Reuters X account restored in India after suspension over legal demand
FILE PHOTO: A 3D-printed miniature model of Elon Musk and the X logo are seen in this illustration taken January 23, 2025. REUTERS/Dado Ruvic/Illustration/File Photo
NEW DELHI - The Reuters News account on X was restored in India on Sunday, a day after the social media platform suspended it, citing a legal demand.
"At this time, we are no longer withholding access in INDIA to your account," X said in an email to the Reuters social media team, without elaborating.
Representatives for X, Reuters and the Indian government did not immediately respond to requests for comment on the restoration of the account.
Earlier on Sunday, a spokesperson for the Indian government's Press Information Bureau told Reuters that no Indian government agency had required withholding the Reuters handle, adding that officials were working with X to resolve the problem.
A Reuters spokesperson had said the agency was working with X to resolve this matter and get the Reuters account reinstated in India as soon as possible.
Reuters World, another X account operated by the news agency which was blocked in India, was also restored late Sunday night.
The main Reuters account, which has more than 25 million followers globally, had been blocked in India since Saturday night. A notice told X users that "@Reuters has been withheld in IN (India) in response to a legal demand".
In an email to the Reuters social media team on May 16, X said: "It is our policy to notify account holders if we receive a legal request from an authorized entity (such as law enforcement or a government agency) to remove content from their account."
"In order to comply with X obligations under India's local laws, we have withheld your X account in India under the country's Information Technology Act, 2000; the content remains available elsewhere".
Reuters could not ascertain if the May 16 email was linked to Saturday's account suspension nor could it determine what specific content the demand referred to, why its removal was sought or the entity that had lodged the complaint.
While the email did not specify which entity had made the request or what content they sought to remove, it said X had been advised that in such cases, a user could contact the secretary of India's Information and Broadcasting Ministry.
The secretary, Sanjay Jaju, did not respond to requests seeking comment.
The 2000 law allows designated government officials to demand the takedown of content from social media platforms they deem to violate local laws, including on the grounds of national security or if a post threatens public order.
X has long been at odds with India's government over content-removal requests. In March, the company sued the federal government over a new government website the company says expands takedown powers to "countless" government officials.
The case is continuing. India has said X wrongly labelled an official website a "censorship portal", as the website only allows tech companies to be notified about harmful online content. REUTERS
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
10 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Xiaomi founder's bold EV bet paying off where Apple's failed
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox Xiaomi succeeding where Apple failed has burnished Mr Lei Jun's reputation, made his company one of the most valuable in China. Hong Kong – Lei Jun, founder and chairman of Xiaomi, the only tech company to have successfully diversified into carmaking, couldn't resist. Speaking at a triumphant launch event in Beijing in June for Xiaomi's second electric vehicle, a long-anticipated SUV, Mr Lei pointedly mentioned Apple, which spent a decade and US$10 billion (S$12.7 billion) trying to make a car before giving up in 2024. 'Since Apple stopped developing its car, we've given special care to Apple users,' he said, noting that owners of the US giant's iPhones would be able to seamlessly sync their devices to Xiaomi's vehicles. The not-so-subtle dig was followed by a flex: Xiaomi then said it had received more than 289,000 orders for its new sport utility vehicle within an hour of its announcement, more than its first EV, a sedan launched in March 2024. Xiaomi succeeding where Apple failed has burnished Mr Lei's reputation, made his company one of the most valuable in China and shaken up both the tech and automobile industries. The collapse of Apple's moonshot car programme has only underscored the effectiveness of Xiaomi's grounded approach, which took inspiration from proven designs from Tesla and Porsche Automobil Holding while staying true to the affordable ethos that's made it a cult brand for Gen Z consumers. Crucially, it also launched into the most fertile EV ecosystem in the world – China. With state subsidies, existing charging infrastructure and a ready made supply chain, Xiaomi had a structural tailwind Apple lacked. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. World Trump says US nears trade deals as tariff effective date delayed Singapore MPs should not ask questions to 'clock numbers'; focus should be improving S'poreans' lives: Seah Kian Peng Singapore Sequencing and standards: Indranee on role of Leader of the House Singapore NUS College draws 10,000 applications for 400 places, showing strong liberal arts interest Singapore Life After... blazing biomedical research trail in S'pore: Renowned scientist breaks new ground at 59 Business Beyond the 9 to 5: Why side hustles are becoming a way of life for more full-time workers Singapore Smart sensors used in study to detect cognitive decline in seniors who live alone Life Star Awards 2025: 11 looks that shocked and charmed on the red carpet Xiaomi declined to comment for this story. Mr Lei and Xiaomi's 'charisma, brand recognition and ecosystem cannot be underestimated,' Yale Zhang, the managing director of Shanghai-based consultancy Automotive Foresight, said. 'It's a big influence on young consumers who have filled their homes with Xiaomi products. When it comes time to buy an EV, they naturally think of Xiaomi.' Recruitment tactics Xiaomi's public narrative is that Mr Lei and his team learned by visiting multiple Chinese automakers, including Zhejiang Geely Holding Group and Great Wall Motor, and talked to more than 200 industry experts in some 80 meetings. The reality is also that he used Xiaomi's reputation as an innovative consumer behemoth to get close to China's large carmakers and pick off their top talent. Geely and its billionaire founder Li Shufu welcomed Mr Lei to the automaker's research institute in Ningbo in the months leading up to Xiaomi's announcement that it would enter the car business to discuss topics, including potential collaboration. It's Geely lore that Mr Lei added the WeChat contacts of many staff at the institute, including then-director Hu Zhengnan. Mr Hu later joined Shunwei Capital Partners, the investment firm co-founded by Mr Lei. Mr Hu, known for his love of the German luxury marque Porsche, was one of the team members credited as being instrumental to developing Xiaomi's EV business, Mr Lei said at the SU7 launch in 2024. He added that Mr Hu left his previous employer after his contract ended. Other executives who joined Xiaomi came from companies including BAIC Motor, BMW, SAIC-GM-Wuling Automobile – the General Motors joint venture with SAIC Motor and Wuling Motors Holdings – and auto supplier Magna Steyr. Besides assembling top Chinese automaking talent, Mr Lei made a prescient bet on investing in a self-controlled supply chain – insulating Xiaomi's operation from manufacturing vagaries. This came from painful lessons learned in Xiaomi's early smartphone-producing days, when external suppliers would cut off components unpredictably. With the 10 billion yuan (S$1.8 billion) it committed to the first phase of its EV venture, Xiaomi also built its own factory, rather than going down the contract manufacturing route that some Chinese makers, including Nio and Xpeng, did when they started out. 'Among tech companies that now build electric vehicles, those who previously had hardware products seem to be more successful than those who only had software products or information services,' said Paul Gong, UBS Group's head of China autos research. Copycat allegations Despite its early success, there are many who argue Xiaomi's one hit car is copied from elsewhere – and that a sole successful vehicle does not a successful auto producer make. Mr Lei's aggressive approach has also raised hackles in China's car industry. Yu Jingmin, vice president of SAIC's passenger car division, reportedly described Xiaomi's approach as 'shameless' in a critique of the SU7 resembling Porsche. The SU7 has been colloquially dubbed 'Porsche Mi' by netizens. Xiaomi's design team, led by former BMW designer Li Tianyuan, has defended the SU7's aesthetics, emphasizing that the choices were driven by aerodynamic efficiency and performance benchmarks. In late March, there was another setback after a fatal accident involving the SU7. The car had its advanced driver assistance technology turned on before the crash, which afterward led to authorities reining in the promotion and deployment of the technology. The usually vocal Mr Lei kept a low profile on social media for more than a month post the March accident. He returned to more active engagement in May with a missive that said this period of time was the most difficult in his career. Fortunately for Xiaomi, its consumer base is sticky. Known as 'Mi Fans,' the loyal customers have played a pivotal role in the company's rise. Xiaomi cultivated this fandom early on by prioritising user feedback and the grassroots allegiance has helped it build strong brand equity, especially in China. The SU7 has remained a top selling model even after the accident in March. Small scale The EVs are also showing financial promise. Xiaomi posted record revenue for first quarter this year, driven by car and smartphone sales. Its EV division is expected to turn profitable in the second half of 2025, Mr Lei said in an investor meeting in June. But even if the popularity of Xiaomi's EVs can spring beyond the company's devoted base, production is still on a much more boutique scale. China's top car brand, BYD, sold around 4.3 million EVs and hybrids last year, many overseas, while Tesla moved about 1.78 million vehicles globally. Toyota Motor, the world's No. 1 automaker, sold some 10.8 million vehicles and boasts a lineup of approximately 70 different models. Mr Lei doesn't seem to be prioritizing the mass market of below US$20,000 yet, which drives significant volume and is where BYD dominates, Automotive Foresight's Zhang said. Without a lineup in that segment, Xiaomi cars will remain niche purchases for middle to higher-income consumers and Xiaomi may face the same risks as Tesla, which is seeing its sales slump exacerbated by a narrow consumer base and limited models. Nonetheless, Mr Lei seems buoyed by Xiaomi's early wins and is now looking at global expansion. Xiaomi will consider selling cars outside China from 2027, he said last week. Success or otherwise, the European Union, the US and Turkey have all slapped tariffs on Chinese EVs, but Xiaomi wants to set up a R&D centre in Munich and may test sales starting in European markets such as Germany, Spain and France when the time is right, Chinese media 36Kr reported in April. 'Xiaomi is a latecomer to the auto industry,' Mr Lei admitted on Weibo in June. But, he said, in a market driven by technology and innovation and the rising global influence of China's EV culture, 'there are always opportunities for latecomers.' BLOOMBERG
Straits Times
26 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Trump says US nears trade deals as tariff effective date delayed
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox Mr Trump in April announced a 10 per cent base tariff rate on most countries and additional duties ranging up to 50 per cent. MORRISTOWN, New Jersey - The United States is close to finalising several trade agreements in the coming days and will notify other countries of higher tariff rates by July 9, US President Donald Trump said on July 6, with the higher rates scheduled to take effect on August 1. Mr Trump and other top officials had flagged the August 1 date earlier, but it was unclear if all tariffs would increase then. Asked to clarify, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick told reporters the higher tariffs would take effect on August 1, but Mr Trump was 'setting the rates and the deals right now'. Mr Trump in April announced a 10 per cent base tariff rate on most countries and additional duties ranging up to 50 per cent, although he later delayed the effective date for all but 10 per cent until July 9. The new date offers countries a three-week reprieve. US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told CNN's State of the Union earlier on July 6 that several big announcements of trade agreements could come in the next days, noting the European Union had made good progress in its talks. He said Mr Trump would also send out letters to 100 smaller countries with whom the US does not have much trade, notifying them that they would face higher tariff rates first set on April 2 and then suspended until July 9. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore MPs should not ask questions to 'clock numbers'; focus should be improving S'poreans' lives: Seah Kian Peng Singapore Sequencing and standards: Indranee on role of Leader of the House Singapore NUS College draws 10,000 applications for 400 places, showing strong liberal arts interest Singapore Life After... blazing biomedical research trail in S'pore: Renowned scientist breaks new ground at 59 Business Beyond the 9 to 5: Why side hustles are becoming a way of life for more full-time workers Singapore Smart sensors used in study to detect cognitive decline in seniors who live alone Life Star Awards 2025: 11 looks that shocked and charmed on the red carpet 'President Trump's going to be sending letters to some of our trading partners saying that if you don't move things along, then on August 1 you will boomerang back to your April 2 tariff level. 'So I think we're going to see a lot of deals very quickly,' Mr Bessent told CNN. Since taking office, Mr Trump has set off a global trade war that has roiled financial markets and sent policymakers scrambling to guard their economies, including through deals with the US and other countries. Mr Kevin Hassett, who heads the White House National Economic Council, told CBS's Face the Nation program there might be wiggle room for countries engaged in earnest negotiations. 'There are deadlines, and there are things that are close, and so maybe things will push back past the deadline,' Mr Hassett said, adding that Mr Trump would decide if that could happen. 'I hear good things' Mr Stephen Miran, chairman of the White House Council of Economic Advisers, told ABC News' This Week program that countries needed to make concessions to get lower tariff rates. 'I hear good things about the talks with Europe. I hear good things about the talks with India,' Mr Miran said. 'And so I would expect that a number of countries that are in the process of making those concessions... might see their date rolled.' Mr Bessent told CNN the Trump administration was focused on 18 important trading partners that account for 95 per cent of the US trade deficit. But he said there had been 'a lot of foot-dragging' among countries in finalising trade deals. Mr Trump has repeatedly said India is close to signing a deal and expressed hope that an agreement could be reached with the European Union, while casting doubt on a deal with Japan. Thailand, keen to avert a 36 per cent tariff, is now offering greater market access for US farm and industrial goods and more purchases of US energy and Boeing jets, Finance Minister Pichai Chunhavajira told Bloomberg News on July 6. India and the United States are likely to make a final decision on a mini trade deal in the next 24 to 48 hours, local Indian news channel CNBC-TV18 reported on July 6, with average tariffs on Indian goods shipped to the US to be 10 per cent, it said. Mr Hassett told CBS News that framework agreements already reached with Britain and Vietnam offered guidelines for other countries seeking trade deals. He said Mr Trump's pressure was prompting countries to move production to the United States. Miran called the Vietnam deal 'fantastic'. 'It's extremely one-sided. We get to apply a significant tariff to Vietnamese exports. They're opening their markets to ours, applying zero tariff to our exports.' REUTERS
Straits Times
26 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Luxury spending in Singapore defies global slump
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox Luxury sales in Singapore are expected to climb 7 per cent to $13.9 billion in 2025 compared with 2024, outpacing Japan, China and South Korea. – Luxury spending is defying a global slump in Singapore, a beacon for high-end retailers grappling with sluggish demand in major markets including China and the United States. Luxury sales in the Republic are expected to climb 7 per cent to $13.9 billion in 2025 compared with 2024, outpacing heavyweight regional shopping hubs Japan, China and South Korea, according to data shared with Bloomberg by Euromonitor International. The country's 2024 year-on-year growth in luxury sales surged past every other Asian market tracked by the analytics firm – except Japan. In 2026, it is projected to catch up to its 2019, pre-Covid-19 peak of $14.7 billion. Singapore's population of around six million is dwarfed by the likes of megacities like Tokyo and Shanghai. Yet it had the third-largest share of luxury store openings in 2024 among 32 Asia-Pacific cities excluding those in China's mainland, according to data shared with Bloomberg by commercial real estate firm Savills. That is benefiting places like The Shoppes at Marina Bay Sands, where Italian label Marni opened its first store in August 2024. The mall provides services like buggies to drive VIPs around for personalised styling sessions, and is set to launch salons previewing unreleased luxury collections for top clients, said senior vice-president of retail Hazel Chan. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore MPs should not ask questions to 'clock numbers'; focus should be improving S'poreans' lives: Seah Kian Peng Singapore Sequencing and standards: Indranee on role of Leader of the House Singapore NUS College draws 10,000 applications for 400 places, showing strong liberal arts interest Business Beyond the 9 to 5: Why side hustles are becoming a way of life for more full-time workers Singapore Changkat Primary School turns 2,000 old uniforms into new creations for 60th anniversary Life Star Awards 2025: 11 looks that shocked and charmed on the red carpet Singapore First BTO project in Sembawang North to be offered in July HDB launch World Tariffs will kick in on Aug 1 barring trade deals: US Treasury Secretary Ms Irene Ho, chief executive of marketing group The Luxury Network Singapore, said brands are also ramping up invitation-only sales events – now held several times a week – reflecting a pivot towards ultra-personalised shopping. Mr Jonathan Siboni, founder and CEO of consultancy Luxurynsight, said: 'Singapore has proved to be a very stable place for wealthy people. That has created a very strong local base for the luxury market. 'Singapore is an oasis in the desert.' The Republic is a rare bright spot in a luxury market dimmed by China's slowdown, with its strength reinforced by political stability and rising affluence. There are reportedly more than 240,000 millionaires here, and median household employment income has risen for five straight years. With visitors from countries including not just China and the US but Indonesia and India driving tourists' retail spend to $3.9 billion from January-September 2024 – up 5 per cent year on year – Singapore is doubling as both a safe haven and strategic gateway for luxury brands targeting South-east Asia. Brands attracted to Singapore's inbound wealth and clients versed in both Western and Asian aesthetics have begun using the market as a 'controlled launchpad' to test retail ideas, said Mr Angelito Perez Tan Jr, co-founder and CEO of RTG Group Asia, whose businesses include a luxury consultancy. 'These aren't just gimmicks, they're strategic soft launches that test how consumers engage emotionally with the brand,' he said. Despite its glitz, Singapore remains home to millions of people who are not millionaires – and its government has been facing a delicate balancing act as it works to narrow the country's wealth gap. Efforts to support the working class hinge partly on raising taxes on the wealthy, but risks driving them away – with some now considering alternative locations like Dubai. Singapore's banks stepped up scrutiny of wealthy clients in 2024, following a record $3 billion money laundering scandal that exposed weaknesses in how banks and brokerages in the country screen their customers. Still, the probe has only reinforced Singapore's credibility among the rich by proving that it protects wealth, identity and reputation through rule of law, said RTG's Mr Tan. 'It showed that the system works, and that's exactly what matters to legitimate high-net-worth individuals,' he said. 'When there's that kind of trust, spending naturally follows. That trust and validation are key reasons why luxury spending in Singapore has remained relatively steady, even as the broader region cools.' Spending is flowing across all segments of the luxury industry and brands are fighting for attention. Tapestry's affordable luxury brand Coach opened its first ever bar in May, tucked into a heritage shophouse in Chinatown and serving up customised martinis and New York City-style street snacks. High-end watchmaker Audemars Piguet Holding, meanwhile, opened AP Cafe inside its boutique, offering Swiss-Singaporean dishes incorporating wonton skins and chicken rice alongside couture. Raffles City mall also entered the luxury beauty game in 2024 with massive pop-ups. In 2025, 21 brands – including Armani Beauty, YSL Beauty, Chanel, Dior and Gucci – are on the bill. The upgrades are inspiring Singaporeans like Ms Chloe Liem, 22, an avid collector of jewellery from brands like Richemont's Van Cleef & Arpels and Cartier. 'Even though I know luxury items are crazily marked up, I understand I'm paying for the experience and feeling of the brand,' she said. 'I feel confident splurging on these items because I enjoy it.' BLOOMBERG
