logo
Another Edmonton police commissioner resigns after conflict-of-interest probe

Another Edmonton police commissioner resigns after conflict-of-interest probe

CBC16-05-2025

The Edmonton Police Commission announced that one of its commissioners resigned Friday afternoon, following an independent, third-party conflict-of-interest review requested by the Edmonton Police Service.
After receiving the review's findings, the commission voted Thursday to have Renée Vaugeois return to the board, with rules in place to manage any conflicts of interest.
"It has become clear that my continued presence may inadvertently cause distraction and tension that could hinder the important work ahead," said Vaugeois, who is also the executive director of the John Humphrey Centre for Peace and Human Rights, in a public news release.
"I have made the difficult decision to step away in the interest of supporting the commission's ability to serve our community effectively and to ensure that focus remains where it belongs: on providing strong oversight and support to the Edmonton Police Service."
In a separate news release issued Friday, the commission said it can manage existing real, perceived or potential conflicts through its existing policy and procedures, as well as implementing more rules.
On Jan. 16, the appointments of a new commission chair and vice-chair were overshadowed, as the Alberta government committed to an inquiry into the appointments of two new commission members — Vaugeois and Dan Jones, the NorQuest College justice studies chair.
The Edmonton Police Service had sought provincial intervention in city council's appointments of Vaugeois and Jones to the commission, which oversees the service. An Edmonton Police Service lawyer said on Jan 30. that concerns about possible conflicts of interest drove the request.
The commission said it will not be releasing further information, citing privacy. It considers the matter closed.
"The conflict of interest review was conducted in accordance with the board's guidelines, procedures, and policy, and the commission has fulfilled all its legal obligations and requirements throughout this process," said commission chair Ben Henderson.
Vaugeois declined an interview request, saying she would likely issue a statement next week on the matter.
Jones resigned from the board on Jan. 16, after his appointment to the commission was announced on the same day.
In December, Henderson replaced John McDougall as commission chair, after public controversy over McDougall's plan to serve on the oversight body until the end of 2026 while living in Portugal.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Mia Hughes: Canadian Medical Association wants to force Alberta to ignore science on gender care
Mia Hughes: Canadian Medical Association wants to force Alberta to ignore science on gender care

National Post

time22 minutes ago

  • National Post

Mia Hughes: Canadian Medical Association wants to force Alberta to ignore science on gender care

Article content The entire field is built upon research out of the Netherlands that has been shown to be methodologically flawed, and the diagnosis of gender dysphoria is shaped by political lobbying intended to reduce stigma and distress. Article content What's more, the Canadian Pediatric Society bases its recommendations on the field's standards of care which are set by the discredited World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH). In a recently withdrawn legal challenge to Alabama's youth gender medicine ban, WPATH was forced to disclose over two million internal emails that revealed the organization blocked independent systematic reviews that showed low-quality evidence, consulted 'social justice lawyers' when drafting its medical guidelines, and, at the Biden administration's request, removed almost all lower age limits from its adolescent chapter to avoid undermining state-level legal battles. Article content Reimer also stated, without irony, that medical decisions should be based on 'the best science.' Yet the best science — specifically the systematic reviews from Sweden, Finland, England, and a team of researchers in Canada — has all concluded the evidence base for paediatric medical transition is of very low certainty. Alberta's Bill 26 reflects that consensus. The CMA's position contradicts it. Article content This isn't the first legal challenge to Alberta's legislation. Late last year, Egale Canada — originally a gay rights charity that expanded into trans advocacy in the early 2000s — teamed up with the Skipping Stone Foundation and five families to contest the law. That move is surprising given early research conducted by leading figures in gender medicine, Psychologist/Sexologist Kenneth Zucker and Psychiatrist Susan Bradley, found that most children with early-onset gender dysphoria would grow up to be gay or lesbian if left untreated, and same-sex attracted teens are overrepresented in the adolescent patients who began flooding gender clinics in the 2010s and among detransitioners. That a gay rights group would back medical interventions that have the potential to sterilize homosexual adolescents is a tragic reversal of purpose. Article content In an interview, Dr. Jake Donaldson, one of three Alberta doctors who filed the challenge alongside the CMA, inadvertently highlighted the questionable rationale for these extreme medical interventions. He believes that puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones help gender-distressed youth blend in better as members of the opposite sex, which makes them 'safer and happier.' But even if that were true — and there is no high-quality evidence to suggest that it is — this approach only offers a superficial, short-term fix that ignores the deeper psychological struggles of these youth. And it can come at such immense long-term cost in the form of sterility, sexual dysfunction, and lifelong medical dependence. Article content 'Medicine is a calling,' explained the CMA president in her statement. 'Doctors pursue it because they are compelled to care for and promote the well-being of patients.' Article content Yet noble intentions are no safeguard against harm. History is littered with medical scandals. At the centre of each one, there were well-intentioned doctors who left a trail of devastation in their quest to help patients. The doctors who prescribed thalidomide didn't do so with the intention of causing major birth defects; the obstetricians who sent expectant mothers for prenatal X-rays didn't deliberately set out to cause childhood leukemia, and Walter Freeman famously believed his prefrontal lobotomies were a humane alternative to the deplorable conditions in insane asylums. Article content At this point, there is little doubt that paediatric gender medicine is destined to take its place in history alongside these medical catastrophes. Therefore, Alberta is not acting unreasonably; it is acting responsibly. By restricting unproven and irreversible treatments for minors, the province has commendably joined a global wave of governments re-asserting evidence and ethical principles in the face of medical groupthink. It is the CMA — not the Alberta government — that must reckon with its conscience. Article content Mia Hughes specializes in researching pediatric gender medicine, psychiatric epidemics, social contagion and the intersection of trans rights and women's rights. She is the author of ' The WPATH Files,' a senior fellow at the Macdonald-Laurier Institute, and director of Genspect Canada. Article content

Popeyes accused of using ‘unsafe' chicken allegedly stored in residential garages in Ontario
Popeyes accused of using ‘unsafe' chicken allegedly stored in residential garages in Ontario

CTV News

time22 minutes ago

  • CTV News

Popeyes accused of using ‘unsafe' chicken allegedly stored in residential garages in Ontario

A lawsuit filed against Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen is accusing the fried chicken chain of buying 'unsafe' meat from an unauthorized seller that was allegedly storing and packaging raw chicken in residential garages in Ontario. The lawsuit was filed at the Ontario Superior Court of Justice on May 26 by ADP, a former raw chicken supplier to Popeyes. The company alleges they lost their contract with Popeyes after bringing forward its concerns about the 'unsafe supply' of products. Popeyes, Restaurant Brands International (RBI)—the Toronto-based company that owns the fast-food chain—and Restaurant Services Canada Inc. (RSCI), the supply chain manager, are all named in the lawsuit. Popeyes, for its part, said in a statement to CTV News that the claims from ADP Direct Poultry Ltd. are unfounded and that it found 'no evidence' to support them following an investigation. The lawsuit also names another company as the unauthorized supplier that allegedly provided, at times, 'rotten or expired' chicken deemed 'unfit for human consumption' to various franchisees across Ontario. The documents continue to say this chicken created a public health risk because it was delivered in vehicles that did not have the proper refrigeration to prevent it from spoiling. The statement of claim alleges that these tainted products were bought by various franchisees—both known to ADP and not, all named in the suit—due to their lower prices. The lawsuit also alleges the franchisees continued to sell the chicken to customers, even after ADP brought forward its concerns that the products did not adhere to food health and safety standards. The allegations have not been tested in court. As laid out in the documents, Popeyes had a system of authorized suppliers and distributors who adhered to the company's specifications and standards, meaning franchisees were required to purchase from within their approved list of vendors. Any restaurant looking to purchase ingredients outside of the company's list of vendors had to write a formal request, after which the supplier in question would have to submit to an inspection to ensure it meets the requirements as well as health and safety standards. ADP claims the chicken sold by the unauthorized company was not inspected by the Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) or any other inspector. CTV News Toronto contacted the CFIA for comment. The supplier claims RSCI, meanwhile, did not investigate the unsafe supply of chicken as they promised and instead conspired to 'manufacture a rationale for removing ADP' from their authorized vendors list. In turn, the filings further allege franchisees were 'upset about the reporting of the unsafe supply' and worked with the RSCI to lodge 'false or misleading' complaints about the quality of their products. CTV News has reached out to Restaurant Services Inc., parent company to RSCI, for comment but has not yet heard back. 'We believe this former supplier is lashing out after losing our business for a variety of legitimate reasons,' Emily Ciantra, Popeye's director communications, told CTV News Toronto in a statement. 'We have always been committed to rigorous safety standards, including regular inspections by third party auditors who verify our strict standards are being followed.' ADP seeks $35 million in damages from Popeyes, RBI and RSCI, citing breach of contract and breaches of the Competition Act. The documents state that $30 million is to cover ADP's loss of profits after their contract—which was expected to continue until 2027—was prematurely terminated. An additional $5 million is to cover the costs the supplier incurred after boosting its production facilities to meet Popeyes' increased production demand, the documents state. ADP also seeks $1 million in punitive damages. The supplier adds it also lost out on business opportunities, such as providing products to other fast-food chains like Wendy's. Additionally, the raw chicken supplier is seeking at least $10 million in damages from the unauthorized company, who it deems liable for 'unlawfully interfering' with ADP's economic relationship with Popeyes, as well as $500,000 in aggravated damages. ADP also seeks $150,000 from each franchisee and an account detailing the quantity of 'unsafe supply' they bought from the company as well as how much they profited from the unauthorized products. 'The defendants' conduct was malicious, high handed, intended to cause harm to ADP, endangered the public, and warrants aggravated and punitive damages,' the filings state.

Crash closes Spring Creek Road in South Bruce Peninsula
Crash closes Spring Creek Road in South Bruce Peninsula

CTV News

time22 minutes ago

  • CTV News

Crash closes Spring Creek Road in South Bruce Peninsula

Spring Creek Road in South Bruce Peninsula closed after serious early-morning crash. Fri., June 6, 2025. File photo An early-morning serious collision has forced the closure of Spring Creek Road in South Bruce Peninsula. Grey Bruce Ontario Provincial Police (OPP) responded to a call shortly after 3 a.m. of a single-vehicle collision on Spring Creek Road. Due to the ongoing investigation and the presence of emergency personnel, Spring Creek Road is currently closed between Legion Road and Allenford Road. Police ask motorists to avoid the area and seek alternate routes.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store