
The Best Wellness Advice Has Always Been Free
Allow me to make myself sound very dainty and attractive: Last year, I was diagnosed with inflammatory bowel disease. This was an unfortunate development, I decided, and so not in line with ' brat summer.' I handled the news like any journalist might—with compulsive research and fact-checking. My fear directed me to Reddit threads and scientific studies, to new diet plans and workout regimens and supplement orders, until my unremitting quest for answers landed me in the Zoom office of a functional-medicine doctor, a woman who charged me a couple of hundred bucks to tell me that I should eat more boiled plantains.
My search for wellness had gone too far. I was spending money I didn't have to try to fix an illness with origins I'd never understand, much less control. Yet I trust that I'm far from alone in this desire to feel good. Every year, the average American spends more than $6,000 on 'wellness,' an imprecise category that includes both fads and legitimate endeavors, with offerings as varied as diagnostic technologies and protein popcorn. Across the world, wellness is a $6.3 trillion business—outpacing even the pharmaceutical industry—and Americans are by far the biggest spenders. Although some health issues require interventions or specialists (which can be exorbitantly expensive), the wellness industry tells Americans that no matter their condition—or lack thereof—there's always some treatment they should be buying. There's always more Googling and optimizing to be done.
Take the journalist Amy Larocca's book, How to Be Well, which details her wellness-industry misadventures, including 'gravity' colonic cleanses, $200-a-month prescription herbs, and $1,000 Goop events. In a recent Atlantic review of the book, the writer Sheila McClear observed how widespread the 'wellness craze' has become, noting that 'in a nation known for its relatively poor health, nearly everybody seems to be thinking about how to be healthy.'
Yet, like the human body's frailty, America's obsession with wellness is far from new. In our archives, I found a letter addressed to someone else facing an unsexy stomach ailment: ' A Letter to a Dyspeptic,' published in 1859, includes some remarkably sassy advice from an anonymous writer to a 19th-century gentleman with indigestion. This writer is all tough love, unafraid to call the gentleman an 'unfortunate individual,' a man of 'ripe old age, possibly a little over-ripe, at thirty-five,' and, due to the fellow's unique bathing habits, an 'insane merman.'
The dyspeptic man had spent the past years suffering, quitting his business and doling out cash to questionable doctors and therapies, to little avail. 'You are haunting water-cures, experimenting on life-pills, holding private conferences with medical electricians, and thinking of a trip to the Bermudas,' the author writes. But this search for a cure came at a high cost: 'O mistaken economist! can you afford the cessation of labor and the ceaseless drugging and douching of your last few years?'
Any hyperfixation on wellness can be draining and futile; an endless search for answers to one's ailments might be alluring, but 'to seek health as you are now seeking it, regarding every new physician as if he were Pandora,' the writer warns, 'is really rather unpromising.'
In lieu of expensive treatments, the writer advises that the dyspeptic man do three things: bathe, breathe, and exercise. (Another suggestion is to purchase 'a year's subscription to the 'Atlantic Monthly,'' one of the 'necessaries of life' for happiness—it seems we writers have never been above the shameless plug.) Notably, all of these (except the Atlantic subscription, starting at $79.99) are more or less free.
Written almost two centuries later, Larocca's book ends on a similar note, championing the kind of health advice that doesn't hurt your wallet. After her tiresome and expensive foray into the world of wellness, she 'doesn't recommend a single product, practice, or service, although she does name one tip that helped her,' McClear notes. 'It's a simple breathing exercise. And it's free.'
America's wellness methods have changed over time—sometimes evolving for the better. (The 1859 letter, for instance, details how some philosophers believed in being as sedentary as possible because 'trees lived longer than men because they never stirred from their places.') Even so, as skyrocketing costs and medical mistrust plague American health care, the wellness industry churns out a carousel of treatments, touting sweeping benefits that are often dubious at best. Compared with the many big promises that 'gravity' colonics and supplement companies might make, most health tips that have stood the test of time are far more quotidian: sleep, exercise, breathe. Their simplicity can be both healing and accessible. The body has 'power and beauty,' the anonymous writer noted more than a century ago, 'when we consent to give it a fair chance.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Chicago Tribune
15 minutes ago
- Chicago Tribune
The silent disease that's been killing Americans for decades — And what doctors are doing about it
Heart disease remains the leading cause of death in the U.S., claiming a life every 34 seconds. But beyond heart attacks or other sudden events, a quieter threat is building inside Americans' blood vessels. It's called arterial calcification, an often overlooked driver of serious health complications. Now a breakthrough technology offers hope for better treatment. When arteries become narrowed or hardened due to the buildup of plaque, it's known as atherosclerosis. Over time, these plaques can calcify, meaning they harden into rigid, rocklike deposits that line the inner or middle walls of arteries. This process, called calcification, makes arteries less flexible and more likely to get blocked, raising the risk of heart attacks, strokes and limb loss. Peripheral artery disease is a common result of this process. It happens when narrowed or hardened arteries reduce blood flow to the legs and feet. PAD affects approximately 230 million people worldwide, yet many don't realize it. Arterial calcification can also affect the arteries that supply the heart, leading to coronary artery disease. When blood flow to the heart is restricted, it can cause chest pain, shortness of breath and heart attacks. Annually, the disease results in 17.8 million deaths worldwide. Like PAD, CAD develops silently over time. Once identified, calcified plaques are notoriously hard to treat. Standard procedures can work well for soft plaque. Doctors thread a tiny balloon into the blocked artery, inflate it to compress the blockage, then often insert a metal mesh tube called a stent to keep the vessel open. With calcified arteries, rigid calcium often doesn't budge. Traditional balloons may fail to expand or cause artery tears. Similarly, stents may not fully deploy, increasing procedural complications. In short, older tools try to push through the problem. But next-generation technology uses a different approach: preparing the artery first, helping ensure procedures are safer and more efficient. Enter intravascular lithotripsy, a breakthrough therapy that borrows from an unexpected source: kidney stone treatment. For decades, doctors have used sound waves to break up kidney stones through a minimally invasive procedure. IVL applies the same principle inside the artery, delivering controlled sonic pulses through a modified balloon catheter to gently crack calcium deposits from within. This approach avoids many complications of more aggressive procedures and is considered one of the most promising developments in interventional cardiology. IVL was first approved for coronary use just four years ago, with adoption growing rapidly. One early IVL company quickly became the market leader and was acquired by Johnson & Johnson in 2024 — another sign of the technology's growing importance in cardiovascular Medical is a standout innovator in the IVL space, pushing the boundaries of energy delivery and procedural efficiency to elevate outcomes in peripheral and coronary interventions. 'FastWave Medical's novel IVL platforms offer genuine promise for addressing severely calcified coronary arteries that are difficult to traverse,' says Dr. Kathleen Kearney, medical director of the Cardiac Cath Lab at UWMC Montlake. 'These technological improvements are greatly needed to empower physicians in providing more effective treatment to their patients.' But what makes FastWave particularly noteworthy isn't just its technology; it's who's backing it. Alongside venture investors, physicians — cardiologists, vascular surgeons and interventional radiologists — have invested in the company. Their involvement signals more than financial interest; it reflects confidence in the system's potential to address the daily challenges they face in the cath lab. When physicians invest in medical technology, it demonstrates something powerful: They believe it will genuinely improve their ability to deliver high-quality care. 'FastWave is moving quickly and decisively to become best-in-class in the IVL space,' said Dr. Arthur Lee, director of peripheral vascular services at the Cardiac and Vascular Institute. 'We are excited to support the development of this groundbreaking technology and get it into the hands of those who need it most.' 'Calcified arteries remain one of the most difficult conditions to treat in our field,' added Dr. Amir Kaki, director of mechanical circulatory support and high-risk coronary interventions at Henry Ford St. John Hospital. 'FastWave's IVL platform is a compelling advancement that should provide a more precise, efficient and predictable way to manage complex arterial disease.' As of July 2025, the company holds a total of eight patents, with several more applications underway. These patents span key areas of the technology from energy delivery to catheter design. Early study results are encouraging for the company's dual IVL platforms. In June, FastWave successfully completed initial first-in-human procedures as part of an ongoing feasibility study for its coronary laser-based IVL system. An Investigational Device Exemption is also planned to evaluate its electric IVL system for the treatment of PAD. 'Calcified lesions aren't just a technical challenge — the condition remains one of the most significant barriers to successful peripheral interventions,' said Dr. Sahil Parikh, director of endovascular services at Columbia University Irving Medical Center. 'FastWave's upcoming IDE trial for PAD will give us a chance to assess whether an advanced IVL system can meaningfully improve the lives of patients who suffer from this difficult disease.' Dr. Venita Chandra, clinical professor of surgery at Stanford Health Care, expects the trial to reveal whether FastWave's device will offer doctors a better tool for difficult cases. 'The key question isn't just whether a device works but whether it makes procedures more efficient and provides physicians with a more predictable tool for treating patients with complex arterial disease,' she said. The stakes are rising rapidly. As the population ages and rates of diabetes and obesity continue to climb, more patients will face PAD and CAD. For the most difficult cases, treatment options are quite limited. But innovation is catching up. First-generation IVL introduced a new treatment paradigm; now advanced tools from startups like FastWave promise doctors more ways to treat this disease.
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Low-Fat Chocolate Milk or 100% Fruit Juice: Which Is Healthier?
Reviewed by Dietitian Karen Ansel, M.S., RDNKey Points Low-fat chocolate milk and 100% fruit juice can both be healthy ways to hydrate. If you're wondering which is better for you, dietitians pick low-fat chocolate milk. It provides high-quality protein, plus calcium, potassium and vitamin plenty of water is one way to meet your hydration goals. But sometimes you want a beverage that can do more. Take low-fat chocolate milk or 100% fruit juice, for example. In addition to helping you stay hydrated, they provide nutrients and banish beverage boredom. But which is better for you? To find out, we polled registered dietitians, and low-fat chocolate milk was the clear winner. Read on to learn why this delicious drink came out on top, plus dietitian-approved tips for choosing a healthy drink next time you're feeling thirsty. Why Low-Fat Chocolate Milk Is the Healthier Choice It's Loaded with High-Quality Protein Even though low-fat chocolate milk contains added sugars, it still has an edge over 100% fruit juice. One big reason is its high-quality protein (nearly 9 grams per cup!). On the flip side, 100% fruit juice contains little to no protein. Chocolate milk's protein isn't just great for building and maintaining muscle. It may also protect against some of the blood sugar-raising effects of chocolate milk's sugars, says Anna Smith, M.S., RDN, LDN. '100% fruit juice is all carbs, which means it can spike your blood sugar quickly,' she explains. 'Low-fat chocolate milk does contain added sugar, but it also offers protein and [a little] fat. That combination helps slow digestion and gives you a more balanced beverage overall.' It's Rich in Hard-to-Get Nutrients Sipping 100% fruit juice can provide essential nutrients like vitamin C and potassium, but these can vary dramatically depending on the type of juice you choose. Even though some kinds of juice may give you a nutrition bump, they can't compare to low-fat chocolate milk's impressive list of nutrients. 'Low-fat chocolate milk provides 13 essential nutrients, including calcium, vitamin D and potassium, while fruit juice typically offers fewer vitamins and minerals,' says Lauren Manaker, M.S., RDN, LDN. Considering that the Dietary Guidelines for Americans say most of us could use more calcium, vitamin D and potassium, low-fat chocolate milk is a slam dunk. An 8-ounce glass gives you all of these for 160 calories. It's Great for Hydration Milk's unique combination of nutrients means it may be better than fruit juice or even water for helping you stay hydrated. While there's not much recent research on the topic, one older study found that skim and whole milk weren't just more effective for hydration than orange juice. They also beat out oral rehydration solutions and water. And other research has found that chocolate milk is as effective as sports drinks for post-exercise recovery. What makes low-fat chocolate milk such a win? 'Milk doesn't just replace the fluids you lose, it also contains electrolytes like sodium and potassium, which help your body hold onto that hydration longer,' says Manaker. 'Plus, the natural sugars, protein and fat in milk slow down how quickly it leaves your stomach, giving your body more time to absorb the fluids.' While 100% fruit juice checks some of the boxes for hydration, it lacks the protein and sodium that make low-fat chocolate milk a better pick. That said, we're not suggesting you should drink an entire jug of chocolate milk to meet your fluid needs. But an 8-ounce glass can be a delicious way to hydrate. Tips to Select a Healthier Drink Low-fat chocolate milk and 100% fruit juice aren't the only nutritious beverages out there. When you want a healthy drink, these dietitian-approved tips can help. Keep it simple: Navigating the beverage aisle can be overwhelming. That's why Manaker recommends keeping things simple. 'When in doubt, stick to water or unsweetened drinks,' she says. 'If you want a little flavor, add a splash of lemon or cucumber to keep it refreshing without the extra sugar.' Read the label: Even healthy-sounding beverages can be sneaky sources of added sugars. Don't assume a drink is healthy because of its flashy packaging or social media buzz, says Anna Smith, M.S., RDN, LDN. 'Be sure to look at both the Nutrition Facts label and the ingredients,' she says. Choose low-sugar or sugar-free: 'If you're cutting back on sugar, try no-sugar-added or 'zero' options to satisfy your cravings without the added calories,' says Daria Zajac, RD, LDN. Look for added benefits: 'Choose drinks that do more for you,' says Manaker. 'Instead of reaching for sugary sodas or fruit drinks, go for options that pack in nutrients, like dairy milk.' Unsweetened tea is another antioxidant-rich beverage that offers health benefits beyond hydration. Our Expert Take Low-fat chocolate milk and 100% fruit juice can both be healthy ways to quench your thirst. However, if you have to pick between the two, choose low-fat chocolate milk. Dietitians say it beats out 100% fruit juice on several fronts. First, it's loaded with high-quality protein. And you might be surprised to learn that it has more nutrients we don't get enough of, like vitamin D, calcium and potassium, than fruit juice. If that weren't enough to convince you, low-fat chocolate milk is one of the best drinks you can choose for hydration. That said, both low-fat chocolate milk and 100% fruit juice provide extra calories and sugar. So, for healthy hydration, stick with about a cup a day. Read the original article on EATINGWELL


Politico
an hour ago
- Politico
Long Covid's lingering financial side effects
LONG COVID'S TOLL — More than five years after the Covid-19 pandemic first ravaged the nation, many Americans are still dealing with the social and economic fallout of having contracted the disease. People with long Covid — those who have new or persistent symptoms lasting three months past infection — have experienced worse financial and employment outcomes, lasting up to three years after their initial infection, compared with people who haven't had the disease, according to a study published Tuesday in JAMA Network Open from researchers at Rush University Medical Center, Yale School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine and other research institutions. Long Covid patients reported worse work impairment, missed work and financial distress compared with those who never had Long Covid, the study found. Vaccination against Covid was associated with improved work and economic outcomes. Not just physical: 'While much of the focus in Long COVID research has been on the medical impact, we must also consider the sustained financial burden faced by those whose symptoms persist,' lead author Michael Gottlieb, an emergency medicine doctor and vice chair of research at Rush, said in a statement. Addressing the financial burden of long Covid might 'require policy interventions, such as expanded disability benefits or workplace accommodations to help combat the work and financial impact of this condition,' the authors wrote. The researchers analyzed self-reported data from more than 3,600 participants in the Innovative Support for Patients with SARS-CoV-2 Infections Registry, a CDC-funded initiative aimed at better understanding Covid's long-term effects. Why it matters: About 6 percent of U.S. adults suffer from some form of long Covid, according to CDC estimates. The National Institutes of Health believes that as many as 23 million people have the illness, which can range in severity from mild to debilitating. The symptoms, which can include fatigue, headaches and brain fog, can be life-disrupting for many patients. Some treatments, like Paxlovid, have shown promise in reducing symptoms, but being diagnosed and finding suitable treatment can be difficult because of the disease's wide range of symptoms that often overlap with other conditions. HHS recently shut down its long Covid office, a casualty of the Trump administration's sweeping reorganization of the agency. At the time the closure was announced, an HHS employee who worked on long Covid and who was granted anonymity to share details of the move told POLITICO that abandoning work that could have cured the disease means the country's health care system will have to provide years, if not decades, of costly care for tens of millions of chronically ill people. In March, the Trump administration also canceled dozens of grants for long Covid projects, but some funding was restored after advocates fought back. WELCOME TO WEDNESDAY PULSE. I'm still reeling from Taylor Swift announcing her new album. Send your Swiftie theories, scoops and feedback to khooper@ and sgardner@ and follow along @kelhoops and @sophie_gardnerj. At the Agencies LOOMER'S LATEST PREY — After successfully ousting several members of Trump's administration for alleged insufficient loyalty, far-right activist and MAGA influencer Laura Loomer tells our colleagues at Playbook that she has her next target: Stefanie Spear, the principal deputy chief of staff and senior counselor to HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. The reason why, in part: 'I think that there's a clear intention by Stefanie Spear to utilize her position to try to lay the groundwork for a 2028 RFK presidential run,' Loomer alleges. Asked for comment by Playbook, a senior HHS official did not deny that Kennedy is weighing a presidential bid. Read the full story in this morning's Playbook. CDC LATEST — CDC officials held a tense all-hands meeting Tuesday in the aftermath of last week's shooting at the agency's Atlanta headquarters, Sophie reports with POLITICO's Amanda Friedman and Lauren Gardner. The meeting came as law enforcement officials revealed early Tuesday additional information about the nature of the shooting: The man who opened fire at the agency on Friday died of a self-inflicted gunshot wound and was motivated by his distrust of Covid-19 vaccines. Agency update: At the CDC's all-hands meeting, Director Susan Monarez thanked employees for their work and acknowledged that 'misinformation can be dangerous,' according to a live transcript obtained by POLITICO. 'In moments like this, we must meet the challenges with rational, evidence-based discourse spoken with compassion and understanding,' she said. 'That is how we will lead.' CDC employees were closely watching Monarez at the meeting to see how she would respond to the shooting and the news that the suspected shooter had expressed distrust of the Covid vaccine. Two CDC employees, granted anonymity to speak candidly, told POLITICO that Monarez's speech was not what they'd hoped. '[Twenty minutes] of reading off a teleprompter,' one of the employees said in a text, adding that Monarez's remarks prompted an 'overwhelmingly negative response from folks in my immediate orbit.' Another agency employee said the meeting was in stark contrast to a separate meeting held for the CDC's National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases staff on Saturday, where employees could ask Monarez questions. What's next: HHS spokesperson Andrew Nixon said that staff would have 'continued opportunities' to voice their perspectives to CDC leadership in the days ahead. 'Friday's shooting was a traumatic event for the agency, and leadership is working to provide continued updates along with resources for healing and recovery,' Nixon said in a statement. DOGE SAVINGS — The Trump administration has drastically exaggerated how much money it has saved through DOGE-related cuts to federal contracts, including at health agencies, according to an analysis of public data and federal spending records from POLITICO's Jessie Blaeser. Through July, DOGE said it had saved taxpayers $52.8 billion by canceling contracts, but of the $32.7 billion in actual claimed contract savings that POLITICO could verify, DOGE's savings over that period were closer to $1.4 billion. Despite the administration's claims, none of that $1.4 billion will lower the federal deficit unless Congress steps in. Instead, the money has been returned to agencies mandated by law to spend it. The health claims: Under the VA, DOGE's wall of receipts reported savings of $932 million from contracts canceled through June, including awards for a cancer registry, suicide-prevention services and other health care support. Federal records show the VA recovered just $132 million from the awards, or less than 15 percent of what DOGE claimed, and that the VA reinstated the contract for suicide-prevention support. One of DOGE's largest savings claims is from a canceled contract for a shelter in Pecos, Texas, to house unaccompanied migrant children. In a post on social media platform X in February, DOGE said HHS 'paid ~$18M/month' to keep the now-empty center open. Canceling the agreement, it said, would translate to more than $215 million in annual savings for taxpayers. By the time the contract was added to the DOGE termination list, that savings claim skyrocketed to $2.9 billion. But HHS and its Office of Refugee Resettlement were not on track to spend anywhere close to the contract's $3.3 billion ceiling. WHAT WE'RE READING POLITICO's Tyler Katzenberger reports on a federal judge blocking the Trump administration from using Medicaid beneficiaries' personal data for immigration enforcement purposes. Bloomberg Law's Celine Castronuovo reports on Texas' attorney general accusing Eli Lilly of unlawfully pushing providers to prescribe its blockbuster obesity drugs and other treatments to receive Medicaid payments.