districts

Indian Express

time43 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

Civil defence mock drill held across 33 Gujarat districts

The second civil defence mock drill, which was postponed on May 29, took place today across all 33 districts in the state. According to officials, this particular exercise was conducted in a more strategic and organised manner. While black outs and exercises were conducted across all the border districts including Kutch, Patan and Banaskantha, the black outs were imposed only at select locations in inland districts. 'In Ahmedabad, the mock drill and accompanying black outs took place only in the Army Cantonment area in the city, and just Viramgam town in the rural swathe of the district,' said Collector Sujeet Kumar. Senior civil defence officials in Gujarat confided that this mock drill, the second one after the one conducted on May 7, was carried out with specific objectives and taking into consideration high risk areas and possible targets for potential air attacks. In the coming days, the government has asked for a comprehensive report to be prepared on the outcome of the exercises so that the preparation levels can be judged and better with each iteration of future mock drills. Following the horrific Pahalgam attack on April 22, India launched Operation Sindoor on May 7, decimating terror infrastructure in Pakistan-occupied Kashmir and Pakistan. The two nations announced cessation of hostilities on May 10.

"What's wrong with that?": Telangana Minister on Congress asking questions concerning Operation Sindoor
"What's wrong with that?": Telangana Minister on Congress asking questions concerning Operation Sindoor

India Gazette

timean hour ago

  • India Gazette

"What's wrong with that?": Telangana Minister on Congress asking questions concerning Operation Sindoor

New Delhi [India], May 31 (ANI): Telangana Minister Uttam Kumar Reddy on Saturday slammed BJP leader Sambit Patra for his 'Pakistan ke babbar' jibe at party leaders and said there is nothing wrong in asking questions of the government about account of gains and losses during a military conflict. 'If somebody asks if India has lost a fighter aircraft, what is wrong with that. Today, (CDS) General Chauhan gave this answer, so what is wrong if any Congress leader asks this question?... Whenever there is a conflict, all nations give their victories and losses. To a question asked by Congress leaders, why did the BJP react that we are anti-national and anti-patriotic?. What will they say today when General Chauhan has said that we lost a fighter aircraft?' he told ANI. Talking to the media, Reddy also talked about to US remarks about mediation. 'As it appears very clearly, Rafale aircraft were shot down in the foreday operations... An hour ago, CDS General Anil Chauhan confirmed this... The government of India should now stop denying this...' He also says, 'The government has never explained why US President Trump announced the ceasefire before either of the DGMOs of both countries spoke,' he said. India carried out Operation Sindoor on May 7 and launched precision strikes on terror infrastructure in Pakistan and PoJK in response to the Pahalgam terror attack. India also repelled subsequent Pakistan aggression and pounded its airbases. Sambit Patra had attacked the Congress and said party leaders Rahul Gandhi, Telangana Chief Minister Revanth Reddy and Jairam Ramesh had not asked how many Pakistan airbases were destroyed or terrorists were killed. 'Rahul Gandhi, Jairam Ramesh, and Revanth Reddy are asking how many Rafales were shot down. 'Yeh jo Pakistan ke Babbar hain, woh Hindustan ke Gabbar hain'. Rahul Gandhi did not ask how many Pakistani airbases were destroyed, how many terrorists were killed; rather, he only asked how many Indian planes were shot down. Today, there are two factions in Congress - one which supports Pakistan and the other which wants to raise a voice for the country but is unable to do so because of you. Your 'Jai Hind Yatra' looks like 'Pakistan's Hind Yatra' and you should stop this yatra and hold a joint press conference with Pakistan', Sambit Patra had said. (ANI)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store