
Starmer's REAL opposition is mutinous MPs who have strangled every meaningful change… he must know it's all over for him
And nothing can stop them from coming for Keir 'Sharkbait' Starmer now.
10
Sharkbait is desperately paddling for the beach because, in his heart, he must know it is all over for him. The opposition has seen to it.
The opposition? No, not Farage 's Reform UK or Badenoch 's Conservative Party.
The REAL opposition to Starmer 's fragile reign are all those Labour backbenchers who are beyond Keir's control, or the will of his Whips, and have forced him into yet another humiliating U-turn.
On Tuesday, this Labour Government was planning to pass its landmark , trimming a modest £5 billion from the £66 billion that health-related will cost the British taxpayer by the end of the decade.
On Tuesday, this Labour Government was planning to pass its landmark welfare bill, trimming a modest £5billion from the £66billion that health-related benefits will cost the British taxpayer by the end of the decade.
And they could not do it.
More than 120 Labour MPs banded together to kill Sir Keir's modest plans to restrict benefits. By succeeding, they leave Starmer in office but hardly in power.
In the coming days we will hear much talk about Starmer's weakness.
He will be called a dead man walking. A lame duck quacking. A dead parrot of a PM.
But do we really believe that ANY Labour Prime Minister would be able to persuade Labour's backbenchers that the billions blown on benefits has become unsustainable?
The truth is that Labour are uncomfortable in Government.
Keir Starmer 'to BACK DOWN' on benefits cuts as he faces major revolt from MPs
Labour have no stomach for taming public spending. They never will.
Keir Starmer should be driving through the changes that he promised. But he exists in a universe of U-turns.
Starmer has already had to repent for taking the winter fuel payment away from pensioners.
The Government is now looking at scrapping the two-child benefit cap — even though Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson warns, 'It would cost a lot of money.'
Because Labour MPs don't like it.
The real problem is not Sharkbait Starmer.
The problem is a Labour Party who were in their comfort zone when they were in opposition.
The Labour backbenchers don't WANT to balance the books.
They want to be virtuous. And that is fine when you are in opposition.
Whelk stall
The performative politics work well when you are free to jeer and virtue-signal from the sidelines.
But this Friday will be exactly one year since Labour's General Election victory. And every meaningful change that Starmer has attempted has been strangled at birth by his mutinous MPs.
Sharkbait's welfare reforms will fail – or be so watered down that they are rendered meaningless. Instead, your taxes will rise.
We will hear lots of blah-blah-blah about those with 'the broadest shoulders' paying more but this is a total lie. The rich can't get out of the UK fast enough.
The increased tax burden will fall on the ordinary working man and woman. And Labour's allergy to taming public spending does NOT prove that they are fonts of human kindness.
It just shows that they are totally unsuited to running a whelk stall, let alone our country.
10
SERVE A LOVE MATCH
10
WIMBLEDON starts tomorrow and the thoughts of all true tennis fans turn inevitably to romance.
Carlos Alcaraz, world number two, and British number one Emma Raducanu will both be in Wimbledon singles action and will play mixed doubles together at the US Open a little later in the summer.
And rumours abound that Emma and Carlos, inset, may have a relationship that extends beyond the court, where love means nothing, to the world beyond, where love is all.
It has been a while since tennis had a great love story.
The big four – Roger Federer, Rafa Nadal, Novak Djokovic, Andy Murray – all married sweethearts from their teenage years.
The UK's Katie Boulter and Australia's Alex de Minaur are engaged and an adorable couple – but lacking the star power of Andre Agassi and Steffi Graf in the Nineties, or Chris Evert and Jimmy Connors in the Seventies.
Alcaraz and Raducanu, both 22, would be on that level. Their union would transcend tennis, exerting the fascination of Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie, or Ben Affleck and Jennifer Lopez.
But what would we call them? Raducaraz? Alcacanu? Raducarlos?
If their relationship blossoms – and old romantics will feel that Emma and Carlos are made for each other – then let's hope they have a happier ending than Brangelina and Bennifer.
Cool? You're Kiddin'
10
FROM the young members of The Who dozing under our nation's flag in the Sixties, to Noel Gallagher 's red, white and blue Epiphone guitar, Union Jacks and gilded youth are never really out of style.
But most experts agree that the apex of Britpop was when Vanity Fair magazine put Liam Gallagher and Patsy Kensit on the cover in 1997, when even their pillows and the duvet were made from the Union flag.
With Oasis about to go back on the road, Tatler magazine has declared – Cool Britannia is Back!
That Vanity Fair cover was so iconic that you get Tatler's reference at first sight.
Tatler's cover models are Molly Moorish-Gallagher, daughter of Liam Gallagher, and Sonny Ashcroft, son of Richard Ashcroft of the Verve, who is a support act for Oasis.
Lovely youngsters, for sure. But they – let's face it – would never be on the cover of a magazine if it wasn't for the fact they are somebody's son and somebody's daughter.
And the rampant nepotism on show is the big difference between then and now.
Back during the heady days of Britpop, nobody gave a toss who your parents were.
Zelensky survives assassination plot
10
UKRAINE President Volodymyr Zelensky has been in the news for so long we take this hero for granted.
When Russia invaded Ukraine, Biden was in the White House and Boris was in 10 Downing Street.
Now come reports that Zelensky survived a plot on his life by Russia's FSB spy service.
Ukraine's own spooks say the would-be assassin was a retired military officer recruited 'decades earlier'.
Russia's murderous threat to Zelensky will be there for the rest of his life. We should be in no doubt – he is what a hero looks like.
Denis gets Bond bout
THE director of the next James Bond film will be Denis Villeneuve.
And we already know the French-Canadian will do a grand job at reinventing 007 because he gloriously rebooted Ridley Scott's Blade Runner with his own Blade Runner 2049.
If Villeneuve can do it with an icon like Blade Runner, then he can do it with a brand like Bond.
Villeneuve is the best thing to happen to 007 since Daniel Craig pulled on those baby-blue budgie smugglers for Casino Royale in 2006.
Long story short, Daisy made the cut
I KNOW I watched American action-comedy The Dukes Of Hazzard because I have vague memories of a brace of amiable young rednecks, an orange hot-rod and a fat man in a white suit – Boss Hogg? – who was some kind of authority figure.
But what I can never forget about The Dukes Of Hazzard – what is seared into my memory and engraved on my soul – is Catherine Bach as Daisy Duke, who was revered for her cut-off denim shorts.
Catherine Bach's Daisy was one of a kind, and now the shorts she wore so well have officially entered the English English Dictionary.
They entered our hearts half a lifetime ago.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
11 minutes ago
- The Independent
Starmer hails ‘breakthrough' on security guarantees after crunch White House Ukraine talks
Sir Keir Starmer has hailed a "breakthrough" in efforts to end Vladimir Putin 's invasion of Ukraine as Donald Trump said he would broker a meeting between the Ukrainian and Russian presidents. The PM joined Voldymyr Zelensky, French president Emmanuel Macron and Nato secretary general Mark Rutte for crunch talks in the White House on Monday. And, following the meeting, Sir Keir said the UK and US would begin work on the specifics of security guarantees with the US as soon as Tuesday. "The two outcomes were a real significant breakthrough when it comes to security guarantees, because we're now going to be working with the US on those security guarantees," he told the BBC. "We've tasked our teams, some of them are even arriving tomorrow, to start the detailed work on that." Mr Trump said he had spoken directly with Vladimir Putin to begin planning a meeting between the Russian leader and Mr Zelensky, which will then be followed by a three-way meeting involving himself. The US president said Moscow will "accept" multinational efforts to guarantee Ukraine's security. Mr Zelensky, meanwhile, said he was "ready" for bilateral and trilateral meetings. But he told reporters following the White House meeting that if Russia does "not demonstrate a will to meet, then we will ask the United States to act accordingly". Nato secretary general Mark Rutte said the US and Europe would "do more" on tariffs and sanctions against Russia if the country "is not playing ball" on direct talks with Ukraine, in comments to Fox News. Sir Keir described the talks as "good and constructive" and said there was a "real sense of unity" between the European leaders, Mr Trump and Mr Zelensky. He said Mr Trump's plans to arrange the bilateral and trilateral meetings showed a recognition that Ukraine must be involved in talks. "That is a recognition of the principle that on some of these issues, whether it's territory or the exchange of prisoners, or the very serious issue of the return of children, that is something where Ukraine must be at the table." Mr Trump called the talks "very good". "During the meeting we discussed security guarantees for Ukraine, which guarantees would be provided by the various European countries, with a co-ordination with the United States of America," he posted on his Truth Social platform. "Everyone is happy about the possibility of PEACE for Russia/Ukraine. "At the conclusion of the meetings, I called president Putin and began arrangements for a meeting, at a location to be determined, between president Putin and president Zelensky. "After the meeting takes place, we will have a trilat which would be the two presidents plus myself." The US president met with Mr Putin in Anchorage, Alaska, on Friday, where he declared there was "no deal until there's a deal" to end more than three years of fighting in eastern Europe. "The Alaska summit reinforced my belief that while difficult, peace is within reach and I believe, in a very significant step, president Putin agreed that Russia would accept security guarantees for Ukraine," he said on Monday. "And this is one of the key points that we need to consider." He later said: "We also need to discuss the possible exchanges of territory taken into consideration the current line of contact." Future three-way talks "have a good chance" of stopping the conflict, the US president said. But he appeared to share conflicting views on whether a ceasefire was necessary to stop the war. "I don't think you need a ceasefire," he originally said, before later explaining that, "all of us would obviously prefer an immediate ceasefire while we work on a lasting peace". Mr Trump's envoy, Steve Witkoff, had suggested over the weekend that measures similar to Nato's article five mutual defence provision - that an attack on one member is an attack on the entire bloc - could be offered by the US without Kyiv joining the alliance. Sir Keir welcomed plans for "Article Five-style guarantees" during Monday's talks and said that they would fit with the work of his "coalition of the willing" group of countries. He said to Mr Trump: "With you coming alongside, the US alongside, what we've already developed, I think we could take a really important step forward today - a historic step, actually, could come out of this meeting in terms of security for Ukraine and security in Europe." Sir Keir also described potential future trilateral talks as a "sensible next step". The prime minister had disrupted his holiday plans over the weekend to join calls, including with Mr Trump and Mr Zelensky, before he headed to Washington. Mr Zelensky, whom Mr Trump greeted at the door of the West Wing with a handshake earlier in the evening, wore a black shirt with buttons and a black blazer to the meeting at the White House. His attire had appeared to become a point of irritation for Mr Trump during a previous meeting in February. Early in the meeting, the Ukrainian described the talks as "really good", saying they had been "the best" so far. Mr Zelensky said: "We are very happy with the president that all the leaders are here and security in Ukraine depends on the United States and on you and on those leaders who are with us in our hearts."


The Independent
11 minutes ago
- The Independent
Grocery price inflation falls slightly to 5% in August
Supermarket inflation fell slightly this month but remains 'well past the point at which price rises really start to bite', according to latest figures. Grocery prices were 5% higher than a year ago in the four weeks to August 10, according to market research firm Worldpanel by Numerator, which was recently renamed from Kantar. However, this was down from July's 5.2%, which represented a rise from inflation of 4.7% a month earlier and marked the highest level since January 2024. Fraser McKevitt, head of retail and consumer insight at Worldpanel, said: 'We've seen a marginal drop in grocery price inflation this month, but we're still well past the point at which price rises really start to bite and consumers are continuing to adapt their behaviour to make ends meet. 'What people pay for their supermarket shopping often impacts their spending across other parts of the high street too, including their eating and drinking habits out of the home.' Mr McKevitt said casual and fast service restaurants especially had seen a decline in visitors over the summer, with trips falling by 6% during the three months to mid-July 2025 compared with last year. Despite the ongoing cost pressures, customers still appear to be seeking to include treats in their baskets, with sales of branded grocery items growing by 6.1% this month, ahead of own-label alternatives which were up by 4.1%. Branded sales mad up 46.4% of all grocery spending but were particularly popular across personal care, confectionery, hot drinks and soft drinks, where they accounted for more than 75% of money through the tills. Sales of premium own-label products also rose by 11.5% this period. Worldpanel's data also shows that more than half of households bought a box of frozen fish fingers over the last year, ahead of the product turning 70 in September. Mr McKevitt said: 'The humble fish finger remains as popular as ever and nearly one billion were sold in the past year, with more than half of households grabbing a box.' He added: 'The average home cook now spends three minutes less preparing the evening meal than they did in 2017 at just under 31 minutes. 'We can see this trend in the growth of things like microwaveable rice, ready meals and chilled pizza too, which have grown by 8%, 6% and 5% respectively.' Lidl and Ocado were tied for top spot as the fastest growing grocers over the 12 weeks to August 10, with sales at both retailers up by 10.7% compared to the same period last year. Tesco enjoyed its largest monthly share gain since December 2024 as its hold of the market rose by 0.8 percentage points to 28.4%, driven by sales growth of 7.4% compared to last year. Asda and Co-op both saw sales down on a year ago, by 2.6% and 3.2% respectively.


The Independent
11 minutes ago
- The Independent
‘Appeasing bullies never works': Readers split over Trump's push for Putin-Zelensky peace talks
It comes after the US president used last night's White House talks with European leaders to float the idea of a three-way summit with the Ukrainian and Russian presidents, which he said he hoped to arrange within the next two weeks. He later confirmed on Truth Social that he had spoken to the Russian president to begin making arrangements, raising the prospect of the first meeting between Zelensky and Putin since 2019. Reacting to the news, our community were united in the view that peace is urgent, but many worried Trump's involvement could destabilise efforts. 'Appeasing bullies never works,' one reader warned, while another concluded grimly: 'Both Trump and Putin use war for their own ends – small countries do not count.' Some feared the US president would concede too much in pursuit of a Nobel Prize and while many argued Ukraine cannot defeat Russia outright, there were warnings that ceding land would only embolden Putin. Others felt Macron and other European leaders must play a central role in negotiations to balance Trump's unpredictability. Another recurring theme was scepticism about security guarantees, with many doubting promises from either Trump or Putin would be 'worth the paper they are written on'. Here's what you had to say: There needs to be a strong European voice In February Trump chewed Zelensky in his mouth and spat him out. Yesterday all changed – why? Because Zelensky was backed by seven European leaders. Of course, Ukraine will have to cede territory because there is no chance of Ukraine defeating Russia, as in bringing it to its knees. But Putin can't keep losing fighting men forever, so there could be a compromise. If Zelensky meets Putin and Trump, Trump will give too much away so he gets his peace prize. Macron is smart – there needs to be a strong European voice in quadripartite negotiations. Truthfirstwarcasualty Trump could never negotiate peace Art of the Deal my foot! Trump couldn't negotiate his way out of a paper bag. If he had been the President of Ukraine instead of Zelensky, he would be taking orders from the Kremlin by now. Pomerol95 Where should talks be held? Where and how will any talks between Presidents of Ukraine and Russia occur? In my opinion, the "where" cannot be in USA, Russia, NATO nations, EU nations, or even the 46 Council of Europe nations. It is also likely that the host should not be a member of the ICC, and also be seen as neutral. That perhaps leaves Qatar as a front runner. Fair enough, as the ruler Emir Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani is a diplomatically pragmatic and highly educated individual. His presence/oversight would solve the issue of such talks being not only neutral as possible, but being seen as such; obviously no member of NATO or EU can attend, let alone mediate. To keep the dialogue on path, there has to be a ceasefire, if only for a limited period, say seven days before, during, and after such a meeting. This to include no military actions, movements, supply, or any combat-related action. All else is solely between the two parties and their translators. Understandably, there will be facilities for private communication between parties and their governments or allies. We are not in the past era of "Great Powers" deciding things for others. The role of external parties is to facilitate the end of the conflict in a manner equitable to all parties. Jonathan Mills Appeasing bullies never works Trump isn't wrong – that is what Putin will demand to 'end' the war. But the big question for Ukraine, and for the rest of the world, is if he gets what he wants for being an aggressor, how long will his version of peace last? When will he decide to grab more land and make more demands on neighbours? The simple fact is appeasing bullies never works. Putin is the 'artful dodger' Given there's no ceasefire, and Trump knowingly put the onus back on Zelensky – by caving to Putin on territorial claims and Ukraine being prevented from joining NATO – Zelensky needs to stand his ground. Whilst Crimea is likely lost, he must oppose any further unlawful territorial gains from Putin. With respect to security guarantees from the US akin to NATO Article 5 stipulations, of course Putin has indicated his willingness to that, but I doubt they would be worth the paper they are written on. Putin will make claims Ukraine has been attempting to seize back Crimea or other parts of its territory, and all bets will be off. I reckon it's a ploy unwittingly agreed to by Trump – but would you trust either of these Presidents to keep their word? Trump regularly flip-flops and changes position all the time, and Putin is the 'artful dodger' when it comes to manipulating Trump and breaking peace agreements at will. StigStag The parallels with the 1930s are deeply worrying The parallels between now and the late 1930s are uncanny and deeply worrying, and the response of 'the leader of the free world' would be laughable if it weren't so pathetic, predictable, and serious. The continental Europeans know, or should remember, what it was like to have a war rage across their lands – something the Americans and British have never experienced. Surely we can learn and realise that the precautionary principle is key and take action to prevent another invasion. That means being appropriately armed and ensuring the territorial integrity of sovereign states is respected – and where military action has attempted to change that, then territorial integrity is restored by whatever means is necessary, hopefully by robust diplomacy. That means we need to cut Trump out of it and deal with this ourselves. Geejay Get serious in arming Ukraine This war has shown that agreements and opinions mean nothing. All that matters is capabilities. Ukraine already had a commitment from NATO to defend it in the Bucharest agreement. But Russia attacked anyway. However, this war has shown that Russia is no longer a first-class military power. The front has barely moved in three years – and that's despite Ukraine being severely outnumbered, having no tanks, aircraft, or long-range missiles, and being supplied with mostly old, outdated NATO weapons. If Europe got serious in arming Ukraine, how long would Russia last? So Ukraine definitely does have a hand at the table – especially considering how unpopular Trump and Putin are in Europe (and elsewhere) at the moment. Ajames Trump dividing Europe The truly scary thing is that Trump, via his tariffs and deals, has already succeeded to a large extent in dividing and thus dominating Europe. People are afraid to upset him – apparently Zelensky is wearing a suit to the meeting! Will they get tariffed, or lose their special deals? Or even be thrown out of the White House? A year ago, Europe would firmly have rejected the idea of Ukraine ceding territory – now it seems they may be putting pressure on Ukraine to do so, even though it isn't spoken out loud. Hungubwe Trump rambles, Putin manipulates Trump rambles, and clearly harbours grudges – not least against Joe Biden, who beat him in 2020. What all this has to do with the actual point of the meeting yesterday is difficult to fathom. It looks like just another Trump rant. There is plenty of precedent for postponing elections during wartime. Britain should have had one in 1940, but by cross-party agreement suspended them for the duration. Trying to get full and fair coverage when a war is raging is almost impossible. It seems to me both Trump and Putin are using war for different ends but with the same basic outcome – small countries do not count. Despite the bluster and accusations Trump threw at Biden yesterday, it was Putin who unleashed his forces against Ukraine on 24/2/2022. If that is not a blatant act of aggression then I do not know what is. Good thing European leaders were there yesterday. There is much more at stake in terms of our security in this war. Allowing Russia to keep its ill-gotten gains is not something we could support. Did they manage to pull Trump back from his favourable opinion of Putin? Who knows with Trump? We live in dangerous times. 49niner