‘Nitish sets free those with AK-47': Tejashwi on shooting incident outside his Patna residence
Patna (Bihar) : RJD leader and former Bihar Deputy Chief Minister Tejashwi Yadav on Thursday lashed out at the Nitish Kumar-led state government over the law and order situation in the state after an incident of firing was reported near his residence in Patna.
Speaking to mediapersons here, the RJD leader said, 'There is a complete rule of criminals in place now. There is no government. Anarchy has set in in the administration and government. Shooting is taking place outside my residence in a VVIP area, it had never happened before.'
Taking a jab at the Nitish Kumar government, Yadav said, 'Nobody is safe in Bihar. There is a criminal disorder of the law and order in Bihar. Nitish ji forms laws and sets free those with AK-47. He supports criminals.'
'Criminals have become fearless in Bihar, and I am a former Chief Minister, Leader of Opposition in the state assembly, there are residences of the Development Commissioner, many ministers near my residence. Still, such incidents are happening. This is very serious… If the most secure area of the state is not safe and they cannot catch the criminals then Bihar CM Nitish Kumar should resign,' said Yadav.
Ahead of Prime Minister Narendra Modi's visit to Bihar tomorrow on June 20, Tejashwi Yadav hit out at the centre and claimed that the morale of the criminals was high in the 'demonic rule' of the NDA.
'In the demonic rule of NDA, the morale of the criminals protected by the government is so high that in the high security zone, at a short distance from the Governor's residence Raj Bhawan, Chief Minister's residence, Leader of the Opposition's residence, Judge's residence and the airport, the dreaded criminals are roaming around openly firing. Beware! What if someone calls it Jungle Raj? Anyway, the Prime Minister is coming to Bihar tomorrow, so the Godi media has to maintain a positive image,' posted Yadav on X.
Earlier in the day, Tejashwi Yadav claimed that the Prime Minister is coming to Bihar to do 'politics of hatred' and should be ashamed to come to the state due to unfulfilled promises.
'If PM Modi listens to his 200 speeches that he has given so far in Bihar, he will be ashamed to come to Bihar. He made hundreds of promises, he will be ashamed of what to say to the people of Bihar… He is not coming to Bihar to provide employment, reduce inflation, eliminate poverty, but just to do the politics of Hindu-Muslim, the politics of hatred,' Yadav told ANI earlier today.
Prime Minister Narendra Modi is set to visit Bihar tomorrow (June 20), where he is scheduled to address a public gathering in the Siwan district of the state. Earlier, as Deputy CM Vijay Kumar Sinha urged people to attend the event in large numbers, he said that PM Modi will highlight the resolution for 'Viksit Bihar' and give a message for 'freedom from nepotism.'
Regarding nepotism, the RJD leader claimed that while the BJP criticises others of family-politics, half of the ministers in the state cabinet are dynasts, while also repeating his claim of NDA being a 'National Daamaad Aayog.
'They keep abusing us about family politics, but their alliance is filled with dynastic politicians, and the same thing is true even in their party (BJP). In Bihar, over 50 per cent of the ministers are dynasts… NDA in Bihar means 'National Daamaad Aayog'. PM Modi has fitted everyone's son-in-law in the 'Aayog',' the RJD leader said.
This report is auto-generated from ANI news service. ThePrint holds no responsibility for its content.
Also read: Gloves off as NDA leaders, Prashant Kishor trade barbs in run-up to high-stakes Bihar polls
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
18 minutes ago
- The Hindu
U.S. report says India acts minimally, Pakistan rarely acts against rights abuses
The U.S. government noted abuses in India and Pakistan in a shortened human rights report released on Tuesday (August 12, 2025) that said India 'took minimal credible steps' to combat the abuses while Pakistan 'rarely took credible steps.' The Trump administration scaled back the annual U.S. government report on human rights worldwide, dramatically softening criticism of some allies and countries that have been President Donald Trump's partners. The State Department human rights documentation for India and Pakistan was also much shorter and scaled back this year. India has been an important U.S. partner in recent years in Washington's effort to counter China's rise, although relations have been tense over Mr. Trump's imposition of a 50% tariff on goods from India. Pakistan is a non-NATO U.S. ally. About India, the report said, 'The government took minimal credible steps or action to identify and punish officials who committed human rights abuses.' On Pakistan, it added, 'The government rarely took credible steps to identify and punish officials who committed human rights abuses.' Indian and Pakistani embassies in Washington had no immediate comment on the report released on Tuesday (August 12, 2025), which documented instances in 2024. Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch fault the Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi's government for its treatment of minorities. They point to rising hate speeches, a religion-based citizenship law the U.N. calls 'fundamentally discriminatory,' anti-conversion legislation that challenges freedom of belief, the 2019 removal of Muslim-majority Kashmir's special status, and the demolition of properties owned by Muslims. Mr. Modi denies discrimination and says his policies, such as food subsidy programs and electrification drives, benefit everyone. In Pakistan, Amnesty International says government authorities fail to protect minorities, including Christians, and use 'excessive and unnecessary force' against civil society voices and protesters. In particular, rights groups, the U.N., and Western governments raised concerns over the 2024 Pakistani elections. A U.N. working group said last year that former Prime Minister Imran Khan's detention violated international law. Khan remains in jail. Islamabad says its elections were fair and dismisses allegations of rigging and foul play. Washington and New Delhi have not reached a trade deal, while the United States has reached an agreement in recent weeks with Pakistan. Mr. Trump angered India by taking credit for an India-Pakistan ceasefire in May after hostilities between the neighbours following an April attack in India-administered Kashmir. India says New Delhi and Islamabad should resolve their ties directly without outside involvement.
Hans India
18 minutes ago
- Hans India
Meat ban row: Independence Day is for unity, not politics, says BJP MLA Rameshwar Sharma
Bhopal: Even though the Madhya Pradesh government has not issued any notification on banning meat sales during the upcoming Independence Day and Krishna Janmashtami celebrations, several civic bodies across the country have ordered such restrictions -- a move welcomed by ruling BJP leaders. BJP MLA from Bhopal's Huzur constituency, Rameshwar Sharma, said decisions by civic bodies in places such as Hyderabad and Kalyan in Maharashtra should be appreciated rather than turned into a political controversy. 'August 15 is a day to showcase India's unity, not to indulge in politics. What is wrong if meat sales are suspended for two or three days?' Sharma told IANS on Wednesday. Reacting to AIMIM chief and Hyderabad MP Asaduddin Owaisi's criticism -- in which he called the ban 'callous and unconstitutional' -- Sharma accused him of trying to stir unrest. 'Owaisi is among those leaders who mislead the Muslim community for political gain. Besides being a politician, he is also a senior advocate. He should understand the significance of Independence Day,' Sharma said. The meat ban orders have triggered a political storm, with leaders from across the spectrum calling it an infringement on personal food choices at a time when the nation is celebrating its freedom. In Hyderabad, the Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation has directed that slaughterhouses and meat shops remain closed on August 15 and 16 -- Independence Day and Janmashtami. A similar order in Maharashtra's Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar drew objections from Deputy Chief Minister Ajit Pawar. 'It is wrong to impose such a ban. In big cities, people from different communities live together. If it's an emotional issue, people may accept a one-day ban. But enforcing it on days like Maharashtra Day, Independence Day, and Republic Day is unreasonable,' Pawar said. The Kalyan Dombivli Municipal Corporation in Thane has also issued a closure order. Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Aaditya Thackeray hit out at the move, saying the municipal commissioner should be suspended. 'What we eat on Independence Day is our right and our freedom. They cannot dictate our meals. In our home, even during Navratri, our prasad includes prawns and fish because that is our tradition -- this is our Hindutva. Why enter people's homes? The corporation should focus on fixing potholes,' Thackeray said.
News18
27 minutes ago
- News18
Decision is correct: Abu Azmi backs SCs order on relocation of stray dogs
Mumbai (Maharashtra) [India], August 13 (ANI): Maharashtra Samajwadi Party president Abu Asim Azmi on Wednesday backed the Supreme Court's order to relocate stray dogs, stating that the decision was 'very correct" as dog bites often lead to serious medical treatment, including 14 injections.'This decision is very correct… People with pet dogs often find their dogs biting people on the road. People love dogs and often carry them in their cars. When a dog bites, 14 injections are needed… However, when we bring a goat into our house, they become very sad, even though the goat never bites…" Azmi told ANI. Earlier in the day, Chief Justice of India (CJI) BR Gavai stated that he would examine the ongoing issue related to the relocation of the dogs after an advocate mentioned the matter and said that different benches of the Supreme Court had issued conflicting directions. The matter relating to stray dogs was mentioned before a bench headed by the CJI for urgent listing, to which the CJI said, 'I will look into this."Advocate Nanita Sharma said two benches of the apex court have passed different orders on the stray dogs issue.'This is with regard to the community dogs issue… There is an earlier judgment of this court, of a bench of Justices JK Maheshwari and Sanjay Karol, which says there cannot be indiscriminate killing of canines and that compassion for all living beings has to be there," the lawyer was referring to the recent order passed by a bench headed by Justice JB Pardiwala, where the court had ordered relocation of the stray dogs in Delhi to dog shelters and another order passed by a Justice JK Maheshwari-led bench in May 2024, whereby the petitions relating to the stray dog issue were relegated to the respective High Courts. Justice Maheshwari had said, 'Under all circumstances, there cannot be any indiscriminate killings of canines and the authorities have to take action in terms of the mandate and spirit of the prevalent legislation(s) in place".Sharma today mentioned the petition filed by an organisation named Conference for Human Rights (India), challenging a Delhi High Court's order in its PIL seeking directions for sterilisation and vaccination of community dogs in Delhi as per the Animal Birth Control (Dogs) Rules. (ANI)
