Children's Health Ireland report referred to gardaí
A report on waiting list irregularities and a 'toxic' work culture at a hospital run by
Children's Health Ireland
(CHI) is to be referred to
gardaí
, the Cabinet committee on health has been told.
The report, which not been published but has been widely reported in some media outlets, has caused shock in Government over the past week.
The revelations come after a series of scandals in CHI, which is due to run the new
national children's hospital
when it opens.
The Cabinet committee on health was told on Wednesday that the Health Service Executive (HSE) has referred the report to the Garda with a view to it being assessed for a possible investigation.
READ MORE
The meeting was attended by Taoiseach
Micheál Martin
, Tánaiste
Simon Harris
, Minister for Health
Jennifer Carroll
MacNeill, Minister for Finance Paschal Donohoe, Minister for Public Expenditure Jack Chambers and Minister for Children Norma Foley.
[
Audit of CHI waiting lists ordered to ensure productivity in public hospitals, Minister for Health says
Opens in new window
]
The
National Treatment Purchase Fund
(NTPF), which buys treatments in the public and private sectors for patients on long waiting lists, has said it will pause funding for CHI while potential irregularities are investigated. Ms Carroll MacNeill has assured parents scheduled surgeries will not be delayed.
Earlier this week, The Irish Times reported further findings, including about reports of a 'toxic' work culture in parts of a CHI hospital, where there were complaints of bullying and victimisation of trainees, and where one consultant had taken proceedings for defamation against another.
The CHI internal report was drawn up in late 2021/early 2022 but was not given to the then minister for health, the HSE or the NTPF.
The report found CHI had a 'broken culture' created by dysfunctional relationships and challenging behaviour.
It said there were also concerns about management of NTPF funding and a lack of oversight of access initiatives that ultimately were not in keeping with a memorandum of understanding between CHI and the NTPF.
[
CHI consultant at centre of review did not fulfil on-call hours for three years due to 'health issues'
Opens in new window
]
The report raised concerns about five special weekend out-patient clinics for 179 children carried out by a consultant. These were funded by the NTPF. The consultant received €35,800 for seeing these patients at the special out-patient clinics that operated over five Saturdays.
The report questioned whether these clinics were needed and suggested the patients could have been treated by other doctors in the public system.
On Tuesday the NTPF suspended payments on a temporary basis pending an investigation into the operation of the waiting list schemes in CHI.
According to the report, which CHI said it cannot publish for legal reasons, the consultant was indefinitely removed from on-call duty for 'health reasons' in 2019, a commitment under his public contract.
CHI hired a locum to fill these hours, spending about €450,000 on the locum between 2019 and when the review took place in 2021.
The report said : 'It needs to be explored how one consultant can undertake a series of NTPF-funded clinics over numerous Saturdays and during these clinics see a much greater number of patients than they are able to see in their routine public clinics, working at a very fast pace with significant throughput – a substantial undertaking of additional work, yet is unfit for any on-call duties for the past three years.'
The NTPF-funded clinics were not sought by or offered to any of the other eight general surgeons in CHI, it said .
In a statement earlier this week, CHI said the NTPF-funded clinics were a waiting-list initiative and were 'over and above the consultant's contractual hours'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
5 hours ago
- Irish Times
Swimming banned at Dollymount Strand due to suspected sewage discharge after heavy rainfall
Swimming has been banned at Dollymount strand in Dublin Bay after a 'suspected discharge' of sewage following heavy rainfall. The restriction at the popular designated bathing area on North Bull Island will continue over the coming days. Deputy Lord Mayor of Dublin Donna Cooney criticised the way the alert was issued and Uisce Éireann for failing to indicate the source of the discharge. 'This is disgraceful at the start of the bathing season,' she said. READ MORE She said alerts about bathing restrictions needed to be more widely disseminated, as she had found people swimming on the beach despite the measure being in place. Cllr Cooney, a member of the Green Party, said she received an alert to confirm water quality at the beach was 'excellent' on May 26th, but got no notice about the recent restriction. She said the utility company should have indicated where the discharge happened, given that real-time monitoring is supposed to be taking place at its Ringsend wastewater treatment plant. Ms Cooney is a regular swimmer at Dollymount and at the Bull Wall Ladies Shelter. She said she was concerned the discharge would lead to algal blooms as seawater warmed in the coming weeks, which would affect swimmers, water sports activities and marine life in the bay. Discharges have occurred intermittently from the plant, which has been operating at excess capacity for many years. Uisce Éireann said the discharge arose due to overflows from storm tanks at the Ringsend plant. 'There is online monitoring of these storm tanks and Dublin City Council, who are responsible for monitoring of bathing water quality, are notified of any overflows during the bathing season,' said a spokesman. 'Stormwater overflows are an essential part of any wastewater network that enable excess flows to be discharged into the sea, rivers or watercourses in a controlled and regulated manner ... Stormwater discharges normally do not have a lasting effect on bathing waters,' he added. 'The tide will wash out the spill and the salt water and sunlight acts to clean the water. Uisce Éireann apologises for any inconvenience caused and regrets the impact overflow incidents may have on beach users.' Uisce Éireann is investing more than €500 million to upgrade the plant so it can serve a 2.4 million population equivalent by the end of 2025. 'The upgrade of Ringsend means the capacity will be increased and these incidents will be fewer in number, although in extreme weather conditions they could still occur,' said the spokesman. The Environmental Protection Agency and the Health Service Executive have been informed, while the council, which erected notices at Dollymount, said it is awaiting laboratory results to determine whether the temporary prohibition can be lifted.
Irish Times
5 hours ago
- Irish Times
How was Tina Satchwell left in a makeshift grave under the stairs for more than six years?
Six-and-a-half years is an unconscionably long time for a body to lie in a makeshift grave, buried just under the stairs of her own home, awaiting discovery. One week ago, after more than four weeks of testimony and nine hours of deliberation, a Central Criminal Court jury found Richard Satchwell guilty of the murder of his wife, Tina Satchwell , or Tina Dingivan as her family know her . On Wednesday, he was sentenced to life in prison . The 58-year-old intends to appeal. Her sister, Lorraine Howard, said Satchwell secretly hid his murdered wife under the stairs of their home where he could have 'ultimate control' over her. For now, just one question remains: why did it take so long for gardaí to find Tina Satchwell's remains? In March 2017, Tina Satchwell, then aged 45, joined the ranks of Ireland's missing persons. Satchwell reported her disappearance to An Garda Síochána on March 24th. It was four days after he claimed to have last seen her, but he said he had no concerns for her welfare. READ MORE In May that year, after gardaí visited him at home, he filed a formal missing person report. He claimed that she had upped and left him without so much as a letter. Also left behind: her mobile phone, her keys, her two beloved dogs. Gardaí were reportedly 'perplexed' by her disappearance. She did not have a passport. There was no evidence that she had departed Co Cork by car, ferry, bus, or plane. She had no prior history of leaving. Still, they waited until June 7th to conduct a preliminary search of the Satchwell home. They discovered unfinished home improvement works under way. But when that search failed to turn up forensic evidence such as blood spatters or a body stuffed in a freezer, the investigation appears to have stalled. [ Tina Satchwell case: Questions raised by politicians over original Garda investigation ] Finally, after a change in the investigating team, gardaí conducted an invasive search that included a cadaver dog in October 2023. The dog solved the mystery of Tina's purported vanishing: she had never made it out of her home alive. I remember the earliest media accounts of Tina Satchwell's disappearance. I was living in Dublin on a research sabbatical at University College Dublin and studying Irish criminal justice policies. At the outset, this case tugged at me. I am a criminologist with research expertise in gender violence. At every stage of life, women and girls who are reported missing are at much greater risk of homicide than men and boys. A recent study of femicides in Ireland reveals that more than half were killed by a person they knew. In most cases, their murderers were their husbands, boyfriends or ex-partners. These are often the same people who call gardaí to report them missing. Satchwell's trial heard from Dr Niamh McCullagh, a specialist in the search and recovery of human remains concealed in a criminal context . She said that 'for all concealed homicide cases that have been studied in Ireland, victims are disposed of within one kilometre of their home address in the majority of cases'. Law enforcement delays and missteps are regrettably common in cases of missing women. Missing person cases are, in general, time-consuming, expensive and emotionally draining. In the year that Satchwell murdered Tina, An Garda Síochána investigated more than 9,500 missing persons reports. To their credit, they solved all but 36 within the year. Tina's disappearance should have been one of them. Research by Bernadette Manifold, a forensic scientist who studies femicide and long-term missing women in Ireland, found that many femicide cases were initially reported as missing persons to the police and that women who go missing have a greater risk of being a victim of homicide. Gender bias often manifests in cases involving intimate and domestic partner violence and sexual assault. In some instances, gender bias gives rise to victim-blaming and denialism. And so reports of violence and abuse in the home may be downgraded. Emergency calls concerning domestic abuse are cancelled and not recorded. In the context of missing persons, investigators may miss red flags and discount the odds of foul play. Gender bias renders men's explanations – even far-fetched explanations – credible. Tina Satchwell's disappearance was littered with red flags. Criminological research identifies several factors to help investigators determine the risk that a missing woman may be the victim of murder. Her case encompassed every single one of those factors. First, did an argument or fight precede the disappearance? Was there a history of violence in the relationship? Check and check. Second, was the last person to see the victim alive an intimate partner? Check. Third, were there delays in reporting the person missing? Check. Fourth, were there inconsistencies in accounts of the disappearance? Check. Fifth, did the missing person leave behind essential items such as a mobile phone and wallet? Check. Three red flags were present at the beginning. Satchwell was the last person to see Tina alive. He delayed contacting gardaí and her family. She left behind her phone and identification card. In the days and weeks that followed, additional flags emerged. Richard revealed that their marriage was on the rocks and that Tina left to 'clear her head'. Discrepancies crept into his statements to gardaí and the media. He suggested their relationship was punctuated by episodes of violence (in his telling, she was always the perpetrator). In his final rendering, he suggested that he killed Tina in self-defence after she charged at him with a chisel. Red flags don't make a person guilty of murder, but these do make it incumbent on investigators to treat a disappearance with utmost urgency. As An Garda Síochána's policy manual on missing persons states, 'it is easier to rein back from the early stages of a big investigation, than recover missed opportunities'. The missed opportunities in this case are glaringly obvious. The search of the Satchwell home in Youghal, Co Cork, should have been conducted in late March 2017, immediately following Satchwell's initial report of Tina's disappearance. That search should have included a cadaver dog. The home improvement works, as well as Richard's far-flung accounts of monkeys for sale, deceased parrots, undiagnosed psychiatric disorders and missing €26,000 should have immediately raised the eyebrows of gardaí. While a thorough and expedient investigation into her disappearance would not have saved Tina Satchwell, improved policing practices that incorporate what we know about gender-based violence, and are informed by criminological research, may spare other women and girls from a similar fate. Dr Jill McCorkel is professor in the Department of Sociology and Criminology at Villanova University, Pennsylvania. She is founder and executive director of Philadelphia Justice Project for Women and Girls
Irish Times
5 hours ago
- Irish Times
Women Gaelic games players suffer injuries in silence due to fear and lack of support, research finds
Fears of being dropped, letting their team down or being seen as weak are among the reasons women Gaelic games players opt to conceal injuries, according to new research. The study of intercounty camogie and women's Gaelic football players found that concern over being sidelined or dropped from the panel were factors in whether players chose to disclose injuries to management, as were worries about how they might be perceived by others in the team setting. The research's lead author, chartered physiotherapist and PhD student at University of Limerick Marese Gilhooly, explains that while various factors can contribute to whether players feel empowered to report injuries, it can often come down to their standing in the set-up. 'A big part of it is the player experience,' she says. 'That might be linked to their years of playing intercounty level – they might be more sure of their place on the team and they mightn't have such fear of being deselected, or risking losing favour with management, whereas younger players mightn't have the confidence or have built up that experience that they feel that they can report [injuries].' READ MORE The research focuses on the players' perceptions of injuries and how those perceptions might lead them to suffer in silence rather than flag what's ailing them. 'One player said she didn't want to be perceived as a 'drama queen',' Gilhooly says, while others said they may not report injuries they felt weren't serious enough so as not to 'waste people's time', as one player quoted in the study said. However, related research conducted by Gilhooly and her colleagues surveying athlete support personnel (ASP – 'individuals in coaching, management and allied health and performance related practice') found they did not share many of the sentiments expressed by players. Of the 42 ASP surveyed, 66 per cent disagreed with the statement 'managers view players as weak for reporting injuries'. Forty-three per cent disagreed that players report all injuries. Gilhooly, who is an assistant lecturer at TUS Athlone, says the findings from the two studies highlight a disconnect between players and ASP. The responses from the ASP also noted the pitfalls of players concealing injuries, with one participant commenting: 'Players need to realise they aren't doing themselves or the team any favours'. Gilhooly explains: 'It's a double-edged sword. They don't want to let the team down, however they're letting both themselves and the team down perhaps by performing through injury or symptoms in the long-term.' External barriers to reporting were also cited both by players and ASP, chief among them access to medical personnel. In the ASP responses, 93 per cent said they believe players are more likely to report injuries when immediate access to medical personnel [team doctors or physiotherapists] is available, which was backed up by the player responses. However, even in elite intercounty set-ups, those resources are often not available, or not consistently so, Gilhooly says. 'I often feel that women are nearly tougher, in a good way and in a bad way. They will put up with an awful lot more, they're not used to being supported,' one of the ASP respondents told the researchers. Another added: 'At club level it's really poor. You have one person on the sideline at club level with a physio bag and he or she is the manager, the coach, the S&C [strength and conditioning specialist] and physio. It's just not good enough. The clubs and county boards need to do better to support females.' The latter comment is important, Gilhooly says, as a lack of support is probably a contributing factor to intercounty players' reluctance to report injuries. 'If players haven't the support at club level, they aren't used to how to access it, how to relay [concerns] to people. Often if they did have it, they didn't know how to make use of it, but often they didn't have it, or it wasn't consistent,' she adds. Gilhooly notes many players detailed how regular access to medical professionals was not a given at intercounty level, adding that even with the adoption of player charters, 'there's still inconsistencies about what is local, feasible and economically able to be put in place'. 'Gaelic games are amateur sports, but [intercounty] players dedicate such time and commitment that it does equal professional standard,' Gilhooly says. 'They're expected to perform like elite athletes but they're not necessarily getting the resources or personnel to support them as elite athletes.' Within the team setting, Gilhooly says 'it really comes down to culture', and, in addition to having the necessary resources in place, encouraging open communication between players and ASP can achieve 'a more honest middle ground' in which players feel empowered to speak up.
