Women and ethnic minorities less likely to be treated after diagnosis of deadly heart disease in England, study finds
Researchers at the University of Leicester analysed data from almost 155,000 people diagnosed with aortic stenosis – a narrowing of the valve between the heart's main pumping chamber and the main artery – between 2000 and 2022 across England, from a database of anonymised GP records.
The study found that patients living in the most deprived areas were 7% less likely to be referred for secondary care after their diagnosis compared with patients in the least deprived areas, and 4% less likely to undergo a procedure to replace their aortic valve.
The analysis, funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) and presented at the British Cardiovascular Society conference in Manchester, also found that women were 11% less likely to be referred to secondary care, such as a hospital specialist, after their diagnosis than men. Women were also 39% less likely to have a procedure to replace their aortic valve.
Aortic stenosis is a condition where the aortic valve, which controls blood moving from the heart to the body, starts restricting blood flow. This causes it to become narrow, resulting in symptoms such as shortness of breath and chest pain.
The study also found that black patients were 48% less likely to undergo a procedure to replace their aortic valve than white patients, with south Asian patients being 27% less likely. Both groups were more likely to be referred to secondary care, although the researchers say that this could reflect referrals for other heart issues not related to their aortic stenosis.
Dr Anvesha Singh, an associate professor at the University of Leicester and a consultant cardiologist, who was involved in the research, said: 'Previous studies have shown lower rates of valve replacement in women, and clinicians had assumed that women were less likely to be diagnosed with aortic stenosis. This analysis using large, real-world data clearly shows that this is not the case, giving us the clearest picture yet of what is happening in day-to-day clinical practice.
'Our study highlights potential inequities in management and care of this common and serious condition. More research is needed to understand the reasons for this and the true prevalence of aortic stenosis in different groups.'
Dr Sonya Babu-Narayan, the clinical director at the British Heart Foundation – which supported the research – and a consultant cardiologist, said: 'This study of over 150,000 GP records has unveiled disparities in access to aortic valve treatment for women, south Asian and black people, and people living in more deprived communities.
Sign up to First Edition
Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters
after newsletter promotion
'We don't yet have the full picture, but these findings are concerning, and we need more research to understand what is driving the differences seen. This will be crucial to enable action to address any underlying causes stopping some people from having access to the heart valve treatment and care they need when they need it.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
4 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Doctors thought my partner had stomach issues and gave him Gaviscon - but he was dead less than three weeks later
A heartbroken widow has told how her partner died after doctors dismissed his deadly health condition for stomach issues and sent him home with Gaviscon. David Burgess, from Sale, Greater Manchester, was otherwise healthy until he suddenly experienced 'horrific' pain in his stomach in April. After the 52-year-old's symptoms failed to subside, his partner Sandra O'Hagan, 56, rushed him to hospital the following day believing he could be suffering appendicitis. But she claimed, here doctors discharged him on the same day with a diagnosis of gastritis—inflammation of the stomach lining—and told him to take Gaviscon. It was only after his condition worsened that on May 1, she took the legal recruitment consultant back to Wythenshawe Hospital's A&E department in Manchester. Here, doctors confirmed he had aortic dissection, a life-threatening condition characterised by the tearing of the aortic wall, which can compromise blood flow to vital organs. Tragically, however, despite urgent surgeries, doctors told Ms O'Hagan there was nothing more they could do and it would 'cruel to keep trying'. On May 10, alongside his family, she made the heartbreaking decision to 'turn the machines off'. Ms O'Hagan now believes her partner would have had a significantly better chance of survival, and may even still be alive, if he had been diagnosed correctly on his first visit to A&E. She is currently exploring legal action against the hospital with the firm Enable Law, although investigations are currently ongoing. Ms O'Hagan has also called for more to be done to educate the public and medical professionals on aortic dissection. Figures show 10 lives could be saved per week with the correct diagnosis. Recalling her horrifying ordeal, Ms O'Hagan said: [Mr Burgess] never went to the doctors, and I can't remember him taking a day off work—he was always so committed to working and he was pretty tough.' But after experiencing a 'sharp pain' on April 24, 'he said he'd never felt anything like it before,' she added. 'It was absolutely horrific, just completely out of nowhere.' According to the Aortic Dissection Charitable Trust, acute aortic dissection can present with a wide range of symptoms, with the most common being the sudden onset of severe pain, typically felt in the chest, back, neck or abdomen, or in a combination of these areas. The following morning she drove him to A&E for testing before going to work. 'But they told him to go home, take Gaviscon, and don't take any painkillers because that would interfere with it and make it worse,' she said. 'Because it's a doctor, you think, "well, that must be right. It can't be that serious, otherwise they'd have picked it up and not sent him home". 'Looking back, you think, "why did we trust them [the doctors]?" But you just do.' Over the following days, she said Mr Burgess was struggling to eat properly and he felt 'drained and had no energy'. After his breathing progressively worsened he returned to A&E on May 1 and tests showed he had a torn aorta—the largest blood vessel in the body, which carries blood from the heart to the rest of the body—and he needed to have urgent surgery. She said: 'I couldn't process it, and I couldn't get through to him, and then I'd had a missed call from Wythenshawe A&E as well, but you ring back and you can't get through to anyone. 'I didn't know what was happening, I couldn't speak to David, I couldn't speak to A&E … so I dashed over to A&E after I'd composed myself. 'The surgeon said he had a torn aorta and half the cases where this happens, the people die straight away. 'So for him to still be alive after six days, it was a miracle.' However, he continued to deteriorate and a brain scan later revealed he had suffered several mini strokes. 'On David's final day, his parents, brother, sister-in-law and two nephews were at the hospital visiting,' Ms O'Hagan said. 'We were all taken aside and they said, "He's on maximum medication, he's not getting any better, there's nothing further we can do. It would be cruel to keep trying, really, because we have done everything". 'So we agreed to turn the machines off after his daughter came up to see him.' She said it was only afterwards that she realised the significance of the initial misdiagnosis, and she has submitted a formal complaint to the hospital. While legal investigations are ongoing, Sandra is determined to raise as much awareness as possible to help prevent others from losing their lives to aortic dissection. 'With David, when they sent him away, that was it, that was his only chance. He had to be diagnosed there and then to have the best chance of survival. 'Aortic dissection seems to be flying under the radar … but this awareness is so important and something's got to be done.' Jackie Linehan, Enable Law legal director and Ms O'Hagan's solicitor, who is working with aortic dissection charities, said: 'I am seeing an increasing number of claims where there have been catastrophic consequences from a failure to diagnose and treat aortic dissection in a timely manner. 'This is likely to be, in part, down to greater pressure on the NHS but also, increasingly, as a result of patients and their loved ones having a greater understanding of the condition and that, in a significant percentage of patients, it can be treated successfully if diagnosed in time. 'I hope to help Sandra get some answers about David's care prior to his diagnosis and to support her in her goal to raise awareness of aortic dissection so that others do not need to suffer as she and David have.' A spokesperson for Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust said: 'We offer our sincere condolences to Mr Burgess's family and friends for their loss. 'We have discussed his sad death with Ms O'Hagan, and we are undertaking a review of Mr Burgess's care. We will be sharing findings from that review with both Ms O'Hagan and the coroner. 'We will await the conclusion of the inquest before commenting further.' The Aortic Dissection Charitable Trust says 2,000 people a year lose their lives from aortic dissection in the UK.
BBC News
34 minutes ago
- BBC News
'Role model' Gobowen nurse receives national award
A Shropshire nurse leader described as "a role model in every sense" has been given a national award for her compassionate Roberts, who is a sister on the Midland Centre for Spinal Injuries (MCSI) at the Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic Hospital, has been awarded a Cavell Star accolades are given to nurses, midwives and other healthcare workers who show exceptional Roberts was nominated by a colleague at the hospital in Gobowen, near Oswestry, after she supported a patient with learning difficulties, who was a high-level tetraplegic after breaking his neck. "Sister Cath is the heart of MCSI," said student nurse associate Sophie Podmore, who nominated said Ms Roberts "consistently goes above and beyond" for patients and staff"."We recently cared for a patient with learning disabilities who built a remarkable bond with Cath," she said."Despite the complexities of his care, she went above and beyond to ensure he understood everything, taking time to explain each step of his care in a way that made him feel secure and heard."She's a role model in every sense."Ms Roberts said the man had no family nearby, and came to the hospital with only the clothes on his back."I got a grant from the League of Friends for him and went shopping," she said."I was so grateful to the League, who gave us a grant of £100. I went to Primark and got absolutely loads of clothes and shoes. He was over the moon."Sophie nominated me for going out of my way for him, but this is what we do for our patients."She said the award was "absolutely awesome", and that she felt "really humbled" to receive it. Follow BBC Shropshire on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X and Instagram.
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Experts discover the hidden health reason why girls may score lower at GCSE than boys
Heavy periods and period pain could see girls score lower at GCSE, concerning new research has suggested. British scientists, who surveyed almost 3,000 girls, found they had a 27 per cent lower chance of achieving five GCSE passes on average because of heavy or prolonged menstrual bleeding. Those who suffered the debilitating symptoms also missed an additional 1.7 days of school every year. Girls were also asked about severe cramps and pain during periods, with researchers discovering those experiencing such symptoms had a 16 per cent lower chance of achieving five GCSE passes. Experts, who labelled the findings important, said they should be taken 'very seriously' but also warned 'not to label women as being less capable because of their periods'. It comes as millions of teenagers across the UK this morning received their GCSE results, with one in five entries achieving at least a grade 7 or A. The GCSE pass rate, however, for English and maths also hit a record low, amid fears that some pupils are being left behind. Professor Gemma Sharp, an epidemiology expert at the University of Exeter, who supervised the fresh research, said: 'We know from previous research that heavy and painful periods can impact attendance and concentration. 'This study tells us that there's also a link with attainment. 'It's clear that people are capable of functioning at a high level regardless of their cycle, but we need a society that's better set up to support them, particularly if they are experiencing heavy bleeding and pain.' In the study, researchers from the University of Bristol and University of Exeter analysed data from 2,700 girls aged 13 to 16 who were taking their GCSEs between 2006 and 2009. The girls were interviewed four times over a three-year period about their periods, and their comments were analysed alongside absence and educational attainment data. The scientists found more than a third (36 per cent) of girls reported heavy or prolonged menstrual bleeding. They had 27 per cent lower odds of achieving five standard GCSE passes, often required to enable a student to go on to the next stage of their education. Meanwhile, over half (56 per cent) of the girls interviewed, said they experienced severe cramps and pain during periods. They took an additional 1.2 days off school on average, the researchers also found. Writing in the journal npj Science of Learning, they added that girls who experienced heavy or prolonged bleeding and menstrual pain were more likely to be persistently absent from school. Concerns about leaking, feelings of shame and embarrassment and bullying, may also be contributing to difficulties, they said. Meanwhile, challenges managing symptoms while in school, and difficulties accessing toilets during lessons, could be other contributing factors. Gemma Sawyer, a PhD student at the University of Bristol, who conducted the research, said: 'Our large-scale study provides the most convincing evidence to date that menstrual symptoms are associated with lower attendance and attainment. 'More education and support may help improve the menstrual health of adolescents and reduce inequalities in education outcomes.'
