Major European drug-trading platform shuttered, operator held
FRANKFURT : A major European drug-trading platform operating on the so-called darknet has been closed down and its main operator arrested following an international investigation, officials said today.
'Archetyp Market' was one of the 'largest and longest-running criminal trading platforms on the darknet', with at least €250 million of illegal narcotics sold through the site, said German prosecutors, who played a key role in the probe.
The site, active for over five years, offered drugs ranging from cannabis to heroin and cocaine, with payment made exclusively in cryptocurrency.
It was also one of the only platforms to offer fentanyl and other synthetic opioids, which have driven an epidemic of deadly overdoses in the US, according to the EU anti-crime bodies Europol and Eurojust, which coordinated the investigation.
When it was closed, the site had more than 600,000 user accounts and around 3,200 vendors, they said.
Several hundred officials across five European countries targeted people allegedly involved in running the site as well as servers during raids between June 11 and 13, the EU bodies said.
The site's alleged founder and operator, a 30-year-old German citizen, was arrested in Barcelona, according to German officials.
The servers used to run the site were then targeted and shut down by police in the Netherlands, and a further seven arrests were made in Sweden.
Assets worth around €7.8 million were seized, as well as other pieces of evidence including computers and phones.
The 'darknet' includes websites that can be accessed only with specific software or authorisations, ensuring anonymity for users.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Malay Mail
5 hours ago
- Malay Mail
‘Completely naked': Spanish teen under investigation after 16 classmates say AI nudes of them posted online
MADRID, July 27 — Spanish police have opened an investigation into a 17-year-old student accused of using artificial intelligence to generate and sell deepfake nude images of female classmates. Authorities launched the probe after 16 girls from an educational institute in the Valencia region reported that manipulated sexual images of them had been circulated online and on social media. The case began in December when one student filed a complaint, saying that AI-generated photos and a video — showing her 'completely naked' — had been posted to a fake social media account created in her name. According to a police statement, investigators later traced the IP addresses behind the accounts to the suspect's home, leading to his identification. He is now being investigated for the offence of corruption of minors. This is not the first time Spanish authorities have uncovered AI-generated explicit content involving minors. In March, the government announced plans to introduce legislation that would criminalise the creation of non-consensual AI-generated sexual imagery. The proposed law — which Madrid says would be the first of its kind in Europe — has not yet been passed by parliament. — AFP
Malay Mail
3 days ago
- Malay Mail
Why no legal action in Batu Puteh's case? — Hafiz Hassan
JULY 24 — All decisions made by the Public Prosecutor (PP) aka Attorney General (AG) on whether to prosecute or not to prosecute should promote consistency in decision making. This is where a prosecution policy would be useful. The policy should outline the relevant factors and considerations which should be taken into account when prosecutors exercise their discretion to institute, conduct or discontinue any proceedings for an offence. The policy should also serve to inform the public and lawyers of the principles which guide the decisions made by the prosecutors. In Australia, the Prosecution Policy of the Commonwealth provides a two-stage test that must be satisfied before a prosecution is commenced. First, there must be sufficient evidence to prosecute the case. Second, it must be evident from the facts of the case, and all the surrounding circumstances, that the prosecution would be in the public interest. In December 2024, a Royal Commission of Inquiry (RCI) recommended a criminal investigation against Dr Mahathir under Section 415(b) and Section 418 of the Penal Code. — Picture from X/ahmadmaslan In determining whether there is sufficient evidence to prosecute a case the prosecutors must be satisfied that there is prima facie evidence of the elements of the offence and a reasonable prospect of obtaining a conviction. The existence of a prima facie case is not sufficient. In making this decision, the prosecutors must evaluate how strong the case is likely to be when presented in court. They must take into account matters such as the availability, competence and credibility of witnesses, their likely effect on the arbiter of fact, and the admissibility of any alleged confession or other evidence. The prosecutors should also have regard to any lines of defence open to the alleged offender and any other factors that could affect the likelihood or otherwise of a conviction. The possibility that any evidence might be excluded by a court should be taken into account and, if that evidence is crucial to the case, this may substantially affect the decision whether or not to institute or proceed with a prosecution. The prosecutors must look beneath the surface of the evidence in a matter, particularly in borderline cases. Having been satisfied that there is sufficient evidence to justify the initiation or continuation of a prosecution, the prosecutors must then consider whether the public interest requires a prosecution to be pursued. In this regard, the prosecutors must consider all of the provable facts and all of the surrounding circumstances. The public interest factors to be considered inevitably vary from case to case, but the following may be considered: whether the offence is serious or trivial; any mitigating or aggravating circumstances; the youth, age, intelligence, physical health, mental health or special vulnerability of the alleged offender, witness or victim; the alleged offender's antecedents and background; the passage of time since the alleged offence; the availability and efficacy of any alternatives to prosecution; the prevalence of the alleged offence and the need for general and personal deterrence; the attitude of the victim; the need to give effect to regulatory or punitive imperatives; and the likely outcome in the event of a finding of guilt. The above are not the only factors, but generally the more serious the alleged offence is, the more likely it will be that the public interest will require that a prosecution be pursued. The decision to prosecute must be made impartially and must not be influenced by any inappropriate reference to race, religion, sex, national origin or political association. The decision to prosecute must not also be influenced by any political advantage or disadvantage to the government. If age is just a factor and not the only factor to prosecute a case, why the decision not to pursue legal action against former prime minister Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad over Malaysia's withdrawal of its claim to Pulau Batu Puteh? In December 2024, a Royal Commission of Inquiry (RCI) recommended a criminal investigation against Dr Mahathir under Section 415(b) and Section 418 of the Penal Code. Dr Mahathir said then that he was prepared to face any investigation and emphasised his integrity during his time as prime minister. Let there be an investigation. It is not even a prosecution, not yet. * This is the personal opinion of the writer or publication and does not necessarily represent the views of Malay Mail.
The Sun
4 days ago
- The Sun
Ukraine arrests top cybercrime forum admin with French-Europol aid
PARIS: A key administrator of a prominent Russian-language cybercrime forum, has been detained in Ukraine through a joint operation involving French law enforcement and Europol. The Paris prosecutor's office confirmed the arrest on Wednesday, marking a significant breakthrough in a long-running investigation. Industry analysts identify as one of the most enduring dark web platforms. Laure Beccuau, Paris public prosecutor, stated, 'On Tuesday July 22, a person suspected of being the administrator of the Russian-language cybercrime forum was arrested as part of a criminal investigation opened by the Paris public prosecutor's office.' The forum, operational since 2013, served as a central marketplace for cybercriminal activities. Beccuau noted, 'Active since 2013, this forum was one of the main hubs for global cybercrime,' facilitating transactions involving malware, compromised system access, stolen data, and ransomware services. Investigators uncovered that also hosted an encrypted Jabber messaging server, enabling anonymous communication among cybercriminals. The probe began in July 2021 before being escalated to investigating magistrates by November that year. Beccuau added, 'A judicial investigation was opened on November 9, 2021 on charges of complicity in attacks on an automated data processing system, organised extortion, and criminal conspiracy.' Intercepted communications exposed extensive illegal operations, with profits estimated at over $7 million. The arrest was executed by Ukrainian authorities with support from French investigators and Europol. This operation highlights growing cross-border collaboration against cybercrime as attacks on public and private entities surge. - AFP
