
Putin dials Xi, China sees red on India-Philippines drills, but welcomes PM Modi for visit
State broadcaster CCTV also reported that the call happened at Putin's request. It comes as US President Donald Trump is expected to meet the Russian leader in the next few days — a first since the Ukraine war began in February 2022.
The US has also targeted India with increased tariffs on its oil imports from Russia, to which Chinese Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Guo Jiakun reacted by saying, 'China's opposition to the abuse of tariffs is consistent and clear'. Its state media websites also came out strongly against the US action, with some advice for India against relying on it.
There was also commentary on a joint India-Philippines naval exercise in the South China Sea, a region that has seen increasing disputes in the last few years. What was new, however, was India and the Philippines coming together to send a signal to China.
Finally, after the visits of Defence Minister Rajnath Singh, External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar and National Security Adviser Ajit Doval to China in recent months, Prime Minister Narendra Modi will likely also travel to China soon.
Here is a closer look at these developments:
The leaders of China and Russia spoke at a time when the US is targeting countries that have close ties with Russia. Although whether this actually has to do with Russia has been contested, with several nations (including India) currently negotiating trade deals with the US, and the country seemingly looking to leverage its position.
UPSHOT: Russia and China have, in their own ways, dealt with the US under Trump amid their larger geopolitical rivalries. While Trump previously spoke positively about Putin and was critical of China and its economy, there has been an interchange of sorts, recently.
China and the US have been communicating on tariffs to secure a trade deal, with China using its monopoly on processing rare earth minerals (which are crucial to most key industries) to its advantage. On the other hand, Trump has become critical of Putin, saying he had 'gone absolutely CRAZY' in a Truth Social post. One Bloomberg columnist recently said, 'China, it appears, is too big for Trump to bully now'.
Most countries are still developing a playbook on dealing with the swiftly changing policies of the Trump administration. PM Modi also spoke to Brazilian President Lula Da Silva on Thursday, with the country slapped with 50% US tariffs as well. The president also told Reuters he would initiate a conversation among the BRICS countries (including India, Russia and China) on tackling Trump's tariffs.
The Philippines' President Ferdinand Marcos Jr visited India this week for the first time since he came to power in 2022. Both countries' navies held their first joint exercise close to the Scarborough Shoal, which has previously figured in the China-Philippines dispute.
In an official declaration on elevating the bilateral relations to a 'strategic partnership', two mentions of the South China Sea issue were made. The first reiterated a 2016 international tribunal award on the dispute. Essentially, the tribunal had ruled that 'certain sea areas are within the exclusive economic zone of the Philippines, because those areas are not overlapped by any possible entitlement of China'. China rejected it.
Second, it expressed 'concern for the situation in the South China Sea particularly with regard to coercive and aggressive actions that impact on regional peace and stability, and calling on relevant parties to exercise self-restraint…' This was a clear reference to China.
UPSHOT: The South China Sea, apart from its strategic value, sees huge volumes of trade passing through, and has reserves of fish and hydrocarbons. It has also become a theatre for Chinese aggression, with Southeast Asian nations attempting to counter it.
For India and the Philippines, which have traditionally not enjoyed close ties (something PM Modi also acknowledged in his address to the Philippines' president), this presents an opportunity for collaboration. India has unresolved boundary issues with China along the Line of Actual Control (LAC), and sees its assertions in the Indian Ocean Region. Marcos has also shown a greater interest in responding to China than his predecessors.
Multiple reports in the Communist Party mouthpiece, Global Times, spoke of why the exercise won't yield the 'desired' effect, called the drills 'more symbolic than substantive', and that it amounted to a third party interfering in the dispute. On Friday, a spokesperson 'urged the Philippines to stop its provocations and propaganda, stop ganging up with others to stir up trouble in the South China Sea'.
A visit by Prime Minister Narendra Modi is likely, according to several reports, as China holds the presidency of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) this year. Rajnath Singh, Jaishankar and Doval also visited China to attend other SCO events.
India, Pakistan, Russia, and several Central Asian nations are part of the SCO, which was created as a regional security cooperation organisation in 2001. The summit will be in the city of Tianjin from August 31 to September 1. If the PM visits, he will also hold bilateral talks with Xi Jinping, The Indian Express reported.
UPSHOT: The two leaders last met in October 2024 on the sidelines of the BRICS summit in Russia, and PM Modi last visited China in 2019, also for an SCO meeting. Since then, the ties have seen a border confrontation in 2020, a pandemic that led to mutual flight and visa restrictions, and other factors that led to a deterioration.
The visit also comes as several steps have been taken since the Russia meeting to normalise ties, such as India opening up visas for Chinese tourists.
A Global Times report also noted that at present, both sides would also hope to seize the opportunity of the '75th anniversary of the establishment of diplomatic ties to achieve greater progress in China-India relations.' It cautioned against 'some Western media outlets' which interpreted the visit as an attempt to 'hedge against' the US.
'Such a view is rather one-sided. Defending free trade and countering unilateral tariffs is the shared will of most countries in the world today. From the perspective of China, China-India cooperation is not aimed at any third party,' it added.
Rishika Singh is a Senior sub-editor at the Explained Desk of The Indian Express. She enjoys writing on issues related to international relations, and in particular, likes to follow analyses of news from China. Additionally, she writes on developments related to politics and culture in India.
... Read More
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Indian Express
4 minutes ago
- Indian Express
More than half of India's exports to US face Trump's 25% reciprocal tariff
With the US' reciprocal tariff of 25 per cent on India having come into effect from August 7, the Indian finance ministry has estimated that more than half of the country's merchandise exports to the US are subject to the same. 'It is estimated that around 55% of total value of India's merchandise exports to the US will be subject to this reciprocal tariff,' Minister of State for Finance Pankaj Chaudhary told the Lok Sabha on Monday. In 2024, India's merchandise exports to the US totalled $87.3 billion, resulting in a trade surplus of $45.8 billion. 'It may be noted that reciprocal tariffs at varying rates have been imposed by the US on imports from all countries. Combination of different factors such as product differentiation, demand, quality, contractual arrangements would determine the impact on India's exports,' Chaudhary added in his reply to a question asking if the government had made any assessment on the impact of the US' reciprocal tariff threat on Indian goods. In a post on social media platform Truth Social on July 30, US President Donald Trump announced a 25 per cent tariff on Indian goods, with an additional but unspecified 'penalty' for importing energy and defence items from Russia. On August 6, the penalty was clarified to be an additional 25 per cent tariff that will be effective from August 27. As such, from that date, the tariff on Indian goods entering the US will be 50 per cent. Chaudhary's reply to the Lok Sabha question on Monday made no mention of the impact of the 25 per cent penalty or what proportion of India's exports would be subject to it. 'The Department of Commerce is engaged with all stakeholders including exporters and industry for taking feedback of their assessment of the situation. The Government attaches the utmost importance to protecting and promoting the welfare of our farmers, entrepreneurs, exporters, MSMEs etc. and will take all necessary steps to secure our national interest,' the minister further said. Certain items from various nations are exempt from the US' tariffs until the so-called investigations under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 are completed. These investigations look into the effect of various imports on US national security. Currently, the US' Bureau of Industry and Security has nine active Section 232 investigations, including for pharmaceuticals and pharmaceutical ingredients. The pharma investigation is particularly crucial from an Indian point of view, with the US accounting for about a third of India's pharma exports of $30 billion in 2024-25. Economists have warned that the US' cumulative 50 per cent tariff could hurt India's growth. In an interview to The Indian Express, Tanvee Gupta Jain, UBS' Chief India Economist, said the 50 per cent tariff has put at risk $30 billion-$35 billion worth of New Delhi's exports to the US. This, Jain said, could lead to GDP growth being lower by almost a full percentage point over Siddharth Upasani is a Deputy Associate Editor with The Indian Express. He reports primarily on data and the economy, looking for trends and changes in the former which paint a picture of the latter. Before The Indian Express, he worked at Moneycontrol and financial newswire Informist (previously called Cogencis). Outside of work, sports, fantasy football, and graphic novels keep him busy. ... Read More


Economic Times
4 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Trump deploys National Guard in Washington DC, places it under direct federal control
President Donald Trump announced he is placing the Washington, DC, police department 'under direct federal control' and deploying National Guard troops to the nation's capital. The move comes after Trump ordered a seven-day surge in federal law enforcement within the city last week, pointing to several high-profile crimes. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Public safety emergency declared in Colombia Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads What makes Washington DC so special? What is DC Home Rule Act? Focusing on homelessness US President Donald Trump Monday invoked Home Rule Act in Washington DC and placed it under direct federal control. Deploying National Guards troops in DC, Trump said he is placing Washington police under federal President said he was deploying National Guard troops and putting the Washington police force under federal control to tackle crime in the US capital. "This is Liberation Day in DC, and we're going to take our capital back," Trump said at a White House press conference.'I'm officially invoking section 740 of the District of Columbia Home Rule Act, you know what that is, and placing the DC Metropolitan Police Department under direct federal control,' Trump said during a White House news president told a crowd of reporters that his actions come as 'something's out of control, but we're going to put it in control very quickly, like we did on the southern border.''I'm deploying the National Guard to help reestablish law, order and public safety in Washington, DC, and they're going to be allowed to do their job properly,' Trump President even compared crime in the American capital with that in other major cities, saying Washington performs poorly on safety relative to the capitals of Iraq, Brazil and Colombia, among others.'We're getting rid of the slums, too,' Trump said, adding that the U.S. would not lose its cities and that Washington was just a also declared a public safety emergency in Colombia, adding that he would also military if needed."We are going to take our capital back," he said. He said that he plans to place the Washington DC Police Department under "direct federal control" using the District of Columbia Home Rule Act. Trump said he will be deploying the national guard to DC and federalising the city's police move comes after Trump ordered a seven-day surge in federal law enforcement within the city last week, pointing to several high-profile crimes. The President said the murder rate in Washington DC is higher than some "of the worst places on Earth" and says the number of car thefts and car jackings has also crime rates, the president talks about a peak in 2023. But data shows crime has fallen in the US capital since then. Trump said Washington DC has been "taken over by violent gangs and bloodthirsty criminals", as well as "drugged out maniacs and homeless people".For Trump, the effort to take over public safety in Washington reflects a next step in his law enforcement agenda after his aggressive push to stop illegal border crossings. But the move involves at least 500 federal law enforcement officials as well as the National Guard, raising fundamental questions about how an increasingly emboldened federal government will interact with its state and local DC is a bustling urban center with schools and businesses serving 700,000 residents -- but is also the seat of national power, home to the White House, Capitol and Supreme the 50 U.S. states, the city functions under a distinct arrangement with the federal government, which restricts its self-governance and gives Congress exceptional authority over local Democratic, the city often faces criticism from Republican lawmakers, who accuse it of being rife with crime, burdened by homelessness, and suffering from poor financial management. In 1973, Congress passed the Home Rule Act, allowing residents to elect a mayor and a city council, although laws passed by the body are subject to congressional review and also controls the city's budget, which has led to political tensions when lawmakers have blocked local initiatives on marijuana legalization, reproductive rights and police doesn't rank among the top 10 U.S. cities for violent crime rates, though it has long faced challenges with public safety, according to the 1990s, the city grappled with soaring homicide numbers, fueled by the crack cocaine epidemic, peaking at about 480 killings in fell sharply through the 2000s but spiked again after the Covid-19 pandemic. By 2023, homicides had climbed to a 20-year high, with 274 people killed — a 36% jump from the previous 2024 figures from the Metropolitan Police Department, however, show a sharp reversal: homicides are down 32% from 2023, helping drive a broader decline in violent crime, which has fallen 35% year over year.D.C. is not a state of its own, but it is also not a part of any other state, which means the federal government has unique powers over how the city is 1973, Congress passed the DC Home Rule Act, which gives the city some power to govern itself. It's what allows D.C. residents to elect the D.C. Council and the the Home Rule Act, the president appointed commissioners who ran the 1967, former President Lyndon Johnson replaced that commissioner government with a mayor and council. But the council members were presidential appointees, not elected Home Rule Act was what gave D.C. residents elected representation. In theory, that power only can be taken away if Congress votes to do so. The president is allowed to deputize the National Guard, giving them orders to support local law in a Sunday social media post had emphasized the removal of Washington's homeless population, though it was unclear where the thousands of people would go.'The Homeless have to move out, IMMEDIATELY,' Trump wrote Sunday. 'We will give you places to stay, but FAR from the Capital. The Criminals, you don't have to move out. We're going to put you in jail where you belong.'Last week, the Republican president directed federal law enforcement agencies to increase their presence in Washington for seven days, with the option 'to extend as needed.'On Friday night, federal agencies including the Secret Service, the FBI and the U.S. Marshals Service assigned more than 120 officers and agents to assist in said last week that he was considering ways for the federal government to seize control of Washington, asserting that crime was 'ridiculous' and the city was 'unsafe,' after the recent assault of a high-profile member of the Department of Government Efficiency.(With agency inputs)
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
7 minutes ago
- First Post
Trump considers National Guard deployment in DC to combat crime and homelessness
President Donald Trump is promising a sweeping federal effort to combat crime and homelessness in Washington D.C., including the possible deployment of the National Guard. read more US President Donald Trump speaks after signing an executive order on creating a White House 2028 Olympics task force in the South Court Auditorium of the White House in Washington, DC, on August 5, 2025. (Photo: Brendan Smialowski/AFP) President Donald Trump is promising new steps to tackle homelessness and crime in Washington, prompting the city's mayor to voice concerns about the potential use of the National Guard to patrol the streets in the nation's capital. Trump wrote in a social media post that he would hold a White House news conference on Monday to discuss his plans to make the District of Columbia 'safer and more beautiful than it ever was before.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Ahead of that news conference, Trump said Monday on social media that the nation's capital would 'LIBERATED today!' He said he would end the 'days of ruthlessly killing, or hurting, innocent people.' For Trump, the effort to take over public safety in Washington reflects a next step in his law enforcement agenda after his aggressive push to stop illegal border crossings. But the move involves at least 500 federal law enforcement officials, raising fundamental questions about how an increasingly emboldened federal government will interact with its state and local counterparts. Combating crime The president has used his social media and White House megaphones to message that his administration is tough on crime, yet his ability to shape policy might be limited outside of Washington, which has a unique status as congressionally established federal district. Nor is it clear how his push would address the root causes of homelessness and crime. About 500 federal law enforcement officers are being tasked with deploying throughout the nation's capital as part the Trump administration's effort to combat crime, a person familiar with the matter told The Associated Press on Monday. More than 100 FBI agents and about 40 agents with the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives are among federal law enforcement personnel being assigned to patrols in Washington, the person briefed on the plans said. The Drug Enforcement Administration, Immigration and Customs Enforcement and the Marshals Service are also contributing officers. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The person was not authorized to publicly discuss personnel matters and spoke to the AP on the condition of anonymity. The Justice Department didn't immediately have a comment Monday morning. Focusing on homelessness Trump in a Sunday social media post had emphasized the removal of Washington's homeless population, though it was unclear where the thousands of people would go. 'The Homeless have to move out, IMMEDIATELY,' Trump wrote Sunday. 'We will give you places to stay, but FAR from the Capital. The Criminals, you don't have to move out. We're going to put you in jail where you belong.' Last week, the Republican president directed federal law enforcement agencies to increase their presence in Washington for seven days, with the option 'to extend as needed.' On Friday night, federal agencies including the Secret Service, the FBI and the U.S. Marshals Service assigned more than 120 officers and agents to assist in Washington. Trump said last week that he was considering ways for the federal government to seize control of Washington, asserting that crime was 'ridiculous' and the city was 'unsafe,' after the recent assault of a high-profile member of the Department of Government Efficiency. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The National Guard The moves Trump said he was considering included bringing in the D.C. National Guard. Mayor Muriel Bowser, a Democrat, questioned the effectiveness of using the Guard to enforce city laws and said the federal government could be far more helpful by funding more prosecutors or filling the 15 vacancies on the D.C. Superior Court, some of which have been open for years. Bowser cannot activate the National Guard herself, but she can submit a request to the Pentagon. 'I just think that's not the most efficient use of our Guard,' she said Sunday on MSNBC's 'The Weekend,' acknowledging it is 'the president's call about how to deploy the Guard.' Bowser was making her first public comments since Trump started posting about crime in Washington last week. She noted that violent crime in Washington has decreased since a rise in 2023. Trump's weekend posts depicted the district as 'one of the most dangerous cities anywhere in the World.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD For Bowser, 'Any comparison to a war-torn country is hyperbolic and false.' Crime statistics Police statistics show homicides, robberies and burglaries are down this year when compared with this time in 2024. Overall, violent crime is down 26% compared with this time a year ago. Trump offered no details in Truth Social posts over the weekend about possible new actions to address crime levels he argues are dangerous for citizens, tourists and workers alike. The White House declined to offer additional details about Monday's announcement. The police department and the mayor's office did not respond to questions about what Trump might do next. The president criticized the district as full of 'tents, squalor, filth, and Crime,' and he seems to have been set off by the attack on Edward Coristine, among the most visible figures of the bureaucracy-cutting effort known as DOGE. Police arrested two 15-year-olds in the attempted carjacking and said they were looking for others. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'This has to be the best run place in the country, not the worst run place in the country,' Trump said Wednesday. He called Bowser 'a good person who has tried, but she has been given many chances.' Trump has repeatedly suggested that the rule of Washington could be returned to federal authorities. Doing so would require a repeal of the Home Rule Act of 1973 in Congress, a step Trump said lawyers are examining. It could face steep pushback. Bowser acknowledged that the law allows the president to take more control over the city's police, but only if certain conditions are met. 'None of those conditions exist in our city right now,' she said. 'We are not experiencing a spike in crime. In fact, we're watching our crime numbers go down.'