Nappies cut ruled out as London-based experts drafted in to help NHS Grampian save millions
Health bosses have voted against plans to slash spending on newborn tots amid fears scrapping hospital nappies 'would do more harm than good'.
A shock dossier earlier this week revealed a range of services across the north-east could be axed or reduced to save the health board £23 million.
This included halting cancer treatment and elective surgeries on public holidays and even stopping giving out disposable nappies for most newborn babies.
The proposed cost-cutting measures would have impacted expectant mums at maternity wards in Aberdeen, Inverurie, Peterhead and Elgin.
It comes as NHS Grampian bosses scramble to recoup millions of pounds after officially becoming the most broke health board in Scotland.
They currently have a staggering £68m overspend that they aim to reduce to £45m in the next 12 months.
And now, external experts have been drafted in to help them balance the books.
Government officials haven hired London-based advisors KPMG to crunch the numbers and help NHS Grampian come up with an expansive savings plan.
They say the cash crisis within the health board has escalated to the point where there is a need for experts to intervene amid concerns over failing to improve services.
Adam Coldwells reassured board members that NHS Grampian will still be 'absolutely in charge' of the recovery plan and the changes they implement further down the line.
However, the external body will be there to monitor their progress, give advice on possible additional savings the board might have missed and 'hold them to account'.
The interim chief executive said this is a necessary measure to turn the health board's fortunes around as 'the scale of the [financial] challenge is significant'.
And he stressed this would be a good opportunity to learn and improve.
He added: 'Clearly it's an extremely serious issue and relates primarily to our financial position, which as a board we've been working on for the last two years.
'We've certainly struggled to find the scale of savings that we need to.
'I'm optimistic this external support from an organisation, who has done this lots of times, will be able to find things that we've simply not been able to identify ourselves.'
Members of the NHS Grampian board were later presented with a detailed report outlining 79 cost-cutting measures which will be implemented within the next year.
Health bosses admit about a dozen of those could have direct impact on vulnerable patients – with a range of medical services no longer taking place on public holidays.
This would affect non-emergency surgeries and diagnostic tests, as well as cancer treatments such as chemotherapy and radiation therapy.
Routine test results will also be given by phone or letter, with face-to-face appointments taking place only when essential.
The aim is to cut down on overtime pay.
Board member Derick Murray questioned whether they are not 'taking a step back' by reducing these services.
But interim director of people and culture, Philip Shipman, said running services on public holidays is 'incredibly expensive' so that's a good place to make a saving.
Dr Colette Backwell later also reminded fellow board members that the recovery plan they have been presented with is a necessity rather than a choice.
'The Scottish Government is asking us to find more savings so we have to go along with that,' she said.
Staff at pharmacies will also be taking a day off on public holidays from now on.
Members raised concerns this could result in people not getting the treatment they need in a timely manner or being missed altogether.
Area clinical forum chairman Mark Burrell admitted other health committees have had similar worries too.
However, he reassured that there is a 'robust evaluation' under way so that 'patients do not suffer' at the hands of the proposed changes.
'This is kept under very close review,' Mr Burrell added.
One of the proposed measures was, however, scratched from the plans amid fears it 'would not be supportive of vulnerable parents'.
Board chairwoman Alison Evison raised concerns that if they stop giving out nappies at hospitals, parents might end up without any supplies at an already stressful time.
This option would have essentially saved them around £8,000 per year.
But Mrs Evison didn't think 'such a small' amount would justify the impact of going ahead with the proposals.
She said: 'This saving has huge implications for certain people who are in need of that kind of support when they're coming to hospital.
'And yet, the saving associated with it is actually relatively small.
'Sometimes people will be coming to a hospital to have a baby when they are not expecting it at that point in time. It's a case of just not being prepared.
'So I think we are actually trying to make a saving which is going to be more negative than supportive.'
All of the other proposals were given the green light, however, with a more detailed report being presented to the board in October.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Press and Journal
13 minutes ago
- Press and Journal
Elgin mum overjoyed to have baby at Dr Gray's as NHS Grampian bosses admit they 'can't believe' recruitment boom
An Elgin mum has spoken of her 'relief' at being able to have her beloved new baby boy at Dr Gray's Hospital instead of facing a drive to Aberdeen. Sarah Clegg gave birth to her first child, Jack Alexander Clegg, on Wednesday morning following a planned caesarean section. The new mum, who actually works on the Dr Gray's maternity ward herself as a healthcare support worker, is one of the growing number of parents having their children in Elgin again. C-sections have been performed every week since they were restored in Moray in April with officials now exploring ways to expand the number of eligible women. Today NHS Grampian revealed that 80% of posts have now been filled as part of its drive to restore a consultant-led maternity service to Dr Gray's by the end of next year. Bosses told the Press and Journal they 'can't believe' how successful a new recruitment approach has been with nearly 600 people now applying for some jobs. When Sarah Clegg became pregnant she was expecting to have to travel to Aberdeen to have her baby, a journey hundreds of other families have faced since the Dr Gray's unit was downgraded in 2018. However, as her due date approached, her hopes were raised of an Elgin birth as elective caesareans were restored. After initially being unsure if she met the strict criteria, she was given the good news and gave birth to health baby Jack, who was 7lbs and 14oz, on Wednesday morning. She said: 'The whole experience was really good. I was really nervous but the staff held my hand and were so lovely. It was actually quite relaxing, I would definitely do it again. 'I definitely always wanted to come to Elgin. Thankfully I fit the criteria, if I hadn't then I would have had to go to Aberdeen. 'It was a big relief because there was always that thought of travelling down in labour. 'It's just been so much more practical. It has meant my mum has been here, my sister has travelled down. 'It's comfortable, the hospital isn't as busy and, because I work here too, I've felt safe. 'There's been so much extra TLC, me and Jack have felt very important.' NHS Grampian was forced to downgrade the maternity unit in 2018 after its previous recruitment methods and staffing models made the service unsustainable. A new campaign, entitled 'Wish You Worked Here', has been launched to boost efforts by showcasing the region and working environment. It has since been viewed 11 million times across platforms including Sky TV, social media and news websites. Targeted ads have also been placed in outdoor lifestyle publications with teams also appearing on industry podcasts and visiting specialist recruitment events where virtual reality devices have showcased the hospital and region. Jane Gill, project director for The Maternity Collaborative, a joint project across NHS Grampian and NHS Highland, said: 'I can't believe it, it's been amazing. 'Every time we do it we think 'Is it going to work this time?' and it does, every single time, it just does. 'We've not had any posts unfilled so far that we've gone for. I'm not saying that's going to continue because we're at the difficult-to-recruit-for posts now but we'll rise to the challenge. 'We've now had over 1,800 people get in touch to explore working here. 'Not every inquiry is maternity-related, but everyone demonstrates that Dr Gray's is being seen as a hospital with momentum and a promising future.' Health Secretary Neil Gray visited Dr Gray's today to see for himself the progress being made in recruitment at the hospital. The minister is the fifth to have held the post since the downgrade. Mr Gray said: 'It's taken time to get to this point, I recognise that. The transformation work has been remarkable though and I'm delighted with the work they're doing.' He added: 'I've been very clear the progress needs to continue to be made, there will be no let-up in our determination with that. 'I'm heartened by what I've seen and heard about recruitment and about the fact we've had a caesarean every week since April. 'So, it is being well used, parental choice is being taken through, and that is so important because I recognise there is still anxiety and making sure we can provide parents in Moray the opportunity have choices around the services they receive.'
The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
‘They entrusted me with their daughter's memory': Women's prize winner Rachel Clarke on her story of a life-saving transplant
To read Rachel Clarke's The Story of a Heart, which has won this year's Women's prize for nonfiction, is to experience an onslaught of often competing emotions. There is awed disbelief at the sheer skill and dedication of the medical teams who transplanted the heart of nine-year-old Keira, who had been killed in a head-on traffic collision, into the body of Max, a little boy facing almost certain death from rapidly deteriorating dilated cardiomyopathy. There is vast admiration for the inexhaustible compassion of the teams who cared for both children and their families, and wonder at the cascade of medical advances, each breakthrough representing determination, inspiration, rigorous work, and careful navigation of newly emerging ethical territory. And most flooring of all is the immense courage of two families, one devastated by the sudden loss of a precious child, the other faced with a diagnosis that threatened to tear their lives apart. Sign up to Bookmarks Discover new books and learn more about your favourite authors with our expert reviews, interviews and news stories. Literary delights delivered direct to you after newsletter promotion To write such a story requires special preparation. 'I was full of trepidation when I first approached Keira's family,' Clarke tells me the morning after she was awarded the prize. 'I knew that I was asking them to entrust me with the most precious thing, their beloved daughter Keira's story, her memory.' The former journalist trained as a doctor in her late 20s, and has spent most of her medical career working in palliative care. Subsequently, she has also become an acclaimed writer and committed campaigner, publishing three memoirs: Your Life in My Hands, Dear Life and Breathtaking. She turned to her medical training for guidance when writing The Story of a Heart. 'I said to myself, my framework will be my medical framework, so I would conduct myself in such a way that they would, I hoped, trust me in the same way that someone might trust me as a doctor. And if at any point they changed their mind, then they could walk away from the project.' Each family read the manuscript in its entirety, with Clarke determined that she would not publish if they had any qualms. On the morning that we speak, she has been in touch with them, and she reads me a message from Loanna, Keira's mother. It says simply: 'Keira really has made such a difference to so many people. She is just incredible.' Loanna, she goes on to tell me, now visits schools to tell children about Keira; Max's mother, Emma, is an 'indefatigable' ambassador for the NHS's organ donation programme. Nobody who reads the book could forget the almost superhuman fortitude of Keira's father, Joe, or her sisters, all of whom not only consented but pressed forward with donating her organs, even as Loanna and Keira's brother were gravely injured. There, too, is the bravery of Max's father, Paul, supporting his desperately ill son through the pain and trauma of treatment; and Max's brother, Harry, now finishing his second year at medical school. It is because of these people that in 2020, Max and Keira's Law entered the statute books, ruling that adults would be presumed to have given consent to organ donation, rather than having to opt in, an enormously important step in addressing the scarcity of donor organs. For Clarke, it was also important to shine a light on the care with which the medical teams treat those who, in death, are giving someone else the chance of life; from the 'moment of honour' that precedes all surgery to retrieve donor organs, in which all fall silent to consider the patient, to the last offices of washing and dressing performed by nurses. 'It's the patient that's the important person,' she explains. 'And I think that says something very profound about us as a species, doesn't it?' Clarke, who is the mother of two teenagers, spends half her time working with patients, and half on 'other things'; not only writing books, but shining a light on the challenges her profession – and by extension all of us – are facing. At the moment, she is furious about the government's recent decision to stop issuing visas to foreign care workers, because what they do is regarded as unskilled labour. With a shortage of 100,000 care workers, the result is patients unable to be discharged from hospital: 'A direct consequence of that is I will see more patients on trolleys dying outside an A&E that they can't even get into because we don't have enough care workers. I will look them in the eye. Keir Starmer won't. Wes Streeting won't. But I will, and I will try to give them the best care I can in a corridor where there isn't even a curtain to draw around them for dignity.' She has, she says, always been torn between the arts and science, but that medicine is 'the perfect marriage of hard science and beautiful, messy humanity. And I try to write books that represent medicine accurately in that sense. You are not a good doctor if you're just a scientist and you're not a good doctor if you're just about emotion and feeling: you have to marry the two.'
The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
Fears assisted dying bill could be defeated as MPs warn ‘tide is turning'
There are growing fears Kim Leadbeater's assisted dying bill could be defeated when it returns to the Commons next week, as MPs claim confidence in it is rapidly being lost. The warning comes as Ms Leadbeater suffered her first major defeat on Friday, after MPs voted to introduce new safeguards to prevent health professionals raising the subject of assisted dying with children. They voted 259 in favour and 216 against an amendment tabled by Labour MP Dame Meg Hillier stating 'no health professional shall raise assisted dying with a person under 18'. It is understood Ms Leadbeater didn't support the amendment because she agrees with the British Medical Association, which has said doctors should not be put in the position where they are barred from raising it with patients. It comes amid concerns that if people under 18 with terminal illnesses are unable to get the advice they want from their doctor, they will turn to the internet, where they are more likely to be subject to misinformation. Labour MP Paul Waugh told The Independent that today's voting shows the bill has 'rapidly lost the confidence of MPs', adding that the 'strong momentum against it is now clear'. 'It had a Commons majority of 56 last November. That was cut to 36 last month on a key amendment. Today, we saw a further cut of the majority to 21 and 26 on amendments. And the final vote - a big defeat for the proposer of the bill by 43 votes - just underlined how uncomfortable MPs are.' Mr Waugh added: 'The more the scrutiny of this particular bill, the more MPs have deep concerns about its lack of safeguards for the vulnerable.' But sources close to Ms Leadbeater insisted there is no reason to believe momentum is being lost, pointing out that the decline in majorities came as a result of fewer MPs attending the debate overall. It is understood that Ms Leadbeater is confident that support for it remains strong. Kit Malthouse, who supports the bill said: "The evidence from today is that our numbers held strong. Our majority proportionally was the same. On one vote, where a fine judgment was required, obviously views of colleagues differed. But if anything, that would probably strengthen their conviction to vote for the bill, having supported us in other votes.' Danny Kruger, who has been a vocal opponent of the bill, said he is 'increasingly hopeful' it will be voted down next week. 'The tide is turning on the Assisted Suicide Bill', he said. While he described the success of the amendment to prevent health professionals from raising the subject of assisted dying with children as a 'big victory', he warned that the bill is 'still way too open to abuse'. Rachael Maskell, who is against the bill, added: 'It is clear that now MPs are engaging in the detail of the Bill that they can see the cracks and are losing confidence'. 'A very different picture was painted today to when the Bill passed with 56 votes in the autumn to an amendment passing by 43 votes today against the will of the Bill's sponsor. MPs now need to engage with the evidence which clearly sets out why this particular Bill is not fit for purpose', she told The Independent. But pro-assisted dying sources pointed out that people on both sides of the debate voted to support the extra safeguards for children. Debating the amendment, Dr Neil-Shastri-Hurst MP, a medical doctor, said: 'Those who have had the privilege of meeting a young person living with a terminal illness will know that they often display a maturity and a depth of understanding far beyond their years. 'To deny them the opportunity of a considered conversation about their future upon reaching adulthood is not an act of compassion, in my view; it is to abandon them. 'It is to leave them isolated, navigating a complex and deeply personal journey through the filter of online forums, rather than in dialogue with trusted, qualified professionals. We owe them better than that.' Opinion in the medical community has been divided over the bill, with the Royal College of Physicians (RCP) and Royal College of Psychiatrists (RCPsych) expressing concern, while some MPs who are doctors are among the Bill's strongest supporters. Seven RCPsych members, including a former president and vice president, have written to MPs to distance themselves from their college's concern, instead describing the Bill as 'workable, safe and compassionate' with a 'clear and transparent legal framework'. Meanwhile, Claire Macdonald, director of My Death, My Decision said 'no-one should be forced to suffer, and the British public wants politicians to change the law on assisted dying'. In a letter to MPs this week, Ms Leadbeater said supporters and opponents appear in agreement that 'if we are to pass this legislation, it should be the best and safest Bill possible'. She added: 'I'm confident it can and will be.' The proposed legislation would allow terminally-ill adults in England and Wales, with fewer than six months to live, to apply for an assisted death, subject to approval by two doctors and a panel featuring a social worker, senior legal figure and psychiatrist. MPs are entitled to have a free vote on the Bill and any amendments, meaning they vote according to their conscience rather than along party lines.
