Western Ghats under direct threat from Sharavathi project: Report
Karnataka Power Corporation Limited
Lion-Tailed Macaque
biodiversity conservation
environmental clearance
Varahi Pumped Storage Project
A report from a city-based non-governmental organisation has highlighted that legally protected wildlife sanctuaries in theare under direct threat from various projects, especially the Sharavathi Pumped Storage Project.According to the report by Mapping Malnad, the's (KPCL) Sharavathi Pumped Storage Hydroelectric Project is advancing based on 'inadequate, misleading, and flawed data,' raising significant environmental and legal concerns. The project, which proposes to divert 279 acres of dense evergreen and semi-evergreen forests in the Sharavathi(LTM) Wildlife Sanctuary, has already been approved by the State Wildlife Board and the Karnataka government. It now awaits Stage-I approval from the Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change (MoEF&CC).'This project will create a system that consumes eight hours of coal-powered energy to generate just six hours of hydropower. It is fundamentally inefficient and results in a net energy loss,' said Nirmala Gowda, founder of Mapping Malnad. 'More critically, it opens up dense evergreen forests—vital carbon sinks and turns them into carbon sources.'The report argues that the project, while marketed as a green initiative to stabilise the power grid, is actually a setback to climate goals and. It also warns that the project'shas been obtained by misrepresenting forest land use. KPCL claimed a requirement of 39.79 hectares in its application, but clearance was granted for 54.155 hectares. As per the Forest (Conservation) Rules, any diversion above 50 hectares necessitates a Biodiversity Impact Assessment—one that KPCL successfully avoided through underreporting.Moreover, while KPCL claimed only 20 trees would be felled, Mapping Malnad estimates the true number at over 16,000, including massive girth evergreen trees. The project also involves the use of 18,000 tons of industrial explosives and will generate approximately 14.49 lakh cubic metres of excavated muck adding to the environmental burden.The sanctuary is a crucial habitat for numerous endangered species, particularly the Lion-tailed Macaque, a primate found only in the Western Ghats. The Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972 allows diversions within sanctuaries only if they are in the interest of wildlife, a standard that, the report argues, this project fails to meet.Gowda said that project documents submitted to authorities contain misinformation and key omissions that compromise the integrity of the clearance process. The project has also been fragmented into smaller components, which environmentalists say is a tactic used to bypass comprehensive review of its ecological impact.Worryingly, the Sharavathi project is not an isolated case. The report flags that the proposedwill require about 612 acres from the Someshwara and Mookambika Wildlife Sanctuaries. It warns that the approvals granted so far are setting a dangerous precedent, with at least 11 more such projects potentially targeting protected areas across the Western Ghats.'No hydroelectric project that clears 279 acres of evergreen habitat, fells nearly 15,000 trees, and disrupts a fragile forest ecosystem can credibly claim to be in the interest of wildlife,' Gowda said. 'Yet, the Karnataka government has greenlit it.'The report was developed in consultation with grassroots activists and reflects growing citizen concern over weakening environmental governance. Gowda called for the immediate establishment of a 'Western Ghats Ecology Authority' to strengthen protections and ensure accountability.'These forests are not just ecological treasures—they are also Bengaluru's most vital water infrastructure,' she said. 'We hope the authorities will reconsider this project in light of the facts. It simply doesn't make sense.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
9 hours ago
- The Hindu
Forest Advisory Committee defers Sharavathi PSP proposal by KPCL, seeks clarifications on tree cutting
The forest advisory committee of the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change has deferred the Karnataka Power Corporation Limited (KPCL) proposal for the Sharavati Pumped Storage Project, seeking clarification with regard to the cutting of trees in the project area. The KPCL has proposed the project to generate 2,000 MW of power in the Sharavati valley, making use of the Talakalale and the Gerusoppa reservoirs. The KPCL has sought the diversion of 54.155 hectares of forestland for the project with the outlay of ₹10,240 crore. The advisory committee, in its report on August 7, stated that it had a detailed discussion with the Deputy DGF (Central) of the regional office in Bengaluru, and the nodal officer of the State government. It sought clarifications/information for further considerations on three issues. NBW meeting Making a reference to the recommendations of the standing committee of the National Board of Wildlife (NBW) in its 84th meeting held on June 26, the committee wanted the status of compliance. The NBW, in its recommendations, stated that most of the 518 trees in the area where a surge tank had been proposed could be saved if an alternative underground structure was constructed with a narrow opening for an air outlet. Further, the NBW stated that over 12,000 trees, enumerated for felling for the construction of the 12.3-km road from Nagarabasti Kere to Begodi, could be saved if the proposed underground road was extended up to the base of the pump house. Such modification in the plan could also help the lion-tailed macaque, the flagship species of the sanctuary. The advisory committee wanted the status of compliance with regard to these recommendations. Besides that, it also sought the State government's comments on the issues raised by the regional office of the MOEF in the site inspection report (SIR). The regional office had not recommended the proposal of the project, citing 15 reasons. Praneetha Paul, DIGF, who conducted the inspection, expressed concern about the damage the project could cause to the Western Ghats. Further, the committee had sought the comments of the regional office of Bengaluru on the concerns raised in the SIR. Protest to intensify Meanwhile, environmentalists of the Malnad region, opposing the project, have resolved to intensify their protests. A meeting was held in Sagar in this regard on August 11. Environmentalists Akhilesh Chipli, Shivanand Kugve, Venkatesh Kavalakodu, and others attended the meeting and decided to spread awareness on the impacts of the project among the people in Shivamogga and Uttara Kannada districts.
Time of India
20 hours ago
- Time of India
MCD continues drive, says no plan to release stray dogs caught so far
New Delhi: After Supreme Court reserved its order on stray dogs on Thursday, Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) said it will continue its drive against aggressive and attacking dogs. The Animal Birth Control (ABC) Rules permit it to keep such dogs under observation for 10 days, it added. "We are adhering to the court's direction dedicatedly and will continue our drives against diseased and attacking dogs, based on the complaints received from the residents on the 311 app, helplines or zonal numbers. We have enough space to keep them and get them treated too through veterinary doctors, if required. We can take help from volunteers as well," said mayor Raja Iqbal Singh. The civic body said it has no plan to release the stray dogs caught recently, as there is no specific order from the court in this regard. "We are providing them proper food and care," said an official. You Can Also Check: Delhi AQI | Weather in Delhi | Bank Holidays in Delhi | Public Holidays in Delhi | Gold Rates Today in Delhi | Silver Rates Today in Delhi According to officials, if aggressive dogs need to be shifted permanently to shelter homes, ABC norms will have to be changed. They added that they had made a submission in this regard to Delhi govt earlier. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Live Update: The Strategy Uses By Successful Intraday Trader TradeWise Learn More Undo In a meeting held earlier this month, the chief secretary had directed to proceed in establishing shelters and achieve 70-80% sterilisation within two months. According to officials, aggressive dogs can continue to be furious after sterilisation too. "ABC rules do not permit keeping dogs in shelters permanently and relocating them to other places. To keep them under observation for a longer tenure, there is a need for amendment in the ABC rules, which can be done by Centre only," said an official. MCD recently formed a subcommittee and involved dog lovers and other stakeholders to look at the stray menace. "In recent meetings, we recommended various sites for establishing dog shelters and pounds, including Ghogha where we have 82 acres of land available and Dwarka where a 2.5-acre space is available. But we can't keep aggressive dogs permanently there unless there is provision in the ABC rules," said the official. Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and silver prices in your area. Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with Happy Independence Day wishes , messages , and quotes !
Indian Express
a day ago
- Indian Express
MCD identifies land to build stray dog shelters in Delhi following Supreme Court order
The Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) has identified land to build stray dog shelters following a series of marathon meetings since Monday in the wake of the Supreme Court order directing authorities in Delhi-NCR to remove all stray dogs from public spaces and permanently relocate them to shelters within eight weeks. An MCD official said the municipality has vacant lands available for shelters, which can be constructed after Thursday's hearing on the matter. A bench of Justices J B Pardiwala and R Mahadevan on August 11 directed the relocation of stray dogs to shelters. The suo motu matter was Wednesday referred to a three-judge bench of Justices Vikram Nath, Sandeep Mehta and N V Anjaria, which is set to hear it Thursday. The MCD official said the process of relocating stray dogs has already started. 'In phase 1, we caught around 150 aggressive dogs after identifying them and upon receiving complaints from the resident welfare association. We can accommodate at least 2,000 dogs in the existing facility of Animal Birth Control (ABC) centres (facilities for sterilising and vaccinating stray dogs to control their population).' 'If the Supreme Court orders to relocate the dogs, we will build a shelter on 3 acres of MCD land located in Dwarka which can easily accommodate up to 2,000-3,000 dogs,' the official said, adding that majority of the dog can be relocated in phase 3 by building a shelter on the 82 acres of land in the Ghogha village. 'However, this can start only if we can get funds from the Centre or the Delhi government since it will require taking permanent care of the dogs, including food, shelter and treatment,' the official added. As of Wednesday night, approximately 300 dogs have been picked up from the Red Fort area over the past three days, and verbal orders have been issued to the ABC centres not to release them back. 'We have stationed our vans around the clock at the Red Fort and instructed the ABC centres not to release any dogs,' said the MCD official. While pronouncing the August 11 order, the Supreme Court said that 'there should not be any compromise in undertaking any exercise' and warned that 'if any individual or organisation comes in the way of picking up stray dogs or rounding them up, we will proceed to take action against any such resistance'. This order has received mixed reactions; some welcome it as a necessary measure for public safety, while animal rights activists and welfare groups termed it impractical. They stated that the order violated the Animal Birth Control (Dogs) Rules, 2001, which require that after vaccination, dogs should be returned to the same locality from where they were picked up.
