Sinn Fein urged to reflect on role played by Provisional IRA during Troubles
Chief Constable Jon Boutcher outlined his concerns around the costs in terms of financial and staffing resources, but also reputational damage because they had not been funded sufficiently to deal with legacy.
Police Service of Northern Ireland Chief Constable Jon Boutcher was speaking during a Northern Ireland Policing Board meeting (Liam McBurney/PA)
He urged more resources as well as a focus on victims, and that an approach to dealing with the past be agreed.
Dealing with the past was not included in the 1998 Belfast/Good Friday Agreement, and subsequent deals, including the Stormont House accord in 2014, were not progressed.
Sinn Fein MLA Gerry Kelly responded to Mr Boutcher, hailing what he said seemed to be a 'new philosophy of approach' and potentially a 'watershed moment'.
'I have sat in front of many chief constables and you're the first chief constable who has said we need to change this in a radical way,' he said.
Mr Kelly also said that while 'nothing is perfect', the Stormont House Agreement saw most of the parties and the British and Irish governments in agreement.
He blamed the UK for 'pulling out' of that agreement.
But DUP MLA Trevor Clarke said many in the unionist community felt 'they were let down particularly by Sinn Fein and others', and in reference to the party's historic relationship with the Provisional IRA, said they were 'the biggest cause of victims in Northern Ireland'.
DUP MLA Trevor Clarke said many in the unionist community felt 'they were let down particularly by Sinn Fein' (Liam McBurney/PA)
'It seems ironic listening to Gerry speak at the minute that there is no reflection on what part Sinn Fein and the IRA played during the Troubles,' he said.
'I know it's not Stormont, it's not a political debating chamber but I think it has to be said that if everyone is to be honest and everyone wants to be honest, then everyone should be honest and should all come to the table honest in terms of the parts that they played during the Troubles, as opposed to working on the small numbers that the security forces were involved in.
'I certainly want to put on record our party's concerns around the process, sympathies with police in how they deal with it, but there is a section of the community will never be satisfied unless the victim makers stand in the courts and actually own up to their part as well.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Spectator
6 minutes ago
- Spectator
Police chiefs must learn to use their common sense
Britain's top cop club has released new guidance to forces in England and Wales on when and how to describe the suspects of serious crimes. It's a day late and a dollar short. The National Police Chiefs Council (NPCC), stirred from their deckchairs by nationwide riots of only twelve months ago, are now advising constabularies that it's probably a good thing in most circumstances if people's ethnicity and immigration status are disclosed at the point of charge. If you're wondering why it takes this body in conjunction with the College of Policing to tell chiefs they are allowed to use common sense, you're in good company. But let's apply this new dispensation to a real-life example to see if it flies. Say, the one where police obfuscation over the identity of a suspect contributed to the worst public order breakdown for over a decade. Alex Rudukabana, the Southport child murderer, was arrested on 29 July last year. Police gave the first information about him to the public later that same evening, which did nothing to contradict misinformation already halfway round the world. Its selectivity only fuelled public anger. After arrest for multiple murders, the police had 96 hours to charge or release him under legislation. By the time police announced he had been charged on the morning of 1 August, serious disorder had broken out in five locations with dozens of officers injured and a violent contagion was released across the UK. It's fair to say that this anaemic intervention should at least stop huge inconsistencies that exist across the country. Chief officers are clearly befuddled by what they perceive to be legal or community tension obstacles to doing the right thing at the right time. Merseyside police, perhaps stung by their mishandling of the Southport massacre comms, swung into action when a car-ramming horror happened on the streets of Liverpool in May. The ethnicity of the alleged assailant – 'a white British man' – was released two hours after his arrest and long before Paul Doyle was charged with multiple counts of GBH. Contrast this with the arrant idiocy of Warwickshire police, whose extreme reluctance to confirm the immigration status and ethnicity of two reported asylum seekers suspected of the rape of a 12 year old girl in Nuneaton recently was based not on any legislative obstacle but on the lack of guidance to tell them they could. The precise status of the alleged attackers Ahmad Mulakhil and Mohammad Kabir is still shrouded in mystery. While they are entitled to the presumption of innocence and due process, I can't see anything that would preclude those facts from being released. Beyond, of course, the cack-eyed fealty to 'community cohesion', which seems to eternally ignore the fact that this social contract relies on the majority in the country believing in it. There is no substitute for the fullest information being disclosed accurately and fast. Where there might be a legal impediment, for example age, that is relied upon to stop any early disclosure, this must be changed. The National Police Chiefs Council ought to be an anachronism these days. We introduced local democratic accountability years ago in the form of policing and crime commissioners (PCCs). But they are too often incompetent duds and political retreads far behind the curve of public opinion that elected them. If this architecture must exist along with the insatiable bureaucracy of the College of Policing, it ought to spend more time ensuring that police chiefs and their guidance are both fit for purpose. Otherwise we will continue to see people like Essex Chief Ben-Julian Harrington well over his head when it comes to policing protests, such as those tinderbox concerns over illegal migration, despite being the NPCC lead for public order. His misunderstanding of the Human Rights Act and the convention it is built on meant that masked antifa protestors from outside the community were given a police escort into and away from a then peaceful demonstration by townspeople outside a hotel for migrants in Epping. This had disastrous results both in terms of disorder and public confidence. One thing PCCs can do is hire chief officers who are able and willing to do the thing public trust relies on – police without fear or favour – and fire those who can't. Perhaps it is not too late for them to step up.
Wales Online
2 hours ago
- Wales Online
Welsh language activism 'no different' to Palestine Action 'terrorism' ex police boss says
Our community members are treated to special offers, promotions and adverts from us and our partners. You can check out at any time. More info A retired police chief and former Welsh language campaigner has slammed the authorities for their approach to banned group Palestine Action. Arfon Jones drew parallels with historic Welsh language campaigns in which scores of activists were arrested for non-violent direct action. Mr Jones, from Wrexham, said he was among those who, in the 1970s, campaigned for Welsh language rights as members of Cymdeithas yr Iaith Gymraeg (Welsh Language Society). 'Some were imprisoned for their activities,' he said. 'None, however, were stigmatised by the British state as terrorists!' On July 5, the UK Government proscribed Palestine Action as a terrorist group after members of the network damaged RAF aircraft at Brize Norton, Oxfordshire. Under the Terrorism Act of 2000, it made group membership a criminal offence punishable by up to 14 years in prison. Since then, police have arrested scores of people for showing support to Palestine Action. Last weekend alone, 474 people were arrested during a 'Lift the Ban' sit-in at Parliament Square (Saturday, August 9). The demonstration had echoes of the first ever protest staged by Cymdeithas yr Iaith Gymraeg: in February 1963, members staged a sit-down blocking Pont Trefechan bridge, Aberystwyth. From demanding the right to court summonses in Welsh, the society moved on to campaign successfully for bilingual road signs followed by action over holiday homes and Welsh language media. Over the decades, more than 1,000 supporters of the society appeared before the courts, making it Britain's largest protest group since the Suffragettes. Join the North Wales Live Whatsapp community now (Image: Geoff Charles/National Library of Wales/Wiki) Some members were jailed but none were ever officially labelled terrorists by the government, said Mr Jones, a former Police and Crime Commissioner for North Wales Police. He also served as an operational inspector at the force before retiring in 2008, and now describes himself as a "social issues commentator". In a letter to the Daily Post he wrote: 'What language campaigners were doing in the 60s, 70s and 80s was no different to what Palestine Action was doing prior to it being proscribed for protesting against a genocide the British state is complicit in. 'Both were using non-violent, direct action against property, and proscription was unreasonable, unjustified and disproportionate. 'This comparison gives some indication of how far the British state has moved from a social democratic tolerant and progressive state in the 1970s, to a right-wing autocratic and oppressive state in 2025, where a Nazi salute is tolerated but protesting a genocide is not. 'The Home Secretary and the Police Service should hang their heads in shame for harassing and arresting honourable and principled individuals who are willing to sacrifice their freedom for the cause of humanity.' The Home Office was approached for a response. Home Secretary Yvette Cooper said many people were not aware of the 'reality' of Palestine Action's true purpose. In the wake of the ongoing Gaza war, the group has become more active but it insists its approach is "non-violent". The Home Secretary said: 'The right to protest is one we protect fiercely but this is very different from displaying support for this one specific and narrow, proscribed organisation. "Palestine Action was proscribed based on strong security advice following serious attacks the group has committed, involving violence, significant injuries and extensive criminal damage. "It also follows an assessment from the Joint Terrorism Assessment Centre that the group prepares for terrorism, as well as concerning information referencing plans and ideas for further attacks, the details of which cannot yet be publicly reported due to ongoing legal proceedings. 'Many people may not yet know the reality of this organisation, but the assessments are very clear - this is not a non-violent organisation. UK national security and public safety must always be our top priority. 'Their actions are not about the horrific suffering in the Middle East and do not reflect or represent the thousands of people across the country who are exercising their rights to protest peacefully.' The National Police Chiefs' Council, and the Association of Police and Crime Commissioners, were also approached for a comment. Sign up for the North Wales Live newsletter sent twice daily to your inbox Find out what's happening near you
Spectator
3 hours ago
- Spectator
Scotland is facing a £26.5 billion black hole
It's that time of year again: GERS day – when Scotland's annual fiscal health is laid bare – has come back around and the figures paint a pretty bleak picture for the Scottish government. There is a £26.5 billion black hole in public finances (don't fall off your chair, Rachel Reeves) while the country's deficit has grown by more than £5 billion. With a Scottish parliament election just around the corner – and the party of government on track to lose seats – it's more bad news for First Minister John Swinney's SNP. Swinney's administration appears to have buried its head in the sand over the figures – with an earlier press release choosing to overlook the headline figures and boasting instead that Scotland's revenue was up by 1.5 per cent on the previous year. This addresses only part of the picture. Scotland's total public spending has outpaced the money brought in via taxes – resulting in a deficit of 11.7 per cent of GDP, or £26.5 billion – leaving Scotland £5 billion worse off than in 2023-24. Startlingly, the black hole widens to more than £30 billion if North Sea oil revenues are excluded. The Scottish government has tried to point to some more positive aspects of the data, noting that the money it has raised grew to £91.4 billion this year. This managed to cover public expenditure on day-to-day devolved services (while spending grew by 6.8 per cent, devolved revenue grew more). But that doesn't change the broader picture, which shows that the country's deficit is only getting worse. Scotland made up 8 per cent of all the money collected by the UK government – matching its share of the population – but this is down a little on the previous year. Excluding North Sea oil and gas would see Scotland raising just 7.7 per cent of UK revenue, also down on last year. Increases seen in income and inheritance tax (which grew in part due to inflation) have raised money. Less was collected from national insurance, however, with employees now paying lower rates, while fuel duty also fell thanks to more people opting for electric vehicles. The reduction of student loans has also seen the revenue generated from interest fall, as rates on student loans have been slashed. Public service spending remains higher than before the pandemic, currently at 52 per cent of GDP – or £117.6 billion – with more money going on devolved social security programmes and benefits in Scotland compared with the UK's welfare spending in 2024-25. This was balanced a little by inflation falling from 2022-23 highs, resulting in less paid out as public sector debt interest. And spending related to Brexit also fell as the UK's exit from the EU recedes into the distance. There is some good news for Scots, however. A greater sum is being spent per head in Scotland compared to the UK average, with those living north of the border receiving £2,700 more from Westminster than their British counterparts. Not that Labour necessarily sees things this way, with the Scottish party's finance spokesperson Michael Marra fuming that the SNP has 'squandered' the UK government's block grant. He added that while Scotland benefits 'disproportionately' from investment in public services, its growing deficit demonstrates how 'the SNP has blown a hole in Scotland's finances'. Today's GERS stats raise questions about the SNP's full fiscal autonomy idea, too. Despite not having made an appearance in more recent manifestos, Shona Robison told the Scottish Affairs select committee in January it was her 'preferred option' within the current constitutional arrangement. The Scottish government also noted in a recent Freedom of Information response that this had been its policy for over a decade, after it was first alluded to in the SNP's 2011 election programme. Yet there remain serious question marks over how it would work in practice – with the latest figures suggesting, Scotland secretary Ian Murray says, that a shift to this approach would cost the public purse more than £14 billion a year. Today's figures suggest there is a long way to go until that fantasy could become a reality.
