Big business says it will transform productivity. Unions say it will destroy jobs. Labor's in the middle
The federal government has been mulling new laws or regulations to limit the potentially damaging effect of some automated tools, mirroring moves in Europe. The EU attracted the wrath of US Vice-President JD Vance, who said in February that 'excessive regulation of the AI sector could kill a transformative industry'.
Australia's most influential corporate lobby group, the Business Council of Australia, is calling on Prime Minister Anthony Albanese to shun calls for heavier regulation stemming from the ethics debates surrounding advances such as OpenAI.
The argument to avoid curbs puts the business lobby on the side of Treasury secretary Steven Kennedy, who said last week that AI presented immense economic opportunities and existing regulations should be favoured instead of new rules. But unions are pushing for federal regulations to protect workers, setting up a fresh contest on industrial relations in Labor's second term.
BCA boss Bran Black wants schools to teach about AI in primary school and is arguing for large boosts to research in the sector to drive up Australia's sagging rate of productivity and material living standards.
Australia must avoid EU-style laws which are too broad, according to Black, a former adviser to ex-NSW premier Dominic Perrottet.
'We should always start from the premise that the application and use of AI is overwhelmingly positive and will increase our collective prosperity,' Black told this masthead.
The BCA is pointing to existing applications of AI to prove its potential as an economic boon, including Commonwealth Bank using machines to read documents, BHP using the technology to manage resources and save water, and Salesforce addressing 84 per cent of customer inquiries without human involvement.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News.com.au
29 minutes ago
- News.com.au
‘Caught out': CBA sensationally backflips on AI job cuts
Commonwealth Bank has sensationally reversed its decision to cut dozens of call centre roles that were to be replaced by AI, but the 'threat remains' a union warns. Last month, the big-four bank announced it would cut 45 customer service roles and replace them with its new AI-powered 'voice bot' in an effort to reduce call volumes. Under the proposal, the voice bot would reduce call volumes by 2000 calls a week. Instead, call volumes climbed, with management scrambling to offer overtime and pulling in team leaders onto the phones. On Wednesday night, CBA backflipped on the decision to cut staff in the call centre. Financial Sector Union national secretary Julia Angrisano called CBA's decision a massive win for workers but said the threat to jobs remained. 'CBA has been caught out trying to dress up job cuts as innovation,' she said. 'Using AI as a cover for slashing secure jobs is a cynical cost-cutting exercise, and workers know it.' According to the union, this case is just the tip of the iceberg and has warned that more so-called 'efficiency measures' dressed up as AI or digital transformation are already in play across the sector. 'Our members want to be part of the conversation about how new technology is used in banking,' Ms Angrisano said. 'They want secure jobs today and the training needed for the jobs of the future, not to be discarded under the guise of efficiency.' At the time of the job cuts announcement last month, a CBA spokesman told NewsWire the bank had hired more than 9000 people in the 2025 financial year and was investing more than $2bn in their operations. 'To meet the changing needs of our customers, like many organisations, we review the skills we need and how we're organised to deliver the best customer experiences and outcomes,' the spokesman said. On August 13, CBA announced its full-year results with a bumper $10.25bn profit. The bank announced cash profits rose by 4 per cent through the year to June, with the banking giant benefiting from lowering bad debts and growth in its business loan sector. The bank's net interest margin, which is a key sign of profitability as it compares the cost of funding with what it can charge for loans, rose to 2.08 per cent. CBA chief executive Matt Comyn said while some Aussies were still struggling with cost of living, households overall remained resilient. 'Pleasingly, many households have seen a rise in disposable incomes due to the recent relief from reduced interest rates, lower inflation and tax cuts,' he said.
News.com.au
an hour ago
- News.com.au
AI mobile phone cameras are already making mistakes
Aussies are being warned of harsher penalties linked to the rollout of AI-powered road cameras could result in innocent motorists being fined. The technology, already operating across much of Australia, uses artificial intelligence to detect drivers doing the wrong thing behind the wheel. The cameras are programmed to detect if a driver is either on their phones while driving, not wearing seatbelts properly, and in some cases, speeding. New South Wales was the first state in Australia to introduce the system and since 2020 more than 921,000 fines have been issued to motorists. Transport for NSW says the system has 'transformed' driving behaviour. 'Since these cameras started catching drivers on their phones, we've seen a big shift — from one in 82 drivers (1.22 per cent) being caught during the 2019 trial, to just one in 957 (0.10%) in 2024,' a spokesperson said. 'Looking at your phone for just two seconds while driving at 60km/h means you've travelled 33 metres without really seeing the road.' The AI system analyses images for potential offences before passing them on to human operators for review. However, Avinash Singh, principal lawyer at Astor Legal, warns that 'the cameras are far from infallible', with courts already seeing cases where AI mistook a wallet or portable charger for a phone. 'We have dealt with numerous cases where mobile phone detection cameras have mistaken other objects as mobile phones. Some recent cases we have had dismissed include people holding power banks, portable chargers, wallets and rectangular makeup mirrors,' Avinash said. 'There has been a significant increase in the number of erroneous mobile phone use infringements that have been issued following the introduction of AI-based cameras.' And it's not just false accusations that are leaving drivers out of pocket. Avinash said that the fine process makes it difficult for motorists to challenge a fine once it has been issued. 'This is not the case with AI camera detections, where there appears to be little human oversight. As criminal defence lawyers, our experience has been that infringements are issued first and then it is for the driver to contest it,' Aviniash said. 'This creates an issue where drivers only are made aware of the infringement months after the actual incident. Often, they may be unable to recall the incident given the passage of time. 'The second issue is that the amount of the fine is less than the legal fees associated with contesting it. Because of this, some people may simply be unable to afford to take the matter to court and fight it.' Despite the concerns, the rollout is accelerating nationwide. In Western Australia, AI-powered cameras are currently in their trial phase, which is capable of detecting mobile phone use, seatbelt offences, speeding and point-to-point speeding. According to WA police, these cameras are the most advanced in the country. Six new mobile camera trailers are monitoring various locations around the Perth metropolitan and regional areas, while fixed cameras monitor two sites along the Kwinana Freeway. The trial runs until October, after which infringement notices will begin to be issued. More recently, Tasmania has activated its own hi-tech road cameras on the newly opened Bridgewater Bridge, a 1.2 km stretch of road equipped with speed cameras that have already caught motorists. Although it's not confirmed whether the cameras operate with artificial intelligence software, they have still caught drivers with hefty fines. In just one week, fines totalling more than $40,000 were issued to drivers. The grace period ended at the beginning of August and within the first week of enforcement 246 motorists received speeding fines, according to Yahoo News. In Victoria, the government claims mobile phone and seatbelt detection cameras use cameras that are monitored with artificial intelligence software. 'The cameras take high-resolution images any time of the day or night, and in all traffic and weather conditions,' the Victorian government's website states. 'The AI technology automatically reviews each image.' In Queensland, mobile phone and seatbelt detection cameras use artificial intelligence to filter images and detect potential offences by drivers. 'If no possible offence is detected, AI automatically excludes the images from any further analysis and the images are deleted,' the state government's website states. 'If AI suspects a possible offence, the image is passed on to Queensland Revenue Office. An authorised officer will review the image to determine if an offence has been committed.'
West Australian
an hour ago
- West Australian
Commonwealth Bank backflips on decision to replace 45 call centre jobs with AI chatbot
Commonwealth Bank will reverse its controversial plan to cut dozens of jobs and replace them with an AI chatbot, admitting the move was a mistake. Australia's largest bank revealed last month that it would axe 45 call centre positions after rolling out an AI voicebot to handle customer queries. But the bank has since backtracked, telling affected staff they could remain in their current roles or opt for a voluntary redundancy payout. The decision came as CBA, despite insisting its voicebot had cut call volumes by 2000 a week, was forced to concede that calls had risen, with managers resorting to overtime and team leaders being pulled onto the phones, the Australian Financial Review reports. A spokesperson for CBA said the decision to cut 45 roles was an 'error'. 'CBA's initial assessment that the 45 roles in our Customer Service Direct business were not required did not adequately consider all relevant business considerations and this error meant the roles were not redundant,' the spokesperson said. 'We have apologised to the employees concerned and acknowledge we should have been more thorough in our assessment of the roles required. 'We are currently supporting affected employees and have provided them with choice regarding continuing in their current roles, pursuing redeployment within CBA or to proceed with leaving the organisation. The announcement coincided with the Labor Government's Economic Reform Roundtable on Wednesday, when discussions shifted towards reviewing current AI regulations, which unions had been pushing for. Finance Sector Union National Secretary Julia Angrisano hailed the reversal a 'massive win' but stressed the ordeal had already taken a toll on workers' wellbeing. 'The damage is already done for the 45 workers who endured weeks of unnecessary stress, not knowing if they would be able to pay bills or support their families,' she added. 'CBA has been caught out trying to dress up job cuts as innovation. Using AI as a cover for slashing secure jobs is a cynical cost-cutting exercise, and workers know it. 'CBA likes to talk about being a digital leader, but real leadership means investing in your people, not tossing them aside and blaming the technology.' CBA said they would review its internal process to improve its approach moving forward.
