Heads, brains, skin, hands, faces, organs: Ex-Harvard employee stole body parts and sold them in black market
Cedric Lodge, former Harvard employee
A former Harvard employee pleaded guilty to human trafficking involving the transportation of stolen human remains, US attorney's office for the middle district of Pennsylvania announced.
Cedric Lodge, 57, from Goffstown, New Hampshire acknowledged his involvement in selling and transporting stolen human remains from Harvard Medical School morgue in Boston, Massachusetts, from 2018 through March 2020.
Lodge, who was then employed as the manager of the Harvard Medical School Morgue, removed various body parts from donated cadavers, including organs, brains, skin, hands, faces, dissected heads, and other parts after their use in research but before proper disposal as per donor agreements.
Without authorisation from his employer, donors or their families, Lodge transported these remains to his New Hampshire residence. He and his wife Denise Lodge then sold and shipped these remains to buyers across states, with transportation routes including Salem, Massachusetts, New Hampshire and Pennsylvania, Justice department said in a statement.
Lodge confirmed selling remains to Joshua Taylor and Andrew Ensanian, amongst others.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
40대 이상이고 PC가 있으세요? 그럼 이 게임을 정말 좋아하실 거예요!
Sea of Conquest
플레이하기
Undo
These remains were often resold at higher prices, including to Jeremy Pauley, who has already pleaded guilty to conspiracy and interstate transportation of stolen human remains.
Related cases have seen guilty pleas from multiple defendants, including Denise Lodge, Joshua Taylor, Andrew Ensanian, Matthew Lampi and Angelo Pereyra. Lampi received a 15-month prison sentence, while Pereyra got 18 months. Denise Lodge and Joshua Taylor await sentencing.
Additionally, Candace Chapman-Scott, who stole remains from an Arkansas crematorium and sold them to Pauley in Pennsylvania, received a 15-year prison sentence in Arkansas federal court.
The Federal Bureau of Investigation, United States Postal Inspection Service and East Pennsboro Township Police Department conducted the investigation, with Assistant U.S. Attorney Alisan Martin prosecuting.
Under federal law, this offence carries a maximum penalty of 10 years imprisonment, supervised release following imprisonment and a fine. The Judge determines the sentence after considering federal sentencing statutes and Federal Sentencing Guidelines.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
35 minutes ago
- Time of India
Parents scammed in fake ‘Paris Kids Fashion Week,' INR 44 lakh lost in Gucci, Dior glam trap!
A Chinese company orchestrated a deceptive scheme, falsely presenting children's fashion shows as part of Paris Kids Fashion Week since 2020. The firm exploited parents' aspirations by charging exorbitant fees for participation and counterfeit costumes, amassing significant revenue. A Chinese company has come under fire for orchestrating an elaborate scam involving fake children's fashion shows, falsely branded as Paris Kids Fashion Week. Since 2020, this firm has misled hundreds of families by claiming affiliation with the prestigious Paris Fashion Week, while using images of iconic landmarks like the Louvre and invoking the names of luxury houses such as Dior and Gucci to appear legitimate. According to The South China Morning Post, the company charged parents 6,000 yuan (around ₹71,000) per child to participate in these runway shows. In some cases, families paid even more for costumes, reportedly upwards of 10,000 yuan (over ₹1.20 lakh). Many of the outfits were later revealed to be counterfeit. Events were hosted in cities like Shanghai, Paris, and Toronto, and the company collected an estimated 367,000 yuan (over ₹44 lakh) in registration fees from unsuspecting parents. The scam was finally exposed after Gucci's legal team filed a complaint in 2023. The Shanghai Market Regulatory Bureau launched an investigation, confirming the fraudulent activities. The company had been using fake logos like Gucc100 and Gucc101, misusing trademarks and misleading customers. As a result, the business has now been fined 600,000 yuan (approximately ₹71 lakh). During the probe, a company staff member admitted that the children's costumes - many of them fake designer replicas, were sourced online. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like They Lost Their Money - Learn From Their Lesson Expertinspector Click Here Undo While the owner, identified as Huang, claimed the clothes were only used for photo shoots and not sold, authorities still deemed this a serious case of trademark infringement. Shockingly, this wasn't the first time the company had been fined. Despite previous penalties, it continued operating with impunity. Its social media presence remains intact, with pages on Instagram and Facebook still live, although the last posts date back to 2023 and show minimal engagement. Sunny Kaushal Flashes a Smile in Andheri Chinese social media users reacted strongly to the revelations. 'Such phenomena are quite common these days,' one user commented, pointing out how many extracurricular training centres prey on parents' aspirations. Another noted, 'The company was exploiting the desperate need of parents to make their kids successful and famous.' The case has sparked wider conversations around parental pressure, counterfeit culture, and the lack of regulation in talent showcases for children. One step to a healthier you—join Times Health+ Yoga and feel the change
Time of India
38 minutes ago
- Time of India
Biden health cover-up? Trump calls it 'one of the worst scandals'; Orders probe into alleged 'conspiracy'
Joe Biden and Donald Trump US President Donald Trump issued a directive on Wednesday calling for an investigation into Joe Biden's presidential actions, questioning the authenticity of his decision-making and use of an autopen for official documents, and also the "conspiracy" behind his declining cognitive health. Trump suggested that Biden's staff concealed his "cognitive decline". Biden issued a firm rebuttal Wednesday night, stating: "Let me be clear: I made the decisions during my presidency. I made the decisions about the pardons, executive orders, legislation, and proclamations. Any suggestion that I didn't is ridiculous and false." The use of autopen for signing legislation and pardons has been accepted by the justice department across different administrations. The Constitution clearly establishes the president's absolute pardon authority, and Trump provided no evidence to support his claims about Biden's awareness of actions taken. Trump stated in a memo: "This conspiracy marks one of the most dangerous and concerning scandals in American history. The American public was purposefully shielded from discovering who wielded the executive power, all while Biden's signature was deployed across thousands of documents to effect radical policy shifts." by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Scam Exposed: What They Won't Tell You about zero trust! Expertinspector Click Here The investigation has been assigned to Attorney General Pam Bondi and White House counsel David Warrington. Biden's representatives have not yet commented on the matter. The legal viability of Trump's initiative remains uncertain. This action demonstrates his continued focus on Biden, who won the 2020 election, which Trump continues to dispute despite no evidence of fraud. Trump criticises Biden's use of the autopen, a device that reproduces exact signatures, despite its established use in previous administrations. He alleges that Biden's staff inappropriately exercised presidential authority. Before leaving office, Biden pardoned his siblings to protect them from potential prosecution under Trump, who had promised retaliation. The pardons also included members of a congressional committee that investigated the January 6, 2021 Capitol incident. Trump has a history of requesting investigations into his political opponents. Previous targets include Chris Krebs, who rejected Trump's election fraud claims in 2020, and Miles Taylor, who authored a critical anonymous opinion piece about Trump in 2018.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
US judge orders deported Venezuelans receive due process
AI- Generative Image WASHINGTON: A US federal judge ruled Wednesday that President Donald Trump's administration must allow over a hundred Venezuelans deported under an obscure wartime law to challenge accusations they are violent gang members. In a highly critical opinion, District Judge James Boasberg said the US government "must facilitate" the migrants' ability to contest their removal, without specifying what actions that would entail. Boasberg is one of several judges who has drawn Trump's ire for curtailing his efforts to wield broad executive power, after ruling against the initial migrant deportation flights. In March, the Trump administration invoked the 1798 Alien Enemies Act (AEA) to deport hundreds Venezuelan migrants by alleging they were members of the Tren de Aragua gang, expelling them to a notorious maximum security prison in El Salvador. Tren de Aragua has been designated a "foreign terrorist organization" by the Trump administration, but attorneys for several of the deported Venezuelans have said their clients were not gang members, had committed no crimes and were targeted largely on the basis of their tattoos. The Trump administration went ahead with the initial deportations of the alleged Tren de Aragua members under the AEA in March despite a restraining order from Boasberg blocking the move. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Switch to UnionBank Rewards Card UnionBank Credit Card Apply Now Undo Angered by Boasberg's ruling, Trump called in March for his impeachment. The US Supreme Court in May then blocked further deportations under the AEA, saying the deported migrants were not being given enough time to legally contest their removal. Three federal district court judges have ruled that Trump's use of the AEA to carry out deportations was unconstitutional, while one, a Trump appointee, said it was permissible. Boasberg on Wednesday offered no ruling on the legality of using the AEA to deport migrants, and acknowledged the deportees could be gang members. "But -- and this is the critical point -- there is simply no way to know for sure as (they) never had any opportunity to challenge the Government's say-so," he wrote in the filing. Boasberg opened his ruling by comparing the treatment of the Venezuelan deportees to the main character of "The Trial" by Franz Kafka. The government "must facilitate" the deportees ability to contest their removal, the judge said, adding that "exactly what such facilitation must entail will be determined in future proceedings." The Trump administration has claimed that it doesn't have the power to bring back the deported migrants, raising fears that its defiance of federal court orders was placing the country on the cusp of a constitutional crisis.
