logo
'I don't have decisive influence' - Textor on multi-club ownership

'I don't have decisive influence' - Textor on multi-club ownership

BBC News11-07-2025
Crystal Palace co-owner John Textor says Uefa have been given a document that says he has no influence on the management decisions of the club. Textor's involvement with both Palace and French club Lyon looks set to cost the Eagles a spot in the Europa League under Uefa's rules governing multi-club ownership."The document that I signed when I signed onto the shares, says clearly, that I'm not entitled to have any say in management decisions," Textor told Talksport. "They've [Uefa] seen that document, and I've sat there in the room and said 'OK, stop talking about the 25% and using that argument because it's below the Uefa threshold of 30%."My document says I have 0% vote so why would it be a problem?"When asked how much responsibility he will take if Palace do get demoted to Conference League, Textor said "we all do as owners," before being pushed to answer about him personally."I'll admit to not even thinking about the issue [prior to Palace winning the FA Cup]."Of course, I have to. But I also read the rule."Everybody is talking about it like it is so obvious. "If you have decisive influence then you may need to consider this but I don't and I didn't."If I had decisive influence, then those Brazilian players that just beat PSG in the Club World Cup, half of them would be coming to Crystal Palace next year."But you don't see one single player from our network of clubs, that's made their way on to the Palace roster."That is the source of my frustration with the lack of collaboration we've been able to have with Crystal Palace."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Mike Lynch's estate ordered to pay HP £700m in High Court ruling
Mike Lynch's estate ordered to pay HP £700m in High Court ruling

The Independent

time15 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Mike Lynch's estate ordered to pay HP £700m in High Court ruling

Hewlett Packard (HP) is set to recoup more than £700 million ($944 million) from the estate of the late Mike Lynch and his former business partner, Sushovan Hussain, a London High Court judge ruled on Tuesday. The sum relates to HP's ill-fated acquisition of British software firm Autonomy. The US technology giant had sought to recover losses from Dr Lynch, who died last year when his luxury yacht sank off Sicily, and Mr Hussain. HP had accused the pair of orchestrating an elaborate fraud to inflate Autonomy's value before its $11.1 billion purchase in 2011, a deal that subsequently unravelled. Within a year of the acquisition, HP wrote down Autonomy's value by $8.8 billion and launched a $5 billion lawsuit against Dr Lynch and Mr Hussain in London. A judge ruled in HP's favour in 2022. Dr Lynch, once lauded as Britain's answer to Bill Gates, consistently maintained his innocence, instead blaming HP for its failure to integrate Autonomy into its operations. He was acquitted of criminal charges related to the deal in the US and had intended to appeal the High Court's 2022 ruling, a process that was on hold pending this week's decision on damages. Judge Robert Hildyard ruled HP sustained losses of over £646 million ($871.8 million) in relation to the difference between what HP paid for Autonomy and what HP would have paid "had Autonomy's true financial position been correctly presented". Hilyard also said HP was entitled to another £51.7 million in relation to "personal claims for deceit and/or misrepresentation against Dr Lynch and Mr Hussain", plus another $47.5 million in relation to losses suffered by group companies. HP said at a hearing last year that it was seeking up to $4 billion. Hussain settled with HP earlier this year.

Britain faces having to pay billions to EU in order for UK firms to access bloc's new €150bn defence fund
Britain faces having to pay billions to EU in order for UK firms to access bloc's new €150bn defence fund

Daily Mail​

time15 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Britain faces having to pay billions to EU in order for UK firms to access bloc's new €150bn defence fund

Britain will have to pay the EU a fee for any weapons bought from UK firms via the bloc's new €150 billion defence fund, it is reported. Sir Keir Starmer boasted in May how his Brexit 'reset' deal with the EU would pave the way for UK defence firms to access the Security Action for Europe (SAFE) fund. The Prime Minister said British participation in the fund would support thousands of jobs and boost economic growth. But Sir Keir was also warned there would be a 'pay to play' element for British access to SAFE, following French demands for a UK financial contribution. According to the Financial Times, this will see Britain having to pay the EU a percentage of the value of any weapons bought from UK companies via SAFE. The newspaper reported the exact figure Britain will have to pay to access the fund is still under discussion by EU member states. They are finalising their position on the deal with the UK, which is expected to be published later this week. Brussels is set to argue that because UK firms would receive EU money to create jobs and expand capacity under the scheme, London should recompense the bloc. An EU diplomat said: 'What was written in the SAFE regulation is that there shall be a fair balance as regards the contributions and the benefits.' Another diplomat revealed how France is pushing for a high UK contribution but other countries, led by Germany, want to ensure the UK is not dissuaded from joining. SAFE was set up by Brussels amid the threat posed by Russia and following threats by US President Donald Trump to scrap American security guarantees for Europe. The multi-billion fund will allow EU member states to take out loans for weapons from funds raised against the EU budget. There are strict rules on where arms can be purchased from, with initial fears that British defence firms would be excluded from the fund. These include a 'buy European' clause that means the fund can only be used to purchase arms from EU-linked countries or Ukraine. Brussels officials previously outlined how the fund would only consider buying British arms if the UK struck a new security and defence partnership with the EU. Sir Keir agreed such a partnership with the EU as part of his Brexit 'reset' in May. In order for UK defence products to qualify, the value of their components from members of SAFE must be at least 65 per cent. Other restrictions relate to the purchase of complex weapons systems where non-EU countries hold 'design authority'. Concerns were recently expressed in Germany that the US has the power to shut off F-35 fighter jets, which are widely used across Europe. But the US denied the existence of a 'kill switch'. A Government spokesperson said: 'We won't preempt our discussions with the EU. 'It is in all our interests for the UK and EU to bring together our unique capabilities and expertise to make Europe a safer, more secure, and more prosperous place. 'That is why we agreed a landmark Security and Defence Partnership, enhancing our security and defence cooperation and delivering for citizens across the continent.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store