logo
Why Labor won't stop talking about nuclear power

Why Labor won't stop talking about nuclear power

On Tuesday, Opposition Leader Peter Dutton's campaign bus pulled up at a football field on the NSW south coast in the marginal seat of Gilmore. But it was not there for long.
After three protesters in hazmat suits hijacked a planned press conference and began measuring the site for radiation levels, the bus was quickly back on the road. The gatecrashers – all of whom were members of the South Coast Labour Council – anointed Dutton the 'Member for Fukushima', a reference to the Japanese city that experienced a nuclear disaster in 2011 after it was hit by an earthquake and a tsunami.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘Asleep at the wheel': Ben Fordham unleashes on Anthony Albanese for torching housing targets with excessive immigration intake
‘Asleep at the wheel': Ben Fordham unleashes on Anthony Albanese for torching housing targets with excessive immigration intake

Sky News AU

time3 hours ago

  • Sky News AU

‘Asleep at the wheel': Ben Fordham unleashes on Anthony Albanese for torching housing targets with excessive immigration intake

Ben Fordham has blasted Prime Minister Anthony Albanese in a fiery verbal spray, accusing the government of undermining its own housing targets by allowing in record levels of migrants. Sky News uncovered on Wednesday that the Albanese government would fail to reach it's target of constructing 1.2 million new homes over five years, with forecasts putting Australia 260,000 short by the deadline of June 2029. The State of the Housing System 20205 report forecast the government would only build 938,000 new homes by June 2029, well short of the 1.2 million repeatedly touted by the Prime Minister. Speaking to Sky News, Urban Development Institute of Australia President Col Dutton said that the UDIA National analysis found that Australia 'will actually undershoot the Housing Accord target by up to 400,000 homes', and that the accelerated immigration program had only made matters worse. Fordham said the Albanese government was deceiving the Australian public if it continued to tout its promise of constructing 1.2 million homes over five years, and that the current rates of immigration were untenable. 'The Albanese government promised to build more houses, today they're building less. They promised to lower immigration, today, they're bringing in more,' Fordham said on his 2GB breakfast program. 'The PM will tell us he's bringing down the migration numbers,' referencing the government's move to limit international student arrivals and 'building as many homes as he can, but we're not seeing it'. Fordham said Australia's housing build was "going backwards" due to the immigration surge. He said while Australians were not ant-immigration the "speed and the size" of the government's intake had caused angst in the community. Mr Dutton said factoring in immigration, UDIA data projections showed that the net losses in housing had ballooned to more than 1,500 every week. 'We simply can't build the houses fast enough. What we need is a sharp focus on skilled migration and coordination of housing supply policy with immigration numbers.' He also stated that the construction industry was being strangled by a myriad of challenges including rigid regulations and red tape, approval delays and a lack of coordination between all levels of governments on environmental laws. 'Supply is being choked by development approvals processes through councils and state governments, lack of funding for enabling infrastructure to service development ready land and cumbersome environmental approval processes lacking a coordinated approach between all levels of government," he said. ABS dwelling completion data showed that Australia had built only 166,000 homes in 2024, with 446,000 net overseas migrants entering the country that same year. With an average of 2.5 people per household, this created a housing shortage of roughly 12,400 in 2024 alone, separate from the existing shortfall.

Corruption watchdog clears Brittany Higgins's $2.4 million payout
Corruption watchdog clears Brittany Higgins's $2.4 million payout

ABC News

time4 hours ago

  • ABC News

Corruption watchdog clears Brittany Higgins's $2.4 million payout

The national anti-corruption body has cleared a settlement paid by the federal government to former Liberal staffer Brittany Higgins over corruption claims. Ms Higgins received a $2.4 million payout from the Commonwealth in 2022 as it sought to settle a compensation claim. The former staffer had alleged she was not adequately supported by her then-boss, Liberal senator Linda Reynolds, after she made allegations she was raped at Parliament House. Multiple figures had called for the National Anti-Corruption Commission (NACC) to investigate the compensation payout, including former opposition leader Peter Dutton and Senator Reynolds. Mr Dutton had accused government figures of "duplicity" and "trickery" in organising the government settlement. "I think there are very serious, very serious allegations here. There's a multi-million-dollar payout," he said in mid-2023. Senator Reynolds had reportedly highlighted concerns about the speed of the mediation process and her exclusion from attending mediation. The NACC on Thursday said an "extensive preliminary investigation" found no evidence of corruption. "There is no evidence that the settlement process, including the legal advice provided, who was present at the mediation, or the amount, was subject to any improper influence by any Commonwealth public official," the statement read. "To the contrary, the evidence obtained reflected a process that was based on independent external legal advice, without any inappropriate intervention by any minister of either government. "There is therefore no corruption issue." The anti-corruption body said it made multiple "notices to produce" to various departments and lawyers, and analysed thousands of documents relating to the settlement. It found the initial legal advice on a settlement was provided to the Morrison government before the 2022 election. Advice later obtained by the Albanese government was "not materially different" and there was no difference in the approach taken by either government towards pursuing a settlement. The NACC also took no issue with the mediation conference lasting less than a day, finding that was not unusual given the substantial work done in the lead-up to mediation and efforts to "[avoid] ongoing trauma to Ms Higgins". It also found the $2.4 million settlement amount was "less than the maximum amount recommended by the external independent legal advice".

Editorial: Pressure grows on Albanese over defence spending
Editorial: Pressure grows on Albanese over defence spending

West Australian

time13 hours ago

  • West Australian

Editorial: Pressure grows on Albanese over defence spending

If Prime Minister Anthony Albanese needed any more reminding about the likely high priority the Group of Seven summit is likely to attach to defence at its looming summit, it came yesterday. Firstly there was the news that the Chinese Navy has sent its two aircraft carriers into the Pacific for the first time, demonstrating to the world its ability as a naval power to threaten America's dominance of the world's biggest ocean. Two carrier battle groups led by the Liaoning and the Shandong operated near the Japanese island of Iwo Jima over the weekend, the Japanese Government reported. And then came a warning flag hoisted by European Union Ambassador Gabriele Visentin. The European Union's top diplomat to Australia described China's military expansion as a 'worrying sign' and signalled the EU's growing ambition to become 'a strong security actor' in the Indo-Pacific. 'We have seen maybe some worrying signs of military scaling up of China,' he said. '(There's) a clear link between the Chinese and the Russian visions of what the new international rules-based order should be.' Mr Visentin said Europe's security was 'completely intertwined' with that of the Indo-Pacific. 'The security for Europe depends also on what is happening in (the) Indo-Pacific, and vice versa,' he said. The warning came against a backdrop of ongoing pressure from the US for its allies to boost defence spending. US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth has floated Washington's demand for Australia to hike its defence budget to 3.5 per cent of GDP, far beyond the projected 2.3 per cent by 2033. The US challenge has helped spark NATO into responding. The alliance's Secretary-General Mark Rutte has warned that 'wishful thinking will not keep us safe' and has set out a plan for NATO members to spend 5 per cent of GDP on defence. He said Russia could be ready to use force against NATO in five years and that a 'quantum leap' in collective defence was required following the Russian President Vladimir Putin's illegal invasion of Ukraine. But the Albanese Government is seemingly not for turning from its announced strategy. This week Deputy Prime Minister and Defence Minister Richard Marles said the Government would determine its defence budget based on strategic needs rather than meeting any benchmark. Mr Albanese largely batted it away too at his National Press Club address on Tuesday. 'Arbitrary figures, you know, lead to a cul-de-sac. And we want to make sure as well that every single dollar that Defence spends results in actual assets,' Mr Albanese said. But the pressure is set to go up again at the G7 summit getting under way in Canada this weekend. Should the expected meeting between Mr Albanese and US President Donald Trump go ahead on the sidelines of the meeting, it is a fair bet that Mr Trump will not be shy of personally pressuring Mr Albanese to do more on defence too.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store