You may not be able to get a Lotto ticket after today
The National Lotteries Commission (NLC) has failed in its bid to change a recent court ruling limiting the temporary licence to operate the lottery to five months.
This means ticket sales may stop before Sunday, 1 June.
The current licence, held by Ithuba Holdings, expires on Saturday. After that, their sister company, Ithuba Lottery, was supposed to take over the licence for a period of twelve months.
But after last week's Gauteng High Court ruling that the issuing of the temporary licence is unconstitutional and can only be issued for five months, Ithuba Lottery said a five-month licence is financially unfeasible and may not continue operating the lottery after Saturday.
And the new licence holder, Sizekhaya Holdings, which is set to take over from Ithuba Lottery for a period of eight years, will need at least nine months to set up its operations.
The NLC therefore applied to change the court order to allow a twelve-month licence. But Judge Omphemetse Mooki ruled against them on Friday.
Will funding stop?
A source at the NLC told GroundUp that the board is in emergency meetings to discuss the way forward.
If lottery ticket sales do stop after Saturday, the National Lottery Distribution Fund does still have about R4.3-billion in reserves to continue issuing grants to good causes.
The NLC's application, which was heard urgently on Thursday at the High Court in Pretoria, was opposed by Wina Njalo, one of the companies that bid on the lottery licence tender.
Wina Njalo argued that the NLC was seeking to relitigate the same issues that had already been heard by the court. If it was found that five months was not enough time, it argued, then the NLC could approach the court at that stage.
It said the application to vary the order was yet another example of how the NLC was seeking to favour the Ithuba companies and they were not entitled to insist on making a profit, given that Ithuba Holdings had already made 'huge profits' by operating the lottery for the last 10 years.
In his ruling, Judge Mooki said the issue was whether it was just and equitable to extend the period that the temporary licence can operate before it is declared invalid and, in doing so, interfere with the discretion exercised by another court.
Such interference was 'very sparingly exercised'.
He said he was not persuaded that the NLC had made out a case.
'There is no substantive support that Ithuba Lottery will suffer a loss of R51-million unless it is granted a temporary licence for 12 months. There was complete silence from Ithuba Lottery. It did not file any affidavits,' the Judge said.
He pointed to the fact that the NLC on 22 May 2025, when it was aware of Judge Potterill's order, had written to Ithuba Lottery requesting it sign a licence to operate for 12 months.
'It was thus inviting the Ithuba Lottery to sign an agreement that would breach the order made on May 21.'
While the NLC had disclosed the response from Ithuba Lottery, it had not disclosed its own letter.
ALSO READ: Big change to Lotto operations: Will tickets be on sale next week?
5 months could be long enough
Judge Mooki said the NLC had also not put up any evidence that Sizekhaya needed more than five months to set up operations.
In fact, as Wina Njalo had pointed out, a condition of the fourth licence was that the successful bidder must be able to operate within five to six months of being awarded the licence.
He said in claiming that its reserves would be significantly depleted should there be no operator after 1 June, the NLC had 'over-egged the pudding'.
'I do not accept that the sky will fall after 1 June should Ithuba Lottery refuse to sign an agreement to conduct lottery operations as determined in (Potterill's) order,' he said.
The request for proposals for the temporary licence was issued when it became apparent that Minister Parks Tau would not meet the strict deadlines to announce the new lottery licence holder, giving it time to take over operations.
He only made the announcement on 28 May, just three days before the expiration of Ithuba's licence. He has yet to provide reasons for the delay.
This article originally appeared on GroundUp and was republished with permission. Read the original article here.
NOW READ: SIU is not done with NLC yet, as more corruption allegations emerge
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Maverick
a day ago
- Daily Maverick
IDT CEO bribery scandal – How I ended up with R60,000 in a Dior bag
Daily Maverick journalist Pieter-Louis Myburgh says he had a hunch that 'something nefarious' was afoot before his meeting with the suspended Independent Development Trust CEO and her spokesperson – who went on to offer him a wad of cash to suppress a continuing journalistic investigation. Victoria O'Regan: How did you get into investigative journalism? Pieter-Louis Myburgh: I studied journalism, and I think around that time already I was quite interested in investigative journalism, specifically. I read All the President's Men [Carl Bernstein and Bob Woodward's non-fiction book detailing how they investigated and uncovered the Watergate scandal in the US, ultimately leading to President Richard Nixon's resignation]. It has always been a favourite read of mine, and at that point it was the most well-known example of really consequential, hard-hitting investigative journalism. I've always been inspired by the impact one can achieve through investigative journalism. VO: How did this specific investigation into the Independent Development Trust (IDT) begin? PLM: It started with the oxygen plants scandal. [A forensic investigation revealed that a shadowy company secured more than half of an IDT R836-million hospital oxygen plant tender during Covid-19, and governance failures at the IDT led to the CEO's suspension.] A source contacted me in mid-2024, telling me to have a look at this massive contract. It just grew from there. I got some documents relating to the contract, and also found out that the main contractor wasn't equipped to deliver that equipment and didn't have the necessary Sahpra [South African Health Products Regulatory Authority] accreditation. VO: How did you get the first tip-off? PLM: I can't go into that much detail, but it goes back to my work on Digital Vibes. [The Digital Vibes scandal involved a politically connected communications firm siphoning off millions meant for public health during Covid-19.] So, seeing as Digital Vibes was a Health Department exposé, I do have some sources in that environment. It was somebody from that environment who told me to look at those oxygen plants, because the oxygen plants thing was a collaboration between the Health Department and the IDT. VO: How did you come up with the idea of doing a sting? PLM: It was just the situation that led me to it. I was pursuing an investigation and, as I was contacting people, word of my probing must've got back to [suspended IDT CEO Tebogo Malaka] – or, at least to Phasha Makgolane, the IDT spokesperson – because Makgolane contacted me, out of the blue, in early June this year. I had just come back from doing some work in Gauteng on this issue that I'm investigating, and then he phoned me and said that we should have a meeting, and it was too sensitive to discuss on the phone. You know, all that suspicious language that gave away what the intentions would be. I contacted Daily Maverick editor-in-chief Jillian Green and deputy editor Anso Thom and I said that everything points to bribery being the intention – I don't think this is just a normal interaction between me and the spokesperson. I proposed the idea that we should pursue the meeting first, with Makgolane, and then later with the IDT CEO. Because when Makgolane contacted me, right from the start he said that there were going to be two meetings – one with him and one where Malaka would also be present. VO: So you suspected it? PLM: Oh, definitely. His language gave it away. Just the fact that he was saying that we have mutual matters to discuss. It's kind of code for something nefarious. VO: Were you nervous? PLM: Absolutely – throughout. We invested so much editorially and journalistically in this project – time and logistics, and there were some expenses, obviously. So just on that front, I really wanted it to work out. But then obviously there are also safety concerns on top of that. VO: Tell me about the tech that you used. Did you plan where to sit based on where you could set up a hidden camera? PLM: I suppose the operation is wrapped up, so we can go into some detail. The first prize was always going to be for us to sit at that table, which is why I arrived much earlier. I was already sitting there so that I could beckon for them to come over to me. But we did plan for some eventualities. If they maybe insisted on going to another table, if they didn't like that one, there would've been mobile cameras with some of the operators to follow us and hopefully get it on camera. But that table was going to be our very best chance of getting the best footage and sound. VO: How did Malaka and Makgolane react when you photographed the money? PLM: I think they were a little stunned. Makgolane thought I was using an app on my phone that was counting the money. Well, he jokingly suggested that. I think that when I did that, it probably dawned on them that I was doing something funny. And then, very shortly after that, I told them I was, in fact, not taking the money and gave it back to them. VO: Who paid the bill? PLM: That's a very good question! Obviously, I walked away to get out of there and so did the two of them. So the people on the ground who assisted with the logistics paid the bill. VO: Are you scared for your safety? PLM: Yes, I am – but, I guess, in this line of work it's almost a constant consideration. Whether it's me working on this or other journalists working on the provincial health department in Gauteng or whistle-blower Babita Deokaran's assassination – it's just, I suppose, a constant consideration. For now, I'm kind of lying low. VO: What now, and what consequences would you like to see happen? PLM: We're still focused on getting our actual investigation out [on Monday], which is the issue that prompted the whole bribe attempt. So, ironically, I think this bribe is going to become the main story for now, but actually the investigation involves another IDT contract and the CEO's property in Gauteng. VO: Some people have quipped that R60,000 isn't that much money. Is there a price that you would've accepted? PLM: No. I think we should definitely correct the optics around the amount, because I see that's one angle that's gone very viral. The reality is that R60,000 was meant to have been a little sweetener. At the very first meeting with Makgolane, the main boon for me would have been tenders from the IDT. He said that I could bring contractors to the IDT, they would clinch the contracts, and then I could sort of get my cut. And, very shortly after that first meeting, he sent me a Western Cape IDT tender, inviting me to spread it among my contractor friends. Unfortunately I don't have many of those [laughs].
SowetanLIVE
2 days ago
- SowetanLIVE
Mary Vilakazi - Breaking through the glass ceiling
Making the most of opportunities has been an important stepping stone for Mary Vilakazi, the CEO of FirstRand — South Africa's biggest banking group. FirstRand, boasting a R400-billion market capitalisation, is a leading financial services group whose divisions include First National Bank (FNB), Wesbank, and Rand Merchant Bank (RMB), employing around 50 000 people globally. "Growing up I would not have said I would be CEO of the largest bank in South Africa, but it is [the outcome of] a series of opportunities I was fortunate to have. I got opportunities along the way and that is what made the difference,' Vilakazi says. 'I always say I was not the brightest or the most gifted, but I managed to get opportunities, whether it is a bursary or someone offering me vacation work or a school programme — all of those things are important because without access to them I would not be here.' Vilakazi joined FirstRand in 2018 as group chief operating officer and took over as CEO in April 2024, becoming the first woman to serve at the helm of the group. Her track record speaks for itself: she previously served as the deputy CEO of MMI Holdings and chief financial officer of the Mineral Services Group. Growing up in Alexandra, north of Joburg, Vilakazi has had a knack for business from a young age. 'My mother wanted me to earn money when I was very young; it was a helpful skill. Instead of giving me pocket money, she gave me a packet of sweets to sell and said I could keep the profits,' Vilakazi says. She describes her tenure as CEO as both challenging, owing to the unique micro-economic environment resulting from FirstRand's diverse geographic footprint, and rewarding, owing to the progress that has been made to address some of South Africa's structural challenges.
Daily Maverick
2 days ago
- Daily Maverick
Can Africa stand together against the economic disruption of Trump's tariff assault?
Some say Africa should present a unified response to US tariffs — but is that possible? It is hard to discern a continental pattern in US President Donald Trump's new 'reciprocal' import tariffs imposed on African countries last week. It is also difficult to discern whether a unified response by Africa is possible or desirable. Thirty-two of Africa's 54 nations got the global minimum rate of 10%, 18 countries got 15%, Tunisia got 25% and South Africa, Algeria and Libya got 30%. Trump's new tariff rates presented on 31 July 2025 corrected some of the grosser anomalies in his April announcement. Notably, Lesotho's astronomical tariff of 50% was reduced to 15%. But some, like South Africa's rate, stayed the same despite vigorous government lobbying to reduce it. In April, Trump imposed high tariffs on many countries, aiming to wipe out trade deficits. But the tariff amount was based on individual nations' trade deficits rather than on their actual barriers to US trade. Lesotho fell foul of the formula because it is surrounded by South Africa, and so imports most of its goods from there and very little from the US — only$2.8-million last year. Conversely, Lesotho exported a relatively large amount of goods (worth about$273.3-million) to the US, mainly garments via the African Growth and Opportunity Act, and diamonds. It is unclear how the US arrived at last week's revised tariffs, but there appeared to be no formula applied, since most African countries got 10% or 15%, apart from the four outliers. So it seems political factors played a prominent role in some cases. This is clear for South Africa, as Trump has raged against the country for its Expropriation Act and alleged 'genocide' against white Afrikaners — for which there is no evidence. Pretoria's decision to take Israel to the International Court of Justice for alleged genocide in Gaza was probably also a factor. Algeria was presumably targeted because of its hostility to Morocco, a member of Trump's Abraham Accords with Arab nations. The reason for Libya and Tunisia's high rates is unclear. Economic rationale If there is any economic rationale behind any of the tariffs, it hasn't been well thought through. Lesotho's reduction to 15% looks dramatic, but Trade and Industry Minister Mokhethi Shelile says it still leaves the country at a fatal competitive disadvantage — in the export of garments to the US — to Kenya and Eswatini especially, which got only 10% tariffs last week. Having switched its Africa policy from aid to trade, one might have expected that the US would have been sensitive to concerns like those of Lesotho — and perhaps it will still be sympathetic to Lesotho's lobbying. Although some analysts and trade experts have called for a unified African response to Trump's tariff assault, there has so far been no sign of one, either from the African Union (AU) or elsewhere. Wamkele Mene, Secretary-General of the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA), said African countries must unify trade policies to deal with the disruption caused by Trump's tariffs. 'The good news out of this crisis is that our heads of state understand that there is not a single market in Africa that will survive on its own,' Mene told CNBC Africa in April. 'We are not going to be able to negotiate bilaterally successfully. I think that's clear. We will have to leverage our combined efforts, our combined market size, market share and combined population size.' However Daniel Bradlow, an economic diplomacy expert at the University of Pretoria and South African Institute of International Affairs, says: 'It seems to me it's idealistic to think that the whole of 54 countries can agree on one strategy for the whole continent, and that the US would accept that. 'The problem with trying to negotiate like that is it's too easy for the US to divide and conquer,' he told ISS Today. 'It can offer Kenya or South Africa, say, too good a deal for them to say no. And that sort of breaks them away from a more unified approach. So it seems to me that that's not a very productive approach. It's more productive to try to develop the AfCFTA.' There is also a question of whether Africa could negotiate as a single entity since it does not have a continent-wide customs union or common market, so cannot have a common external tariff with an outside country. (Although sub-regional groups have negotiated free trade deals with the European Union.) Diversify markets But Bradlow is right — and Mene concurs — in proposing that Africa must now diversify its markets and strengthen intra-African trade, which remains the lowest among global regions at under 20%. And that means accelerating AfCFTA implementation, which is taking too long to get off the ground. Perhaps Trump's tariff assault will hurry them up. Few other African countries match the volume of South Africa's exports to the US, particularly when you subtract the goods exempted from the new tariffs, like oil and minerals, which are of strategic value to Washington. But we have seen how for countries like Lesotho, even relatively low values of exports are critical. And forthcoming United Nations Economic Commission for Africa, AU Commission and African Development Bank joint research suggests that new US import tariffs could reduce Africa's exports to the US by up to 21.5%. 'This goes beyond trade volumes,' says United Nations Economic Commission for Africa Executive Secretary Claver Gatete. 'It affects industrial jobs, regional supply chains and Africa's voice in shaping the terms of engagement.' He urged countries to mobilise domestic resources to withstand a deteriorating external environment of rising tariffs and falling aid. Although individual African states are continuing to negotiate with the US, the focus is beginning to shift from mitigation to adaptation. South Africa, for instance, is establishing an Export Support Desk to help firms cope, and announced it would implement measures to cushion the blow for key affected industries like autos and agriculture. Meanwhile, America's aggressive protectionism offers an opportunity for its chief global rival China, which is throwing African countries a lifeline by dropping import tariffs for nearly all of them, Nigerian economist Bismarck Rewane told CNN. Still it's hard to do without the world's largest economy. Perhaps the best Africa and the world can hope for is that the pandemonium caused by Trump's trade policy will boomerang on America — as seems to be happening already — and force him to recant. Meanwhile, African countries should accelerate AfCFTA's implementation and strengthen their domestic economies against this perfect storm of rising tariffs and plunging aid. DM
