War speculation shakes Amritsar, fails to rattle border villages; few consider relocating; ‘Not Told To Evacuate Yet'
Amritsar: The holy city — around 50 km away from Lahore — is grappling with uncertainty as the nation gears up for a mock drill on Wednesday, speculating whether India and Pakistan will engage in all-out war, limited strikes, or continue their aggressive posturing without crossing the line into direct conflict.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
Amritsar's urban areas are displaying greater anxiety about relocating compared to those living in close proximity to the international border.
"During the 1971 Indo-Pak war, I moved with my family to my brother's house in Dehradun. I am still considering going there, but I sincerely hope there is no war," said Ravinder Singh, a local businessman.
Conversely, residents of Daoke, a village of 2,200 people surrounded by Pakistan on three sides, remain seemingly unfazed by the looming threat of conflict and the prospect of relocating.
Harpreet Singh, a local resident, expressed greater concern over the Border Security Force (BSF) restricting access beyond the border fence, which has halted crucial bailing work and caused financial losses.
Similarly, former village council member Balkar Singh stated, "I don't follow the news; life is normal here. Unlike past war scares, we haven't been asked to evacuate so far, but the BSF's restrictions on accessing our fields beyond the fence are the real issue."
As tensions rise, both govt and private medical facilities in Amritsar are on alert. Dr Avtar Singh, who runs a 400-bed private hospital, affirmed the private sector's readiness. "Everyone will step forward. Our group has discussed this, and as in the past, we are fully committed to supporting our saviours, the Army," he asserted.
However, a former Indian Air Force officer, speaking on condition of anonymity, downplayed the likelihood of a full-scale conventional war.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
"If there were concrete indications of an impending conflict, we might have already witnessed preemptive measures such as the evacuation of border villages, the laying of landmines, and the construction of new bunkers, as was the case during Operation Parakram in 2001-2002," he said.
Social activist Harjit Singh, recalling the 1971 Indo-Pakistan conflict, described the upcoming mock drills and blackout exercises, similar to those in Ferozepur, as efforts to ensure preparedness.
However, he suggested that advancements in modern warfare technology might render such traditional measures less effective. "Blackouts can still disorient enemy pilots, offering a brief tactical advantage—perhaps the reason these drills persist," he opined.
Meanwhile, a group of morning walkers at Company Bagh in Amritsar was overheard discussing survival techniques in the event of a nuclear explosion.
MSID:: 120931058 413 |
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Lesson from stampedes: Communication key to crowd control, say experts
This year, stampedes at a major railway station in Delhi, at the Maha Kumbh in Uttar Pradesh, and during a cricket match victory celebration in Karnataka have led to at least 72 deaths and a few hundred injuries so far — a grim statistic which exposes the glaring gaps in crowd regulation rules, official apathy and tokenistic governance. Action taken following these tragic, largely preventable deaths does little to avert such incidents in the future — after the June 4 stampede in Bengaluru, the state leadership, replicating the action of its counterparts in other parts of the country, suspending the city's top cop and other police staff, and ordered a magisterial inquiry. Later, the Karnataka high court also took suo motu notice. In light of these developments, HT spoke with veteran police officers, planners, urban designers, and academics to dissect the anatomy of stampedes and how to prevent them. Prakash Singh, a retired IPS officer who was the state police chief of Assam and Uttar Pradesh and the director-general of the Border Security Force, said the Bengaluru tragedy appears to be a case of overriding political desire overruling reservations from the police. Multiple reports, including by HT, suggest that the police had initially dismissed the idea of a parade due to paucity of time. But as some players from the overseas were scheduled to return home, there was a rush to hold the celebrations on June 4 itself, according to people aware of the matter. 'But this should have never been made part of the consideration. No event can be organised without the clearance from the police,' Singh said. The second issue, he pointed out, was the inconsistent messaging. 'There were multiple versions of when and where the parade will be held.' The most significant lapse, however, was the police's alleged failure to react when the crowd started trickling, Singh said. 'Around 200,000-300,000 people tried to make their way towards the stadium when the capacity was only 36,000. It was a policing failure, given that there are enough surveillance measures that would have indicated swelling of crowds.' Police should have, through existing intelligence and surveillance measures, prevented the crowd from converge from all directions. Another lapse was the inadequate deployment of forces, he added. 'Ideally, civic volunteers, armed battalions, and the fire brigade should have been mobilised. If there was fatigue, police from outside the commissionerate should have been engaged, he said. While Karnataka home minister G Parameshwara has announced that the government will formulate a new SOP for crowd control, these mechanisms are not alien to India, where heavy footfall events such as the Maha Kumbh are held regularly. They have been part of the police manual since colonial times, and even the National Disaster Management Agency (NDMA) has issued guidelines to manage crowds at events. To prevent stampedes, the administration — be it government, private organisers or temple trusts— should actively control the 'hype' through constant messaging, said Monika Vij, a geography professor at Delhi's Miranda House, who has researched extensively on crowd management at religious events. Referring to the Kumbh tragedy in January, where the official death toll was 30, she said, while the authorities made 'excellent arrangements', the hype of a historical event overshadowed everything. Authorities could not effectively communicate with the crowd when the stampede took place, she said. 'There has to be greater control and responsibility over disseminating information.' On the Bengaluru stampede, she said it was the 'lack of clarity over the venue and ticketing' which led to the tragedy. Similar confusion was seen at the February 15 stampede at the New Delhi Railway Station over train departures, Vij said. Another retired IPS officer Nazrul Islam, who was the ADGP in West Bengal, said a crowd, by default, is fuelled by frenzy and not rationality — be it a religious procession or a sports event. 'Visible, prompt policing is important to keep the crowd disciplined. Staggered movement of crowds is essential, and for that, checkpoints are installed in all directions from approaches to the event venue,' he said. KT Ravindran, founder of the Institute of Urban Designers India, said, for any kind of gathering, authorities must ensure that designing standards, such as entry and exit points and emergency exit, are followed. 'At any point in time, the potential to disperse should be higher than the potential to gather.' Ujan Ghosh, the former president of the institute, said the combined action of authorities, including police, along with the architecture, either prevents or causes a stampede. He also questioned if the Bengaluru stadium was the right choice as the venue for the cricket felicitation event. Spaces, such as streets and pavements, are often designed for specific purposes, he said, suggesting that stadiums are usually for ticketed events.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Dhumma's Bluestar event messaging went beyond Gargaj, had a Patna Sahib outreach
Jalandhar: On the 41st anniversary of Operation Bluestar at Akal Takht, Baba Harnam Singh Dhumma-led Damdami Taksal showed it clout by not letting Akal Takht acting jathedar Giani Kuldeep Singh Gargaj to speak or honour the families of the "martyrs" (people who were killed in the Army action in 1984), but the messaging went beyond this. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Damdami Taksal also made it a point to invite two Takht Patna Sahib high priests and give them prominence at a function held at its Mehta Chowk headquarters on the same day. These high priests were barred by Akal Takht on May 21 from 'panthic services'. Both priests, along with three others, retaliated on the same day by declaring the jathedars of Akal Takht and Takht Damdama Sahib "tankhaiya" and summoned Shiromani Akali Dal president Sukhbir Singh Badal. The two high priests in question were Patna Sahib head granthi Giani Baldev Singh and granthi Gurdial Singh. Both, along with three other priests, issued another directive on June 1, giving Sukhbir an extension and asking him to appear before them on June 10 to present his side, warning him with "stringent action" if he failed to do so. To communicate the message further, both were made to stand next to Darbar Sahib head granthi Giani Raghbir Singh when he addressed the congregation. Two others who were made to flank him included Darbar Sahib granthi Palwinderpal Singh, a former student of taksal, and a representative from Takht Hazur Sahib. Baldev Singh also addressed the congregation. Shiromani Gurdwara Parbandhak Committee president Harjinder Singh Dhami also addressed the function, while quite a few granthis of Darbar Sahib and leaders of different sampardas (traditional groups) attended the gathering. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now A press statement issued by the taksal mentioned Raghbir Singh as "jathedar", while former Kesgarh Sahib jathedar Giani Sultan Singh, who is now working as granthi at Darbar Sahib, was mentioned as Kesgarh Sahib jathedar. Both Raghbir Singh and Sultan Singh were unceremoniously sacked from their posts of jathedars in March, and their removal led to a big controversy. Taksal chief Baba Dhumma has been agitating against their removal and has been objecting to Gargaj's appointment and taking charge as jathedar, arguing that 'maryada' was not followed. At the June 6 function at Akal Takht, Gargaj gave his message through the 'ardas'. While Baba Dhumma got an upper hand as his point prevailed, Gargaj, after the function, gained some sympathy from the community members. The tradition of Akal Takht jathedar not giving his message on that day was broken to avert a clash. Box – Clash between Akal Takht and Patna Sahib clergy Five Sikh high priests at Akal Takht, including Akal Takht acting jathedar Kuldeep Singh Gargaj and Takht Damdama Sahib jathedar Tek Singh Dhanaula, in their meeting on May 21 held that an earlier directive by Akal Takht on Dec 6, 2022, about Baldev Singh and Gurdial Singh was not complied with, and barred them from rendering panthic services. At that time, Giani Harpreet Singh was acting jathedar of Akal Takht. The May 21 directive also explicitly mentioned that Baldev Singh was not fit to render services at Takht Patna Sahib or in the panthic sphere. Both priests were also asked to appear at Akal Takht and present their side. Until then, they were barred from rendering 'panthic services'. The Akal Takht directive also asked the Takht Patna Sahib management committee to appear at Akal Takht and present its side. Hours after this directive, the five granthis (priests) of Takht Patna Sahib, including Baldev Singh and Gurdial Singh, hit back by declaring Gargaj and Takht Damdama Sahib jathedar Tek Singh Dhanaula 'tankhaiya'. They asked Sukhbir Singh Badal to appear there for "his interference and being a conspirator" in the whole affair and asked the Patna Sahib management committee to not appear at Akal Takht. They also held that from now on, no directive from Akal Takht or from any other yakht would be implemented at Takht Patna Sahib nor complied with. When Baba Dhumma announced his opposition to Gargaj's address, to further buttress his case, he prominently cited the Takht Patna Sahib clergy declaring him 'tankhaiya'. MSID:: 121707935 413 |
Hindustan Times
3 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Donald Trump inviting public to Fort Bragg? Here's truth behind the text message you received
Several social media users on Sunday shared screenshots of what they claimed was an invitation by President Donald Trump to Fort Bragg, one of the largest military bases in the world. The message, which some X users have flagged as suspicious, aligns with Trump's confirmed visit. The president will be in North Carolina on Tuesday to take part in celebrations for the Army's 250th year. The text message, according to X posts and CityView NC, was sent by America250 organization. 'Americans will gather at Fort Bragg — home to the most elite military in the world — to celebrate the unmatched strength, sacrifice, and accomplishments of the men and women who defend our nation. This special event will honor the courageous warriors ready to defend liberty at a moment's notice and recognize their enduring commitment to America's security and values," it reads. Guests have been asked to pre-register. However, no official White House or Fort Bragg source confirms a broad public invitation. Reacting to the message, one person tweeted: 'It's a good thing I'm not willing to waste my life in prison just to take out president Trump, cuz his team just invited me to one of their functions at Fort Bragg. I'm going to decline because I don't have any Trump merchandise to sell at the event.' Trump is scheduled to visit Fort Bragg on June 10, 2025, to kick off the Army's 250th birthday celebrations. The visit follows his campaign promise to restore the base's name from Fort Liberty to Fort Bragg. The text implies unrestricted public access, but Fort Bragg's strict security limits attendance to pre-registered civilians and DoD cardholders, per No evidence supports a mass public invitation, and the America250 VIP events were donor-exclusive, per Similar text campaigns have pushed scams or political fundraising, as seen in 2024 election cycles, per NBC News.
