logo
SC seeks Centre's response on presidential inaction  over Punjab Bills on Gurudwaras, DGP selection mechanism

SC seeks Centre's response on presidential inaction over Punjab Bills on Gurudwaras, DGP selection mechanism

Time of India30-07-2025
NEW DELHI: At a time when it is seized of the Presidential Reference for the
Supreme Court
's opinion SC's power to fix timelines for the constitutional heads on Bills passed by Assemblies, the apex court on Tuesday sought the Centre's response to a petition by Punjab govt alleging presidential inaction on its two Bills relating to Gurudwaras and selection of DGP.
A bench of Chief Justice B R Gavai and Justice K Vinod Chandran issued notice to the Union govt after senior advocate Arvind Datar, appearing for the Punjab govt, complained that two Bills passed by Assembly two years back - The Sikh Gurudwaras (Amendment) Bill, 2023 and The Punjab Police (Amendment) Bill, 2023 – have been kept in limbo by the President after the Governor arbitrarily referred these to her.
In its writ petition under Article 32 of the petition which entitles anyone to move the SC directly for violation of his/her fundamental right, the Bhagwant Singh Mann govt through advocate Nupur Kumar said it challenged 'first, the Governor's referral of two bills to the President of India for her consideration in contravention to the aid and advice of the council of ministers in the absence of any constitutional trigger or any extraordinary breakdown of democratic governance.
'
It also challenged 'the President's simpliciter inaction to act on both the bills without granting assent, or withholding assent, which must be accompanied by furnishing reasons for such withholding' as was ruled by the SC in its Apr 8 judgment, which had triggered the President send a Reference to the apex court for its opinion on the power of the SC in laying down timeline, which is not prescribed by Constitution, for the President and Governors.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Indonesia: New Container Houses (Prices May Surprise You)
Container House | Search ads
Search Now
Undo
The Sikh Gurudwaras (Amendment) Bill, 2023, seeks to mandates the Board constituted under the Sikh Gurudwaras Act, 1925, to propagate teachings of the Gurus by making uninterrupted live feed of the holy Gurbani from Sri Harmandir Sahib available to all media houses, platforms, channels, etc., free of cost and restrains anyone broadcasting the Holy Gurbani from telecasting any advertisement 30 minutes prior to and after the broadcast.
The Punjab Police (Amendment) Bill, 2023, seeks to amend the Punjab Police Act, 2007, to create an independent mechanism for selection and appointment of suitable persons to the post of Director General of Police (DGP). The state said the amendment would free the selection from political or executive interference, while keeping in view the peculiar conditions in Punjab.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Inside BCCI's RTI Escape: How Indias Richest Sports Body Avoided Public Scrutiny In New Sports Bill
Inside BCCI's RTI Escape: How Indias Richest Sports Body Avoided Public Scrutiny In New Sports Bill

India.com

time28 minutes ago

  • India.com

Inside BCCI's RTI Escape: How Indias Richest Sports Body Avoided Public Scrutiny In New Sports Bill

The Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) has once again displayed its political and financial clout, dodging a long-looming inclusion under the Right to Information (RTI) Act. In a significant development that is already stirring debate across the sports fraternity, the Union Sports Ministry has amended the National Sports Governance Bill to exempt BCCI from being classified as a "public authority" — a title that would have opened it to public scrutiny. The earlier draft of the Sports Bill tabled in Parliament on July 23 had explicitly included all National Sports Federations (NSFs) within the scope of the RTI Act, 2005. It aimed to enforce accountability across Indian sport by mandating transparency in decision-making, team selections, fund usage, and governance. However, a key clause — 'a recognised sports organisation shall be considered a public authority under the Right to Information Act' — has now been quietly omitted. The revised version of the Bill specifies that only bodies 'receiving grants or financial assistance from the Central or State Government' will be considered public authorities under RTI, effectively sparing the BCCI, which is financially self-reliant and does not receive direct government funding. Why BCCI Was Let Off the Hook Sources within the Sports Ministry clarified that the amendment was necessary to remove legal grey areas and prevent the Bill from facing potential litigation. 'The amended clause defines public authority as an entity relying on government funds or assistance. This ensures compliance with the RTI Act,' a senior ministry official told The Indian Express. The exemption appears tailored to the BCCI's long-standing argument — that its operations are entirely independent of government subsidies, and hence it should not be forced into transparency obligations meant for publicly funded bodies. Despite this, watchdogs argue that the BCCI has enjoyed indirect government benefits such as tax exemptions, land grants, and access to public infrastructure. Olympic Push Forces BCCI's Partial Compliance While BCCI may have dodged the RTI net, it isn't walking away entirely unscathed. The amended Sports Bill still mandates that the BCCI must register as a National Sports Federation (NSF) — a pre-condition for India's ambition to include cricket in the 2036 Olympics, where India is bidding to be host. This compliance will bring new obligations: the formation of an Ethics Commission, Athletes Committee, and implementation of the Safe Sports policy, among others. Moreover, any instance of government assistance — including use of stadiums, security, or land — would open a window for scrutiny under the RTI Act, albeit limited to those specific interactions. Expert Opinions: Transparency vs Autonomy The move has reignited discussions around sports governance and accountability. Legal experts and former officials cite the Supreme Court's 2016 RM Lodha Committee recommendations and the Law Commission's 275th report in 2018, both of which endorsed the inclusion of BCCI under RTI due to its public function and historical government benefits. Critics argue that while financial independence is a valid point, the BCCI's monopolistic control over cricket in India — a sport followed by over a billion people — necessitates transparency. 'You can't be a private body when it suits you and a public institution when it benefits you,' noted a senior legal analyst.

If Prez Denies Appointment…Cong plans ‘Chalo Rashtrapati Bhavan'
If Prez Denies Appointment…Cong plans ‘Chalo Rashtrapati Bhavan'

Hans India

time28 minutes ago

  • Hans India

If Prez Denies Appointment…Cong plans ‘Chalo Rashtrapati Bhavan'

Hyderabad: In case of denial of President's appointment, Telangana Congress leaders, led by Chief Minister A Revanth Reddy, will be organising 'Chalo Rashtrapati Bhavan' on Thursday. According to party sources, the leaders are still optimistic about the appointment. But in case President Droupadi Murmu denies, the next plan of action would be marching towards the official residence of the President. 'Our next plan of action in case an appointment is denied will be building further pressure. We shall be holding a dharna at Rashtrapati Bhavan. 'Chalo Rashtrapati Bhavan' will be the next idea to highlight the issue of BC reservations in the national capital,' said a BC leader in Delhi. Meanwhile, Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi who could not attend the Mahadharna at Jantar Mantar as he was attending final rights of Shibu Soren urged President Droupadi Murmu to give her assent to Telangana's reservation bills. "The Telangana Government and Congress sat on a dharna in Delhi today, demanding President's assent to the law reserving 42% for backward classes in education, employment and local government. This law is a major advance towards the Constitution's vision of social justice, grounded in data from the caste census," the Congress leader posted on X.

Important cases listed in Supreme Court on Thursday
Important cases listed in Supreme Court on Thursday

News18

time37 minutes ago

  • News18

Important cases listed in Supreme Court on Thursday

Agency: PTI Last Updated: Representational image (Image: News18) Important cases listed in the Supreme Court on Thursday, August 7: * SC to hear pleas of women Army officers of Short Service Commission (SSC) seeking permanent commissions. * SC to hear Lakhimpur Kheri violence case. * SC to hear pleas against various provisions of PMLA. * SC to hear PIL seeking measures to save endangered Great Indian Bustard. * SC to hear PIL of All India Drug Action Network on drugs' pricing. * SC to hear income tax dispute pertaining to Congress. PTI SJK DIV DIV First Published: Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store