Do not let LGBT veterans scheme to ‘become damaged', 45 MPs urge Healey
In a letter to John Healey, the cross-party MPs warned that some veterans facing financial crisis are 'suffering from severe mental health issues' without support 'from the outset'.
LGBT veterans who faced mistreatment, including dismissal and bullying, because of their sexuality between July 1967 and January 2000 can make a claim through a financial recognition scheme worth £75 million.
Liberal Democrat MP Ben Maguire, who signed the letter, accused the Government of 'now failing the very veterans they pledged to support'.
The North Cornwall MP said: 'The slow pace of delivery is unacceptable and causing avoidable distress.
'Many of these LGBT veterans have already endured lifetimes of shame, stigma and rejection.'
Mr Maguire added: 'These veterans should not have to suffer all over again because of bureaucratic delays.
'That's why I'm very pleased to have colleagues from right across Parliament join me in demanding faster payments, and clearer transparency, for MPs and the public.'
The letter has 46 backers in total, including the Liberal Democrats' defence spokeswoman Helen Maguire, several Labour and Plaid Cymru MPs, and Stonewall charity co-founder Lord Cashman.
Dame Caroline Dinenage, the Conservative MP for Gosport who also signed the letter, told the PA news agency that LGBT veterans had faced an 'injustice that's gone on for far too long'.
The MPs have requested that the Ministry of Defence (MoD) 'widens the criteria for prioritisation to include all those in financial crisis', to applicants 'who are in most need of a swift decision suffering from financial crisis – not just when they are in ongoing bankruptcy proceedings in court'.
Fast-tracked applicants under the existing scheme include claimants who are facing bankruptcy or having their home repossessed through a court process.
'Many of these veterans who are in financial crisis, but are not yet in the court system, are still suffering from severe mental health issues because of a lack of financial support provided by the redress scheme from the outset,' the MPs warned.
They suggested that instead of making veterans who were dismissed or administratively discharged wait for their full award, 'by making an immediate payment of £50,000 to all these veterans who qualify, the MoD can alleviate the pressure and anger being felt by this community and would provide a quick win for the MoD' before a panel considers whether to issue further payouts on a case-by-case basis.
'These veterans have struggled immensely to progress their claims, and after years of waiting for signs of hope are still waiting for settlement and closure,' the MPs added.
'We cannot allow this process to become damaged in the same way as other compensation schemes have.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Evening Standard
18 minutes ago
- Evening Standard
Future of punting in Cambridge faces threat from locks ‘in danger of collapse'
It comes ahead of a visit to the city by Liberal Democrat leader Sir Ed Davey on Friday, who plans to highlight the lack of investment in the lock system and how this could lead to a failure of the sluices and wears.
The Independent
18 minutes ago
- The Independent
Stop working in the heat? If only it were that simple, Angela Rayner…
It is reported that Angela Rayner has called for the right to stop working during heatwaves. It was, to be fair, during her time in opposition, and her old tweet (from 2022) was, and is, in the public domain. So no secret socialist plot. On a newspaper story headlined 'Unions call for maximum UK workplace temperature as heatwave descends', she commented: 'We need urgent guidance for safe indoor working temperatures and the government must ensure employers allow staff to work flexibly in this heat. Where is their plan to keep people safe?' Obviously there's been a (delayed) backlash to this 'anti-growth' measure, and it is true that it is another layer of regulation. However, I have some sympathy for Rayner's view – for I have personal experience of it being too hot in the kitchen, so to speak. Many years ago, I worked at a crisp factory. I won't bore you with the details of my employment, but it should not surprise you that a crisps factory – while no steel furnace – is a very hot place to labour. There were no windows, for a start, because the sun's rays would damage the precious product at every stage of its processing, from raw potato to finished cellophane bag (partly clear in those days). The cookers were basically chip pans the size of a bungalow, and the rumbling conveyor-belts and clattering packing machines pumped out more racket and heat. We had big posters near where we clocked in and out, detailing the main provisions of the Health and Safety at Work Act 1974, and – my memory is playing me up, I now realise – I thought there was a maximum temperature defined by law. But we've actually never had such a thing – only a minimum (13C for manual work, 16C otherwise). Anyway, during a hot summer, the place was almost unbearable. But instead of a legal intervention, the company management and the Transport and General Workers Union and had an arrangement whereby we'd get free soft drinks – Fanta, Panda Pops, Hay's lemonade – and a more relaxed attitude to taking 'comfort breaks'. Some of us felt the Union had been too accommodating and thought we should have been paid extra for conditions that, foolishly, we compared to working on the Burma Railway. The point is that even though there wasn't some kind of temperature trigger that meant everything had to stop, when things obviously started to get silly, ways were found to get round the problem. Production was hardly affected, though I do wonder whether having some of us succumb to heatstroke was an acceptable price to pay to help stave off economic recession. Some places, as mentioned, are just going to be hot whatever the weather outside, so some arbitrary rule about stopping work at a given temperature isn't practical. But a stronger obligation on employers to ameliorate things is perfectly sensible. These days, we work in offices where air-conditioning is virtually universal, and at home, where we can go around in a state of undress (I am fully clothed as I write this, out of a misplaced sense of decency). The heat doesn't get to us so easily. However, climate change does present new challenges and requires some new thinking, drawing on the experiences of countries that have long since had to adapt to the summer torpor. Maybe it's time for a siesta for all the hard workers, as they churn out crisps and other items?
BBC News
18 minutes ago
- BBC News
UK bioethanol industry faces collapse after government rejects rescue
The UK's bioethanol industry faces collapse, after a government decision not to offer the sector a rescue country's two major producers, Hull-based Vivergo Fuels and the Ensus plant in Redcar on Teesside, have both warned that without government support they will be forced to close, after a deal to allow US ethanol to be imported tariff-free. Associated British Foods (ABF), which owns Vivergo, said the government's had decision to notsupport a "key national asset" was "deeply regrettable".The government said it worked closely with the companies since June, but had decided not to provide them with taxpayer funds "in the national interest". The US-UK trade pact, agreed in May, removed a 19% tariff on ethanol imported from the US up to a quota of 1.4bn litres. That is approximately equivalent to the current size of the UK firms have previously said the trade agreement had made their businesses "commercially unviable".Vivergo said it had presented the government with a plan to return the firm to profitability."In making this decision, the government has thrown away billions in potential growth in the Humber, a sovereign capability in clean fuels that had the chance to lead the said jobs in clean energy would now move overseas."This plant should always have been profitable under the right regulatory environment, as similar plants in Western Europe demonstrate. The Government's own commissioned analysis spells out that Vivergo could and should be profitable under that Ensus has also been approached for two plants employ 270 people, but their closure could affect thousands more in the supply chain.A government spokesperson said after working with the companies over weeks to understand "the financial challenges they have faced over the past decade", the government had taken the difficult decision not to offer direct funding "as it would not provide value for the taxpayer or solve the long-term problems the industry faces".The government said it recognised this was a "difficult time for the workers and their families" and said it would work with trade unions, local partners and the companies to support those a fuel made from wheat, corn or sugar beet, is added to fuels such as E10 petrol in the the government has also said that by 2030, it wants 10% of all fuel used in planes to come from sustainable sources, one of which is bioethanol industry buys thousands of tonnes of wheat from UK farms, and Ensus also produces 30% of the UK's commercial carbon dioxide – used in soft drinks, medical and nuclear government said it would continue to work on measures to ensure the resilience of the CO2 supply chain.
