We cannot police the streets if online material is not regulated
When I was growing up in the 1970s there was no racism here, or so it seemed. There was, apparently, no racism because there were almost no foreigners. Apart from family who came home from England, it was just us, and everyone else was the same as us. Except, on second thoughts, there was more to it. When I think harder, I remember anti-English feeling as a child. We didn't use the word British much. But it was popular to be anti-English.
Violence played out on black and white televisions every night from Northern Ireland and that had an underlay of racism. But because it was for and against a united Ireland, it was insisted that the hate was not racial. Odd, given Cromwell had clear views to the contrary. But if Northern Ireland was obvious, what was almost invisible were the very small number of people who did look different.
The testimony of the late Christine Buckley and others of colour was of a cruel State. But in the way we were brilliant at segregating out what we did not want to mix with, that uncomfortable truth was unseen. Itinerants – we didn't use the word Traveller then – were in plain sight but ostracised.
READ MORE
[
President condemns 'despicable attacks' on Indian people
Opens in new window
]
In the 1980s, I first experienced a multicultural society in the United States. The talk in Irish pubs among the newly arrived often instantly picked up on the outright racism that characterised parts of Irish America. It was bad alchemy.
Ireland started to change dramatically in the 1990s and by the early noughties, in what was still an analogue culture, there was feverish talk of a 'them' who were getting everything from free prams to free houses while claiming asylum here.
The Citizenship Referendum in 2004 was the answer to that and it largely settled the issue for 20 years. In hindsight, that apparent lull was helped by the economic crash. Now things are at full tilt again economically, immigration is an economic necessity, and right-wing racism is on the rise.
Racism in this State is old. What is new is the vile discourse online, and most of it comes from abroad, principally the United States and United Kingdom. We spent a century fantasising about being contaminated by foreign filth in the form of dirty books. Now the reality arrives via algorithms on an extraordinary scale.
[
Social media algorithms boosting videos of attacks on asylum seekers, says campaign group
Opens in new window
]
People correctly look to
Minister for Justice Jim O'Callaghan
and gardaí to act in relation to the recent attacks, and they should. It is
Minister for Communications Patrick O'Donovan
who is at the front line. The
Ireland is Full
protests are native but copycat the far right globally.
Talking down to disaffected people caught up in the anger will serve no purpose.
The electronic ether, acted out on protests, is socialising hate in working-class communities. Children and younger teenagers – mainly boys – are picking up hate in stereo on the ground and online. The number who act out these impulses is still small, but the consequences are potentially deadly and inflammatory.
[
The Irish Times view on racist attacks: No place for hate on our streets
Opens in new window
]
Beyond the few who move on from verbal assault to actual violence, there is an ecosystem talking up untruth and legitimising hate. Casual abuse and the feeling of being unsafe are increasing for members of the Indian community, immigrants and Irish people who look different. We could kid ourselves about what sort of society we were in the 1970s, but not now.
Schools have been remarkably successful hubs of racial integration, but are not a simple answer. The dilemma about occupying bored teenagers over the long summer holidays is perpetual. There is an open question about whether these attacks were coincidental or copycats. In any event, they were horrific and have blighted the lives of the victims.
[
#WeAreIrish and proud, but the online racism is exhausting
Opens in new window
]
Today marks Independence Day in India and US president Donald Trump is meeting Russian president Vladimir Putin in Alaska. Their world, where there are no rules, reflects reality online. It is Trump's world and the base of his power. Global tech platforms are rapidly reversing online moderation in the name of free speech. The ether is a new frontier of dystopian untruth. Government or EU intervention to police it will provoke a US backlash. That presents a difficult challenge for Mr O'Donovan because we can't police the streets if we don't regulate online.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
Trump drops Ukraine ceasefire demand and suggests Putin plan could bring peace
US president Donald Trump on Saturday split from Ukraine and key European allies after his summit with Russian president Vladimir Putin , adopting Putin's plan for a sweeping peace agreement based on Ukraine ceding unoccupied territory to Russia, instead of the urgent ceasefire Trump had said he wanted before the meeting. Skipping ceasefire discussions would give Russia an advantage in the talks, which are expected to continue on Monday when President Volodymyr Zelenskiy of Ukraine visits Trump at the White House. It breaks from a strategy Trump and European allies, as well as Zelenskiy, had agreed to before the US-Russia summit in Alaska. Trump told European leaders that he believed a rapid peace deal could be negotiated if Zelenskiy agrees to cede the rest of the Donbas region to Russia, even those areas not occupied by Russian troops, according to two senior European officials briefed on the call. In return, Putin offered a ceasefire in the rest of Ukraine at current battle lines and a written promise not to attack Ukraine or any European country again, the senior officials said. He has broken similar promises before. READ MORE Trump had threatened stark economic penalties if Putin left the meeting without a deal to end the war, but, as European and Russian officials acknowledged, he suspended those threats in the wake of the summit. The American president's moves got a chilly reception in Europe, where leaders have time and again seen Trump reverse positions on Ukraine after speaking with Putin. Trump wrote on Truth Social early on Saturday that he spoke by phone to Zelenskiy and European leaders after his meeting with Putin. He said that 'it was determined by all that the best way to end the horrific war between Russia and Ukraine is to go directly to a Peace Agreement, which would end the war, and not a mere Ceasefire Agreement, which often times do not hold up.' European leaders made clear, publicly and privately, that was not the case. They issued a statement that did not echo Trump's claim that peace talks were preferable to a ceasefire. Britain, France, Germany and others welcomed Trump's efforts to stop the war but threatened to increase economic penalties on Russia 'as long as the killing in Ukraine continues'. Still, in public statements, the European leaders praised Trump – in mellower terms than normal – for his efforts to broker peace, and in particular for his pledge to involve the United States in guaranteeing Ukraine's security going forward. Giorgia Meloni , Italy's prime minister, said in a statement that Trump supported a collective-security clause that would allow Ukraine 'to benefit from the support of all its partners, including the US, ready to take action if it is attacked again'. Trump confirmed Zelenskiy's announcement earlier on Saturday that the Ukrainian president would come to the White House on Monday. If that visit goes well, Trump said, he would schedule another meeting with Putin. With Russia advancing on the battlefield, a ceasefire would give Ukraine relief from Moscow's attacks and deprive Putin of some leverage at the bargaining table. Before his meeting with Putin, Trump had agreed with European allies and Zelenskiy that no peace negotiations could begin without a ceasefire in place. Zelenskiy, who was left out of the summit, said in a statement that he and Trump would on Monday 'discuss all of the details regarding ending the killing and the war'. Trump, in an interview with Fox News host Sean Hannity after the summit, put the onus for securing peace on Zelenskiy. 'Now it is really up to President Zelenskiy to get it done,' he said. 'I would also say the European nations have to get involved a little bit.' Russia, which launched a full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022, has demanded that Ukraine cede a large part of its land, disarm, swear off joining Nato and change governments. This article originally appeared in The New York Times . 2025 The New York Times Company
Irish Post
2 hours ago
- Irish Post
Who owns the legacy of the Troubles?
MY FRIEND Lyra McKee died from a gunshot wound and became a symbol of a post-Troubles generation. She was a young lesbian and a freelance journalist starting to establish a reputation. One night in April 2019 she stood watching a riot in Derry. Dissident republicans who had rejected the peace deal of 1998 were throwing stones and petrol bombs at police officers who had come into the Creggan estate to make arrests. Riots of this kind were common during the period of the Troubles, generated by both republican and loyalist communities, often with the police as the main target. I watched many riots as a young journalist as Lyra did that night, standing behind police or army lines or occasionally on the sidelines for a clearer view, depending on how safe I felt there. On that night in Derry a man came forward with a pistol and fired at the police. One of his bullets struck Lyra in the head. She then became a symbol of change because this was not supposed to happen. The violence was meant to be behind us. Most of those who had led the violence of the past agreed on that. And Lyra was seen as part of a post conflict generation. She would have been watching that riot perhaps because she had never or rarely seen such a thing. She would have regarded it as a throwback to an awful time. British prime Minister Theresa May applauds with Taoiseach and Fine Gael leader Leo Varadkar and mourners as the hearse leaves the church after the funeral of murdered journalist Lyra McKee at St Anne's Cathedral in Belfast (Pic: Rolling News) Her symbolic importance was such that her funeral at St Anne's cathedral in Belfast was attended by the then Prime Minister Theresa May and several dignitaries including the Northern Irish First Minister, Arlene Foster. Her writings were republished, and one particular piece was seen as speaking for her whole generation. As a lesbian writing to her younger self she had said: 'It won't always be like this. It's going to get better.' The tragic irony of how she had died was that it seemed to affirm that the awfulness continued despite her hopes and confidence. And the starkness of that seemed to reinforce a determination that her vision would be fulfilled, that her death could not be pointless, that there had to be a Northern Ireland free of violence and prejudice in which a new generation had put the past behind them. Young people today in Northern Ireland seem divided between those who regard themselves as a fruitful new generation untainted by the past and those who retain the anger and suffer inherited trauma. Both often seem naive to me, as inevitably young people will when trying to respond to events that took place before they were born. Some say they are not like the generation of their parents which made a mess of things. Some carry grief for what their families suffered and struggle to understand a society that has moved on. Take Liadan Ní Chuinn who has just published an extraordinary collection of short stories that the critics are raving about. Liadan is a pseudonym and there is no public disclosure over who she or he is. The name is female. The Irish Times has said of Every One Still Here that it deserves to be considered 'among the best Irish books of the 21st century'. That's one hell of an endorsement. The stories are largely about generational trauma, featuring young characters who agonise over the legacy of the Troubles and relate the deaths of older relations to the stress and violence of those days. The book is brilliantly written. An energetic imagination relates characters and situations vividly and movingly. There is a coherent and authentic young voice throughout. In the closing story a character Rowan confronts an older person, Shane who doesn't want to dwell on the past and tells him he'll get over it. Rowan is furious and the older character is saying that the past is behind us and best left there. This presents us with a counter to the image of Lyra McKee who is taken to symbolise the generation that has moved on. There can be no question that Liadan is a major artist, an impressively evocative writer but there is naïveté and warped perspective here too. That last story ends the book with a passionate litany of many of those who were killed by British soldiers during the Troubles, many of the soldiers being defended by their own officers and by government ministers; few were charged and convicted of murder. The scandal of murders by soldiers is well recorded yet few have ever been held accountable. But Ní Chuinn's vision of the cause of conflict presents the British army as the main source of grief. And this book is not alone in thinking like that. The First Minister, Michelle O'Neill, who has said that there was no alternative to the IRA campaign, has recently spoken of how she and those around her were moved by the horror of young men being killed by soldiers. That conviction that the primary evil, the most damnable source of grief and grievance was the British army may be reality for some but what is missing here is context. Most of the killing was done by the IRA and by loyalist paramilitary groups. How can that simply be forgotten or discounted as irrelevant? There is danger in that blindness for that simplistic account of our past is what drives the dissident republicans still, the ones who couldn't compromise for peace, the ones who shot Lyra McKee. See More: Lyra McKee, Northern Ireland, Troubles
Irish Times
6 hours ago
- Irish Times
The Irish Times view on Budget 2026: put the focus on what is important
Over the next couple of weeks, as the Autumn political season starts to kick in, debate on October's budget will get underway in earnest. As ever, there will be a cacophony of demands from interest groups and lobbyists, looking for more spending or lower taxes for their particular cause. The job of the Government, of course, is to look through the noise to what is important. Despite the generous amount of €9.4 billion set aside for budget measures, this will not be easy. Money will be quickly eaten up through spending pressures in providing State services. Plans to hike vital investment expenditure need to be allowed for. And the demands on the table already would take up the €1.5 billion set aside for tax reductions a few times over. Yet while the choices will be sharp in some areas, context is needed. This is not shaping up to be a 'tough' budget. The promised package is still nearly three times the size of the last pre-Covid budget in 2019. The first job of the Government, indeed, is to start returning annual budgets to more sustainable levels, reducing them from the huge spending rises required during Covid-19 and to tackle the cost-of-living crisis. Claims that households are still squeezed need to be met in two ways. One is by appropriate increases in welfare and other support packages. The other is by continuing to improve the provision of services in areas such as health, education and childcare. These are much more effective in the longer-term than another round of universal cash supports. But by engaging in a blatant pre-election manoeuvre last year to repeat these 'once-off' supports again, Ministers have created a rod for their own back this time around. READ MORE Statements from Ministers that there would be no cost-of-living package this time appear to have become more equivocal in recent weeks. But giving a lot of money out again through these payments to all households is an inefficient use of State cash. If the Government does not bring this process to an end in the first budget of its new term, then – barring a big squeeze on the State finances – it never will. The plan to increase vital State investment is a key reason why there needs to be some restraint elsewhere. Realistic budgeting for the provision of State services also needs to be restored, ending the annual overruns in areas like health. Relying on corporate tax to keep outperforming as a way to pay for spending coming in ahead of target each year is not a good strategy. The other reason for caution is the uncertainty faced due to the policies of Donald Trump. Despite the trade deal between the EU and US, the economic and political backdrop for Ireland remains risky and unpredictable. Having cash in reserve and pursuing a strategic approach have seldom looked more important.
