logo
Invoking criminal law for recovery of money is abuse of law: Supreme Court

Invoking criminal law for recovery of money is abuse of law: Supreme Court

Time of India3 days ago
Supreme Court
NEW DELHI: Invoking criminal law by filing an FIR for recovery of money by a person is an abuse of the process of law as it is a civil dispute, the Supreme Court said and expressed frustration over HCs allowing it in violation of its rulings.
The apex court stated this while quashing criminal proceedings initiated by a production house against Bollywood filmmaker Shailesh Kumar Singh, who had produced 'Tanu Weds Manu', over a monetary dispute.
'How many times HCs are to be reminded that to constitute an offence of cheating, there has to be something more than prima facie on record to indicate that the intention of the accused was to cheat the complainant right from the inception.
The plain reading of FIR does not disclose any element of criminality,' a bench of Justices J B Pardiwala and R Mahadevan said in an order on July 14.
Indicating that HCs have virtually turned a deaf ear to its recent orders holding that such cases come within the ambit of civil suits, the bench referred to its verdicts which had settled the issue. It said SC in Aug had stated that a mere breach of contract cannot give rise to a criminal prosecution for cheating unless fraudulent or dishonest intention is shown right from the beginning of the transaction.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Hiranandani Fortune City: At Panvel, Mumbai: 2BHK: 1.05 Cr*
Hiranandani Fortune City
Enquire Now
Undo
'Every act of breach of trust may not result in a penal offence of criminal breach of trust unless there is evidence of a manipulating act of fraudulent misappropriation.
An act of breach of trust involves a civil wrong in respect of which the person may seek his remedy for damages in civil courts but, any breach of trust with a mens rea, gives rise to a criminal prosecution as well,' it had said.
Advocate Sana Raees Khan, appearing for producer Shailesh Kumar Singh, told the court that no criminal offence was made out against him and criminal prosecution should not be allowed to be used as an instrument of harassment.
Agreeing with her, the bench quashed the FIR and also expressed shock on how the Allahabad HC dealt with the case by directing him to pay Rs 25 lakh to the complainant. SC also directed them to go for mediation.
'We fail to understand why the HC should undertake such an exercise. The HC may either allow the petition saying that no offence is disclosed or may reject the petition saying that no case for quashing is made out. Why should the HC make an attempt to help the complainant to recover the amount due and payable by the accused.
It is for the civil court or commercial court, as the case may be, to look into in a suit that may be filed for recovery of money or in any other proceedings,' SC said.
'We are quite disturbed by the manner in which the HC has passed the impugned order. The HC first directed the appellant to pay Rs 25 lakh to the respondent, and thereafter, directed him to appear before the Mediation and Conciliation Centre for the purpose of settlement.
That's not what is expected of an HC to do in a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution or a miscellaneous application filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for quashing of FIR or any other criminal proceedings,' SC said.
It said that 'what is expected of the HC is to look into the averments and the allegations levelled in the FIR along with the other material on record, if any. The HC seems to have forgotten the well-settled principles as enunciated in the decision of this court'.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

CBI books Arunachal college teacher for Rs 1.95 lakh bribe in contracts
CBI books Arunachal college teacher for Rs 1.95 lakh bribe in contracts

Hans India

time4 minutes ago

  • Hans India

CBI books Arunachal college teacher for Rs 1.95 lakh bribe in contracts

Guwahati: An assistant professor of the College of Agriculture, Pasighat, Arunachal Pradesh, has been booked by the CBI for taking Rs 1.95 lakh bribe for favouring a particular supplier and conspiring to award contracts for the supply of goods at inflated rates, an official said. Pavankumar Goudar was booked on Wednesday for criminal conspiracy, demand of bribe/undue advantage by a public servant and charges related to bribing a public servant by a commercial organisation and abetment, said a CBI official. The CBI received a tip-off that the assistant professor had entered into a criminal conspiracy with Anand Kumar Dwivedi, proprietor of Matrix Solution, Pasighat, and unknown others, with a predetermined intention to cause wrongful loss to the college. The CBI FIR said that Dwivedi had transferred a bribe/undue advantage of Rs 1.95 lakh in May 2025 to the predetermined bank account furnished by Goudar against showing favour in the award of a contract, supply of goods/items in the past. The FIR noted that sources revealed that in the most recent irregularity, Goudar favourably awarded the contract of supply of 30 pieces of Milton buckets to Dwivedi at an inflated rate. Dwivedi supplied the buckets on July 3. On July 15, Goudar conveyed to Dwivedi that, against the order for supply of 30 pieces at an inflated amount of Rs 75,000, the actual amount of the supplied goods was Rs 36,000 at the rate of Rs 1,200 per bucket and demanded the difference amount of Rs 39,000 bribe, the FIR said. Goudar also demanded the residual bribe of Rs 24,000 that remained unpaid on earlier occasions from Dwivedi towards the supply of goods and items, it said. Dwivedi agreed to pay a collective sum of Rs 55,000 as a bribe/undue advantage against the demanded amount of Rs 63,000, said the probe agency. A source revealed to the CBI that on July 21, Goudar reminded Dwivedi about the commitment of payment of a bribe made by the latter and asked him to pay the said amount of Rs 55,000 by Wednesday. After the source indicated that there was every likelihood that an exchange of bribes between Goudar and Dwivedi may take place on Wednesday at Pasighat, the CBI took up an investigation and registered an FIR. A preliminary report mentioned in the FIR said, 'A Regular case is registered u/s 61 (2) of BNS and u/s 7, 8, 9, 10 and 12 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (as amended in 2018) against Goudar and Dwivedi and unknown others and investigation of the case is entrusted to CBl, ACB, Guwahati.'

Statewide cyber awareness conferences to be held in Andhra
Statewide cyber awareness conferences to be held in Andhra

News18

time13 minutes ago

  • News18

Statewide cyber awareness conferences to be held in Andhra

Amaravati, Jul 24 (PTI) Andhra Pradesh Technology Services chairman M Mohana Krishna on Thursday said the agency will hold statewide cyber security awareness conferences to protect people from the rising number of cyber crimes in the state. He said the agency monitors Information Technology infrastructure round the clock and issues early alerts to curb cyber threats. 'To protect the public from cybercriminals, APTS will conduct cyber security awareness conferences," said Krishna, addressing a press conference here without specifying a date. The awareness sessions will focus on fraud tactics, preventive measures, and complaint procedures, with an emphasis on the need for 'technical interventions in light of the global surge in cybercrimes," he added. Krishna claimed that APTS had conducted 'Hackathon 2025', training selected graduates and IT professionals in cyber security for six months, with a monthly stipend of Rs 10,000 provided during the period. He said Chief Minister N Chandrababu Naidu and Education Minister Nara Lokesh have ordered strict action against cyber fraud. He also recalled the Centre's cyber law from 2013 and Andhra Pradesh's Cyber Security Policy introduced in 2017. Under this policy, APTS serves as the nodal agency, working with the Andhra Pradesh Cyber Security Operational Centre (APCSOC), which was launched in 2018. APTS aims to build a secure digital future for the state, Krishna added. PTI MS STH SSK (This story has not been edited by News18 staff and is published from a syndicated news agency feed - PTI) view comments First Published: July 24, 2025, 19:45 IST Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

Sarvarkar Defamation Case: Rahul Gandhi Granted Bail, Pleads Not Guilty
Sarvarkar Defamation Case: Rahul Gandhi Granted Bail, Pleads Not Guilty

NDTV

time18 minutes ago

  • NDTV

Sarvarkar Defamation Case: Rahul Gandhi Granted Bail, Pleads Not Guilty

Mumbai: A court in Maharashtra's Nashik city on Thursday granted bail to Congress leader Rahul Gandhi in a defamation case filed against him for remarks about Hindutva ideologue and freedom fighter V D Savarkar during the Bharat Jodo Yatra in 2022. Appearing through video link before additional chief judicial magistrate R C Narwadia, RahulGandhi, the leader of opposition in the Lok Sabha, pleaded 'not guilty'. Nashik-resident Devendra Bhutada, through his lawyer Manoj Pingle, has filed the criminal defamation case under sections 500 (defamation) and 504 (intentional insult with intent to provoke breach of the peace) of the Indian Penal Code. After RahulGandhi pleaded not guilty, his lawyers sought bail. The court allowed the plea on a bond of Rs 15,000, said advocate Pingle. The complainant, director of an NGO, alleged that Gandhi, at a press conference in Hingoli and in a speech during his yatra in November 2022, made statements that harmed Savarkar's reputation. "The speech of the accused along with press statements try to ruin the reputation of the complainant's idol Swatantryaveer Savarkar and his contribution to the society along with his noble work in the pre-independence period," the complaint said. Gandhi said that "Savarkar prayed for release with folded hands and later on promised to work for the British government", it alleged. Gandhi is also facing a defamation case in Pune, filed by Savarkar's grandnephew, over his statements about the late Hindutva ideologue.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store