logo
Beyond Obesity: Eli Lilly's Genetic Medicine Bet On Verve Therapeutics

Beyond Obesity: Eli Lilly's Genetic Medicine Bet On Verve Therapeutics

Forbes5 hours ago

Cambridge, MA - July 11: Verve CEO and cofounder Sekar Kathiresan. Cambridge company Verve ... More Therapeutics announced on Tuesday morning that it has dosed the first patient with its new CRISPR gene editing technology called base editing, which changes a single letter of DNA into another letter to treat genetic disease. (Photo by Suzanne Kreiter/The Boston Globe via Getty Images)
Eli Lilly's $1.3 billion acquisition of Verve Therapeutics represents a strategic move into cardiovascular genetic medicine. The pharmaceutical behemoth paid a substantial premium of approximately 113% above Verve's 30-day volume-weighted average trading price, triggering an 80% surge in Verve's stock price on June 17, 2025.
The acquisition aligns with Eli Lilly's broader diversification strategy beyond its core diabetes and obesity treatment portfolio. Verve's innovative gene-editing technology, which permanently deactivates the PCSK9 gene to address high cholesterol, represents a breakthrough approach to cardiovascular disease treatment. This move positions Lilly to capture value in the high-impact cardiovascular therapeutics market while expanding its genetic medicine capabilities. On a separate note, see – SoundHound AI: Buy, Sell Or Hold SOUN Stock At $10?
Despite the premium paid for Verve, Eli Lilly's core valuation metrics suggest reasonable positioning relative to historical norms. Trading at 57 times trailing adjusted earnings of $13.76 per share, the company's current valuation sits below its three-year average P/E ratio of 66 times. This suggests that while the stock commands a premium, it remains within established valuation parameters given the company's strong financial and operational performance as seen in Buy or Sell Eli Lilly Stock dashboard.
Several key risks warrant attention in evaluating Eli Lilly stock:
The Verve Therapeutics acquisition reinforces Eli Lilly's position as an attractive investment opportunity, supported by strong demand for its obesity treatments and successful diversification into high-potential therapeutic areas. That said, there always remains a meaningful risk when investing in a single, or just a handful, of stocks. Consider Trefis High Quality (HQ) Portfolio which, with a collection of 30 stocks, has a track record of comfortably outperforming the S&P 500 over the last 4-year period. Why is that? As a group, HQ Portfolio stocks provided better returns with less risk versus the benchmark index; less of a roller-coaster ride as evident in HQ Portfolio performance metrics.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Grifin secures $11M to make investing less intimidating
Grifin secures $11M to make investing less intimidating

TechCrunch

time12 minutes ago

  • TechCrunch

Grifin secures $11M to make investing less intimidating

Grifin, an investment app that simplifies investing by automatically purchasing stocks in brands where users regularly shop, announced on Wednesday that it has secured an $11 million Series A funding round, bringing the total amount raised to around $22 million. Alongside the announcement, Grifin also revealed it has surpassed 500,000 registered users, indicating that its approach to investing resonates with a lot of users. Grifin also claims approximately 1 million total app downloads and 100,000 monthly active users. The company declined to share its valuation. The investment and user growth mark important milestones for Grifin, reflecting investors' confidence in the company's business model and its capacity to disrupt traditional investing methods. The stock market can be intimidating for many Americans — reportedly only 62% of U.S. adults own any stocks directly. The new capital will be invested in building out the company's software engineering and UX design teams, as well as product development. Notable upcoming features include an AI chatbot that Grifin is working on, as well as family plans designed for parents who want to introduce their young adult children to investing. Grifin, founded in 2017 by Aaron Froug, Bo Starr, and Robin Froug, aims to simplify investing for those who find it daunting. Initially based on the concept of 'Stock Where You Shop,' the company evolved in 2024 to an adaptive investing model that automatically invests $1 from users' transactions into stocks related to their purchases. For instance, if a user shops at Walmart, $1 is invested in Walmart stock. Users can also manually adjust their investment amounts. The model has proven successful, as evidenced by Grifin's internal data showing a 234% increase in spending at Walmart six months after users bought its stock. Image Credits:Grifin Another approach Grifin takes to simplify investing is by providing educational material that offers users daily insights into financial literacy. The company plans to expand its educational offerings and develop an AI chatbot that can summarize articles on the platform and provide quick answers to user questions. The chatbot will also provide insights into individual accounts, answering queries such as, 'When did I make this investment?' or 'When did I receive a dividend?' The timing of the rollout is currently unknown, as Grifin wants to ensure that the chatbot delivers accurate answers before its launch. Techcrunch event Save $200+ on your TechCrunch All Stage pass Build smarter. Scale faster. Connect deeper. Join visionaries from Precursor Ventures, NEA, Index Ventures, Underscore VC, and beyond for a day packed with strategies, workshops, and meaningful connections. Save $200+ on your TechCrunch All Stage pass Build smarter. Scale faster. Connect deeper. Join visionaries from Precursor Ventures, NEA, Index Ventures, Underscore VC, and beyond for a day packed with strategies, workshops, and meaningful connections. Boston, MA | REGISTER NOW 'AI can be an amazing feature, but it can also sometimes not give the correct things,' Aaron Froug, who is Grifin's CEO, told TechCrunch. 'So we're just making sure that we're dotting the i's and crossing the t's before we launch something like that.' The educational offerings are particularly important because of Grifin's user base. Many of its users are women between their late 40s and 60s, a group that traditionally has less confidence in their investing knowledge. There are also younger women users aged 18 to 24, which could be why Grifin is considering adding budgeting tools that give users insights into their spending. One of the most requested features is family plans, which would enable users to share their Grifin accounts with family members and introduce investing to younger users. Many younger generations have been hesitant to invest in the stock market. Although the market has improved in recent months, there are still risks involved. 'One of the cool things that we want to do with family plans as well is [allow] parents or grandparents to help fund the accounts for kids or the grandkids, so there isn't too much financial stress,' Aaron Froug added. The round was led by Nava Ventures with participation from Alloy Labs, Draper Associates, Gaingels, Nevcaut Ventures, and TTV Capital. In addition to the funding, Freddie Martignetti, partner at Nava Ventures, joined Grifin's board.

The Longevity Paradox: Medicine Meets Silicon Valley
The Longevity Paradox: Medicine Meets Silicon Valley

Medscape

time12 minutes ago

  • Medscape

The Longevity Paradox: Medicine Meets Silicon Valley

'For without friends, no one would choose to live.' - Aristotle Jeffrey Benabio, MD, MBA Last year, Bryan Johnson, a 46-year-old tech founder, spent 2 million dollars on a regimen that included monthly plasma transfusions from his teenage son. Why? Well, we live in an age when the wealthy inject themselves with young blood, undergo elaborate hormone replacement protocols, get infusions of NAD+, and gobble metformin pill-packs to optimize their biological age. The sell is seductive: Death is evitable. Aging is curable. And with enough money, one can live to be old and healthy. The venture capital bets might be recent, but the yearning is ancient. Herodotus wrote in the 5th century BCE about special waters the long-lived Macrobians drank and bathed in — waters that not only extended life but left their skin "glossy and smooth." Later, Alexander the Great, in his conquests, was said to have been on a quest to find the "Water of Life." He died at 32, which is probably why his product isn't a popular supplement on Amazon today. Lucas Cranach's "The Fountain of Youth," painted in the late Medieval period, shows old and infirm patrons swimming in magical waters and emerging vibrant and young on the other side. Perhaps those waters had rapamycin-producing Streptomyces growing in it — which is a top seller today. The Fountain of Youth by Lucas Cranach d.Ä. Behind the tempting pitch to live forever lies an uncomfortable question: Is this medicine? Should we be testing testosterone on an athletic 23-year-old? Or continuously monitor glucose for a healthy adult with no signs of diabetes? Few doctors would order these for patients, and fewer payors would pick up the tab if they were ordered. This is the disconnect between medicine and entrepreneurs. "The medical system is so patronizing," said a young venture capitalist on a popular startup podcast I was listening to. He was complaining about how doctors resist ordering MRIs or specialized tests because we doctors "think patients are idiots." We do not. He's missing the point that, as a healthy 30-something, medicine is not resourced to help him with wellness requests. Who should pay for his requested MRI? Who would interpret the results? We physicians cannot keep up with the demand for services from those who need us acutely. We've no plan for absorbing a new generation of the "worried well" — better named the "ambitious well" — while also caring for their boomer grandparents. We have a critical shortage of primary care physicians; one that will only worsen as our population ages. The Association of American Medical Colleges projects a shortage of up to 40,400 primary care doctors by 2036. What happens if a portion of that workforce begins dedicating their time to monitoring biomarkers and fine-tuning supplement regimens for patients who are not sick? Healthcare resources — physicians' time, diagnostic equipment, laboratory services — are finite. Every hour we spend with a healthy person seeking optimization is an hour not spent with a patient who is ill. For every primary care physician giving up their practice for a cash-paying longevity clinic, there will be 2000 or so patients who now have to be redistributed onto already burdened practices. When healthy 35-year-olds can get same-day MRIs at boutique practices while my father-in-law waits nearly 2 months for an MRI to characterize a renal mass seen on ultrasound, we've failed. Caring for cash-paying patients who can sit with you for an hour is preferable to the daily grind of 15-minute appointments for patients who actually need an hour of your time. Why shouldn't docs get to choose? For one thing, our training is publicly funded. Taxpayer dollars pick up the tab for more than $20 billion in graduate medical education every year. It seems not quite right that this education doesn't at least in part serve the public who funded it. Despite these concerns, we should acknowledge the import of the longevity movement. Prevention is indeed better than cure. Early intervention can avert costly medical problems. And individuals have a right to pursue health optimizations they value, using their own resources. The question is, how should longevity medicine relate to our broader healthcare system and societal priorities? I think transparency is essential. Longevity interventions should be clearly labeled based on the strength of supporting research. It's the standard we adhere to every day in practice. We also need to be clearer about necessity versus enhancement. Insurance coverage and public resources should prioritize interventions that address or prevent disease. Enhancement services should be demarcated as distinct from necessary medical care. Physicians working in longevity medicine might also acknowledge some societal obligations. Perhaps consider devoting a portion of their practice to underserved populations or contributing to research that benefits the broader public, not just those who can afford boutique services. We also surely must address the structural factors that push physicians toward concierge practices. If doctors are fleeing due to administrative burden and time constraints, improving those would help ensure care remains accessible to all. Lastly, we might recognize that the best determinants of longevity operate at the population not the individual level. Clean air and water, safe neighborhoods, access to nutritious food, and strong social connections likely do more to improve the health and longevity of a population than any supplement or monitoring device. Realizing the promise of longevity medicine requires more than scientific breakthrough; it demands clarity about how these advances should be distributed and what values should guide their application. As physicians we face a choice: Should we allow longevity to become another domain where privilege determines outcomes? Or could we build a system where the benefits of extended healthy life are available to all? Since Herodotus and after nearly 2500 years of searching, we still haven't found the water of life. Or maybe Aristotle actually discovered it just a few years later: gymnastics, moderation in food and drink, and good friends. It's hard to raise a series A with that pitch though.

From Chatbots To Workbots: Why NiCE's AI Strategy Focuses On Execution
From Chatbots To Workbots: Why NiCE's AI Strategy Focuses On Execution

Forbes

time13 minutes ago

  • Forbes

From Chatbots To Workbots: Why NiCE's AI Strategy Focuses On Execution

NiCE is betting that AI agents that complete tasks—not just conversations—will separate winners from pretenders in the enterprise AI race The artificial intelligence hype cycle has reached peak saturation, with technology vendors scrambling to slap "AI-powered" labels on everything from refrigerator recipe suggestions to chatbots that rely on simple keyword matching. Yet, for all the breathless marketing rhetoric, most business leaders are still waiting for AI that simplifies operations and improves data analysis. NiCE, a customer experience platform provider, is making a calculated bet that the next phase of enterprise AI won't be about making chatbots sound more human. The next wave of business outcomes will leverage AI agents that can navigate complex business processes from start to finish with minimal human intervention. NiCE's CEO, Scott Russell said, 'Optimizing knowledge is not just critical for AI to truly thrive in your environment, but it's also the key for transforming service from reactive to proactive, identifying opportunities to solve issues and predict future needs.' NiCE's recent product launches and strategic moves reveal a move toward enhanced automation and agentic AI. The first wave of enterprise AI focused primarily on making data more accessible through conversational interfaces—essentially putting a chat layer on top of existing applications and knowledge repositories. While this represented significant progress in democratizing data access, it only scratched the surface of AI's potential business value. Organizations could ask questions and get answers, but the burden of reasoning through complex decisions and taking action remained entirely on human operators. Going forward, technology vendors, such as NiCE, will use AI to deliver solutions that can reason through multifaceted problems and take semi or fully autonomous action. This evolution from conversational AI to agentic AI represents the difference between AI that informs and AI that performs. Agentic AI enhances a company's ability to analyze context, weigh multiple variables, make informed decisions based on key business performance indicators, and execute actions across interconnected systems. Traditional conversational AI helps a customer service representative find relevant information. Still, agentic AI can help a representative evaluate a customer's complete history more easily, assess risk factors, determine appropriate responses based on business rules, and automatically trigger the necessary workflows to resolve issues end-to-end. "There's a big difference between AI that talks and AI that gets things done," explains Barry Cooper, President of NiCE's CX Division. "While others are building agents that mimic conversations, we're building agents that fulfill customer needs—end to end." This distinction becomes crucial when examining NiCE's CXone Mpower Agents. Traditional AI chatbots had limited access to data, offered scripted responses, and were confined to specific areas of the business, such as front-office or back-office operations. NiCE's AI agent platform aim to break through these constraints by operating across the entire enterprise ecosystem—from initial customer contact through mid-office approvals to back-end fulfillment systems. Admittedly, Agentic AI is the AI buzzword of 2025, but early, well-scoped use cases show promise. Technology companies are increasingly working to streamline AI deployment as traditional approaches require extensive technical resources, custom development, and lengthy implementation cycles. NiCE's model simplifies AI agent creation while maintaining enterprise-grade sophistication through what they call vibe coding, allowing business users to tailor each agent's personality and communication style without requiring technical expertise. While the concept of vibe coding remains ill-defined, and its merits are hotly debated within the enterprise software community, there is a broad consensus around the underlying goal of making AI agents easier to code and deploy. The specific term matters less than the fundamental shift toward empowering business users to create and customize AI functionality without requiring deep technical expertise. In a rapidly evolving tech landscape, no single vendor can deliver everything an enterprise needs to succeed with AI, cloud, data, and digital transformation. Today, companies are no longer looking for isolated solutions—they need interconnected ecosystems. That's why strategic partnerships are essential. By working together, enterprise technology vendors can bridge data and function silos, improving workflows and accelerating innovation. Just as importantly, these alliances help enterprises extract greater value from existing technology investments by ensuring that new capabilities work in concert with the tools already in place. Over the past several months, NiCE has expanded its partnership with Amazon Web Services (AWS) and added ServiceNow and Snowflake to the mix. At Interactions 2025, NiCE announced an expanded collaboration with AWS, bringing together NiCE's domain expertise and rich interaction data with AWS's cloud infrastructure and generative AI services, including Amazon Bedrock, Amazon Q, and the Amazon Nova family of large language models. The partnership addresses some of the most pressing challenges facing enterprise AI deployments: fragmented workflows, disconnected data, and inconsistent global performance. The partnership focuses on three core pillars. First, content-aware automation ensures that AI-generated responses are highly relevant and context-specific. Using the Amazon Q Index, Mpower Agents are equipped with up-to-date business content—from product documentation to policy details and case histories—enabling them to respond accurately and confidently in real time. Second, the integration delivers enterprise-wide orchestration by bridging front, middle, and back-office operations. NiCE's CXone Mpower Orchestrator automates workflows across functional teams, while Amazon Q Business extends this reach into a broader set of enterprise applications—eliminating silos and streamlining complex processes. Additionally, global scalability is made possible through AWS's robust cloud infrastructure. With low-latency performance and high availability across regions, multinational organizations can deploy and scale AI-driven customer service experiences quickly and consistently around the world. NiCE's partnership strategy also extends beyond AWS to include other critical enterprise platforms, such as ServiceNow and Snowflake. NiCE's latest partnership with ServiceNow aims to eliminate long-standing service gaps by tightly integrating real-time customer engagement with enterprise workflow automation. Announced at ServiceNow's Knowledge 2025 event, the collaboration integrates NiCE's customer service platform with ServiceNow's AI and Customer Service Management (CSM) tools to streamline operations across the entire organization, from the front office to the back. The goal: fully automated customer service fulfillment. The combined solution routes inquiries based on sentiment, intent, and service-level agreements (SLAs)—bridging siloed departments to accelerate resolution times and enhance both customer and employee experiences. Role-based AI copilots assist agents and back-office teams with real-time insights and next-best actions, while continuous optimization tools flag issues and launch workflows automatically. These relationships provide access to complementary technologies and customer bases, allowing NiCE to integrate with the broader enterprise software ecosystem that companies rely on for operations, data management, and workflow automation. NiCE's strategic collaboration with Snowflake aims to unlock the full value of customer interaction data by making it accessible, secure, and actionable across the enterprise. By integrating Snowflake's AI Data Cloud with CXone Mpower, NICE can improve data sharing, breaking down silos that have traditionally limited the impact of customer insights. Snowflake serves as the backbone of the CXone Mpower data lake, centralizing interaction data and enriching it with information from other enterprise systems. This unified data foundation allows organizations to automate key processes—from billing to claims handling—while powering AI-driven analytics, dashboards, and decision-making. The result: faster fulfillment, greater accuracy, and a deeper, organization-wide understanding of the customer experience. Apparently, 2025 is the year of the brand refresh. The technology industry has witnessed updates from Five9, Google's G, Hitachi HPE, and Qualcomm's introduction of Dragonwing, alongside NiCE's own transformation. Every brand refresh has its own story to tell, but NiCE's new logo and marketing campaign represent more than a desire for fresh typography and color schemes. The rebrand indicates the company's strategic desire to expand its AI vision beyond the contact center to encompass its broader portfolio of finance and security solutions. The company describes the rebrand as positioning "NICE to empower brands to deliver AI-powered experiences that are proactive, human-centered and intuitive—whether connecting with customers, protecting communities or combatting financial crime." NiCE's solution involves partnering with actress Kristen Bell, who serves as the face of the company's "NiCE World" brand campaign. The initiative positions Bell as the "NiCEst Person in the World," NiCE said the campaign "builds on NiCE's reimagined brand, championing a future where AI isn't just intelligent – it's connected, intuitive and working behind the scenes to make life better. The enterprise AI market remains in flux, with new entrants and existing players continually repositioning themselves. NiCE's focus on domain expertise, integration depth, strategic partnerships, and automation suggests a company that understands both the technical and implementation requirements necessary for large-scale AI adoption. As enterprises increasingly demand AI that delivers results, NiCE's bet on fulfillment-focused automation may prove prescient. Of course, there's still the matter of cost and return on investment. Most companies struggle to understand and plan for the true product and operational costs of AI. Organizations need to work with their technology vendors to deploy well-scoped use case that deliver measurable return on investment, fast. The question isn't whether AI will transform customer experience—it's which companies will build AI that completes the transformation rather than just talking about it.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store