logo
You can pay Tinder to find matches of a certain height. But why do we care so much?

You can pay Tinder to find matches of a certain height. But why do we care so much?

CNN14 hours ago

In her Tinder bio, Natasha Burns would tantalize potential matches with a few words: 'Probably taller than you.'
Men readily slid into the model's DMs ready to compare heights. When they found out she was 6 feet, 5 inches tall, though, many of them balked.
'I found most men would be okay with me in the setting of their own home or hanging out without people around,' she said. 'When it's seen publicly, it's a little bit more humiliating, I guess.'
Burns is 6 inches taller than her now-husband, whom she met on Tinder. But if either of them had been able to filter their potential matches by height, it's possible the two would have written each other off based on measurements alone.
Tinder is testing a feature that lets paying users set height preferences for potential partners, with the goal of matching singles whose desired height ranges align. Other dating apps already offer versions of this setting.
Single men on the shorter side almost immediately condemned the test setting: Surely, women would use it to filter them out completely, they protested.
The filter doesn't quite work that way — a Tinder spokesperson said the height setting won't block singles from being seen by users with different preferences — but it will influence the recommendations the app makes.
'We're always listening to what matters most to our Tinder users — and testing the paid height preference is a great example of how we're building with urgency, clarity, and focus,' Phil Price Fry, Tinder's vice president of communications, told CNN in a statement.
A potential partner's height really is that important to many singles on the digital prowl. Research shows that heterosexual women prefer to date taller men, while men commonly report seeking women who are shorter than them.
But dating apps have likely exacerbated our well-studied fixation on height in a potential partner, said Liesel Sharabi, an associate professor at Arizona State University who studies how online dating affects modern love.
'They're seeing people as their height,' she said of dating app users. 'They're seeing the ability to filter it, so suddenly height becomes salient in a way that it wasn't before. In doing that, the dating apps are telling you what you should be prioritizing.'
Knowing what you like in a potential partner is important, she said. But the narrower your idea of the perfect match becomes, the harder it can be to find them in real life.
Most dating apps allow (paying, premium) users to filter for their ideal match. They can set their desired age range, political affiliation, substance use, even intentions for using the app — are they looking for short-term fun or a love that lasts?
Other apps have introduced similar height filters (though Tinder remains the most popular among them — at least 14% of American adults have used it, per Pew Research Center). But even before users could specify that they're looking for a guy in finance, trust fund, 6-foot-5, blue eyes, many singles felt 'compelled to put (height) in their profile,' Sharabi said.
'Maybe they think that it's something that's going to make them especially attractive,' she said. 'Then other people see it and feel like, 'oh, I should be putting this in my profile, too.''
The height obsession often leads to deception, she said, and filters might even 'encourage' some singles to fudge their heights so they appear in front of more users.
'They might think, 'What's an inch? No one's gonna notice that,'' she said. 'People feel like they don't have any other choice.'
Well-meaning shorter men won't be filtered out completely through the new Tinder feature — the popular TikToker iPadTinderGirl set her height filter between 6 feet and 7 feet, 11 inches, and the first user she encountered after that was still under 6 feet tall.
'It's not a guarantee that these people aren't going to get shown to you, but at the same time, you're nudging the algorithm in a certain direction, right?' Sharabi said.
Though the conversation around dating app discrimination can quickly slide, among some aggrieved singles, into misogynistic territory, shorter men are likely at a disadvantage on the apps, Sharabi said.
A 2013 study found that a partner's height matters more strongly to straight women than it does to men (though men have been shown to prefer shorter partners, natch). There are also typically more men on dating apps than women — Pew found that 50% of men in 2022 reported having used dating apps in the last year compared to 37% of women — so women are able to be more discerning, Sharabi said.
It isn't only the 'short kings' that Sharabi worries about. Tall women could find themselves facing fewer matches with height filters, she said.
'I don't know why society has to perceive 'feminine' as being petite,' Burns said. 'I feel very feminine as a super tall woman.'
There's nothing inherently wrong with preferring tall men as a short woman, or vice versa, Sharabi said — we like what we like. But those preferences are at least subconsciously influenced by society's perceived norms of dainty women and strong, dominant men.
'We tend to equate height with things like power and status,' she said. '(Height preferences) are coming from some of these pretty highly gendered expectations that we have for what our relationship dynamics should look like.'
Dating biases are easier to disregard when two people meet offline and just click. But filters allow us to act on those biases before giving a chance to anyone who doesn't meet our requirements, Sharabi said.
'Filters remove a little bit of that serendipity,' she said.
Before meeting someone through online dating became de rigueur, the apps were designed to be 'equalizers' that could connect singles in thin dating markets with a galaxy of potential matches, she said.
Now, filtering has made it easy to search for a hyper-specific, ideal match — not so easy, though, to find them.
'People come into it with a wishlist of things they're looking for,' she said. 'And at a certain point, it almost becomes like you're shopping.'
Twitch streamer Charlie Schroeder enraged many users when she weighed in on the 'wishlist' element on X:
'Not to side with the men here, but why do women 5'3' and under have such strong preferences for men 6ft+. you are a hobbit, 5'8' is tall enough. you can't even tell when your 5'8' boyfriend is lying about being 6'0' because you're so short.'
Hobbits aside, Schroeder said she's noticed the '6-foot fixation' has only become more pronounced among single women she knows through the ubiquity of dating apps.
'People kind of become metrics on dating apps,' Schroeder told CNN. 'They're a set of data that you try to figure out if you're attracted to. A random number — 6 feet — became important because it signaled something -– attractiveness, masculinity.'
Focusing on an arbitrary measurement, she said, might 'foreclose some potential relationships,' she said.
'(Height) says nothing,' she said. 'It doesn't indicate anything about your ability to truly connect with someone.'
Schroeder and Burns both said height doesn't matter to them in a prospective partner — Schroeder, who has given up on using Tinder, tends to date shorter guys and taller women almost accidentally, she said. Burns is happily married to a shorter man who doesn't mind that his wife has several inches on him.
Dating apps may incentivize pickiness — and certainly, filters help users avoid matching with someone whose politics or lifestyles are incompatible — but singles who want to improve their chances of finding someone kind, who makes them laugh and shares their interests, might consider putting a little less emphasis on how tall that person is.
'People who are judging compatibility based on height might just miss out on some really great people for things that they wouldn't notice if they were to meet them,' Sharabi said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Ether Holds Steady Above $2,500 as ETF Demand Signals Institutional Confidence
Ether Holds Steady Above $2,500 as ETF Demand Signals Institutional Confidence

Yahoo

time30 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Ether Holds Steady Above $2,500 as ETF Demand Signals Institutional Confidence

Ether ETH has rebounded firmly from key support near $2,460, recovering losses and stabilizing above the $2,500 threshold amid broader market volatility. The rally follows a higher low formation backed by above-average volume, signaling growing market confidence. Institutional participation appears to be reinforcing the trend, with BlackRock's ETHA ETF reporting $492 million in net inflows last week. Total holdings now exceed $4.84 billion, reinforcing long-term bullish sentiment even as price action remains sensitive to geopolitical developments. Traders are watching to see if ETH can challenge resistance in the $2,520–$2,530 range. Technical Analysis Highlights ETH traded within a $72 range over 24 hours, from a low of $2,460.35 to a high of $2,532.41. A key support zone formed at $2,460–$2,470, where ETH bounced on strong volume during midnight hours. Final hour surge reached $2,515.11, backed by 5,919 ETH in volume. Higher low structure established with interim support at $2,485 and resistance at $2,503. Final retracement held support at $2,507, with price consolidating around $2,510 into the close. Disclaimer: Parts of this article were generated with the assistance from AI tools and reviewed by our editorial team to ensure accuracy and adherence to our standards. For more information, see CoinDesk's full AI Policy. Sign in to access your portfolio

Solana 's SOL Rebounds as Buyers Step In Above $147
Solana 's SOL Rebounds as Buyers Step In Above $147

Yahoo

time30 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Solana 's SOL Rebounds as Buyers Step In Above $147

SOL SOL showed renewed strength Saturday as it rebounded from a low of $147.13 to trade back above $151, despite lingering global macroeconomic headwinds. The recovery comes amid a spike in on-chain activity, with Coin Days Destroyed surging to 3.55 billion—its third-highest level this year—indicating movement of long-dormant tokens. The bounce off $147 confirmed a bullish double bottom pattern, supported by rising volume and a return to a short-term bullish channel on the 6-hour chart. Solana now faces overhead resistance near $152.85, where sellers previously stepped in, but a move above that level could open the door toward the $155–$157 zone. While Solana's network fundamentals remain strong, the broader macro environment continues to inject volatility into crypto markets, with ongoing US-China tariff disputes and rising global bond yields weighing on investor confidence. Technical Analysis Highlights SOL rallied from $147.13 to $152.94, gaining 3.95% intraday. Double bottom formed near $147.50, signaling a potential trend reversal. Resistance is developing at $152.50–$153.00, capping upward momentum. Bullish channel seen on 6-hour chart, with volume rising on green candles. Coin Days Destroyed spiked to 3.55 billion, its third-highest reading in 2025. Price dropped slightly in the last hour from $152.51 to $151.77 (0.48%). Hourly chart shows bearish engulfing pattern; $150.85 is near-term support. Disclaimer: Parts of this article were generated with the assistance from AI tools and reviewed by our editorial team to ensure accuracy and adherence to our standards. For more information, see CoinDesk's full AI Policy.

Why this key chip technology is crucial to the AI race between the US and China
Why this key chip technology is crucial to the AI race between the US and China

Yahoo

time40 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Why this key chip technology is crucial to the AI race between the US and China

In the largest single foreign investment in US history, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company has unveiled a $100 billion investment, drawing global attention and prompting concern in Taiwan. TSMC, which produces more than 90% of the world's advanced semiconductor chips that power everything from smartphones and artificial intelligence (AI) applications to weapons, will build two new advanced packaging facilities in Arizona, among others. Here's everything you need to know about advanced packaging technology, which has seen exponential demand growth along with the global AI frenzy, and what that means for the struggle between the US and China for AI dominance. While the two countries have announced a temporary truce that rolled back disruptive three-digit tariffs for 90 days, the relationship remains tense because of ongoing feuding over chip restrictions imposed by the US and other issues. Last month at Computex, an annual trade show in Taipei that has been thrust under the limelight because of the AI boom, the CEO of chipmaker Nvidia, Jensen Huang, told reporters that 'the importance of advanced packaging for AI is very high,' proclaiming that 'no one has pushed advanced packaging harder than me.' Packaging generally refers to one of the manufacturing processes of semiconductor chips, which means sealing a chip inside a protective casing and mounting it to the motherboard that goes into an electronic device. Advanced packaging, specifically, refers to techniques that allow more chips — such as graphic processing units (GPU), central processing units (CPU) or high bandwidth memory (HBM) — to be placed closer together, leading to better overall performance, faster transmission of data and lower energy consumption. Think of these chips as different departments within a company. The closer these departments are to each other, the easier it is, and less time it takes, for people to travel between them and exchange ideas, and the more efficient the operation becomes. 'You're trying to put the chips as close together as possible, and you're also putting in different solutions to make the connection between the chips very easy,' Dan Nystedt, vice president of Asia-based private investment firm TrioOrient, told CNN. In a way, advanced packaging keeps afloat Moore's Law, the idea that the number of transistors on microchips would double every two years, as breakthroughs in the chip fabrication process become increasingly costly and more difficult. While there are many types of advanced packaging technologies, CoWoS, short for Chips-on-Wafer-on-Substrate and invented by TSMC, is arguably the best known that was thrown under the limelight since the debut of OpenAI's ChatGPT, which sparked the AI frenzy. It has even become a household name in Taiwan, prompting Lisa Su, CEO of Advanced Micro Devices (AMD), to say that the island is the 'only place that you can say CoWoS and everybody would understand.' Advanced packaging has become a big deal in the tech world because it ensures AI applications, which require a lot of complex computing, run without delays or glitches. CoWoS is indispensable to producing AI processors, such as the GPUs produced by Nvidia and AMD that are used in AI servers or data centers. 'You could call it the Nvidia packaging process if you want to. Almost anyone making AI chips is using the CoWoS process,' said Nystedt. That is why demand for CoWoS technology has skyrocketed. As a result, TSMC is scrambling to ramp up production capacity. In a visit to Taiwan in January, Huang told reporters that the amount of advanced packaging capacity currently available was 'probably four times' what it was less than two years ago. 'The technology of packaging is very important to the future of computing,' he said. 'We now need to have very complicated advanced packaging to put many chips together into one giant chip.' If advanced fabrication is one piece of the puzzle in terms of chip manufacturing, advanced packaging is another. Analysts say having both pieces of that jigsaw in Arizona means the US will have a 'one-stop shop' for chip production and a strengthened position for its AI arsenal, benefitting Apple, Nvidia, AMD, Qualcomm and Broadcom, some of TSMC's top clients. 'It ensures that the US has a complete supply chain from advanced manufacturing to advanced packaging, which would benefit the US' competitiveness in AI chips,' Eric Chen, an analyst with market research firm Digitimes Research, told CNN. Because advanced packaging technologies key to AI are currently only produced in Taiwan, having it in Arizona also reduces potential supply chain risks. 'Instead of having all eggs in one basket, CoWoS would be in Taiwan and also the US, and that makes you feel more safe and secure,' said Nystedt. While CoWoS got its moment recently, the technology has actually existed for at least 15 years. It was the brainchild of a team of engineers led by Chiang Shang-yi, who served two stints at TSMC and retired from the company as its co-chief operating officer. Chiang first proposed developing the technology in 2009 in an attempt to fit more transistors into chips and solve bottlenecks in performance. But when it was developed, few companies took up the technology because of the high cost associated with it. 'I only had one customer … I really became a joke (in the company), and there was so much pressure on me,' he recalled in a 2022 oral history project recorded for the Computer History Museum in Mountain View, California. But the AI boom turned CoWoS around, making it one of the most popular technologies. 'The result was beyond our original expectation,' Chiang said. In the global semiconductor supply chain, companies that specialize in packaging and testing services are referred to as outsourced semiconductor assembly and test (OSAT) firms. In addition to TSMC, South Korea's Samsung and America's Intel, as well as OSAT firms including China's JCET Group, America's Amkor and Taiwan's ASE Group and SPIL are all key players in advanced packaging technologies. Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store