logo
Democrats bash Trump, GOP over disappointing jobs report: ‘Awful'

Democrats bash Trump, GOP over disappointing jobs report: ‘Awful'

The Hill4 days ago
Democrats on Capitol Hill are hammering President Trump and his GOP allies for Friday's underwhelming jobs report.
Released by the federal Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), the analysis revealed that U.S. employers added 73,000 jobs in July — well below economists' estimates of 100,000 — while the figures for May and June were revised dramatically downward to indicate that the economy created 258,000 fewer jobs over those months than initially reported.
The Democrats say the disappointing numbers are no accident, but reflect a Republican policy agenda — including Trump's efforts to gut the federal government through the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) — that has prioritized the financial well-being of the wealthy at the expense of everyone else.
'This is really bad,' Rep. Sean Casten (D-Ill.), a member of the Financial Services Committee, wrote on X. 'The job slow down obviously, but the size of the revisions is maybe more ominous in light of all the DOGE cuts to BLS and other economic reporting agencies.
'If this volatility is the new normal we are stapling a huge risk premium on the US economy.'
Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) piled on, pinning the hiring stall directly on Trump's policies, including on-again, off-again tariffs that have destabilized global trade and created uncertainty for domestic businesses.
'Unsurprising bad jobs report. Just 73,000 added in July, and most of those were health care,' Murphy posted on X. 'Even worse, May and June jobs numbers revised down by 258,000. Awful. Companies don't want to create jobs in Trump's chaos economy with weakening rule of law and rampant corruption.'
Trump, a billionaire real-estate mogul, has centered his political career on promises to apply his business successes to Washington. On the campaign trail, he vowed to end pandemic-era inflation on 'day one' and adopt economic policies that would launch a manufacturing 'renaissance' across America.
'We will take other countries' jobs,' Trump said during a campaign speech in Savannah, Georgia, last September. 'We're going to take their factories.'
Trump's Republican allies have portrayed the president as an economic visionary, hailing his policy agenda as a liberating force that's cutting taxes for consumers and red tape for businesses. They did not change their tune after Friday's jobs numbers were released.
'This week, we saw how the Trump economy is firing on all cylinders: strong economic growth, better trade deals, wages outpacing price increases, tamed inflation, and now, a job market that keeps going,' Rep. Jason Smith (R-Mo.), the chairman of the powerful Ways and Means Committee, said Friday morning in a statement.
Smith praised Trump for fueling job creation in the private sector, rather than in the government.
'Unlike during the Biden Administration, when taxpayers were forced to pay for millions of new bureaucrats while watching their grocery and gas bills skyrocket, President Trump's economy is freeing the private sector to create new jobs with more financial security for American families,' Smith said.
Yet Friday's new labor report also suggests that the economic uncertainty surrounding Trump's erratic global trade policies is undermining the confidence of private employers to make new hires. It also suggests that the Republicans' 'big, beautiful bill,' which Trump signed into law on July 4, has not alleviated those jitters.
The analysis revealed that job growth in May, June and July was at its lowest level since COVID-19 led to a firing spree in 2020 — a statistic that was not overlooked by Trump's Democratic critics, who are bashing the president for what they view as broken promises to voters.
'A July jobs report way below expectations. May and June revised down as well. Unemployment rate ticked back up to 4.2%. We haven't seen conditions like these since 2020,' California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) posted on X.
'Don't let Donald Trump gaslight you. He is failing Americans and crashing our economy.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

How a Gen Xer clawed his way back to a $900K income working 5 remote jobs after layoffs demolished his overemployment strategy
How a Gen Xer clawed his way back to a $900K income working 5 remote jobs after layoffs demolished his overemployment strategy

Business Insider

time2 minutes ago

  • Business Insider

How a Gen Xer clawed his way back to a $900K income working 5 remote jobs after layoffs demolished his overemployment strategy

Back in March, Harrison was riding high. He was on track to earn roughly $800,000 this year thanks to a carefully engineered strategy of secretly juggling six remote IT jobs — and hiring a team of global freelancers to help him manage the load. But then, over the course of several weeks, his operation collapsed. Harrison lost four of his six jobs, slashing his annualized income to about $200,000. The sudden drop forced him to delay buying a car, consider skipping a family wedding, and rethink how much he could support his children financially. "Three-quarters of my income was gone — it really shook me," said Harrison. Business Insider verified his identity but agreed to use a pseudonym. He lives abroad most of the year but uses a VPN to work his US-based jobs. "You question yourself, you question God, you question the world." Over the past two months, Harrison has made a comeback. He's now on track to earn $900,000 annually across five jobs — a mix of W2 and contract roles related to quality assurance — and says a sixth in the works could push that figure above $1 million. Roughly one-third of his income goes toward paying the four employees who help him complete his work tasks, but he estimated he's on pace to profit more than $500,000 annually. He plans to keep the applications flowing to hedge against future layoffs. "I don't want to be there again," he said of his time with two jobs. "If I can handle it and make it work, I'm going to keep looking." Over the past three years, Business Insider has interviewed 30 "overemployed" workers who have secretly held multiple remote jobs to boost their incomes. Harrison is among an even smaller group of job jugglers who have hired people to do some of their work, a trend enabled by the remote work revolution, globalized social networks, and growing access to software tools that make outsourcing possible. Despite the tech advancements that make it easier,holding multiple jobs without employer approval could have professional repercussions and lead to burnout. Additionally, return-to-office mandates, a hiring slowdown, and tech layoffs have made it harder to sustain job juggling. Despite those headwinds, Harrison managed to rebuild his operation by leaning on automation, scaled-back staffing, and a bit of luck. Cutbacks and automation: His response to losing 4 jobs Before the layoffs began, Harrison spent most of his days attending work meetings and reviewing the output of his employees, who were based in the US, Canada, India, and Pakistan. His outsourcing operation was made possible by software tools like Zoom, TeamViewer, and UltraViewer, which allowed his team to remotely access his work computers. But once the job cuts started, Harrison said he began to question how sustainable his operation really was. Harrison doesn't know why some of his jobs were cut, but he suspects two were tied to government budget constraints related to the Department of Government Efficiency — or DOGE. He said one contract role on a government project ended without notice, while another was ultimately scrapped due to approval delays at a government office that had recently undergone major staffing cuts. A third job was cut when the company decided to hand over his contract duties to full-time employees, while a fourth — a full-time gig he thought was particularly secure — was eliminated during a company reorganization. The swift series of job losses caught Harrison off guard. "I thought I was good at sensing the room temperature and feeling how things are going," he said. "But I think nowadays with all these other factors going around, there's no way to know." In addition to government budget cuts, Harrison pointed to organizational restructuring, economic uncertainty, and the rise of AI as reasons it's become harder to predict the hiring landscape. When Harrison started looking for new jobs, it was a struggle early on. "I was sending 100, 150 résumés a day, literally getting almost nowhere," he said. So, like many businesses experiencing a sudden downturn, Harrison looked for ways to cut costs. In addition to pausing payments to his contract employees who had supported his previous roles, he parted ways with the two workers he'd been paying to apply for jobs on his behalf. Harrison turned to AI tools to replace that lost labor. He relied on the automated application platform LazyApply to send out hundreds of applications a day and experimented with the job-search tool Simplify to help tailor his résumé for specific roles. Back to 6 jobs, but not back to normal After a couple of weeks without much traction, Harrison did something that would have been almost unthinkable a few months earlier. He accepted a role that required occasional in-person work. Around the same time, other doors started to open, and he landed two more jobs over the course of a few weeks. Roughly a month after losing four roles, he'd secured three new ones — and more recently, he said he landed a sixth through a personal connection. Two of the roles are W-2 positions, while the rest are contract jobs, all but one of them billed as full-time. Harrison said he's not sure why his luck changed, but he'll take it. Landing new jobs meant bringing employees back on board, but Harrison's operations didn't go entirely back to normal. For one, working part-time from the office has been a major adjustment, making it harder for him to keep tabs on his other jobs. This change has forced him to rely more on his employees. "Ideally, I can keep my head on a swivel and look at four screens at once, but on-site, I can have one or two computers up — I can't have four," he said. Now that he's back to six jobs, Harrison said he's thought about quitting the in-office role. But after losing so many positions so quickly, he's hesitant to make any sudden moves. Looking ahead, Harrison said he's trying to focus on roles where his skillset is particularly valued — the idea being these roles will be more secure. While he was admittedly a bit "cocky" before the job cuts began, he said he's learned his lesson. His operation is more fragile than he thought it was, and he'll likely have to work harder to sustain it. "Even if you have two or three jobs, they could be gone tomorrow before your coffee's cold," he said.

Detroit voters will pick 2 candidates from a large field vying to become next mayor

time13 minutes ago

Detroit voters will pick 2 candidates from a large field vying to become next mayor

DETROIT -- Voters in Detroit will see a mayoral ballot without Mike Duggan's name on it for the first time since 2012 as they go to the polls Tuesday to narrow the field of nine candidates jockeying to succeed him in the job. The continued growth of the city could be at stake since Duggan has helmed Detroit as it exited the largest municipal bankruptcy in U.S. history and surged back to respectability following decades of mediocrity. The former prosecutor and medical center chief has overseen a massive anti-blight campaign and pushed affordable housing developments across the city. The top two vote-getters in the nonpartisan primary will move on to the general election to determine who takes office in January. Duggan didn't seek reelection as he launches an independent campaign for Michigan governor next year. The field of nine features the Detroit City Council president, a current council member, former council member, pastor of a megachurch and a popular ex-police chief. Council President Mary Sheffield is seen by many as the leading candidate in the primary, dominating campaign fundraising. She first was elected to the Detroit City Council in 2013 at age 26. She has been council president since 2022. Saunteel Jenkins was elected in 2009 to the City Council where she spent one four-year term. Jenkins later became chief executive of a nonprofit, which provides utility assistance for families. Either would become Detroit's first female mayor. Current Councilman Fred Durhal III also is on the primary ballot. He has been on the council since 2021 and was a Michigan state representative from 2014 to 2019. The Rev. Solomon Kinloch Jr. has been senior pastor at Triumph Church for about 27 years. The Detroit-based church has more than 40,000 members across a number of campuses. Kinloch also was an autoworker and member of the United Auto Workers union. Former police chief James Craig came to Detroit in 2013 amid the city's bankruptcy crisis and remained in charge of the police department until retiring in 2021. Craig failed to make the Republican ballot for Michigan governor in 2022 due to fraudulent signatures on campaign petitions. In 2024, he dropped a Republican bid for an open U.S. Senate seat. Other candidates include attorney Todd Perkins, digital creator DaNetta Simpson, business owner Joel Haashiim and entrepreneur John Barlow. The next mayor will inherit a city on much firmer footing than the one Duggan was elected to lead in 2013 when an emergency manager installed by the state to oversee the city's flailing finances filed for bankruptcy on its behalf. Detroit shed or restructured about $7 billion in debt and exited bankruptcy in December 2014. A state-appointed board managed the city's finances for several years. Detroit has had 12 consecutive years of balanced budgets. Developers have built hundreds of affordable housing units in the city, and more than 25,000 vacant and derelict homes and buildings have been demolished. The next mayor, though, will be under pressure to maintain that progress and continuing to keep the city's growth — financially and in people — going. In 2023, the census estimated that Detroit's population rose to 633,218 from 631,366 the previous year. It was the first time the city had shown population growth in decades. Detroit also is becoming a destination for visitors. The 2024 NFL draft held downtown set a record with more than 775,000 in attendance. New hotels are popping up in and around downtown. But perhaps the most visual example of the city's turnaround has been the renovation of the once-blighted monolithic Michigan Central train station. For decades, the massive building just west of downtown symbolized all that was wrong with Detroit. That's before Dearborn, Michigan-based Ford Motor Co. stepped in and bought the old Michigan Central and adjacent properties. It reopened in 2024 following a six-year, multimillion-dollar renovation that created a hub for mobility projects. While no longer a manufacturing powerhouse, Detroit's economy still is intertwined with the auto industry which currently faces uncertainties due to tariffs threatened and imposed by the Trump administration. Stellantis, the maker of Jeep and Ram vehicles, has two facilities in Detroit. The automaker said last month that its preliminary estimates show a $2.68 billion net loss in the first half of the year due to U.S. tariffs and some hefty charges.

A legal win for immigrant protections — but the clock is still ticking
A legal win for immigrant protections — but the clock is still ticking

Boston Globe

time31 minutes ago

  • Boston Globe

A legal win for immigrant protections — but the clock is still ticking

Get The Gavel A weekly SCOTUS explainer newsletter by columnist Kimberly Atkins Stohr. Enter Email Sign Up The program allows people whose home countries have experienced natural disasters, war, or civil strife to live in the United States and apply for work permits. Ending the protections is supposed to be based on whether it's safe to return, but the Trump administration seems intent on revoking it out of racism and spite. Related : 'The freedom to live fearlessly, the opportunity of liberty, and the American dream,' Thompson wrote. 'That is all Plaintiffs seek. Instead, they are told to atone for their race, leave because of their names, and purify their blood. The Court disagrees.' One of the plaintiffs is Maria Elena Hernandez, a Nicaraguan immigrant who arrived in the United States nearly three decades ago. She was visiting her brothers in Florida when 'We are not criminals, we are not illegal, we are not undocumented, and we work legally with the permit that TPS gives us,' Hernandez, 67, told me in an interview. She has worked as a janitor in a Florida university for the past 18 years. 'We contribute economically because we have always paid our taxes. We have always respected the laws of this country and have always lived with the promise that if our countries are not safe, they will protect us here.' Jackey Baiza, who came to the United States from Honduras at age 2, spoke during a rally in solidarity with TPS holders from Honduras, Nepal, and Nicaragua during a vigil on July 29 in Boston. Danielle Parhizkaran/Globe Staff Thompson's ruling also acknowledges the broader consequences of terminating Temporary Protected Status. Many of the plaintiffs, she noted, are 'long-standing employees' who have built lives and livelihoods over decades in the US. 'Termination of TPS for Nepal, Honduras, and Nicaragua will result in a $1.4 billion loss to the United States economy,' the federal judge wrote. Hernandez said she decided to join the lawsuit because she wanted to fight the Trump administration's unjust attempts to end the program. 'It would be very devastating for me' to move back to Nicaragua, she told me, 'not only because it would separate me from my family, but also because I would lose my Social Security, to which I have contributed for so many years, and my health insurance, which I need so much because I have chronic asthma and a heart condition.' Advertisement Lest we forget, the US government itself The fight to preserve the protections is far from over, but the reality is grim. The Trump administration seems intent in decimating the program, which as of Sept. 30 was protecting Still, for Guerline Jozef, executive director of the Haitian Bridge Alliance, a nonprofit advocacy organization based in Southern California, it is vital to highlight Thompson's ruling as a powerful affirmation that 'our communities matter,' she said in an interview. Indeed, Thompson's ruling offers a clear-eyed assessment of what's really driving the push to end temporary protections: It isn't national security; it's racialized fear. Unless Congress steps in with a permanent solution (here's hoping against hope) decades of contribution and belonging can still be wiped out with the stroke of a pen. Advertisement Marcela García is a Globe columnist. She can be reached at

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store