logo
5 reasons Democrats are in good shape

5 reasons Democrats are in good shape

Vox5 days ago
The Democratic Party's approval rating is at its lowest point in at least 35 years, according to a Wall Street Journal poll released last week.
In that survey, 63 percent of voters expressed an unfavorable view of the Democrats, while just 33 percent voiced a positive one. By contrast, voters disapproved of Congressional Republicans by only 11 points. These dismal figures are broadly consistent with other recent polling: In RealClearPolitics's average of recent surveys, voters disapprove of the Democratic Party by a 59.3 to 36.3 margin.
What's more, Democrats don't just have a lower favorability rating than Republicans, but also command less trust on the public's top issues. In the Journal's poll, voters disapproved of Trump's management of the economy, tariffs, inflation, foreign policy, and immigrant deportations. And yet, they said that they trusted Republicans to handle all of those matters better than Democrats would. Of the 10 issues raised in the survey, voters favored Democrats on only two — health care and vaccine policy.
These grim data points have spurred some handwringing in blue America. But just how dire is the Democrats' predicament? Is the party temporarily tainted with the stink of last year's defeat — and poised to rally back into power, just as it did after losing in 2004 and 2016? Or is the better precedent for the party's current position 1981, when the party began a 12-year struggle to escape the shadow of a failed presidency?
Only prophets can answer such questions with certainty. In my own view, though, two things are true:
• The Democrats' putrid approval numbers paint a misleadingly bleak picture of their current standing.
• The party is in much worse shape than it was eight years ago, and will likely struggle to secure full control of the federal government any time soon.
Below, I'll detail five reasons for believing that first point, and two for accepting the second one.
This story was first featured in The Rebuild.
Sign up here for more stories on the lessons liberals should take away from their election defeat — and a closer look at where they should go next. From senior correspondent Eric Levitz.
Why Democrats might not be in disarray
1. Disaffected, but loyal, Democrats are driving down their party's approval rating
In the Journal's poll, the GOP's net-favorability rating is 19 points higher than the Democratic Party's. And yet, in that same survey, voters say that they would prefer a Democratic Congress to a Republican one by a 3-point margin.
This seems odd. Voters disapprove of Democrats by a much larger margin than they disapprove of Republicans. Yet a plurality nonetheless say they would vote for the former party over the latter one.
As polling analysts G. Elliott Morris and Mary Radcliffe observe, there is only one explanation for this: Unhappy — but loyal — Democratic voters are driving down their party's favorability rating.
This interpretation is consistent with polling from YouGov and The Economist, which finds that only 74 percent of Democratic voters approve of congressional Democrats, while 22.6 percent disapprove. By contrast, 88.9 percent of Republican voters approve of their party's congressional causes, while just 8.3 percent disapprove.
Partisans often disapprove of their own parties when they suffer defeat. Republicans had abysmal approval numbers in 2009, yet stomped to a historic midterm victory the following year. And that turnaround was not an aberration: According to Morris and Radcliffe, historically, there is no correlation between how well a party performs in favorability polls taken this far from Election Day and how well they ultimately do at the ballot box.
It's unlikely that the Democrats' plummeting popularity is entirely attributable to the disaffection of its own base. The GOP's trust advantage on various issues suggests a broader problem. Nonetheless, the Democratic Party is (almost certainly) in better shape than its approval rating would suggest.
2. Trump is more unpopular than Biden was at this point in his presidency
The president's approval rating is among the best predictors of an opposition party's midterm success. And Donald Trump has rapidly squandered the American public's goodwill.
When Trump came into office, voters approved of him by an 11.6 margin, according to Nate Silver's polling average. Now, they disapprove of the president by 8.8 points.
For context, at this point in Joe Biden's presidency, the public still approved of the Democrat by more than 7 points. And although Trump's approval is unlikely to collapse to the extraordinary degree that Biden's did, there's reason for thinking it will follow the same trajectory. Namely:
3. Americans will likely feel the full impact of Trump's tariffs next year
Thus far, the economic impacts of Trump's tariffs have been fairly modest. Those duties have pushed up consumer prices and likely slowed economic growth. But they haven't triggered inflation akin to that which America witnessed in 2022, let alone a stagflationary crisis.
This is partly because Trump walked back his most radical tariff proposals. Yet the president's trade restrictions remain extraordinarily expansive, outstripping what many deemed the worst-case scenario during campaign season. According to Yale's Budget Lab, America's average effective tariff rate sits at 20.2 percent, its highest level since 1911. And Trump's current tariffs are poised to cost US households an average of $2,700 in annual income.
Americans are not yet paying the full price of Trump's trade policy. The US government has yet to begin collecting tariffs on many foreign countries. And American retailers loaded up on foreign goods earlier this year to get ahead of the president's trade duties. But as America ramps up its tariff collection regime — and companies draw down their inventories — consumer prices will rise. Preston Caldwell, chief US economist for Morningstar, recently told Vox that he expects inflation to peak in 2026, when voters will be heading to the polls.
4. Democrats dominated the most recent high-profile, swing-state election
Since Trump's conquest of the GOP in 2016, Democrats have gained ground with highly politically engaged voters, and lost support among less-engaged ones. This trade didn't work out very well in the high-turnout environment of 2024. But the fact that Democratic voters are now disproportionately 'reliable' — which is to say, disproportionately likely to cast a ballot in every election — may help them in the 2026 midterms, when overall turnout is sure to be lower.
And the results of this year's Supreme Court election in Wisconsin lend credence to this view. That contest was the one 2025 race that 1) pit a Democrat against a Republican, 2) took place in a swing state, and 3) galvanized national attention. And the Democrat won 10 points, outperforming her standing in the polls.
5. Democrats' best issue is gaining salience, while their worst issue is losing it
Finally, the American electorate's top concerns have been shifting, in ways that are potentially beneficial for Democrats.
For years, Republicans have enjoyed an advantage over Democrats on immigration. And the Journal's poll shows that voters still trust the GOP to better manage illegal immigration by a margin of 17 points.
But Americans are also much less worried about that issue than they were a year ago. In Gallup's polling, the share of voters who say they worry 'a great deal' about illegal immigration has fallen from 48 percent in 2024 to 40 percent this April. A more recent Gallup survey showed that the percentage of Americans who want immigration reduced has fallen from 55 percent last year to 30 percent today.
Meanwhile, the share of Americans who worry 'a great deal' about health care — perennially, one of the Democratic Party's strongest issues — rose from 51 percent to 59 percent in April. And that was before the GOP enacted sweeping cuts to Medicaid funding.
1. Democrats are in much worse shape than they were in 2017.
All this said, there's still reason to fear for the Democrats' future. For one thing, the party is much weaker than it was at this point in Trump's first term. Eight years ago, voters said they favored a Democratic Congress over a Republican one by roughly 8 points (compared to just 3 points today).
Since 2018, the share of Americans who identify with the Democratic Party has also fallen sharply. Seven years ago, 50 percent of Americans said they supported (or leaned toward) the Democrats, while 42 percent said the same of Republicans, in Pew Research's polling. Today, 46 percent support the GOP while 45 percent back the Democrats.
Opposition parties almost always gain House seats in midterm elections. And since the Republican House majority is small, Democrats are heavily favored to retake the chamber next year. But current polling suggests that the party's gains will be meager.
And in 2028, for the first time in more than a decade, the Republican Party will not be led by Donald Trump. If the GOP retains its advantage on the economy — while shedding its exceptionally undisciplined and scandal-plagued standard-bearer — the party could become even more formidable.
This is a very speculative concern, to be sure. But it's worth entertaining the possibility that Democrats' current position is more analogous to its predicament in 1981 — when Jimmy Carter's defeat was followed by 12 years of Republican presidential rule — than in 2017.
The previous two times that Democrats lost control of the White House — in 2000 and 2016 — the party's outgoing president had been reasonably well-liked. Bill Clinton had earned a reputation for skillful economic management, thanks to the late 1990s economic expansion. Barack Obama was a singularly magnetic figure, and the US enjoyed relatively low unemployment and inflation in 2016. Both Clinton and Obama's successors won the popular vote in their respective elections, despite the fact that they each were conspicuously uncharismatic. Their losses could therefore be fairly easily dismissed as the consequence of easily reversible tactical errors.
By contrast, presiding over post-COVID inflation rendered Biden historically unpopular while devastating the Democrats' credibility on economic management.
2. The party has long odds of winning the Senate anytime soon
The Democrats' biggest political problem, however, lies in the Senate.
The party's prospects for securing control of Congress's upper chamber — either next year, or in 2028 — look poor. Democrats need to gain four seats to win a Senate majority in 2026. Yet next year's map features no easy targets. The party's best pickup opportunity lies in Maine, a state that Kamala Harris won comfortably in 2024. But that state's incumbent Republican senator, Susan Collins, won reelection by 8.6 points in 2020, even as the national political environment leaned towards Democrats. Her defeat next year is far from assured.
After defeating Collins, Democrats' next-best hope for growing their Senate caucus is winning the open seat in North Carolina, a state that backed Donald Trump all three times he was on the ballot, most recently by 3 points.
If the party manages to beat Collins and win over the Tarheel State, they would still need to win races in Ohio and Iowa — or else, in places that are even more Republican — to eke out a bare majority in the Senate.
Even winning control of the Senate by 2029 would require extraordinary electoral feats. The most plausible path here would involve Democrats beating Collins, winning a race in North Carolina, flipping a Wisconsin Senate seat in 2028, and taking back the presidency that same year (since the vice president breaks all ties in the Senate, Democrats would only need to flip three seats to boast a working majority in 2029, provided that they control the White House). And yet, this path only works if Democratic Senate incumbents also win reelection in every swing state race between now and 2029: Specifically, Democrats would need to win two races in Georgia, one in Pennsylvania, one in Michigan, and one in Arizona.
This is conceivable. But it is not especially likely.
The fundamental problem facing Democrats is that only 19 states voted for their party in each of the last three federal elections, while 25 US states backed Trump all three times. Put differently, the median US state is more right-wing than America as a whole. In practice, this means that — to win a Senate majority — Democrats don't merely need to beat Republicans nationally, but to do so by a hefty margin. For context, in 2018, Democrats won the House popular vote by 8.6 points and still lost Senate seats.
In the US, midterms usually witness backlashes against the president's party. But Democrats need more than an ordinary midterm backlash to put themselves on pace to win the Senate by 2029. And without a Senate majority, Democrats that year would be unable to pass partisan legislation or appoint liberal Supreme Court justices, even if they did manage to win the presidency.
Democrats might not need to become drastically more popular to win back the House. But to actually run the federal government, they likely need to make their party more broadly appealing than it was eight years ago. This makes their historically low approval rating more than a little alarming.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Stock market today: Dow, S&P 500, Nasdaq futures rise as Trump hints at chip tariff carveout
Stock market today: Dow, S&P 500, Nasdaq futures rise as Trump hints at chip tariff carveout

Yahoo

time18 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Stock market today: Dow, S&P 500, Nasdaq futures rise as Trump hints at chip tariff carveout

US stock futures edged higher on Thursday as President Trump's sweeping tariffs hit dozens of US trade partners after his self-imposed deadline for countries to strike deals expired. At the same time, Trump's hint of a carveout for coming duties on semiconductors boosted tech for a second consecutive day. Futures attached to the Dow Jones Industrial Average (YM=F) gained 0.6%. Futures attached to the benchmark S&P 500 (ES=F) were up 0.7%, and those on tech-heavy Nasdaq 100 (NQ=F) rose 0.8%. Trump's deadline for trade deals landed at 12:01 a.m. ET on Thursday. Imports from nearly 200 countries now face duties ranging from 10% to 50%, and the overall average effective tariff rate is projected to jump to 18.3%. Read more: The latest on Trump's tariffs Apple (AAPL) shares climbed Thursday in premarket trading as Trump and CEO Tim Cook announced the company would make a $100 billion investment in the US. As part of the deal, Apple will manufacture the cover glasses for iPhones and Apple Watches in Kentucky. The president also revealed at the press conference that he plans to eventually set a 100% tariff on semiconductors. Companies like Apple that commit to building in the US, however, will be exempt from the tariff, he said. Airbnb (ABNB), DoorDash (DASH), and Lyft (LYFT) reported earnings after the bell. DoorDash shares jumped premarket on an upbeat forecast driven by resilient delivery demand. Airbnb and Lyft, meanwhile, fell on disappointing guidance. On Thursday, in addition to grappling with the latest trade policy shifts, Wall Street will receive new data on weekly jobless claims. The state of the labor market is in high focus following a disappointing July jobs report and downbeat revisions to the May and June jobs reports. Intel stock dips as Trump calls for CEO resignation President Trump on Thursday morning called for the resignation of Intel's (INTC) CEO Lip‑Bu Tan, who has been at the job since March, saying the executive is "highly conflicted" and should leave his post immediately. 'The CEO of INTEL is highly conflicted and must resign immediately. There is no other solution to this problem. Thank you for your attention to this problem!' wrote Trump on social media. On Wednesday, Reuters reported US Republican Senator Tom Cotton sent a letter to the company's board raising questions about Tan's ties to Chinese firms and a recent criminal case involving his former company, Cadence Design (CDNS.O). Intel stock was down as much as 3% in pre-market trading. Eli Lilly stock falls despite earnings beat as oral GLP-1 pill results disappoint Eli Lilly (LLY) stock fell 7% in premarket trading. Although the company's second quarter earnings topped expectations, the results of a late-stage trial of its highly anticipated oral GLP-1 pill disappointed. For the quarter, Eli Lilly reported $15.56 billion in revenue, beating Wall Street estimates of $14.69 billion. Earnings per share came in at $6.31, compared to Street expectations of $5.56. Much of the $10.81 billion in US revenue was driven by strong sales of weight-loss drugs, Mounjaro and Zepbound, which increased 46% in volume, though prices fell 8%. Yahoo Finance's Anjalee Khemlani reports: Read more here. Good morning. Here's what's happening today. Economic data: Initial jobless claims (week ending Aug. 2); Nonfarm productivity (second quarter preliminary); Unit labor costs (second quarter preliminary) Earnings: Block (XYZ), Celsius (CELH), ConocoPhillips (COP), Eli Lilly (LLY), Sony (SONY), SoundHound (SOUN), Pinterest (PINS), Take-Two Interactive (TTWO), Twilio (TWLO), The Trade Desk (TTD), Vistra Energy (VST) Here are some of the biggest stories you may have missed overnight and early this morning: Investors are 'agitated' by less than perfect earnings Shopify's strong quarter shows consumers are ignoring tariffs Eli Lilly stock falls on GLP-1 pill trial results Trump's tariffs hit dozens of countries as trade deadline expires Trump to sign order easing path for private assets in 401(k)s Apple leads surge in global tech shares after Trump tariff relief Trump boasts billions of dollars flowing into US from tariffs Warner Bros revenue surges on streaming expansion, box-office hits Trump floats possible tariffs on China for buying Russia oil\ TSMC shares surge as Taiwan says firm exempt from Trump tariffs Keep an eye on Firefly IPO Not too far removed from Figma's (FIG) huge IPO, Firefly will come to market at the Nasdaq later on today. The IPO was upsized, and it's likely it will come out of the block strong when it opens. I am not in love with the company's financials, but it has a host of key deals in place and its technology has proven to work (see trips to moon). And it has a SpaceX ( like story to tell at a hot time for markets. Perfectly timed debut. I am live with Firefly CEO Jason Kim around 11am ET today from the Nasdaq. Tune into Yahoo Finance! SoftBank swings to profit on vision fund gains ahead of AI push Softbank's (SFTBF, 9984.T, SFTBY) Tokyo shares closed 1% up on Thursday after reporting a bigger profit than expected in the June quarter. Bloomberg News reports: Read more here. Apple gains after announcing $100B US investment Apple stock rose 3% before the bell on Thursday. Yahoo Finance's technology editor Daniel Howley and Washington correspondent Ben Werschkul outline the latest developments from the Apple investment announcement on Wednesday. Read more here. Sony stock rises as in-demand games and music help allay Trump tariff fears Bloomberg News reports: Read more here. TSMC hits record; Taiwan says tech giant exempt from US tariffs Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. (TSM) shares rose 5% in premarket trading on Thursday after announcing it will not have to pay 100% tariff on sales to the US. Bloomberg News: Read more here. Intel stock dips as Trump calls for CEO resignation President Trump on Thursday morning called for the resignation of Intel's (INTC) CEO Lip‑Bu Tan, who has been at the job since March, saying the executive is "highly conflicted" and should leave his post immediately. 'The CEO of INTEL is highly conflicted and must resign immediately. There is no other solution to this problem. Thank you for your attention to this problem!' wrote Trump on social media. On Wednesday, Reuters reported US Republican Senator Tom Cotton sent a letter to the company's board raising questions about Tan's ties to Chinese firms and a recent criminal case involving his former company, Cadence Design (CDNS.O). Intel stock was down as much as 3% in pre-market trading. President Trump on Thursday morning called for the resignation of Intel's (INTC) CEO Lip‑Bu Tan, who has been at the job since March, saying the executive is "highly conflicted" and should leave his post immediately. 'The CEO of INTEL is highly conflicted and must resign immediately. There is no other solution to this problem. Thank you for your attention to this problem!' wrote Trump on social media. On Wednesday, Reuters reported US Republican Senator Tom Cotton sent a letter to the company's board raising questions about Tan's ties to Chinese firms and a recent criminal case involving his former company, Cadence Design (CDNS.O). Intel stock was down as much as 3% in pre-market trading. Eli Lilly stock falls despite earnings beat as oral GLP-1 pill results disappoint Eli Lilly (LLY) stock fell 7% in premarket trading. Although the company's second quarter earnings topped expectations, the results of a late-stage trial of its highly anticipated oral GLP-1 pill disappointed. For the quarter, Eli Lilly reported $15.56 billion in revenue, beating Wall Street estimates of $14.69 billion. Earnings per share came in at $6.31, compared to Street expectations of $5.56. Much of the $10.81 billion in US revenue was driven by strong sales of weight-loss drugs, Mounjaro and Zepbound, which increased 46% in volume, though prices fell 8%. Yahoo Finance's Anjalee Khemlani reports: Read more here. Eli Lilly (LLY) stock fell 7% in premarket trading. Although the company's second quarter earnings topped expectations, the results of a late-stage trial of its highly anticipated oral GLP-1 pill disappointed. For the quarter, Eli Lilly reported $15.56 billion in revenue, beating Wall Street estimates of $14.69 billion. Earnings per share came in at $6.31, compared to Street expectations of $5.56. Much of the $10.81 billion in US revenue was driven by strong sales of weight-loss drugs, Mounjaro and Zepbound, which increased 46% in volume, though prices fell 8%. Yahoo Finance's Anjalee Khemlani reports: Read more here. Good morning. Here's what's happening today. Economic data: Initial jobless claims (week ending Aug. 2); Nonfarm productivity (second quarter preliminary); Unit labor costs (second quarter preliminary) Earnings: Block (XYZ), Celsius (CELH), ConocoPhillips (COP), Eli Lilly (LLY), Sony (SONY), SoundHound (SOUN), Pinterest (PINS), Take-Two Interactive (TTWO), Twilio (TWLO), The Trade Desk (TTD), Vistra Energy (VST) Here are some of the biggest stories you may have missed overnight and early this morning: Investors are 'agitated' by less than perfect earnings Shopify's strong quarter shows consumers are ignoring tariffs Eli Lilly stock falls on GLP-1 pill trial results Trump's tariffs hit dozens of countries as trade deadline expires Trump to sign order easing path for private assets in 401(k)s Apple leads surge in global tech shares after Trump tariff relief Trump boasts billions of dollars flowing into US from tariffs Warner Bros revenue surges on streaming expansion, box-office hits Trump floats possible tariffs on China for buying Russia oil\ TSMC shares surge as Taiwan says firm exempt from Trump tariffs Economic data: Initial jobless claims (week ending Aug. 2); Nonfarm productivity (second quarter preliminary); Unit labor costs (second quarter preliminary) Earnings: Block (XYZ), Celsius (CELH), ConocoPhillips (COP), Eli Lilly (LLY), Sony (SONY), SoundHound (SOUN), Pinterest (PINS), Take-Two Interactive (TTWO), Twilio (TWLO), The Trade Desk (TTD), Vistra Energy (VST) Here are some of the biggest stories you may have missed overnight and early this morning: Investors are 'agitated' by less than perfect earnings Shopify's strong quarter shows consumers are ignoring tariffs Eli Lilly stock falls on GLP-1 pill trial results Trump's tariffs hit dozens of countries as trade deadline expires Trump to sign order easing path for private assets in 401(k)s Apple leads surge in global tech shares after Trump tariff relief Trump boasts billions of dollars flowing into US from tariffs Warner Bros revenue surges on streaming expansion, box-office hits Trump floats possible tariffs on China for buying Russia oil\ TSMC shares surge as Taiwan says firm exempt from Trump tariffs Keep an eye on Firefly IPO Not too far removed from Figma's (FIG) huge IPO, Firefly will come to market at the Nasdaq later on today. The IPO was upsized, and it's likely it will come out of the block strong when it opens. I am not in love with the company's financials, but it has a host of key deals in place and its technology has proven to work (see trips to moon). And it has a SpaceX ( like story to tell at a hot time for markets. Perfectly timed debut. I am live with Firefly CEO Jason Kim around 11am ET today from the Nasdaq. Tune into Yahoo Finance! Not too far removed from Figma's (FIG) huge IPO, Firefly will come to market at the Nasdaq later on today. The IPO was upsized, and it's likely it will come out of the block strong when it opens. I am not in love with the company's financials, but it has a host of key deals in place and its technology has proven to work (see trips to moon). And it has a SpaceX ( like story to tell at a hot time for markets. Perfectly timed debut. I am live with Firefly CEO Jason Kim around 11am ET today from the Nasdaq. Tune into Yahoo Finance! SoftBank swings to profit on vision fund gains ahead of AI push Softbank's (SFTBF, 9984.T, SFTBY) Tokyo shares closed 1% up on Thursday after reporting a bigger profit than expected in the June quarter. Bloomberg News reports: Read more here. Softbank's (SFTBF, 9984.T, SFTBY) Tokyo shares closed 1% up on Thursday after reporting a bigger profit than expected in the June quarter. Bloomberg News reports: Read more here. Apple gains after announcing $100B US investment Apple stock rose 3% before the bell on Thursday. Yahoo Finance's technology editor Daniel Howley and Washington correspondent Ben Werschkul outline the latest developments from the Apple investment announcement on Wednesday. Read more here. Apple stock rose 3% before the bell on Thursday. Yahoo Finance's technology editor Daniel Howley and Washington correspondent Ben Werschkul outline the latest developments from the Apple investment announcement on Wednesday. Read more here. Sony stock rises as in-demand games and music help allay Trump tariff fears Bloomberg News reports: Read more here. Bloomberg News reports: Read more here. TSMC hits record; Taiwan says tech giant exempt from US tariffs Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. (TSM) shares rose 5% in premarket trading on Thursday after announcing it will not have to pay 100% tariff on sales to the US. Bloomberg News: Read more here. Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. (TSM) shares rose 5% in premarket trading on Thursday after announcing it will not have to pay 100% tariff on sales to the US. Bloomberg News: Read more here.

Trump calls for Intel CEO to 'resign immediately'
Trump calls for Intel CEO to 'resign immediately'

Yahoo

time18 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump calls for Intel CEO to 'resign immediately'

President Trump early Thursday called for the resignation of Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan in a post on social media. "The CEO of INTEL is highly CONFLICTED and must resign, immediately," Trump wrote on Truth Social, the social media platform he owns. "There is no other solution to this problem. Thank you for your attention to this problem!" Tan was named Intel's CEO back in March, taking over from Pat Gelsinger's tumultuous tenure that saw the company's stock fall and the chipmaker fall behind in the AI race. Investors cheered Tan's appointment, with the stock rising as much as 15% after the news. Intel stock fell over 3% following Trump's post. In April, a Reuters report detailed Tan's wide-ranging investments in Chinese companies made through his VC firm, with the outlet finding that Tan's firm, Walden International, "remains invested in 20 funds and companies alongside Chinese government funds or state-owned enterprises, according to Chinese corporate databases." Trump's post came a day after one of his top allies in the Senate, Republican Tom Cotton, wrote a letter to Intel's board chair questioning Tan's China ties. "Intel is required to be a responsible steward of American taxpayer dollars and to comply with applicable security regulations," Cotton wrote, pointing to Intel's nearly $8 billion grant from the CHIPS Act. "Mr. Tan's associations raise questions about Intel's ability to fulfill these obligations." This is breaking news. More to come. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Citi, Bank of America CEOs join the parade to pitch Trump on taking Fannie, Freddie public
Citi, Bank of America CEOs join the parade to pitch Trump on taking Fannie, Freddie public

Yahoo

time18 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Citi, Bank of America CEOs join the parade to pitch Trump on taking Fannie, Freddie public

Citigroup (C) CEO Jane Fraser and Bank of America (BAC) CEO Brian Moynihan met with President Trump on Wednesday to discuss how to relinquish the government's grip over two housing giants, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, according to people familiar with the matter. The president has been inviting the chiefs of big Wall Street banks one by one recently to discuss what such a deal could look like, which would include an initial public offering (IPO), Bloomberg first reported last Thursday. JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon and Goldman Sachs CEO David Solomon also met with Trump for such discussions last week. Some of these discussions have revolved around how the banks value these organizations, how they think they could sell them, and how this wider privatization effort could be structured, according to one person familiar with the matter. The over-the-counter shares of Freddie Mac (FMCC) and Fannie Mae (FNMA) both fell more than 3% Wednesday. They are up 101% and 147%, respectively, year to date. Spokespeople for the banks declined to comment. Fannie and Freddie play integral roles in the US housing market by purchasing mortgages and repackaging them as securities. Both fell under government conservatorship during the 2008 financial crisis when mortgage defaults soared and the US Treasury Department injected over $180 billion into the mortgage lenders. A combined stock offering of these two mortgage giants could mean one of the world's largest public deals, which would result in a major payday for the stock underwriting desks of these big banks. The president vowed in late May to take the mortgage giants public in a post on Truth Social. However, pulling off such a move would be far from a simple feat. The challenge with relinquishing the government's conservatorship of Fannie and Freddie is that turning these massive institutions into private businesses could drastically impact access to affordable credit in the housing market, which has steadily relied on these institutions to fund 30-year mortgages for over a decade. Read more: Best low- and no-down-payment mortgage lenders of 2025 For these reasons, Democratic politicians, civil rights organizations, and some housing experts have been critical of the effort. "This could mean stricter lending requirements, higher interest rates, and even higher guarantee fees to reflect greater risk. This could mean higher costs for credit unions to sell these loans," Kelsey Nelson, federal regulatory compliance counsel for the credit union advocacy group America's Credit Unions, wrote in June. Republicans, including many Trump allies, argue that the government backing of Fannie and Freddie was never intended to be permanent and that loosening its grip over these entities would promote better competition in the mortgage market. The government selling its stakes in these companies could also generate billions that could be used to reduce the deficit and return money to taxpayers, they claim. Some prominent Wall Street investors, including Bill Ackman, long ago purchased stock in Fannie and Freddie, betting that the companies would eventually be returned to private control. These investors hoped the transition would happen during the first Trump administration, only to see that effort fizzle. These two entities constitute approximately 40% of one-to-four-family mortgage originations and close to half of the multifamily mortgage market, according to the the Urban Institute, a left-leaning Washington, D.C.-based think tank. Last November, Mark Calabria, the former director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA), which oversees the two mortgage giants, said in an interview that privatizing Fannie and Freddie "is 100%, in my mind, mechanically doable." However, in that same interview, Calabria said there was "zero chance" such a development could be pulled off in 2025. David Hollerith is a senior reporter for Yahoo Finance covering banking, crypto, and other areas in finance. Click here for in-depth analysis of the latest stock market news and events moving stock prices Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store