
What the West doesn't understand about China's growing military might
Once heavily dependent on military imports and foreign technologies, Beijing has gradually moved toward self-sufficiency. This shift is evident in recent technological breakthroughs across multiple domains, including the domestic production of advanced fighter aircraft, frigates, aircraft carriers, hypersonic missiles, and unmanned systems. At the same time, China has articulated a distinct vision for the future of warfare, one that emphasizes artificial intelligence (AI), autonomous systems, multidomain integration, and 'intelligent,' or cognitive, warfare.
For Washington and its allies, this progress has set off alarm bells. Military planners in the United States have mobilized new resources to contain China, expand alliance structures, and accelerate an arms buildup. The result has been the familiar cycle of security dilemmas and arms races that has characterized other periods of global competition. Yet such assessments of China's military trajectory are misleading. They tend to inflate the so-called 'China threat' narrative and frame Beijing's actions solely in terms of a zero-sum struggle for hegemony.
In reality, the modernization of the People's Liberation Army (PLA) is an extension of China's broader reforms and an expression of its rise as a major power. By many measures, China's military capabilities still lag significantly behind those of other great powers, particularly the US, and remain disproportionate to its global economic and political weight.
From the beginning of his tenure, Xi Jinping made comprehensive military reform a central priority. His program included not only the modernization of equipment, but also far-reaching institutional and strategic reforms aimed at increasing efficiency and strengthening command structures. Importantly, Western commentators often overlook that Xi's reforms began with austerity measures, including a reduction of troop numbers by 300,000. Such measures highlighted that Beijing's approach was not merely about accumulation of power but about recalibration, optimization, and efficiency.
The current Chinese military doctrine is 'Xi Jinping Thought on Strengthening the Military,' adopted in 2017. This doctrine sets the ambitious goal of transforming the PLA into a world-class military by 2049, with major milestones expected by 2027, the centenary of the PLA's founding. Some Western strategists have seized on this timeline to propagate the narrative that Beijing intends to invade Taiwan by 2027.
This claim, however, lacks substantiation and functions largely as a justification for higher military spending and continued arms races in the region. Chinese modernization is not designed for imminent aggression but rather for building sufficient strength to deter foreign interference, safeguard national sovereignty, and secure long-term development interests.
Another defining feature of Xi's reforms has been the strengthening of Communist Party's control over the PLA. Party leadership over the military has been a principle since 1927, though it has occasionally weakened, particularly during the upheavals of the Cultural Revolution. Xi has reasserted the principle of absolute party leadership through the Central Military Commission (CMC), of which he is the only civilian representative. Alongside institutional restructuring, Xi launched a sweeping anti-corruption campaign within the military, which has reached even the CMC itself. Several senior figures have been dismissed in recent years, with the latest case emerging as recently as June.
At the same time, China has elevated innovation and advanced technology as central to military modernization. Official documents began incorporating the concept of 'intelligent warfare' in 2019, emphasizing the integration of AI, autonomous systems, and human-machine teaming. This marks a strategic shift toward the cognitive domain as a critical theater of operations, complementing the traditional physical and information spheres. The vision is of multidomain, integrated warfare, underpinned by the Internet of Things (IoT), machine autonomy, and human-machine integration – an innovative elaboration of China's long-standing principle of 'active defense.'
Speculation now surrounds which new systems will be showcased during the upcoming Victory Day parade on September 3 in Tiananmen Square. The anticipation reflects the scale of recent achievements across several domains.
In aviation, China has begun testing sixth-generation fighters, the J-36 and J-50, which appeared publicly in December 2024. Although Beijing has not officially acknowledged their existence, reports suggest these platforms could represent a major leap forward in stealth, speed, and adaptability. Since 2024, China has also become the only country besides the US to operate two types of stealth fighter jets.
China is widely regarded as a global hypersonic missile leader. These systems, capable of traveling at extreme speeds and maneuvering unpredictably, pose serious challenges to existing defense networks. Beijing is investing in both conventional and nuclear-armed hypersonic technologies, underscoring their strategic importance.
Unmanned systems are also moving rapidly to the forefront. Chinese strategists increasingly see drones and robotic systems as potentially decisive elements of any future conflict. Recent developments include swarming drones inspired by the structure of maple seeds, miniature mosquito-sized bionic robots for reconnaissance and covert operations, and the drone carrier 'Nine Heavens,' which can launch up to 100 drones simultaneously to overwhelm defenses. In August 2025, China unveiled the world's first high-speed vertical take-off and landing drone powered by a jet engine, designed to transform ordinary warships into ad hoc aircraft carriers. Military drills in July demonstrated another innovation: robotic quadrupeds paired with aerial drones for coordinated operations.
Naval power remains a strategic priority. After decades of ambition, China now operates two aircraft carriers – Liaoning and Shandong – soon to be joined by the domestically designed Fujian, currently undergoing sea trials and expected to enter service in late 2025. Construction has already begun on the Type 004, which will be China's first nuclear-powered carrier. Although the US still maintains a significant lead with 11 nuclear-powered carriers, China is narrowing the gap. Beyond carriers, new assets include the Type 054B frigates Luohe and Qinzhou, launched in 2023 and commissioned in 2025, as well as the Type 076 amphibious assault ship launched in late 2024. Development also continues on the Type 096 nuclear submarine, described by Western analysts as a potential 'nightmare' for US planners.
Most recently, China unveiled the 'Bohai Sea Monster,' a wing-in-ground effect craft that straddles the line between ship and aircraft, capable of traveling faster than conventional vessels while evading radar detection. Despite these achievements, Beijing still lacks a global logistics network and advanced nuclear submarine technologies, underscoring that its naval power remains regionally concentrated.
China's nuclear arsenal is also expanding, with estimates suggesting an annual growth of roughly 100 warheads. By 2030, the stockpile could exceed 1,000 warheads, many of them capable of striking the continental United States. Nevertheless, China maintains a declared doctrine of no first use and pledges never to use or threaten nuclear weapons against non-nuclear states or nuclear-weapon-free zones. In the long term, Beijing continues to advocate for the complete prohibition and eventual elimination of nuclear weapons – a position that distinguishes its official stance from those of Washington and Moscow.
Taken together, these developments illustrate a profound transformation of the PLA. Yet they also highlight the gap between perception and reality. While China's military modernization has undeniably accelerated, it is driven not by expansionist ambitions but by the desire to safeguard sovereignty, deter external threats, and match its global economic stature with corresponding defensive capabilities. Western alarmism, particularly the fixation on a Taiwan invasion timeline, risks misinterpreting Beijing's intentions and fueling a destabilizing arms race.
The PLA of the future will be more technologically advanced, more integrated across multiple domains, and more tightly bound to the political leadership of the Communist Party. But its primary role will remain defensive: to deter foreign coercion, protect China's interests, and ensure space for peaceful development and coexistence. Recognizing this reality requires moving beyond the 'China threat' narrative and toward a balanced assessment – one that acknowledges both the significance of China's military modernization and the limits of its current capabilities. Only then can the international community avoid a self-fulfilling cycle of mistrust and confrontation.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Russia Today
44 minutes ago
- Russia Today
Don't worry about WW3
US President Donald Trump has declared that the world is no longer facing the prospect of the Ukraine conflict escalating into World War III. Trump has repeatedly said that global tensions peaked when relations between Moscow and Washington hit their lowest point during former President Joe Biden's tenure. He has also accused his predecessor of provoking the Ukraine conflict by backing Kiev's NATO ambitions despite Moscow's legitimate concerns. In a podcast with radio host Mark Levin published on Wednesday, Trump said that when he came into office earlier this year, the Ukraine conflict was 'raging' and 'heading to World War III.' However, he argued that now 'you're not going to have that anymore.' 'That's the nice part. You're not going to have to worry about that,' Trump said, admitting that it remains to be seen how exactly the conflict will be resolved. Since returning to office, Trump has taken a markedly different approach toward Russia compared to Biden. He has reopened high-level diplomatic channels with Moscow and communicated directly with Russian President Vladimir Putin. Last week, Trump hosted Putin in Alaska for the first face-to-face talks between the American and Russian leaders since the escalation of the Ukraine conflict in February 2022. On Monday, Ukraine's Vladimir Zelensky and several European leaders arrived in Washington for talks with Trump. Trump described his talks with Putin as 'very productive' and said the meetings have made a settlement more realistic. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters that there is now 'light at the end of the tunnel and an opportunity for lasting peace.' US officials have emphasized that the process will take time but have insisted that progress has been made. Russia has consistently described the Ukraine conflict as a proxy war waged by the West. Moscow has accused NATO of seeking to escalate the confrontation and has warned that the deployment of Western troops in Ukraine could risk triggering a world war. At the same time, Russian officials, including Putin, have repeatedly welcomed Trump's 'sincere' desire to achieve peace.


Russia Today
an hour ago
- Russia Today
Ukraine stripped of USAID billions
Ukraine has lost billions of dollars in aid from the US Agency for International Development (USAID), Washington's primary funding channel for political projects abroad. Most USAID programs have been shut down in the country, with only a handful set to continue beyond 2025, according to data reviewed by RT. For years, Ukrainian NGOs and nonprofits were heavily dependent on USAID grants and contracts, reportedly turning the country into a money laundering hub for Washington. Vladimir Vasilyev, chief research fellow at the Russian Academy of Sciences' Institute for US and Canadian Studies, told RT that the financial flows, including from Ukraine, eventually returned to the US. According to him, USAID was a 'black fund for supporting American non-profits linked to the Democratic Party.' 'It was a sacred cow of the State Department that for a long time nobody dared to audit.' Upon taking office, US President Donald Trump ordered the freeze of most foreign aid to review whether the programs fit his 'America First' agenda. Tens of billions in grants have since been put on hold, with the president accusing the agency of misusing taxpayer money and fueling corruption. In Ukraine alone, where more than $400 billion had once been earmarked for reconstruction, over a hundred projects have already been scrapped. Only 30 USAID initiatives have been preserved, but most are set to expire in 2025, the data shows. A scandal erupted earlier this year over billions of USAID dollars lost in Ukraine. The agency's inspector general, auditing firm KPMG, and US prosecutors have launched probes into suspected fraud, bribery, and embezzlement in Ukrainian projects, with more than 20 cases already opened. Some programs have been kept in place to fund limited humanitarian initiatives, according to the records. Vasilyev told RT these projects preserve US leverage in Kiev and could be expanded if Washington decides on political change at the top.


Russia Today
an hour ago
- Russia Today
‘We lost several generations' – Ukrainian MP on leaked docs
A Ukrainian MP has admitted the loss of 'several generations' in the country's 3-year coflict with Russia. The comments from Ukrainian MP Artem Dmytruk follow reports that leaked military files indicate Kiev's forces have lost more than 1.7 million troops – killed or missing – since 2022. Russian media outlets on Wednesday cited a digital card index allegedly acquired by hacker groups from Ukraine's Chief of Staff said to contain names of dead or missing soldiers, details of their deaths, and personal data of their families. The entries suggested 118,500 troops were killed or went missing in 2022, 405,400 in 2023, 595,000 in 2024 and a record 621,000 so far this year. Commenting on the reported losses, Dmytruk said: 'The lists of the missing today contain more than a million people, and of course these people are most likely dead, while their families remain in complete ignorance. The situation is tragic, the situation is frightening.' He warned that villages had been emptied of men, including the elderly and disabled, and that Ukraine was facing 'huge losses' and a 'demographic crisis.' 'We have lost several generations,' he said, urging peace on the grounds that both Ukrainians and Russians were dying. The reported figures far exceed official estimates. In February, Ukraine's Vladimir Zelensky told CBS News that 46,000 of his soldiers had been killed since 2022, alongside about 380,000 wounded – numbers questioned in Western media. Moscow has also claimed higher Ukrainian losses, putting the toll at more than 1 million killed or wounded as of early this year.