logo
Corruption watchdog clears Brittany Higgins's $2.4 million payout

Corruption watchdog clears Brittany Higgins's $2.4 million payout

The national anti-corruption body has cleared a settlement paid by the federal government to former Liberal staffer Brittany Higgins over corruption claims.
Ms Higgins received a $2.4 million payout from the Commonwealth in 2022 as it sought to settle a compensation claim.
The former staffer had alleged she was not adequately supported by her then-boss, Liberal senator Linda Reynolds, after she made allegations she was raped at Parliament House.
Multiple figures had called for the National Anti-Corruption Commission (NACC) to investigate the compensation payout, including former opposition leader Peter Dutton and Senator Reynolds.
Mr Dutton had accused government figures of "duplicity" and "trickery" in organising the government settlement.
"I think there are very serious, very serious allegations here. There's a multi-million-dollar payout," he said in mid-2023.
Senator Reynolds had reportedly highlighted concerns about the speed of the mediation process and her exclusion from attending mediation.
The NACC on Thursday said an "extensive preliminary investigation" found no evidence of corruption.
"There is no evidence that the settlement process, including the legal advice provided, who was present at the mediation, or the amount, was subject to any improper influence by any Commonwealth public official," the statement read.
"To the contrary, the evidence obtained reflected a process that was based on independent external legal advice, without any inappropriate intervention by any minister of either government.
"There is therefore no corruption issue."
The anti-corruption body said it made multiple "notices to produce" to various departments and lawyers, and analysed thousands of documents relating to the settlement.
It found the initial legal advice on a settlement was provided to the Morrison government before the 2022 election.
Advice later obtained by the Albanese government was "not materially different" and there was no difference in the approach taken by either government towards pursuing a settlement.
The NACC also took no issue with the mediation conference lasting less than a day, finding that was not unusual given the substantial work done in the lead-up to mediation and efforts to "[avoid] ongoing trauma to Ms Higgins".
It also found the $2.4 million settlement amount was "less than the maximum amount recommended by the external independent legal advice".
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Federal Court judges question logic of Bruce Lehrmann's legal argument in appeal against defamation ruling
Federal Court judges question logic of Bruce Lehrmann's legal argument in appeal against defamation ruling

ABC News

time14 minutes ago

  • ABC News

Federal Court judges question logic of Bruce Lehrmann's legal argument in appeal against defamation ruling

Bruce Lehrmann's bid to overturn a finding that he raped his former colleague Brittany Higgins has not started smoothly, with Federal Court judges questioning the logic of his grounds of appeal. The former Liberal staffer's defamation claim against Network Ten and journalist Lisa Wilkinson failed, after Justice Michael Lee found last year, on the balance of probabilities, Mr Lehrmann had raped Ms Higgins at Parliament House in Canberra in 2019. Follow our live blog for the latest updates from the courtroom. Mr Lehrmann has now returned to the Federal Court to seek to overturn that finding, represented by his solicitor, Zali Burrows. Mr Lehrmann is being represented solely by Ms Burrows, because the court heard he was unable to afford his preferred barrister, Sydney silk Guy Reynolds. "Mr Lehrmann couldn't afford Mr Reynolds, which we really wanted, so we apologise in advance," Ms Burrows told the court. Ms Burrows conceded she was "not as prepared" as the opposing council but said "I'm just going to try and do the best I can". This morning, in spelling out the first of four grounds of appeal, Ms Burrows said Mr Lehrmann was denied procedural fairness. "The primary judge found that the rape occurred in a particular way that wasn't put to Mr Lehrmann in defence," she told the court. "He was taken by surprise as to the nature of the rape … it was pleaded as a violent rape, when His Honour [Justice Lee] found it was a non-violent rape." In response, Justice Craig Colvin, one of three judges presiding over the appeal, said, "I'm not sure that that's a concept that I understand". Justice Wigney also weighed in, pointing out that Mr Lehrmann had consistently maintained his innocence and that no sexual intercourse took place. He said it would not have made sense for Mr Lehrmann to have faced questions about the nature of an act he was denying. "He would have maintained that there was no violence, because there was no sexual intercourse," Justice Wigney said. "How could he have been questioned about the particulars?" Justice Colvin voiced his confusion. Mr Lehrmann's appeal raises questions about how the court considered the meaning of rape to the ordinary, reasonable person. Ms Burrows relied on her written submissions, which urged the court to discern a difference between the seriousness of a rape that is violent with one that is non-violent. In responding, Network Ten's lawyer Dr Matthew Collins said that argument was "obviously rooted in historical misconceptions", and that there was no coherent basis for distinguishing between the rape of a woman who is "cognitively impaired" and unable to resist, and one who is conscious. He said either scenario was a "horrid violation of bodily autonomy" and that effectively "all rape is violent". Another ground of appeal is that Mr Lehrmann was entitled to more damages than the $20,000 Justice Lee had flagged, if he had been successful in the original case. Ms Burrows said her client had "pretty much become the national joke", arguing the level of damages was insufficient. "As I've previously submitted to the court, he's probably Australia's most hated man," she said. Dr Collins disputed Ms Burrows's claims that the manner of the rape was erroneously linked to the damages Mr Lehrmann should have received, if he had won. He argued, whether or not Ms Higgins verbally refused consent, Mr Lehrmann still raped a woman he knew was "seriously intoxicated" and left her alone in the office of a federal minister. Although Ms Higgins did not name her alleged rapist in the interview with The Project, Mr Lehrmann said he was identifiable, and therefore defamed. A criminal trial over the allegation collapsed in 2022 because of juror misconduct and the charge against Mr Lehrmann was later dropped.

ANU rules out further forced redundancies
ANU rules out further forced redundancies

ABC News

time14 minutes ago

  • ABC News

ANU rules out further forced redundancies

The Australian National University (ANU) says future savings in its ongoing restructure will not involve forced job cuts. But forced redundancies will still happen in areas where the university has already announced a savings plan. This includes the College of Arts and Social Sciences and the School of Music. The university says it will save $60 million through salary reductions, with $40 million to go. It is part of a broader target of saving $250 million. ANU vice-chancellor Genevieve Bell says future announcements will not feature forced job losses. "We have used the tools that were most appropriate for the circumstances we were in," she said. ACT Secretary of the National Tertiary Education Union Dr Lachlan Clohesy has described the university's announcement that it will stop forced job cuts as "vindication". "Today's announcement isn't just business as usual. It's clearly come about because of the campaigning…of ANU staff, students and the broader community." He says while stopping forced redundancies is welcome, he's concerned about possible future cuts. "ANU said no forced redundancies as part of 'Renew A-N-U'…but that's potentially ambiguous — we're calling on the Vice Chancellor to rule out forced redundancies in 20-26 in total."

Teen charged over Sydney underworld shooting of Dawood Zakaria, first murder charge under Taskforce Falcon
Teen charged over Sydney underworld shooting of Dawood Zakaria, first murder charge under Taskforce Falcon

ABC News

time14 minutes ago

  • ABC News

Teen charged over Sydney underworld shooting of Dawood Zakaria, first murder charge under Taskforce Falcon

A man has been charged over the fatal shooting of a Sydney underworld figure, marking the first murder charge to come from NSW Police's mega taskforce investigating organised crime networks. Dawood Zakaria, 32, was shot multiple times inside a Toyota Hilux in May while stopped at traffic lights in Granville. Police allege that as the utility vehicle turned onto Woodville Road, the occupants of a nearby Mercedes approached the other car and fired several rounds, hitting the driver and front seat passenger. Lawyer Sylvan Singh was also shot, and two other men inside the vehicle were uninjured. On Wednesday, detectives under Taskforce Falcon executed a search warrant in Guildford and arrested a 19-year-old man. He was charged with murder and attempted murder, and other gang-related offences. Detective Superintendent Jason Box said that while police do not allege the 19-year-old was solely responsible for the shooting, his actions, pre, during and post the shooting allegedly amounted to him being a "principal" player in the slaying. Superintendent Box said it was a significant arrest for the taskforce, and investigations were still ongoing. "This was a brazen shooting at 5pm on a Sunday in the middle of Sydney ... there could have been multiple innocent victims," he said. In response to this May shooting, NSW Police had announced it would set up Taskforce Falcon to address growing fears of underworld violence in Sydney. At least 16 shootings with potential links to organised crime have occurred since the commencement of Taskforce Falcon — including one on Sunday night, with another on Wednesday morning still being investigated. When asked if NSW Police were "losing the war" when it came to organised crime in Sydney, Superintendent Box defended the force's efforts and said there had been several arrests in connection with recent violent attacks. Thirteen members of an emerging criminal network in Sydney's south-west, dubbed 'G7', were arrested and charged as part of the taskforce's investigation in recent months. It is alleged the group, made up of young men, are responsible for a string of public place shootings, home invasions and motor vehicle thefts across Sydney. The ABC understands the group do not 'play sides' and had been recruited for feuding organisations, including the notorious Alameddine crime network and Brothers 4 Life. Superintendent Box said he was not aware if the 19-year-old arrested on Wednesday morning had any connection with G7 and refused to be drawn on any other suggestions of other groups that may have played a part. Taskforce Falcon is also investigating a series of gangland attacks dating back to December last year, including the shooting murder of 31-year-old David Khau at Canley Heights.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store