
Armed forces — an acclamation — I
Whilst at primary school, reading 'The Charge of The Light Brigade' written by Lord Alfred Tennyson, I would invariably imagine with pride our brave and courageous soldiers, when reciting these lines from the second stanza, to the class at the behest of the teacher,
'Theirs not to make a reply, Theirs not to reason why, Theirs but to do and die. …' That picture conjured by imagination hasn't been altered by my growing decades; in fact, it has been consistently reinforced. The courage and bravery of our Men in Uniform is second to none — comparable or beyond the best armies of the world.
Pakistan since its independence under the banner of our Founder's vision of living in harmony and peace with all countries of the world, particularly the neighbouring countries (Jinnah's sincerity can be gauged by the fact that he once compared, and imagined, Pakistan and India to be living in peace, just as France and Germany, post the bitterness of WW II) has pursued the policy of malice towards none and friendship towards all — of peace and peaceful coexistence.
Regrettably, India has not till date reconciled to the creation of Pakistan, and has waged war upon us, several times — from continuous skirmishes to full-scale war and battles. We fight back so that we may live in peace.
Indian belligerence has only been strengthened with the arrival of Narendra Modi in New Delhi (leaders may know that Nathuram Godse was the assassin of Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi and he was hailed by RSS — the Hindutva party that Shri Modi had joined at the age of 17 years). His hatred towards non- Hindus is known and is deep seated. He hasn't till date either criticised or apologised the carnage of murder, loot, rape and plunder of Muslims in Gujarat. He is not a man of peace. A die-hard war monger.
This panegyric and encomiums about our respected armed forces is much deserved. I am not arguing a case; I am telling a truth here.
Indians orchestrated the Pahalgam incident to coincide with the visit of US vice-president, JD Vance. They killed their own citizens including a young newly married lieutenant colonel and raised a hue and cry that Pakistan aided terrorists carried out the attack. Modi's desperation and frustrations arising out of elections prompted this false flag operation. The devil's chaplain, Narendra Modi, who believes and preaches violence created war hysteria. The US refused to fall prey to his designs. Modi had cast the dice of death by this miscalculated misadventure.
On the 7th of May India launched its silly named, 'Operation Sindoor'. Sindoor is vermillion red, and not saffron coloured. Sindoor was discovered as a 'pavitar' (pure and noble) tradition some 5,000 years back where women applied a powder made of Cinnabar, a mineral mixed with lime or lead, between the hair parting on the scalp; this was considered to be a visible mark of a woman's marital status in Hinduism. This also served as a sign of commitment and fidelity. By naming it 'Operation Sindoor', Modi has insulted the women of India and particularly the widowed.
India attacked seven civilian sites at equal number of cities; they killed by missile women, men, children and infants in the darkness at 1.05am. They demolished mosques in Muzzafarabad, Kotli, Bahwalpur, Muridke and other cities.
Pakistan and its armed forces exercised utmost restraint. Every honorable action has its proper time and season, or rather it is this proprietary or observance which distinguishes an honourable action from the opposite (Agesilaus— 400BC). The Indians based on their media frenzy started to celebrate as if they had conquered.
TV anchors and analysts went berserk; in their false sense of jubilation, they began to broadcast what they may have perceived would happen. It seemed pre-scripted. The 'PM is missing'; 'the army chief is under detention', 'Lahore seaport is on fire', and a lot of other mumbo jumbo arising out of delusional thinking.
In fact, the entire Indian media was hallucinating, particularly in North India; the South seemed to have kept itself aloof from this madness. They showed wreckage of some old clips from other parts of the world—all a dream that never happened. Indian disinformation campaign in two days was laid in tatters.
The west disbelieved from the beginning itself. The regret on the face of one known TV anchor when she says, 'America and President Donald Trump is buying Pakistan's story' is so revealing of what the truth is. India stood exposed. The media since then has been sitting on the horns of a self-created dilemma, looking to understand which way will the breeze blow?
Pakistan after much patience gave a befitting reply on 10th May, not like the cowards in the darkness, but in early morning light. In 16 hours the shape and balance of the security situation in South Asia had been turned upside down.
Pakistan's ever ready air force returned the dare by the Indians by downing five, nay six, of their fighter jets, including the now infamously famous Rafale aircraft built by France. Pakistani drones lit up New Delhi. The Cyberattack rendered the halt of energy supplies to a major part of Northern India. The enemy was shocked. Pulverized. Stunned. They rushed to seek ceasefire.
India initially remained in denial. They were not prepared for the fierceness of the counter attack by Pakistan army and Aair force. India's Chief of Defence Staff Gen Anil Chauhan, in an interview with Bloomberg TV admitted that 'India lost an unspecified number of fighter jets.' Air Marshall A.K. Bharti, DG, operations of Indian air force, in a press conference gave no details of the loss suffered but admitted that Pakistan had downed their aircraft. During the spinning of the cobweb of lies, he said, 'objective achieved, but don't ask how many aircrafts were downed…we are still at war.'
(To be continued)
Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Business Recorder
an hour ago
- Business Recorder
France's Dassault and India's Tata to produce Rafale fuselage in Hyderabad
NEW DELHI: France's Dassault Aviation and India's Tata Advanced Systems have agreed to manufacture the fuselage of the Rafale fighter aircraft in India, the companies said on Thursday, the first time it will be produced outside France. India, the world's biggest arms importer, has been looking to step up domestic production and boost defence exports, which jumped 12% in the fiscal year to end-March, to $2.76 billion. Tata will set up a production facility in the southern city of Hyderabad to manufacture key structural sections of the Rafale as part of the agreement, the companies said in a statement. The first fuselage sections are expected to roll off the assembly line in the 2028 financial year, with the facility expected to deliver up to two complete fuselages per month, they said. After Pakistan downed Indian jets, Indonesia weighs purchase of China's J-10s The statement did not say how much the deal was worth nor whether the finish products would be for domestic use or export, but Tata Advanced Systems said on X that the fuselage would be 'for India and other global markets'. The Indian Air Force currently operates 36 Rafale fighters. India also signed a deal in April with France – its second-largest arms supplier - to buy 26 naval versions of the jets for $7 billion, which are expected to be delivered by 2030. The South Asian nation is looking to modernise its military and boost domestic weapons' production, particularly to strengthen its defences against neighbours Pakistan and China. India used fighter jets in four-days of fierce clashes with Pakistan last month, after a deadly attack by assailants that killed 26 men in Indian Illegally Occupied Jammu and Kashmir (IIOJK). Pakistan's defence minister had said three of India's Rafale fighter jets had been shot down during the fighting but did not share any evidence. One US official told Reuters that at least one downed Indian aircraft was a Rafale. Dassault Aviation had declined to comment. India's chief of defence staff told Reuters in an interview last week that India suffered losses in the air, but declined to give details.


Business Recorder
an hour ago
- Business Recorder
Only ceasefire between Pakistan, India represents true victory, says Bilawal
Only a lasting ceasefire between Pakistan and India represents true victory, said former Foreign Minister of Pakistan Bilawal Bhutto Zardari on Monday. On May 7, India launched airstrikes on Pakistani targets to 'avenge last month's killing of 26 people by gunmen in Pahalgam town', about 89km east of Srinagar, the summer capital of Indian Illegally Occupied Jammu and Kashmir (IIOJK). Pakistan denied any involvement in the attack. In an interview with China Central Television (CCTV) at the United Nations headquarters, Zardari, also the chairman of Pakistan People's Party, said that there is no 'real victory' until the final ceasefire. 'I think the very easy answer to who won this war is who's lying to their people? Whose media was lying to their people? Whose government was lying to their people during the conflict and after the conflict? It took one month for the Indian government to admit that we downed their planes. Why were they hiding this fact from their people? Because the truth is they lost. As our initial self-defense for their unilateral violation of our sovereignty, we downed six Indian jets and they refused to admit it up until literally yesterday. We've achieved a ceasefire. That's important. I think that's the true victory,' said Zardari. IMF warns Pakistan-India tensions could threaten reform, fiscal goals Pakistan and India announced on May 10 that they had agreed on an immediate ceasefire, but Zardari admitted that it is a fragile ceasefire. 'This is, I think, a fragile ceasefire. In order for this to be a lasting ceasefire, we appeal to the international community to play its role because Pakistan has said that they're willing to talk. There's only one country that says they're not willing to talk and that's India. So obviously that's not a sustainable situation. And therefore, it is our effort to engage the international community for them to play their role to establish peace, which must include resolving the issue of Kashmir, resolving India's water dispute that India has now started illegally and having a proper conversation about terrorism,' said the former foreign minister. Zardari stated that both parties are most likely to resolve their disputes through dialogue. 'I think the most important and the most sort of possible achievement would be for us to start a dialogue. Dialogue and diplomacy has to be the start for us to address any and all issues. So Pakistan is willing to talk with India. We want peace, but peace is not possible, as you say, until we engage in a dialogue. Of course, I believe as we relied or there was the international community's involvement in achieving our ceasefire. Therefore, it's reasonable to believe that if the international community plays its role in a similar way, perhaps, we will able to establish perpetual peace, at least in South Asia,' he said.


Business Recorder
3 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Indians fume as Pakistan secures key UN counter-terror roles
Indians erupted in outrage after Pakistan secured leadership roles on two pivotal UN Security Council committees this week despite New Delhi's years-long campaign to isolate it internationally. The diplomatic blow for India came Wednesday when Pakistan was named: Vice Chair of the UNSC's Counter-Terrorism Committee (established post-9/11 under Resolution 1373), which oversees global anti-terrorism compliance. Chair of the committee monitoring Taliban sanctions (Resolution 1988). The appointments cap a string of failures for India's isolation strategy, following similar setbacks at the IMF and ADB. BJP-linked figures lashed out, with some calling the UN's credibility into question. 'The UNSC has become a joke' fumed one BJP linked journalist, Smita Prakash. Others called on the Indian leadership to leave the UN. Major Indian outlets, including The Hindustan Times, blasted the UN's decision with provocative headlines. The diplomatic firestorm erupts mere weeks after the rivals teetered on the brink of war during their most dangerous military confrontation in decades. The flashpoint came in late April when a brutal attack on tourists in Indian-administered Kashmir left 26 dead—a massacre New Delhi pinned squarely on Pakistan. Islamabad's furious denials fell on deaf ears as the incident triggered cross-border airstrikes and brought the nuclear-armed neighbors to the edge of full-scale conflict.