
State tentatively restoring millions for disability services after weeks of advocacy
This is part 2 of a 2-part series about the challenges of navigating self-directed services, a disability care model.
Part 1, which addressed the impact of policy changes made to self-directed services in 2024, ran in the March 15-16 edition.
When Carol Custer first saw Gov. Wes Moore's proposed budget for the coming fiscal year, she was devastated and confused.
Moore released his $67.3 billion budget proposal for fiscal year 2026 on Jan. 15, amidst a projected $3 billion deficit for the state.
That proposal would fill in the deficit and leave Maryland with a positive cash balance of $106 million.
It also included millions in cuts to the Developmental Disabilities Administration (DDA).
Custer, who lives in Frederick County, is a board member of the Self-Directed Advocacy Network of Maryland (SDAN), an organization that promotes self-directed services.
Self-directed services is one of the disability care service models the DDA offers. It allows people with intellectual and developmental disabilities to choose how they spend funding that the state gives them.
Participants can choose which services they receive, how they receive the services and what staff provides their care.
Each participant has a Person-Centered Plan, which outlines what services and programs they want, and a budget based on that plan.
For most of 2024, following a change in leadership at the DDA, self-directed services participants had what felt like a sea of red tape to cross to access funding they were already approved for. They also had trouble getting their Person-Centered Plans approved.
In November, the DDA rolled out several changes to self-directed services, codifying the difficulties people were already experiencing.
People with disabilities, their families, staff members and other advocates were calling their local legislators, marching in front of the State House in Annapolis and attending hearings to share their stories and how cuts to the DDA could drastically change lives.
Among those proposals were cutting wages for support staff, eliminating some programs for people with disabilities and reducing funds for one-to-one and two-to-one staffing with people who need services.
Danielle Gummo, Self-Directed Services
Danielle Gummo, center, counts dollar bills with Raquel Malave, a professional direct support staff for Danielle, right, as Sarah Hickman, Danielle's roommate, watches at Danielle and Sarah's home on March 10. Danielle has Down syndrome and started transitioning to using self-directed services in 2018. Danielle and Raquel were determining how much was spent on Danielle's activities for the day.
Throughout the 2025 Maryland General Assembly session, adjustments to the cuts have been made as advocates told their stories.
Maryland budget leaders and the Moore-Miller administration released a joint statement on Feb. 20 that they were restoring a total of $76 million in planned DDA state budget cuts for the current fiscal year.
This funding will help provide consistent disability care services through the end of fiscal year 2025.
On March 4, Moore's administration released a fiscal year 2026 supplemental budget to adjust his original proposal.
The supplemental budget includes $154 million more in state funds for DDA community services.
However, most of the originally proposed DDA cuts for fiscal year 2026 — including cuts that would impact self-directed services — remained and left participants, their families and other supporters distraught and frustrated.
But on March 20 — the same day Moore and the General Assembly announced a budget framework with new taxes and more state spending reductions — the House of Delegates' Appropriations Committee announced it was restoring millions in DDA funding.
On Tuesday, the state Senate's Budget and Taxation Committee met to make decisions on the budget, which included accepting some recommendations from the House on DDA cuts and making adjustments to others.
It's a sigh of relief for self-directed services, though not the end of the struggles that became more pronounced by policy changes last November, according to Custer.
Budget deliberations were still ongoing as of Tuesday. The state Senate and House of Delegates have to pass a budget bill by March 31.
In 2024, about 19,500 people were using DDA services across the state, 3,855 of which were self-directed services users.
The other people used traditional services, meaning their care is overseen by provider agencies.
Custer said she's happy that hundreds of millions of dollars in funding is on track to being restored, but if people who self-direct still have problems accessing their funding, many issues will continue.
"I'm happy that they restored [a lot of] the budget. That took away a lot of pressure, but honest to God, it was all there before we even had a budget cut," she said.
The original cuts
On Feb. 7, DDA officials, including its deputy secretary, Marlana Hutchinson, hosted a community input meeting to discuss the proposed cuts.
Hutchinson said Moore's originally proposed budget includes more than $1.3 billion in state general funds for the DDA — two thirds higher than it received three years ago.
She said the funding will help support new enrollments, long-term services and support improvement, and create a moderate rate increase for providers.
Some of the proposed changes include eliminating higher rates for staff in more expensive counties and getting rid of low-intensity support services for children and adults with disabilities.
Five counties — Frederick, Montgomery, Prince George's, Calvert and Charles — currently have a "geographical differential" rate for support staff above the rate for staff in other counties.
Danielle Gummo, Self-Directed Services
Danielle Gummo, left, smiles at Raquel Malave, one of Danielle's professional direct support staff, as Gummo works at Beans & Dreams - Nektario's Place on March 10.
For most of the state, there is a set maximum wage exception for employees, which varies depending on the position. In these five counties, that maximum wage exception is higher because the cost of living is higher.
Traditional services providers in those counties can get paid that higher maximum exception rate, and self-directed services participants living in those counties can get that rate as part of their budgets to pay staff.
Hutchinson said this change would allow the DDA to "preserve, promote and maximize funding" for the administration's community services.
Through low-intensity support services, the DDA provides up to $2,000 to adults and children with intellectual or developmental disabilities to help them buy services or items to address their needs.
There were also proposals to change the DDA's reasonable and customary rates to align with wage rates from the federal Bureau of Labor Statistics, as well as eliminate wage exceptions for self-directed services participants.
Other proposed cuts to DDA services mentioned in the meeting include:
• Requiring providers to use up shared hours before using their dedicated hours, which are one-to-one and two-to-one staff-to-participant support hours based on the participant's needs
• Placing a cap of $5,000 on individual-directed and family-directed goods and services, which are activities, services and supplies to help participants with a need or goal, independence or community inclusion
Danielle Gummo, Self-Directed Services
Cash envelopes are shown at Danielle Gummo's home on March 10. The envelopes are used to budget how much money Danielle has to spend on different things in her life.
• Using money in a waiting list equity fund — which provides funds to participants on waiting lists for community services — to help pay for DDA community services
Maryland Department of Health spokesperson Chase Cook responded on Feb. 28 to questions a reporter had emailed and asked for responses from Hutchinson.
"The disabilities community has stepped up and made their voices heard. The department fully recognizes that the proposed reduction in the DDA budget has real consequences for the people who rely on these services," Cook wrote.
"We understand the impact that the DDA budget has on the lives of Marylanders. Most importantly, we are committed to working together to find solutions that honor the dignity and well-being of the developmental disabilities community."
Cook did not respond to an email sent March 20 asking if the DDA or Hutchinson has comment on the fiscal year 2026 budget and the potential cuts.
Advocates at the General Assembly
For about a year, state Sen. Karen Lewis Young, who represents Frederick County, has consistently heard concerns about the challenges people who self-direct started seeing in 2024.
Self-directed services is a topic close to her heart. In 2022, when she was a state delegate, she was the House sponsor for the Self-Direction Act.
This legislation expanded self-directed services and the funding people could access.
In an interview on Feb. 12, Lewis Young said she and other legislators were already concerned about budget cuts being made "on the backs of people with disabilities" when Moore's proposal came out.
"Even before the governor's budget came out, they [the DDA] were pulling back. They were denying services that were part of the bill, part of the law, and when people would call to challenge, they wouldn't even get a return phone call," Lewis Young said. "So, in a way, we saw this coming."
Lewis Young is a member of the state Senate's Budget and Taxation Committee, but she isn't a member of the subcommittee focused on health and human services.
She had spoken with her colleagues who do sit on the health subcommittee, as well as state Sen. Guy Guzzone, the chair of the Budget and Taxation Committee, and Senate President Bill Ferguson regarding the DDA cuts in Moore's budget.
State Del. Kris Fair, who also represents Frederick County, also met with the DDA along with Lewis Young. He was part of her staff when the Self-Direction Act passed.
In addition to giving people with disabilities more freedom, self-directed services also saves taxpayer money, Fair said in an interview on Feb. 5.
pull quote
He said "there is no middle ground here for me when it comes to the cost of self-direction."
He said "there is no middle ground here for me when it comes to the cost of self-direction."
"Self-direction is a program that is one of those unique win-wins in society. It is a program that is person-centered, that allows the person the autonomy and agency to actually lead their own service care model, and it saves the taxpayer money," Fair said. "... I cannot see a bigger win for all of us than this program."
The restorations
On March 20, the House of Delegates' Appropriations Committee announced the restoration of significant amounts of funding to the DDA budget, changing several of Moore's originally proposed cuts.
The committee's report on the budget bill, which can be accessed online at bit.ly/4iFRZMH, proposes to restore about $147 million in state funds to the DDA in fiscal year 2026. These changes can be found on page 239.
Some of these changes directly pertaining to self-directed services include that the reasonable and customary rates for staff will not be changed and wage exceptions will not be eliminated.
Danielle Gummo, Self-Directed Services
Danielle Gummo, left, dances with her roommate Sarah Hickman, right-center, at the Walkersville Bowling Center on March 10. The two have been living together since August of 2024. Both Danielle and Sarah use self-directed services.
However, the wage exceptions for people who self-direct will be allowed up to 15% above the maximum reasonable and customary rate and 10% above the standard maximum wage for the geographical differential counties.
Additionally, the committee rejected the proposal to eliminate low-intensity support services and allocated $2 million to the program for the coming fiscal year.
The committee also said to cap individual grants from this program at $500.
Under the committee's changes, the geographical differential rates for providers will not be eliminated. Those rates will instead be capped at 10% above the other state rates.
Additionally, the committee said that the DDA can't consider the availability of shared hours in a home when approving the dedicated hours a participant needs from their staff.
The state Senate's Budget and Taxation Committee accepted several of the House Appropriations Committee's recommendations, but it still made some adjustments.
One change by the Senate included capping geographical differential rates that are already more than 10% above other state rates to be at 10% above the rates.
The Senate committee also said the cap for low-intensity support services grants should be $1,000 instead of $500.
'Cautiously optimistic'
Carol Custer said self-directed services users were worried the original cuts would mean sacrificing qualified staff and the programs they need — and possibly being institutionalized.
She's glad that legislators were supportive of trying to reduce or eliminate the DDA cuts, and it's "appropriate" that funds were restored.
Some weight has been lifted off participants and staff members — but Custer said there's still work to be done to undo DDA policies that make it hard to self-direct efficiently.
"It comes back down to the access issue," Custer said. "Self-direction gets the same amount in their budget, but it's blocked by blocking the wages of the employees. It's blocked by denying access to funds for programming."
Lynne Gummo, another SDAN board member, has a 29-year-old daughter, Danielle Gummo, who self-directs. Danielle has Down syndrome and uses most of her DDA funding to pay her staff.
Lynne, who lives in Montgomery County, is part of Danielle's staff and handles day-to-day administrative tasks, such as tracking her daughter's expenses and maintaining Danielle's home in Frederick.
Danielle has multiple jobs, including working at Beans & Dreams - Nektario's Place, a coffee shop in Middletown, and lives with one roommate. She has a full life, seeing friends and her boyfriend after work and going bowling every week.
Danielle Gummo, Self-Directed Services
Danielle Gummo, left, watches as her boyfriend Bill Hutchison opens a birthday present from her at the Walkersville Bowling Center on March 10. The two have been dating for two years and attend bowling with other friends who use self-directed services.
Danielle Gummo, Self-Directed Services
Bill Hutchison reads a birthday card from his girlfriend Danielle Gummo at the Walkersville Bowling Center on March 10. The two have been dating for two years and attend bowling with other friends that use self-directed services.
Her staff consists of seven people, including a job coach who guides her through work and helps her with professional skills like spelling names and counting money.
Danielle also has multiple life coaches, who work with Danielle to achieve her goals and live independently.
In Danielle's home, there's a thick binder containing hundreds of pages of documents. It includes Danielle's budget, an employee manual and resources for staff members, like what life coaches need to check off during their shifts.
Danielle Gummo, Self-Directed Services
Danielle Gummo, left, and her roommate Sarah Hickman sit together at their home on March 10. The two have been living together since August 2024.
Lynne said that Danielle used traditional services in 2017 and began the switch to self-directed services in 2018. After the COVID-19 pandemic, Danielle started using only self-directed services.
When she used traditional services, Danielle lived with her father and stepmother. She would go to her service provider's program and then go home, Lynne said.
Danielle suffered "significant mental and emotional concerns" because she was so isolated, her mother said.
Lynne said traditional services didn't allow Danielle to have the staff she needs to live independently and work, like she does now.
Most of Danielle's DDA funding goes toward staff wages and giving them benefits, such as paid time off and holiday pay.
If there are cuts to DDA funding and how much Danielle receives to pay her staff, Lynne said, "we won't be able to make this work."
She doesn't want Danielle to experience the same isolation she felt while using traditional services, should they have to let staff go.
"If you look at how she spends her money, it's 95% staff," Lynne said. "... If you have somebody that works well with Danielle — and knock on wood, we have — we want to be able to keep them."
Lynne learned about the funding restorations on Thursday. She said she is still worried about the impact of capping certain wage rates, as that could impact her daughter's staff and whether they decide to keep working for Danielle or not.
Still, it was nice to see that the work and advocacy of so many people and organizations "created awareness at the legislation level to be able to make some changes and to address it."
"I'm cautiously optimistic because we still have a lot of work to do," she said.
"... There's a lot of misunderstanding about self-direction, what it really is doing to help support this community and that all of us, we all have a responsibility to continuously educate our communities and our legislators."
Danielle Gummo, Self-Directed Services
Lynne Gummo, Danielle Gummo's mother, looks through documents at her daughter's home. Lynne keeps track of different logs from support staff.
Shari Silverman, a Frederick County resident, has a 23-year-old son, Sam, who self-directs his services.
She said she was upset and worried about the proposed cuts because it could mean one-to-one staff support services are reduced, and Sam's staff members may leave if they make less money.
Silverman said her and her son's lives would change drastically if he couldn't have good caregivers.
She was worried she wouldn't be able to keep working because she would need to make sure she could take care of him, should his staff leave. Then, there'd be the issue of how Silverman could support herself financially.
She said in an interview Tuesday afternoon that she's "very happy and grateful" that legislators have worked hard to get funding back — but she's still worried, since the budget isn't concrete yet and needs to be approved by the General Assembly and Moore.
She also said she is still "a little untrusting" of the DDA, since the administration still has policies that make self-direction difficult and may not consult stakeholders on other future policy changes.
"I'm worried that I'm going to be able to continue to pay my staff what they're making, or if Sam gets new staff, whether I'd be able to pay them enough to keep them and make it a career and offer benefits," Silverman said.
Danielle Gummo, Self-Directed Services
Danielle Gummo, center, smiles while embracing her roommate Sarah Hickman, left, and Danielle's boyfriend Bill Hutchison as the trio prepares for a group photo at the Walkersville Bowling Center on March 10.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Washington Post
5 hours ago
- Washington Post
UN envoy to Myanmar warns that violence puts country on 'path to self-destruction'
UNITED NATIONS — Myanmar is on 'a path to self-destruction' if violence in the conflict-wracked Southeast Asian nation doesn't end, the U.N. envoy warned on Tuesday. Julie Bishop told the U.N. General Assembly that 'alarmingly' the violence didn't end after a powerful earthquake in late March devastated parts of the capital, Naypyitaw, and the country's second-largest city, Mandalay, killing more than 3,000 people and injuring thousands more.


Time Magazine
18 hours ago
- Time Magazine
Why Waymo's Self-Driving Cars Became a Target of Protesters in Los Angeles
As protesters and police clash across Los Angeles and beyond, a striking image from the mayhem has been that of graffiti-strewn white cars engulfed in flames. But these aren't ordinary cars. They've got sensors protruding from the top and sides—and, critically, they've got no drivers. Waymo, a robotaxi company, found itself at the center of the demonstrations against the Trump Administration's Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) raids after a group of protesters over the weekend, according to the Los Angeles Times, approached a parked row of the autonomous vehicles and smashed their windows, slashed their tires, spray-painted them with anti-ICE slogans, and set them on fire. While eye-catching, the trend is also extremely dangerous. Electric vehicles, like those in Waymo's fleet, have lithium-ion batteries, and in a post on X, the L.A. Police Department warned: 'Burning lithium-ion batteries release toxic gases, including hydrogen fluoride, posing risks to responders and those nearby.' According to Scientific American, first responders exposed to the fumes of burnt lithium-ion batteries without protection historically 'have developed throat burns and breathing difficulties upon arriving,' and, depending on the hydrogen fluoride levels, individuals can start coughing up blood within minutes of exposure. At least six Waymo vehicles across the county have reportedly been the target of vandalism, resulting in the company temporarily suspending operations in the area 'out of an abundance of caution.' California Gov. Gavin Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass have condemned the violence and destruction, which Newsom attributed to 'insurgent groups' and 'anarchists' who have infiltrated otherwise peaceful protests. President Donald Trump, who mobilized the National Guard to respond to the situation, has called the demonstrators ' troublemakers ' and ' paid insurrectionists.' Here's what to know. What is Waymo? Waymo is a subsidiary of Alphabet, Google's parent company, and grew out of the Google Self-Driving Car project that began in 2009. It launched its robotaxi business in 2020 in limited markets, which grew to include Los Angeles in 2024. While the company says its mission 'is to be the world's most trusted driver,' a national survey earlier this year found that '6 in 10 U.S. drivers still report being afraid to ride in a self-driving vehicle' while the proportion of people enthusiastic about the development of the technology has actually decreased from 18% in 2022 to 13% in 2025. Waymo vehicles were involved in 696 accidents across the U.S. between 2021 and 2024, or about one accident every other day. MKP Law Group, a Los-Angeles based firm that represents clients involved in accidents, acknowledged in a blog post that this statistic 'is not necessarily indicative of Waymo causing those accidents, as some may have been the fault of the other involved drivers.' Studies show that self-driving technology is likely safer than most human drivers. Waymo has also reportedly annoyed some people, including those who find self-driving vehicles to be an eyesore as well as locals where the vehicles routinely get stuck. Neighbors near a Waymo charging station in Santa Monica have complained about noise pollution caused by the driverless vehicles honking at each other in the parking lot. Waymo vehicles as well as other self-driving cars have previously been the target of vandals, particularly in California, where Waymo is headquartered. In January, a Waymo car was torn apart in Los Angeles. In February 2024, another Waymo car was smashed and set ablaze in San Francisco. And in July 2024, a man was charged with slashing the tires of 17 Waymo cars in San Francisco. Why is Waymo being targeted in the L.A. protests? Several potential explanations have emerged for why Waymo vehicles were targeted during the protests in Los Angeles. The Wall Street Journal reported that part of the reason the cars were vandalized was to obstruct traffic—a traditional, albeit controversial, protest tactic. Some social media users have suggested that self-driving vehicles in particular have become a new target because they are seen by protesters as ' part of the police surveillance state.' Waymo's cars are equipped with cameras that provide a 360-degree view of their surroundings, a tool that has been tapped by law enforcement, according to reports. Independent tech news site 404 Media reported in April that the Los Angeles Police Department obtained footage from a Waymo driverless car to use as part of an investigation into an unrelated hit-and-run. And Bloomberg reported in 2023 that police have increasingly relied on self-driving cars and their cameras for video evidence. Chris Gilliard, a fellow at the Social Science Research Council, told Bloomberg that self-driving vehicles are 'essentially surveillance cameras on wheels,' adding: 'We're supposed to be able to go about our business in our day-to-day lives without being surveilled unless we are suspected of a crime, and each little bit of this technology strips away that ability.' Waymo told Bloomberg at the time that it 'carefully' reviews every request from police 'to make sure it satisfies applicable laws and has a valid legal process.' Some activists have also suggested that the burning of Waymo vehicles should garner less sympathy from onlookers. 'There are people on here saying it's violent and domestic terrorism to set a Waymo car on fire,' racial justice organizer Samuel Sinyangwe posted on X. 'A robot car? Are you going to demand justice for the robot dogs next? But not the human beings repeatedly shot with rubber bullets in the street? What kind of politics is this?' 'There is no human element to Waymo,' climate and labor organizer Elise Joshi similarly posted on X. 'It's expensive and bought-out politicians are using it as an excuse to defund public transit. I pray on Waymo's downfall.'
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Tesla Is Launching Robotaxis in Austin. Safety Advocates Are Concerned
Elon Musk's ugly public spat with former bestie Donald Trump is sure to cause more headaches for the Silicon Valley mogul down the line. Not only has he sacrificed any influence he might have with the White House by blasting the president for his association with the late sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein, but some in the administration have floated the idea of reviving regulatory investigations into Musk's corporate empire. The timing of such a threat could hardly be worse. That's because Tesla, Musk's electric vehicle manufacturer, is about to face a make-or-break test of self-driving technology that the CEO believes is key to its future value — yet has been the subject of a years-long probe by the Justice Department into potential securities and wire fraud. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is meanwhile conducting multiple investigations into the possible risks posed by the same tech. More from Rolling Stone The Biggest Boondoggles in Trump's Big Beautiful Bill 'Dejected' Trump Says Relationship With Musk Is Over; Calls Him a 'Big-Time Drug Addict': Report Vance Says 'Trump Didn't Do Anything Wrong With Jeffrey Epstein' Last fall, at a carefully staged event on the Warner Bros. Discovery studio lot in Burbank, California, Musk unveiled what he called a 'Cybercab,' a sleek, two-seat vehicle with no steering wheel. This was the long-awaited prototype of Tesla's robotaxi, or a fully autonomous, driverless passenger vehicle. Back in 2019, Musk had predicted that existing Tesla models would become capable of driving themselves without human oversight once their 'Full Self-Driving' (FSD) driver-assistance software had been adequately updated. Now he was demoing a different, built-to-purpose model, seeming to signal that Teslas already on the road would not be upgraded to robotaxi capability. Then, in a January earnings call, Musk offered one of his typically optimistic predictions about a timetable for a paid robotaxi service, similar Amazon's Zoox, or Waymo, a subsidiary of Google parent company Alphabet. 'Teslas will be in the wild, with no one in them, in June, in Austin,' Musk said, referring to the Texas city that has been a base of operations for his businesses in recent years. Investors were skeptical. After all, Musk has a history of overpromising, and the Cybercab unveiled barely three months earlier was essentially a glorified movie prop. By late May, however, Musk was declaring significant progress on a robotaxi launch. 'For the past several days, Tesla has been testing self-driving Model Y cars (no one in driver's seat) on Austin public streets with no incidents,' he posted on X on May 28. 'A month ahead of schedule. Next month, first self-delivery from factory to customer.' It would appear, in this case, that Tesla had defaulted to the original idea of modifying its commercially available models to make them autonomous rather than holding off until it had a fleet of Cybercabs. Aside from stray comments like these, little is known about what Tesla's initial robotaxi program will look like. The company is reportedly targeting a launch date of June 12, with just 10-20 vehicles to start. A Morgan Stanley analyst — not Tesla itself — has claimed that rides will be available by invite only, not to the general public, and that the cars will be remotely supervised by operators prepared to take manual control if needed. That the automaker is keeping most details under wraps has left plenty of room for questions, doubts, and concerns — particularly as Waymo and other competitors tend to collect data and conduct local testing for far longer periods before welcoming passengers aboard. Dan O'Dowd, a software entrepreneur and founder of the tech safety group the Dawn Project, which has routinely showcased the shortcomings of Tesla's FSD tech, predicts that the robotaxi rollout will amount to lackluster stunt. 'Musk's upcoming robotaxi launch will still be nothing more than a bigger version of the 1950s Disneyland ride that Tesla demonstrated at [the Cybercab] event last year, if it even takes place at all,' he says. 'Despite Elon Musk claiming that Tesla was less than a year away from solving autonomy for nearly a decade and decrying the real robotaxi companies for geo-fencing and remote supervision, Tesla plans for its so-called robotaxis to only be able to drive around certain parts of Austin, avoiding intersections that are difficult,' while being remotely supervised,' O'Dowd notes. (Musk admitted in a recent interview that the robotaxis would be 'geo-fenced,' or restricted from certain parts of the city.) 'Tesla has also shown itself incapable of developing a working Cybercab, instead leaning on its Model Y in another backtrack on Elon's many false promises about solving autonomy,' O'Dowd adds. 'The golden Model 3 mules that Tesla is using to develop the Cybercab's software clearly demonstrate that Tesla has put the cart before the horse with the Cybercab.' On June 2, an X user posted a video of a Model 3 in a Tesla lot in San Diego that had seemingly been modified to resemble the Cybercab design, with its side mirrors removed and the rear windshield painted gold along with the body panels. The clip was taken by many Tesla observers as evidence that it was also using Model 3s to run autonomous driving experiments ahead of the robotaxi pilot program. Brett Schreiber, a partner at the San Diego law firm Singleton Schreiber who is currently pursuing multiple injury and wrongful death suits against Tesla over accidents involving its driver-assistance features, agrees that the company is backing down from the Cybercab concept Musk presented last year. 'It is a retreat on the idea that they are going to build out a new vehicle that is capable of autonomy,' he says, though 'a repeat of the continued lies and misrepresentations' from the CEO — namely, that existing Teslas can be turned into robotaxis. 'There is nothing about the vehicle today, whether you slap some lipstick on the pig of a Model Y, or any other vehicle in their production fleet, that [makes it] capable of level four or level five autonomy without driver intervention. They simply haven't gotten there, and just because they keep saying so doesn't make it true.' Levels four and five of driving automation refer to systems in which 'a human driver is not needed,' per NHTSA guidelines. Tesla's FSD is currently classified as level two, meaning that a human driver 'is fully responsible' for operating the vehicle even while assistance features are engaged. Schreiber believes that Tesla brought the robotaxi project to Texas for 'a more lax environment with respect to enforcement,' saying that 'in many states, California being one of them, they would not be allowed to do this in the way that they are doing it. They fled California for a lot of reasons, the least of which was the fact that they felt more constrained by their ability to roll out and continue to use the public roadways as their own personal test track, and use the members of the public as the guinea pigs in the grand experiment.' Indeed, the Texas Department of Transportation does not require any special permits for operating autonomous vehicles — only that these meet the same safety and insurance requirements as other vehicles. In California, by contrast, the Department of Motor Vehicles 'issues permits to manufacturers that test and deploy autonomous vehicles on California public roads.' Tesla, which does not have a press department, did not reply to a request for comment on details of the robotaxi launch or why Austin was chosen as the site. As for regulatory enforcement by NHTSA, it would largely come after the fact, since autonomous vehicle permitting is a state matter, not a federal one. 'Under U.S. law, NHTSA does not pre-approve new technologies or vehicle systems — rather, manufacturers certify that each vehicle meets NHTSA's rigorous safety standards, and the agency investigates incidents involving potential safety defects,' a sposkesperson for the agency tells Rolling Stone. 'Following an assessment of those reports and other relevant information, NHTSA will take any necessary actions to protect road safety.' NHTSA, as it happens, was one of a handful of regulators scrutinizing Musk's businesses to face cuts imposed by his so-called Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), with at least four percent of staff dismissed. In Schreiber's estimation, the agency's Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) 'has been completely gutted,' hampering its ability to go after Tesla. Even so, the ODI did send a letter to Tesla's director of field quality in May, requesting extensive information about the proposed automated driving system for its robotaxis in order 'to understand Tesla's technologies and operational use cases further, including to assess the ability of Tesla's system to react appropriately to reduced roadway visibility conditions.' NHTSA's probe into Tesla's FSD involves several accidents in which the system faced conditions such as fog or sun glare, including a 2023 collision in Arizona in which a Model Y struck and killed a pedestrian while driving into direct sunlight. That investigation 'remains open,' the agency spokesperson says. Meanwhile, if Tesla doesn't answer NHTSA's questions about how its robotaxis work and what steps it is taking to ensure their safe operation by a deadline of June 19, or secure a filing extension, it could be subject to civil penalties. By that time, of course, people may already be hailing driverless Teslas in Texas, with passengers, other motorists, and bystanders all at the mercy of a supposed breakthrough in vehicle autonomy. That's what has safety advocates like O'Dowd so alarmed. 'The people of Austin did not sign up to be crash-test dummies for Musk's reckless deployment of Tesla's defective and dangerous Full Self-Driving software,' he says. If the thought has ever bothered Musk, he hasn't said so. Upon stepping down from DOGE, he wrote on X that he would return to a '24/7' focus on his companies, Tesla in particular, as 'we have critical technologies rolling out.' Best of Rolling Stone Every Super Bowl Halftime Show, Ranked From Worst to Best The United States of Weed Gaming Levels Up