Sit-in protest after 'humiliated' mum told to stop breastfeeding at Stirling sports centre
A group of mothers have staged a sit-in demonstration at a Stirling sports centre after a woman was told she was not allowed to breastfeed.
Nine parents brought their children to The Peak on Tuesday to raise awareness of the legislation protecting breastfeeding mothers.
Under the Breastfeeding etc. (Scotland) Act 2005, it is an offence to stop someone from feeding a child under the age of two in a public place.
The mother, who wishes to remain anonymous, visited the Forthside Way sports centre last Thursday.
While feeding her baby by the pool, a male member of staff told her husband she was not allowed to breastfeed.
The family immediately left, and after complaining to The Peak, were told an investigation was underway.
Active Stirling has since apologised and plan to ensure all staff are trained on upholding these rights.
The mum-of-one described it as a 'humiliating' experience.
She told The Courier: 'I was definitely quite shocked. I was embarrassed and ashamed. I felt like I'd done something wrong.
'It was in the view of other parents and babies and other children in their swimming lessons.
'Members of staff and observers in the viewing area could see too.'
She also worries that such experiences could lead to new mothers becoming isolated and struggling with their mental health.
Unsure if she was in the wrong, the woman turned to Forth Valley Breastfeeding Network.
The group were 'upset' and informed her the law was on her side.
Other mothers say they have previously breastfed in The Peak and there were no signs prohibiting breastfeeding in the pool area.
However, another woman revealed she had experienced a similar situation at the sports centre.
The group came together at The Peak to stop the stigmatisation of breastfeeding.
Active Stirling's head of facilities met with the group and issued an apology to the mother.
One parent at the sit-in told The Courier she felt 'angry' over the situation.
She said: 'It's so wrong. You're allowed to feed your baby – it's the law.
'I'm here in solidarity. I was really angry that had happened.'
An Active Stirling spokesperson said: 'Active Stirling would like to express our sincere regret and concern at the experience described by a valued customer in an incident which occurred on Thursday 8 May 2025.
'We are deeply sorry to hear of the upset and distress this incident has caused the customer to whom we have promptly and unreservedly apologised.
'We are committed to undertaking an immediate full and thorough investigation into our employee training and operating procedures around breastfeeding to ensure no similar such incident occurs again in the future.
'We fully acknowledge the legal rights of breastfeeding parents as protected by the Breastfeeding etc. (Scotland) Act 2005 and the Equality Act 2010.
'We are entirely committed to upholding those rights, and we have always strived to be champions of inclusive, respectful, and supportive environments for all service users — especially breastfeeding mothers and young families.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
6 hours ago
- The Sun
Designer Karen Millen forced to issue an apology after sparking backlash by calling breastfeeding mothers ‘selfish'
KAREN Millen has been forced to issue an apology after causing backlash with her claim that breastfeeding makes mothers "selfish". The fashion designer was on Channel 5 show Vanessa on Tuesday when she made the controversial comments, as she weighed in on a viral story about a U.S. mum breastfeeding her three-year-old. 3 3 3 "There's no benefit, is there, for a child to be breastfed beyond six months, really," Karen said when asked for her opinion on the story. "I think it's quite a selfish thing on the mother's part." "Do you?" host Vanessa Feltz asked. "Why do you feel that?" "I do, actually, yeah," Karen continued. "I just think, you know, that's not good emotionally for that child." Influencer and mum-of-two Imogen was among those slamming Karen for the interview, as she said she "can't even bring myself to watch it" because she's "so angry and upset". Calling her a "woman bashing women", Imogen continued in her TikTok video: "Breastfeeding is incredible for your children. "The amount of antibodies, the goodness, everything that comes with that. "We can say how amazing something is without offending every single person in the world. "I just think comments like that should be kept to your own Whatsapp chat." Following the backlash surrounding the interview, Karen issued a statement to Vanessa, as she insisted it wasn't her "intention to upset a lot of your viewers". "The question was aimed at a three-year-old being breastfed, and my thoughts on that," she said. "And my answers reflected that, not the subject of breastfeeding. "I have three children, and I breastfed all three of them up until six, seven months, despite it being incredibly painful. "I got mastitis each time, and cracked and sore nipples. But I did it because I knew it was the best thing for them for at least six months. "So, you know, I think my issue was more on the fact that, you know, as a baby, breast milk is the best. What are the recommendations around breastfeeding? The NHS recommends breastfeeding your baby exclusively (feeding them breast milk only) for the first six months, but it's completely up to you to decide when you want to bring it to an end - and there's really no right or wrong way to do it. The NHS says weaning often happens gradually as your baby begins to eat more solid foods. They note that solid food shouldn't replace breast milk, as there is evidence to suggest breast milk helps a baby's digestive system when processing solid food for the first time. "Once they are eating solids, your baby will still need to have breast milk or formula as their main drink up to at least their first birthday," recommends the NHS. "Cows' milk isn't suitable as a main drink for babies under one, although it can be added to foods, such as mashed potatoes." You can also combine breastfeeding with formula, too and the NHS says "phasing out" of breastfeeding is often the easiest way. For example, dropping one feed in the day or at night time. After around a week, you can begin to think about dropping another. "If your baby is younger than one year, you'll need to replace the dropped breastfeed with a formula feed from a bottle or (if they are over six months) a cup or beaker, instead," they say. You can breastfeed for as long as you want, and while the NHS recommends breastfeeding your baby exclusively for the first six months, you shouldn't feel like you cannot continue for longer. The World Health Organization says: "Exclusive breastfeeding is recommended up to 6 months of age, with continued breastfeeding along with appropriate complementary foods up to two years of age or beyond." "And beyond being a baby, growing into a toddler, I just found it more difficult to come to terms with how that would benefit a three-year-old, a toddler. "So anyway, everyone has their own personal choice and decision in these things, and I respect that. "And as a woman, to women, I do respect your choices, and I do want to support you. "So my apologies once again - I hope you forgive me." But many people in the comments section were unwilling to accept the apology, with one writing: "This issue was that there was no balance and it was factually incorrect. "As a programme you should know better. Very disappointing. "Karen Millen came across as really smug and was quite rude, there was no compassion from her!" "We don't accept her apology. Cancel Karen Millen," another urged. "Well that's not an apology is it," a third sighed. As someone else called it the "most pathetic apology ever". "Karen Millen specifically mentioned breastfeeding past 6 months," they added. "She likened it to an addiction. She is completely uneducated and ignorant of the FACTS and recommendations by WHO (the World Health Organisation). "That is what she should apologise for. Not a half hearted back peddle. "She judges parents that breastfeed past 6 months - shameful." Vanessa concluded by saying: "The World Health Organisation recommends that children be breastfed exclusively for the first six months of their lives, and then up to the age of two and beyond that, if it suits the family." Others insisted that Karen is entitled to her own opinion, with some agreeing with her. "Apologise for your own opinion?? Why?" one questioned. "I don't see why she she should apologise," another added. "Karen is 100% right," a third insisted.
Daily Mail
a day ago
- Daily Mail
NHS bosses who denied boy, 8, treatment because he attends a private school could be guilty of 'indirect discrimination' says barrister
NHS bosses may have 'indirectly discriminated' against a boy by denying him treatment because he went to private school, a barrister has said. Daniel ShenSmith, a practising lawyer and internet personality, said such a move would be 'unethical' and could breach the Equality Act 2010. It comes after the Mail on Sunday revealed the boy, eight, was denied occupational therapy for this hypermobility syndrome because he is not state-educated. The website of his local NHS Trust, in west London, confirms 'referral criteria' limits the service to children attending a 'state-maintained Richmond school'. On his YouTube channel, Mr ShenSmith explained that such a policy would be potentially 'indirectly discriminatory' because it puts some people with a disability at a disadvantage. He added: 'It's just unethical. How can you justify not treating a child because they go to a private school? 'In my view there is no possible justification for this. 'I think this is indirectly discriminatory. It is a practise that needs to stop. They need to treat all these children in the same fair way, which you might expect an NHS trust to do.' The website of Kingston and Richmond NHS Foundation Trust confirms 'referral criteria' limits occupational therapy to children attending a 'state-maintained Richmond school' He pointed out that the policy is even 'spelt out' on the trust's website, and added: 'I don't think the lawyers looked at this one – and if they did... they need to look at it again.' The intervention comes after the Mail on Sunday revealed the family of the child, who asked to remain anonymous, believe a 'two-tier system' is now at play. However, the Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) has said any suggestion school choice was a factor was a 'miscommunication'. According to the boy's mother, he was referred to a paediatrician at Kingston Hospital in south-west London after she noticed he was 'struggling to hold the pen well enough to write properly', along with other mobility issues. At the hospital appointment she was asked to fill in a form which asked: 'Where does your child go to school?' She had been hoping to get an appointment with Richmond children's occupational therapy service that would have been the 'most important stage' of his assessment. However, days later, she received a text message saying the child had been 'declined' the crucial next appointment with occupational health therapists. She then discovered that the specialist unit had written a letter to her GP saying: 'We are unable to see this child as we do not provide a service to school age children who attend an independent schools [sic]. 'We are only commissioned to provide a service to the mainstream schools.' The boy's older brother – who has the same condition, had been treated without issue several years earlier. In his video about the case, Mr ShenSmith said: 'Why should it make any difference whatsoever whether they attend a state-maintained school as opposed to an independent school?' He said one possible reason for the policy may be to do with administrative processes related to funding. However, he added: 'That's wrong in my view, because that then excludes anyone that goes to an independent school that their parents pay for, and in my view that could be at the very least indirectly discriminatory.' He said under the Equality Act, a blanket policy can be potentially indirectly discriminatory if it 'has an effect which particularly disadvantages people with a protected characteristic'. This would include people with disabilities. Mr ShenSmith, who runs ShenSmith Law, is registered with the Bar Standards Board and was called to the Bar in 2018. He works in a wide range of fields including family, commercial and intellectual property law. In addition, he runs the YouTube channel BlackBeltBarrister, which aims to 'help people understand law'. He added that the Richmond policy was also in breach of the general statutory duty under the current legislation - the National Health Service Act 2006. He told Mail Online: 'This establishes the framework for NHS England to provide universal and free at the point of use service to all eligible individuals including children, regardless of where they attend school.' Health Secretary Wes Streeting was urged this week to 'act swiftly' to intervene in the case. A spokesman for Kingston and Richmond NHS Foundation Trust said the boy had not been denied treatment because of his school. They said occupational therapy services are provided to all children who hold an education, health and care plan (EHCP), regardless of their school. For those without an EHCP, some state schools provide an on-site NHS occupational therapy advice. The spokesman added: 'We are sorry if the wording of our correspondence has caused upset and confusion; we will amend it prospectively.' It is understood anyone without an ECHP who attends a private school would not be able to use on-site services at state schools. A DHSC spokesman said: 'NHS services are free at the point of use to all. 'NHS occupational therapy services are provided for all children with an EHCP. 'For those without an EHCP, some schools provide on-site NHS occupational therapy. 'The Trust has apologised for any miscommunication in its correspondence with the family and is amending its wording to avoid any confusion in the future.' In a separate case, families are currently awaiting a judgement from the High Court on the Government's decision to impose VAT on private school fees. To view Mr ShenSmith's full commentary visit the BlackBeltBarrister YouTube channel.
The Courier
a day ago
- The Courier
EXCLUSIVE: 'Large-scale' investigation launched into Blairgowrie care home after complaint over care of resident
A 'large-scale' investigation has been launched into a Blairgowrie care home after a complaint over the care of a resident. Perth and Kinross care chiefs are probing Muirton House Care Home, which supports elderly people and those with dementia and learning difficulties. It follows a complaint from the family of a resident at the home, 40-year-old Heather Sandilands, who claimed she was not being given the proper care or support. The Care Inspectorate upheld a complaint made about Muirton House, including that Heather – who has Down syndrome and type one diabetes – was given 'inadequate access to meaningful social and recreational activities'. She was eventually moved from the Essendy Road home after eight years. Heather's sister Kirsty Cambridge, who is her welfare guardian, told The Courier that Muirton House seemed a good fit for her when she moved in. Kirsty said: 'She had a fantastic life there, better than I felt I could've provided myself. 'They were always out doing things, non-stop activities. 'I saw on Facebook all the things they were up to – they went to great lengths to make it a family home. 'Then came Covid, and all the activities stopped, and Heather started to have some behavioural issues. 'When lockdown passed, life went back to normal, but there were some staff changes at the home with new management. 'Heather used to spend the money I'd send her for when they were out doing things. 'I noticed she wasn't spending any money, and I could see on the Facebook photos her hair was long – she hates long hair. 'I phoned up to ask, and they told me they didn't have enough staff to take her out to do these things, like going to the hairdresser.' Kirsty claims Heather was being kept occupied by activities like cleaning her room instead of going swimming and out to eat food. 'Her life became like lockdown, and then the behaviour started again,' Kirsty said. 'I felt I had no alternative but to go to the Care Inspectorate.' All four parts of Kirsty's complaint to the Care Inspectorate were upheld. The watchdog found that: The report said: 'Ms Sandilands did not experience care planning reflective of her needs, wishes, choices and stress and distress symptom management.' Kirsty says when she saw the report, she was 'horrified' and it was 'actually worse than I realised'. In April 2025, Heather was given 28 days to leave Muirton House on the grounds it was unable to meet her clinical care needs. She has since been moved into a new care home in Clackmannanshire, closer to her sister. Off the back of concerns raised about the home, Perth and Kinross Health and Social Care Partnership has launched a 'large-scale' investigation – a multi-agency probe that takes place when people may be at risk of harm in a care setting. The partnership is made up of representatives from Perth and Kinross Council, NHS Tayside and other agencies. A spokesperson said: 'We can confirm that Perth and Kinross Health and Social Care Partnership is undertaking a large-scale inquiry into Muirton House. 'We are working with the provider, residents, other placing local authorities and families, as well as the Care Inspectorate, to ensure that any issues identified are resolved promptly and all residents receive the highest possible standards of care and support.' A spokesperson for Muirton House, which is run by Larchwood Care, said: 'It would not be right for us to discuss publicly any individual and their care needs. 'We are working with the Perth and Kinross Health and Social Care Partnership to ensure that the care and support provided is of the required standard. 'The informal feedback has been very positive, and where necessary, changes have been made. 'We are confident in the care and support provided.'
