logo
Political pundits downplay risk of war

Political pundits downplay risk of war

Express Tribune03-05-2025

While the spectre of full-scale war remains distant, the possibility of limited military action looms large – one that could fan the flames of war hysteria deliberately stoked by the belligerent Modi government, analysts have warned.
Tensions continue to simmer on both sides of the border after India vowed retaliation over a recent attack in Indian Illegally Occupied Jammu and Kashmir (IIOJK), which it blamed on Pakistan without furnishing evidence. In response, Islamabad issued a stern warning against any misadventure and placed its forces on high alert.
Political analysts in Pakistan have downplayed the chances of full-scale conflict, arguing that India's media-driven war talk serves to bolster the ruling party's domestic image rather than signal genuine military intent.
Despite the heightened rhetoric, they believe strategic restraint still holds at the military level, though a return to calm appears out of reach for now.
Former Senator Mushahid Hussain Sayed, speaking to The Express Tribune, said the current "no war, no peace" situation is likely to persist as it benefits the Modi regime. However, he asserted that no military conflict or war between the two neighbours is expected.
He said that despite Pakistan's smaller size, it had responded responsibly to India's threats. "Not only that, we are also apprising the world of the risk of misadventure by India, which shows our commitment to peace even in these testing times," he said.
He likened the situation to the Cuban Missile Crisis, which brought the US and the USSR to the brink of nuclear conflict.
"The world must be made aware of the consequences of a nuclear fallout," he warned.
He added that Pakistan was compelled to issue a strong response only after India threatened annihilation. "Despite the chest-thumping on the Indian side, Pakistan remained composed, its people and its media," he said.
He noted that Indian media's jingoism had reached a fever pitch. "The language pro-Modi media was using bordered on hate speech," he observed.
Commenting on India's move to hold the Indus Waters Treaty (IWT) in abeyance, Mushahid said it was a dangerous game that could backfire. "If we are the lower riparian in the case of the Jhelum, Chenab and Indus rivers, then India is a lower riparian state in the case of the Brahmaputra and Indus, both of which originate from China," he said.
"If India tries to fiddle with our water supply, China could disrupt the flow in those rivers."
He clarified that India had only held the IWT in abeyance and had not suspended it. "They cannot suspend the treaty, nor can they disrupt the water supply in the short run. They simply don't have the infrastructure for that," he said.
Senior political analyst and former caretaker Punjab Chief Minister Hasan Askari also said the probability of a full-blown war was low. However, he warned that limited military action remained a real possibility.
He noted that India had for the past two decades sought ways to punish Pakistan below the nuclear threshold, but had failed to do so thus far.
He praised Pakistan's overall conduct during the crisis. "Other than the defence and information ministers, Pakistan and its media have acted maturely and professionally," he said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

'Own resources used in conflict with India'
'Own resources used in conflict with India'

Express Tribune

time3 hours ago

  • Express Tribune

'Own resources used in conflict with India'

'Own resources used in conflict with India' Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Committee General Sahir Shamshad Mirza told BBC that Pakistan fought the recent 96-hour conflict with India using only its own resources. His remarks counter reports from Indian media claiming China's military assistance to Pakistan during the clash between the two nuclear-armed neighbours last month. General Mirza emphasised that Pakistan used equipment comparable to India's and procured some military hardware from other countries. He highlighted that previous skirmishes were limited to disputed areas and did not reach the international border. However, he continued, "This time the borders were relatively peaceful and this time the cities were hot." He argued that this lowering of threshold where cities are considered focal targets is dangerous for both India and Pakistan in any future conflict. Tensions between Pakistan and India soared after the April 22 Pahalgam attack, killing 26 in IIOJK. India blamed Pakistan-based elements without presenting any evidence, which Islamabad denied calling for an independent probe. India closed the Wagah border, revoked visas, and suspended the Indus Waters Treaty, prompting Pakistan to call it an "act of war." Explosions hit Pakistani cities on May 6–7, as India launched air attacks on Pakistan. Pakistan retaliated with Operation Bunyanum Marsoos, targeting Indian military sites. A US-brokered ceasefire was later announced after escalating military exchanges. "This affects the trade, investment and development needs for 1.5 billion people," Gen Mirza said. "There is no formalised conflict resolution or management mechanism at the moment. The Director-General of military operations of both countries have a hotline that is regularly used on Tuesday to exchange issues and information, and is available on currents if any untoward situation like this, and it can be used at any time. However, this is the only option available." He warned that future conflicts may not remain confined to specific regions and criticised the absence of an effective and organied mechanism to resolve Indo-Pak disputes. He continued that if there is only one defence mechanism available at all times and it faces an Indian polity with a reckless and extremist mindset, then the time window for intervention substantially decreases. He concluded by saying, "With the absence of any conflict management system, the chances of this conflict spiraling remain high". Regarding emergency communications, the chairman noted reliance solely on DGMO hotlines and expressed concern that extremist mindsets limit international intervention time. He added that global powers, including the US, have limited time left for mediation. Previously, Pakistan on June 2 strongly criticised recent comments by Indian leaders, describing them as reflective of a hostile and dangerous mindset that undermines regional peace. The statement from Pakistan's Foreign Office followed remarks made by India's Ministry of External Affairs spokesperson on May 29, when he claimed that talks on Kashmir would only proceed if Pakistan "hands over Azad Jammu and Kashmir" to India.

Armed forces — an acclamation — I
Armed forces — an acclamation — I

Business Recorder

time4 hours ago

  • Business Recorder

Armed forces — an acclamation — I

Whilst at primary school, reading 'The Charge of The Light Brigade' written by Lord Alfred Tennyson, I would invariably imagine with pride our brave and courageous soldiers, when reciting these lines from the second stanza, to the class at the behest of the teacher, 'Theirs not to make a reply, Theirs not to reason why, Theirs but to do and die. …' That picture conjured by imagination hasn't been altered by my growing decades; in fact, it has been consistently reinforced. The courage and bravery of our Men in Uniform is second to none — comparable or beyond the best armies of the world. Pakistan since its independence under the banner of our Founder's vision of living in harmony and peace with all countries of the world, particularly the neighbouring countries (Jinnah's sincerity can be gauged by the fact that he once compared, and imagined, Pakistan and India to be living in peace, just as France and Germany, post the bitterness of WW II) has pursued the policy of malice towards none and friendship towards all — of peace and peaceful coexistence. Regrettably, India has not till date reconciled to the creation of Pakistan, and has waged war upon us, several times — from continuous skirmishes to full-scale war and battles. We fight back so that we may live in peace. Indian belligerence has only been strengthened with the arrival of Narendra Modi in New Delhi (leaders may know that Nathuram Godse was the assassin of Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi and he was hailed by RSS — the Hindutva party that Shri Modi had joined at the age of 17 years). His hatred towards non- Hindus is known and is deep seated. He hasn't till date either criticised or apologised the carnage of murder, loot, rape and plunder of Muslims in Gujarat. He is not a man of peace. A die-hard war monger. This panegyric and encomiums about our respected armed forces is much deserved. I am not arguing a case; I am telling a truth here. Indians orchestrated the Pahalgam incident to coincide with the visit of US vice-president, JD Vance. They killed their own citizens including a young newly married lieutenant colonel and raised a hue and cry that Pakistan aided terrorists carried out the attack. Modi's desperation and frustrations arising out of elections prompted this false flag operation. The devil's chaplain, Narendra Modi, who believes and preaches violence created war hysteria. The US refused to fall prey to his designs. Modi had cast the dice of death by this miscalculated misadventure. On the 7th of May India launched its silly named, 'Operation Sindoor'. Sindoor is vermillion red, and not saffron coloured. Sindoor was discovered as a 'pavitar' (pure and noble) tradition some 5,000 years back where women applied a powder made of Cinnabar, a mineral mixed with lime or lead, between the hair parting on the scalp; this was considered to be a visible mark of a woman's marital status in Hinduism. This also served as a sign of commitment and fidelity. By naming it 'Operation Sindoor', Modi has insulted the women of India and particularly the widowed. India attacked seven civilian sites at equal number of cities; they killed by missile women, men, children and infants in the darkness at 1.05am. They demolished mosques in Muzzafarabad, Kotli, Bahwalpur, Muridke and other cities. Pakistan and its armed forces exercised utmost restraint. Every honorable action has its proper time and season, or rather it is this proprietary or observance which distinguishes an honourable action from the opposite (Agesilaus— 400BC). The Indians based on their media frenzy started to celebrate as if they had conquered. TV anchors and analysts went berserk; in their false sense of jubilation, they began to broadcast what they may have perceived would happen. It seemed pre-scripted. The 'PM is missing'; 'the army chief is under detention', 'Lahore seaport is on fire', and a lot of other mumbo jumbo arising out of delusional thinking. In fact, the entire Indian media was hallucinating, particularly in North India; the South seemed to have kept itself aloof from this madness. They showed wreckage of some old clips from other parts of the world—all a dream that never happened. Indian disinformation campaign in two days was laid in tatters. The west disbelieved from the beginning itself. The regret on the face of one known TV anchor when she says, 'America and President Donald Trump is buying Pakistan's story' is so revealing of what the truth is. India stood exposed. The media since then has been sitting on the horns of a self-created dilemma, looking to understand which way will the breeze blow? Pakistan after much patience gave a befitting reply on 10th May, not like the cowards in the darkness, but in early morning light. In 16 hours the shape and balance of the security situation in South Asia had been turned upside down. Pakistan's ever ready air force returned the dare by the Indians by downing five, nay six, of their fighter jets, including the now infamously famous Rafale aircraft built by France. Pakistani drones lit up New Delhi. The Cyberattack rendered the halt of energy supplies to a major part of Northern India. The enemy was shocked. Pulverized. Stunned. They rushed to seek ceasefire. India initially remained in denial. They were not prepared for the fierceness of the counter attack by Pakistan army and Aair force. India's Chief of Defence Staff Gen Anil Chauhan, in an interview with Bloomberg TV admitted that 'India lost an unspecified number of fighter jets.' Air Marshall A.K. Bharti, DG, operations of Indian air force, in a press conference gave no details of the loss suffered but admitted that Pakistan had downed their aircraft. During the spinning of the cobweb of lies, he said, 'objective achieved, but don't ask how many aircrafts were downed…we are still at war.' (To be continued) Copyright Business Recorder, 2025

PM orders removal of impediments to execution of Diamer Bhasha Dam
PM orders removal of impediments to execution of Diamer Bhasha Dam

Business Recorder

time4 hours ago

  • Business Recorder

PM orders removal of impediments to execution of Diamer Bhasha Dam

ISLAMABAD: Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif on Tuesday directed authorities to remove all obstacles to the timely completion of the $15 billion Diamer-Bhasha Dam, calling it vital for the country's energy security and agricultural self-reliance. The prime minister, while chairing a high-level meeting on water resources, stressed that building new dams was crucial to expand water storage capacity, ensure reliable irrigation, and reduce the risk of floods. 'The country's self-reliance depends on affordable power and agriculture, both of which require increased water storage and efficient usage,' he said, urging officials to prioritise major hydropower projects. 'Cost of Diamer-Bhasha Dam Project has increased 119.21pc' Sharif added that affordable electricity and agricultural growth were key to the country's economic independence, and vowed full government support to advance these priorities. The Diamer-Bhasha Dam – a 4,500-megawatt concrete-filled gravity hydropower project under construction on the Indus River between Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and Gilgit-Baltistan – is expected to rank among the world's largest dams upon completion. It will not only generate electricity but also irrigate 1.2 million acres of farmland, create 16,500 jobs, and extend the operational life of the Tarbela Dam by 35 years. The meeting was attended by federal ministers,AhsanIqbal, Amir Muqam, AzamNazeerTarar, MoeenWattoo, Adviser RanaSanaullah, Gilgit-Baltistan Chief Minister Gulbar Khan, and senior officials. It is pertinent to mention that last month, Planning and Development Minister Ahsan Iqbal said the government would fast-track hydropower projects to counter potential Indian moves to divert water from shared rivers. His remarks came after India put in abeyance its participation in the Indus Waters Treaty of 1960, accusing Pakistan of orchestrating the Pahalgam attack. However, Pakistan vehemently denied the allegations, terming it a false flag operation carried out by India itself. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store