France considers axing bank holidays - would Brits riot if UK does the same?
But as France toys with the idea of scrapping Easter Monday and VE Day bank holidays to provide a much-needed boost to their economy, Metro asks top economists if the UK could follow suit.
With the UK facing a similar yawning spending black hole, experts consider whether one less day of rest could be the answer, and if so, which day it should be.
One less day of rest means one more day of workers back in the office and being economically productive, argues Maxwell Marlow, Director of Public Affairs at the Adam Smith Institute.
Indeed research suggests each bank holiday costs the UK £2.3 billion.
With economic growth declining in April and then in May this year, that boost could be an 'attractive' option for the Chancellor.
Marlow told Metro: 'In terms of the facts and figures, scrapping a bank holiday would be good for GDP and they should probably do it.'
Senior Economist Charlie Cornes agreed that cutting a bank holiday would help to balance the books.
It could also be a 'creative', but unlikely, way Rachel Reeves could avoid tax rises or spending cuts in the Autumn Budget.
Less bank holidays would hit an already struggling hospitality sector, economists told Metro.
Bars, restaurants, pubs and shops all see a boost to their profits when Brits are off work and socialising, explained Cornes, Senior Economist at the Centre for Economics and Business Research (CEBR).
But as the sector continues to be 'in a lot of trouble, facing rising costs and labour shortages, one less public holiday could be the nail in the coffin'.
While a cut to bank holidays could see a short-term boost to GDP, the risk is that the move would upset and demotivate workers.
Prof Stephen Millard told Metro: 'Public holidays are partly about morale. Less days off could damage morale and could mean people won't work as hard.'
The UK only has eight public holidays a year as it is – compared to 14 in Spain, 11 in France and nine in Germany and Ireland.
Prof Millard, who is the Interim Director at National Institute of Economic and Social Research, explained that workers might just ask their bosses for more annual leave anyway – making the cuts less effective.
'The idea that a government would want to scrap public holidays as a way of improving public finances doesn't seem to be the right sort of logic,' he added.
Above all, the move would be 'too politically toxic' and unpopular for the Chancellor to ever consider.
'There would be riots on the streets,' Marlow predicted.
The most costly bank holidays, Christmas and Boxing Day, are also the most culturally important, adds the Adam Smith Institute economist.
'They are total turn-off days for the economy' because shops shut and people stay at home with friends and family.
Marlow added: 'If the Chancellor was going to cut a bank holiday, it'd probably be one of the seasonal bank holidays in May or August. They are not cultural bank holidays.'
Economics lecturer Renaud Foucart believes that people are attached to the May breaks from work and that if Reeves was going to target one she should pick the August holiday, due for August 25 this year.
Cornes disagreed, however, saying the August day off needed to be protected because summer weather is most profitable for local tourism and hospitality.
While the Easter bank holidays are also religiously and culturally significant, that leaves the early May holiday as the economist's choice too.
Dr Siegel from Kent University says the May bank holidays have the highest impact on the economy because of disruptions to the construction sector that months – so agrees one of the two days off would be best to axe.
All experts Metro spoke to saw the economic benefits of moving a bank holiday away from the 'cluster' of days off in the Spring.
The UK always see two rest days for Easter and then two more just months later in May.
'This leads to multiple four-day weeks and could lead to increased disruption to the economy' explains Cornes.
'They have more of an impact than singular bank holidays.'
Marlow called this 'front-loading' of days off 'crazy'. He believes that spreading them out would help GDP in the spring months.
Moving a bank holiday would also address burnout faced by workers in the long stretch without a day off at the end of the year.
Prof Millard explained: 'We have no holiday between the August bank holiday and Christmas. That's a very tough time for workers, that would have an effect on productivity.' More Trending
Taking out the early May bank holiday and shifting it to later in the year could help workers and keep them 'happier', he speculated.
Rachel Reeves and her advisors appear set to tackle the UK's financial challenges without touching bank holidays.
A UK Government spokesperson told Metro: 'Economic growth is the number one mission of this government to deliver our Plan for Change.
'The current pattern of bank and public holidays is well established, and we have no plans to change it.'
Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@metro.co.uk.
For more stories like this, check our news page.
MORE: What changes in ISAs could mean for you and where you should invest
MORE: What changes to mortgages for first-time buyers means for you
MORE: The Starmiversary is here – where did it all go so wrong?
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
4 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Shares in Glasgow's iomart fall 20% after dividend scrapped
However, the company underlined a strong performance by Atech Cloud, the Marlow-based business it acquired for £57m in November. Iomart said at the time that the acquisition, which increased its headcount to 650, would significantly strengthen its position as 'one of the UK's principal providers of secure cloud services across public, private, and hybrid environments'. A six-month contribution from Atech helped to deliver a 13% rise in revenue to £143.5m for iomart over the period. Net debt at iomart surged to £101.9m from £42.3m at the same stage last year, following cash outflow of around £57m associated with the Atech deal. Read more: Richard Last, executive chairman of iomart, said: "The year has been one of both challenge and transformation for iomart. The group's trading performance was mixed, with customer churn impacting revenue and profits. On the positive side we have seen good order bookings growth in the year, which gives the board confidence in achieving our medium-term growth strategy. "The acquisition of Atech during the year was a significant milestone, substantially enhancing the group's scale, credibility, and capabilities in public cloud and security. Since acquisition, Atech has delivered revenue growth and profitability in line with our expectations, reinforcing the value of this strategic move. "Our focus for FY26 will be to improve the operating efficiency of the group, address churn in our self-managed and private cloud customer base, increase sales momentum in high-growth service areas, including providing Atech with the support to flourish, and to reduce our level of debt. The board is committed to delivering disciplined execution, operational efficiency, and improved value for shareholders.' On the decision to suspend dividends, the company stated: "The board believes it is in the best interest of shareholders to forego the payment of a final dividend, with future dividends restored based on improved operating profitability and a reduced overall level of indebtedness." Iomart reported a statutory loss before tax of £53.2m, reflecting a £52.9m non-cash exceptional goodwill impairment charge relating to the iomart Cloud Services Cash Generating Unit. Iomar said in a statement: 'This reflects both the shift away from low growth, heritage product areas and the previously disclosed accelerated customer churn in certain areas of this CGU. 'This non-cash charge has no impact on the group's operational performance or cash flows but does result in a large statutory loss after tax of £55.1m in the year to 31 March 2025 (2024: £6.4m profit).' Shares closed down 22.8% or 6.5p, at 22p.
The Sun
11 hours ago
- The Sun
After years watching Channel migrant crisis unfold Brits have just about snapped – and it's killing Starmer
CAST your mind back to Christmas 2018 when a few dozen migrants clambered into rickety dinghies off the French coast and headed for Britain. Then-Home Secretary Sajid Javid flew back early from his family holiday to declare a 'major incident', MPs called for the Navy to be deployed and the public rightly demanded action. 2 2 You don't need me to tell you what happened next: over the next seven years 174,000 more would-be asylum seekers crossed the English Channel. Billions of pounds of taxpayer cash have been ploughed into snapping up hotels for them to live in, with free bed and board. The lives of vulnerable men, women and children have been tragically lost. And families feeling the pinch have watched agog as successive governments throw good money after bad. Yesterday's revelation that thousands of asylum seekers have been gambling with money from taxpayer-funded pre-paid cards was shocking. But in many ways what is more depressing is that nobody is even really surprised any more. All roads lead to migration After years of hollow promises from politicians vowing to get a grip, voter patience is at breaking point — and the evidence backs it up. Immigration has now leapfrogged the economy and health to become the number one issue for the electorate. According to the pollster Scarlett Maguire, the public mood has taken a turn even in the last few months. When trying to take the nation's temperature in focus groups, it seems that all roads lead to migration. 16 arrested after protests outside Epping migrant hotel as ring of steel ramps up around TWO asylum seeker centres 'Even when I ask people's views about housing or the NHS, almost always the voters will bring the conversation back to migration,' she tells me. After years watching the Channel crisis unfold, it appears Brits have just about snapped. This does not bode well for Sir Keir Starmer. In a recent YouGov poll, 55 per cent of us thought the Government was handling immigration 'very badly', and 22 per cent 'fairly badly'. Just 14 per cent thought the PM was doing a good job — a dismal verdict on his attempts so far to get a handle on the scandal. Ministers like to crow about statistics they insist prove the opposite. They point to an increase in the number of deportations, or that spending on asylum is down by a third. All credible achievements, but, as one Starmer aide puts it: 'It's the visibility which is killing us. People see the boats, they see the migrant hotels and they just can't believe it.' It is a point Labour MPs — once terrified to touch illegal migration for fear of upsetting their base — are starting to make. Even those on the soft Left of the party are becoming more vocal, because the impact on their constituents is impossible to ignore. That senior backbencher Meg Hillier publicly took Starmer to task on homeless families having to compete for housing with asylum seekers reflects the shifting public mood. Or as one Labour MP tells me: 'You are always going to get a few left-wing back-benchers that see controlling our borders as a right-wing concept, which is clearly mental. 'But the party is waking up to the fact that the public is losing patience. 'The fact that many of my colleagues are talking about European Convention on Human Rights reform is quite something — it would have been unimaginable even a few years ago.' The clock is ticking because currently it is Nigel Farage who is laughing all the way to the ballot box. Jack Elsom Figures around Starmer say he is finally recognising the scale of anger simmering through the population. As protesters have rallied outside migrant hotels in recent weeks, Downing Street has been at pains to stress it understands their concerns. One insider says: 'Keir has become alive to the rage. A year ago he was calling people far-right. You don't hear him say that any more.' Some in the Labour tribe hope this is the moment the PM finally grasps the nettle and gets radical. Yes, he has signed a returns deal with France and inked various other agreements aimed at flushing out the smuggling gangs. But to quench the public's thirst for action, there is a sense among many Labour figures that none of this cuts the mustard. One loyalist MP tells me: 'They do get how bad it is. But that now needs to feed into radical policy, with urgency. 'The French deal is genuinely very impressive but it will take time to come through. And we don't have that much time.' The clock is ticking because currently it is Nigel Farage who is laughing all the way to the ballot box. The public wants radical The Reform leader's hardline stance on migration has earned him a commanding lead in the polls. Some 36 per cent of voters say he is best placed to slash migration, compared to 11 per cent for Labour and a mere six per cent for the Tories. His uncompromising promise to tow the boats back to France has gone down a storm with supporters, but met with mocking derision by detractors. They mock him at their peril. As one down-to-earth Labour figure put it: 'We're idiots if we think the way to beat Farage is by saying his ideas are too radical — we need to understand, the public WANTS radical.' Some of the hardliners in the party want a Thatcher-style 'purge of the wets' — with Attorney General Lord Hermer top of their list. For decades much of the country has felt concerns about immigration have been suppressed Westminster politicians. Many are now finding their voice for the first time. And even the ones who are not speaking publicly will make their feelings known at the ballot box.
Metro
13 hours ago
- Metro
How much Brits should actually have in their savings, according to their age
Sophie-May Williams Published July 23, 2025 2:25pm Link is copied Comments In May, Metro published an article that revealed the average amount of savings Brits had in their bank accounts. This was categorised by age, and based on a study by personal finance site, Finder. The results proved somewhat interesting: over half of Brits between 18 and 44 years have less than £1,000 in savings. Meanwhile, over the age of 44, the figure hovers around 35-40% (Picture: Getty Images) While not everyone can save chunks of money every month - for some, it may be on an ad hoc basis - it's still important to be financially responsible. You never know when you might need to shell out cash for a broken boiler or get four brand new tyres for your car. Saving is also crucial for your future, especially if you want to ensure a comfortable retirement (Picture: Getty Images) With this in mind, Metro spoke to Dr Nisha Prakash, Financial Management lecturer at the University of East London, to find out how much Brits should actually have in their savings, according to their age. This recommended benchmark should give you an idea of whether you're on the right track, or if you need to re-evaluate your financial habits. However, don't stretch yourself too thin trying to save huge amounts to catch up: saving in whatever capacity you can afford is still good practice (Picture: Getty Images) Before we start, Prakash explains that how much liquid savings (savings account, current account and liquid stocks/bonds) Brits should have depends on many factors (lifestyle, earnings, location, dependencies, etc.), of which age is one. She touches on the worrying £1,000 statistics from earlier, noting that, in addition to maintaining one's standard of living in retirement, consistent savings are required to build an emergency fund of typically three to six months' expenses. (This is a general baseline, and increases with age, as you'll find out) (Picture: Getty Images) 'As the UK economy slows down, Brits must maintain sufficient funds for unpredictable events, including job loss, reduced hours, or increased living expenses,' Prakash says. In terms of the three-to-six-month emergency fund, she explains that the 'golden rule' is to have enough to cover essential expenses for such periods. Meaning rent or mortgage, food, utilities, and insurance coverage. Having said that, Prakash adds that holding too much cash is also a problem due to inflation, as the purchasing power of money keeps going down. Keen to find out the recommended amount of savings you should have based on your age? Keep reading: (Picture: Getty Images) This age group should have between £1,000 to £3,000 in savings. Naturally, the higher end of this scale is directed more towards the older people in the category. Prakash says that this amount is a solid emergency fund that can help avoid debt at this time in a person's life (Picture: Getty Images) In this group - and the rest from now on - Prakash says that monthly expenses typically stay the same, and don't change much with age. She explains: 'Monthly expenses are between £2200 for rent and £2700 for mortgage, based on a family of four.' In terms of 25-40 year olds, three to six months saved is advised. 'This should cover rent/mortgage, insurance, bills, dependents and groceries in case of job loss,' the expert states. Rent: • Three months: £6,600• Four months: £8,800• Five months: £11,000• Six months: £13,200 Mortgage: • Three months: £8,100 • Four months: £10,800• Five months: £13,500 • Six months: £16,200 (Picture: Getty Images) During this time of life, a solid six months is expected for financial security. Unfortunately, Prakash says that increased responsibilities and the impact of financial shocks, such as job loss, will be greater. Anything less in your savings account could be detrimental in the event of an emergency. Rent: £13,200 Mortgage: £16,200 (Picture: Getty Images) For 51 to 60-year-olds, six months to a year is necessary. Prakash says that in addition to the above expenses, it is also important to be prepared for an early retirement or redundancy. Wages also start declining at this point, going from £42,796 between 40 to 49, to £36,036 from 60. From 50 to 59, it's £40,456. Rent: • Six months: £13,200• Seven months: £15,400• Eight months: £17,600• Nine months: £19,800• 10 months: £22,000• 11 months: £24,200• 12 months: £26,400 Mortgage: • Six months: £16,200• Seven months: £18,900• Eight months: £21,600• Nine months: £24,300• 10 months: £27,000• 11 months: £29,700 • 12 months: £32,400 (Picture: Getty Images) 12 months of expenses are recommended at age 60 and above. This allows for a smooth transition into retirement. Those still in the workforce will earn, on average, £36,036. However, 94.4% of people aged 75 to 84 years are retired, according to 2023 ONS data. It rises to 95.2% for those 85 and over. Rent: £26,400 Mortgage: £32,400 (Picture: Getty Images) As well as providing saving recommendations for each age group, Prakash has also shared five tips for liquid savings. These include:1. Set a clear goal after tracking your monthly expenses; aim to cover at least three to six months of expenses.2. Open a separate easy-access savings account separate from the current account. This avoids the temptation to spend.3. Save and then spend - rather than saving what remains after spending. Set a monthly standing order to transfer an amount from your current account to your savings account. Even £50-£100 monthly adds up over time.4. Treat the savings account as an emergency fund only - not for holidays, sales, etc. 5. Choose high-interest, easy-access savings account options provided by your bank. This will ensure your money grows, and avoids monetary trouble in the event of an emergency (Picture: Getty Images) Your free newsletter guide to the best London has on offer, from drinks deals to restaurant reviews.
