Russian propagandists split between downplaying devastating Ukrainian attacks and issuing threats
Russian officials and propagandists have chosen different strategies for dealing with the unprecedented Ukrainian drone attacks on Russian airfields that took place on June 1.
The Security Service of Ukraine (SBU) said that, as part of an operation dubbed Spiderweb, it had destroyed or damaged 41 Russian aircraft parked at the Belaya, Dyagilevo, Olenya, and Ivanovo air bases on June 1.
The Kyiv Independent could not independently verify the number of aircraft hit by the SBU.
Kyiv has claimed it had disabled 34% of Russia's strategic bomber fleet in what is seen as one of the most daring operations during the full-scale war. The strike reportedly involved 117 drones launched from trucks hidden across Russian territory.
Russian top officials, including President Vladimir Putin, did not comment on the Ukrainian operation at all, while some pro-war propagandists tried to downplay its scale.
Other propagandists threatened to take revenge on Ukraine and the West by launching nuclear strikes and attacking airfields in NATO countries.
But some pro-war bloggers were more skeptical, saying that the attacks were a "Russian Pearl Harbor" — a reference to the devastating Japanese strikes on the U.S. naval base in Pearl Harbor, Hawaii, in 1941. These bloggers argued that the Russian authorities should not lie about the attacks and must draw conclusions to prevent similar incidents in the future.
"Russia's nuclear threats don't look serious after it became clear that you can deprive Russia of a large part of its nuclear potential using drones and trucks," Russian anti-Kremlin columnist Sergei Parkhomenko told the Kyiv Independent in a reference to nuclear-capable strategic bombers allegedly destroyed by Ukraine.
Russia's Defense Ministry presented the Ukrainian strikes as "a terrorist attack" by the "Kyiv regime" — an odd claim, given that the operation targeted exclusively military facilities, not civilians.
The ministry claimed that "all terrorist attacks were repelled" and that "several pieces of aircraft equipment caught fire."
"The fires have been extinguished," the ministry said. "There are no casualties among military personnel or civilian staff."
The Defense Ministry also claimed that "some of the perpetrators of the attacks have been detained."
Some pro-war bloggers also chose to downplay the scale of the Ukrainian attacks.
"I spoke with people in the know, and they say that, while the reputational damage is certainly significant, the material loss is not," pro-war propagandist Alexei Zhivov wrote on Telegram. "The forces and resources needed to continue the military campaign are available. Fundamentally, nothing will change."
He added that Ukrainian "bombardments can't bring anyone to their knees."
Read also: Operation Spiderweb — everything we know about Ukraine's 'audacious' attack on Russia's heavy bombers
One of the country's top propagandists, Vladimir Solovyov, said during his TV show that the Ukrainian operation was "grounds for a nuclear attack" and called for conducting strikes on Ukraine's president's office on Bankova Street in Kyiv and airfields in Poland and Romania allegedly used by Ukrainian aircraft.
Commenting on the publication of footage from the Russian airfields by soldiers during the Ukrainian attacks, Solovyov called for introducing "the most severe military censorship" to crack down on such videos.
Margarita Simonyan, chief editor of the Kremlin's English-language TV network Russia Today, said on Solovyov's show that "revenge" for the Ukrainian attacks was "inevitable" and hinted that those responsible would be executed.
Some pro-war propagandists, however, were critical of the Russian authorities.
"This day will later be called a black day for Russia's long-range aviation," the pro-war blogger with the nickname Fighter Bomber wrote on Telegram.
Commenting on containers from which the Ukrainian drones were launched, Fighter Bomber wrote that "you really had to work hard to screw up and miss such containers."
"But we managed," he added.
Fighter Bomber also quipped that they expected the Russian authorities to reward those who failed to protect the airfields rather than to punish them, alluding to the widespread nepotism and corruption in the Russian army.
Meanwhile, the pro-war blogger Starshe Eddy ("older than the Edda") dismissed claims by other propagandists that the operation was carried out by Western intelligence rather than by Ukrainians.
"If the British, using the hands of these so-called 'dumb' Ukrainians, managed to hit us like this — then what should we expect from a direct confrontation with the British themselves?" the pro-war blogger said on Telegram.
"The Ukrainians are not dumb at all. They've been at war with us for three and a half years, carrying out subtle, clever, and daring operations. Today's tragedy will go down in the textbooks of intelligence services — including our own."
He added that "British intelligence is directly involved in the war, but let's not once again cover up our own failures by blaming everything on the British."
"As one wise man once said: if you publicly shit yourself, you should apologize, wash your ass, and change your clothes — not walk around a public place with your pants full of shit pretending nothing happened," the blogger continued.
Another propagandist, Alexander Kots, urged Russians to stop distorting information about Ukrainian attacks.
"It's important to tell the truth now, no matter how bitter it may be," he wrote. "We'll win the war anyway. We just have to stop lying to ourselves."
Another group of critics of the Russian authorities' actions were the people who call themselves the opposition to Putin's regime.
Anti-Kremlin columnist Parkhomenko said that some officials would likely be fired due to their failure to prevent the attacks, but the Kremlin would try to avoid making any public connection between such dismissals and the Ukrainian operation.
He also told the Kyiv Independent that Russia was likely to launch some revenge attacks against Ukraine.
Parkomenko believes the attacks will also have an impact on Russia's relations with NATO countries since he thinks Western intelligence agencies likely took part in the operation.
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has denied such claims, saying that Ukraine had carried out the attack singlehandedly without the assistance of Western intelligence services.
Moreover, Russia's position in negotiations with the West has also been weakened due to the strikes, he added.
Parkhomenko said, however, that the attacks were unlikely to deal a major blow to Putin's reputation among the population or the Russian elite.
Russian propaganda is downplaying the damage, and those who like or hate Putin are unlikely to change their opinions, Parkhomenko said.
He added that Ukraine's unprecedented incursion into Russia's Kursk Oblast had not had a major impact on Putin's popularity either.
Read also: Ultimate guide on how drones changed warfare in Ukraine
We've been working hard to bring you independent, locally-sourced news from Ukraine. Consider supporting the Kyiv Independent.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Boston Globe
18 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Iran's supreme leader criticizes US proposal in nuclear talks but doesn't reject the idea of a deal
But what Khamenei did not say in his speech matters as well. He didn't reject the talks, which Iran views as crucial for its economy to lift some the crushing economic sanctions it faces. Advertisement Khamenei also did not insist on any specific level of nuclear enrichment. Iran now enriches uranium up to 60% — a short, technical step from weapons-grade levels. Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi, who has led the talks with Witkoff, said Tehran soon will offer its response to the U.S. Khamenei's speech Wednesday at the mausoleum of Grand Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini may serve as a preview. 'If we had 100 nuclear power plants while not having enrichment, they are not usable for us,' Khamenei said. 'If we do not have enrichment, then we should extend our hand (begging) to the U.S.' Later, Trump said he spoke with Russian President Vladimir Putin and that the pair had discussed 'the fact that time is running out on Iran's decision pertaining to nuclear weapons, which must be made quickly!' Advertisement Trump said in a post on his social media site Truth Social that he told Russia's president 'that Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon and, on this, I believe that we were in agreement.' He said that Putin suggested 'that he will participate in the discussions with Iran' and could perhaps 'be helpful in getting this brought to a rapid conclusion.' Trump also said he thought Iran has been slow-walking their decision 'and we will need a definitive answer in a very short period of time!' Khamenei touched on previous remarks The 86-year-old Khamenei, who has final say on all matters of state in Iran, often balances his remarks over the demands of reformists within the country who want the talks against hard-line elements within Iran's theocracy, including the paramilitary Revolutionary Guard. Late in August, Khamenei in a speech opened the door to possible talks with the U.S., saying there is 'no harm' in engaging with the 'enemy.' The supreme leader later tempered that, saying that negotiations with America 'are not intelligent, wise or honorable,' after Trump floated nuclear talks with Tehran. Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei attends a ceremony marking the anniversary of the 1989 death of the late revolutionary founder Ayatollah Khomeini at his shrine just outside Tehran, Iran, Wednesday, June 4, 2025. Uncredited/Associated Press Khamenei's speech on Wednesday, marking the anniversary of Khomeini's death, offered an opportunity to discuss Witkoff's proposal. He described it as '100% against the idea of 'we can,'' borrowing from an Iranian government slogan. He described the U.S. as having long sought the dismantling of Iran's entire nuclear industry. 'The impolite and insolent American leaders keep repeating this demand with different wordings,' Khamenei said. He added, using a slogan he's said before: 'Those currently in power, Zionist or American, should be aware that they can't do a damn thing about this.' Advertisement Some nuclear power nations do get uranium from outside suppliers, however. Experts long have viewed Iran as using its nuclear program as a chip in negotiations with the West to get sanctions relief. Details of American proposal are still murky The details of the American proposal remain unclear after five rounds of talks between Iran and the U.S. A report by the news website Axios on the American proposal, the details of which a U.S. official separately confirmed, include a possible nuclear consortium that would enrich uranium for Iran and surrounding nations. Whether Iran would have to entirely give up its enrichment program remains unclear, as Axios reported that Iran would be able to enrich uranium up to 3% purity for some time. A failure to get a deal could see tensions further spike in a Middle East already on edge over the Israel-Hamas war in the Gaza Strip. Iran's long-ailing economy could enter a free fall that could worsen the simmering unrest at home. Israel or the U.S. might carry out long-threatened airstrikes targeting Iranian nuclear facilities. And Tehran may decide to fully end its cooperation with the United Nations' nuclear watchdog and rush toward a bomb. Associated Press writers Nasser Karimi in Tehran, Iran, and Will Weissert in Washington contributed to this report.
Yahoo
37 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Carson demands answers on potential migrant detention at Indiana's Camp Atterbury
U.S. Rep. André Carson speaks at a rally on Oct. 26, 2024, in Indianapolis. (Whitney Downard/Indiana Capital Chronicle) A Wednesday letter from Democrat U.S. Rep. André Carson to the federal Department of Homeland Security seeks answers about the possible use of Camp Atterbury in Indiana as an immigration detention facility. The letter follows recent Indiana Capital Chronicle reporting that federal officials may be eyeing the southern Indiana base as a temporary site for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) detainees. The federally owned facility is licensed to and operated by the Indiana National Guard. A DHS spokesperson last week declined to confirm any plans but acknowledged the agency is exploring 'flexible options' to respond to capacity issues in its nationwide detention network. In his letter to DHS Secretary Kristi Noem, Carson said the prospect raises 'serious questions' and flagged concerns about legal rights, humane treatment and national security. Feds could eye Indiana's Camp Atterbury as potential site for ICE detainees amid capacity strain 'Camp Atterbury has historically served as a training base for the Indiana National Guard and has been a vital part of our state's military infrastructure,' wrote Carson, who represents portions of Marion County. 'The prospect of repurposing it for migrant detention raises significant issues that warrant thorough examination, including the negative impact this will have on our national security and military readiness.' Carson's letter comes as ICE detention has surged in recent months, approaching 50,000 people nationwide — far above the 41,500 beds funded by Congress — according to the latest federal numbers. That strain has reportedly prompted DHS to review underused military and federal facilities across the country, including Camp Atterbury, but no official decisions have been announced. Carson, a senior member of the House Intelligence Committee, said he's especially troubled by reports of due process violations at other ICE detention sites. 'As a senior Member of the House Intel Committee, I am always thinking about keeping our state and our country safe,' Carson said in a statement. 'Not only does the prospect of using Camp Atterbury raise concerns that our military readiness will be reduced, it also is deeply concerning given numerous reports that detainees across the United States have been denied legal due process.' Camp Atterbury has previously been used to house Afghan evacuees and Ukrainian refugees, but not immigration detainees held under enforcement authority. Carson asked DHS to respond to seven specific questions about the potential use of Camp Atterbury by June 13, including what laws and funding would govern its use of the national guard site, and how military operations might be affected. DHS had not responded publicly to the letter as of Wednesday evening. Carson Letter – June 4 SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Yahoo
37 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Shifting supply chains, infant formula under scrutiny, lunar mission: Catch up on the day's stories
👋 Welcome to 5 Things PM! The US Food and Drug Administration is conducting the first comprehensive update and review of infant formula since 1998. 'We're going to make American infant formula the gold standard for the world,' Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. said. Here's what else you might have missed during your busy day: 1️⃣ 'We need to change': With President Donald Trump enacting tariffs on nearly every US import, American companies are scrambling to move their supply chains out of countries like Mexico and China. This small island in the Caribbean could be the answer. 2️⃣ Builders of peace: Congregation Bonai Shalom in Boulder, Colorado, welcomes both Jews and non-Jews to participate in all aspects of the community. An antisemitic attack that injured several members — including a Holocaust survivor — is testing their resilience. 3️⃣ Tracking measles: As cases rise to precipitously high levels in the US, there's a new tool to help measure the spread of the disease. Wastewater surveillance has the potential to identify possible cases days before an individual shows symptoms or seeks care. 4️⃣ Lunar lander: A Japanese company will try to touch down on the moon three months after an uncrewed American spacecraft did the same. Ispace executives said their slow and steady approach offers some long-term advantages. 5️⃣ Candid confession: Kylie Jenner detailed her breast augmentation on TikTok — down to the exact size. Her revelation chips away at a taboo. But is it a victory for transparency or a setback for beauty standards? ☔ Waterlogged: Flash flood emergencies were declared in Wichita and El Dorado, Kansas, after a month's worth of rain fell in one day. The heavy rain flooded roads and submerged cars. • Trump says Putin told him in phone call he will respond to Ukraine's weekend drone attacks• 2 Chinese researchers charged with smuggling biological pathogen to study at university lab• US Education Department threatens Columbia University's accreditation over campus antisemitism concerns 💸 That's how much House Republicans' sweeping tax and spending cuts package would add to the deficit over the next decade, according to a Congressional Budget Office analysis. 🪨 Preserving history: Stephen Townley Bassett is painstakingly recreating mysterious ancient rock art in South Africa before it's lost. His works are no ordinary replicas. 💬 No thanks: Formerly known as 'MAGA Granny,' Hemphill is a convicted January 6 rioter who served two months in federal prison. Watch as she explains why she refused a pardon from President Trump. 🪖 Approximately how many Russian soldiers have been killed or injured in the war with Ukraine? A. 100,000B. 300,000C. 600,000D. 950,000⬇️ Scroll down for the answer. 🎾 C'est magnifique! Heavy underdog Lois Boisson continued her fairy tale run at the French Open tennis tournament by beating No. 6 seed Mirra Andreeva to advance to the semifinals. The hometown hero's next opponent? American Coco Gauff. 👋 We'll see you tomorrow. 🧠 Quiz answer: D. Russia is nearing 1 million war casualties in Ukraine.📧 Check out all of CNN's newsletters. 5 Things PM is produced by CNN's Chris Good, Meghan Pryce, Kimberly Richardson and Morgan Severson.