DA's Legal Challenges: A threat to South Africa's transformation agenda
Image: Armand Hough / Independent Newspapers
Experts have raised concerns over the Democratic Alliance's (DA) growing tendency to turn to the judiciary to challenge and overturn government policies aimed at tackling South Africa's deep-rooted inequalities.
Critics argue that this strategy is designed to weaken the country's transformation agenda and prolong the socio-economic struggles faced by marginalized communities.
Legal Battles Outside the GNU
Although the DA is a member of the Government of National Unity (GNU), it has frequently taken its opposition to the courts, often outside the formal mechanisms of shared governance.
Recent notable examples include the party's legal challenge to amendments in the Employment Equity Act, which seek to accelerate racial and gender transformation in the workplace.
The Pretoria High Court has reserved judgment on this case, but the move indicates the DA's intent to stall progress.
Beyond employment laws, the DA has also contested land reform initiatives, arguing that they threaten property rights and economic stability.
Social welfare programs designed to alleviate poverty have not been spared; the party has challenged expansion plans for social grants, claiming they place unsustainable strain on public finances.
A Strategy of Disruption, Says Political Analyst
Political analyst Joe Mhlanga warns that the DA's legal tactics are part of a broader effort to weaken the ruling ANC and its allies.
'The DA is anti-GNU; they're strategically using the courts to undermine the ANC's efforts,' he said.
'Their influence outside the GNU is aimed at blocking policies that seek to uplift marginalised communities. This raises serious questions about who truly benefits from this ongoing sabotage.'
Mhlanga further pointed out that the DA's courtroom interventions are often aimed at delaying or blocking reforms essential for redressing historical injustices.
'How is the revolutionary movement so comfortable being in a relationship with the DA, which has consistently undermined efforts to address poverty and inequality? We need to ask who stands to gain from this damaging relationship.'
Courtroom Tactics as a Political Weapon
The analyst emphasised that the DA's influence extends beyond mere opposition.
'It's shocking how they succeed in persuading courts to rule in their favor repeatedly,' Mhlanga remarked.
'They operate through the judiciary to implement policies that serve their political interests, often at the expense of transformative goals.'
He called on opposition parties to unite and leverage their collective majority in parliament to advance policies that benefit the majority of South Africans.
'Opposition forces, including the MK party and others committed to genuine change, should work together to push a shared agenda,' he said.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
Support for Transformation from the ANC
Meanwhile, some of the ANC leaders have condemned the DA's legal challenges.
ANC NEC member and former Youth League leader Andile Lungisa described the DA's actions as 'mischievous and provocative,' asserting they hinder efforts to accelerate transformation.
He praised recent amendments to the Employment Equity Act, which aim to fast-track progress toward racial, gender, and disability equality.
'Transformation is inherently uncomfortable for those who benefited from previous systems of inequality,' Lungisa said.
'But that doesn't mean we should turn back the clock or undermine our constitutional commitments.'
He called for legislative measures to expedite reform processes, especially when delays threaten progress.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
2 hours ago
- IOL News
Legitimacy crisis looms over National Dialogue as organisations withdraw
The withdrawal of Thabo Mbeki's foundation and others underscores significant concerns regarding transparency and preparation for the National Dialogue, raising vital questions about leadership and accountability in South Africa's pursuit of a cohesive national vision. Image: Armand Hough / Independent Newspapers Just two days before its scheduled start, the National Dialogue is facing a crisis of legitimacy, with several organisations withdrawing their participation due to concerns over transparency, funding, and the ANC's intentions. More organisations have withdrawn from the National Dialogue, citing concerns over its legitimacy, transparency, and effectiveness. The uMkhonto weSizwe Party (MK Party) has questioned the financing of the event, while the Freedom Front Plus, ActionSA, Solidarity, and Afrikaner Leierskapsnetwerk (Afrikaner Leadership Network, ALN) have all announced their decision not to participate. This follows the withdrawal less than a week ago of the Mbeki Foundation and other prominent legacy foundations, including the Steve Biko Foundation, Desmond and Leah Tutu Foundation, and FW de Klerk Foundation, from the ambitious event. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading The foundations stated that a key factor in the decision was the uncertainty regarding the R700 million allegedly allocated for the National Dialogue. They also cited concerns over the rushed timeline, inadequate preparation, and shift towards government control as reasons for their withdrawal. The MK Party has questioned who will finance the dialogue and slammed it as an "expensive sideshow" designed to bypass Parliament and give the Presidency unchecked influence over policy-making. 'The Ministry of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation (DPME), whose duty is to guard against waste and ensure that government spending addresses urgent national priorities, has disgracefully allowed public resources to be poured into a politically engineered 'Convention' that has no legal mandate, no parliamentary approval, and no place in the constitutional order. 'Deputy President Paul Mashatile and his Inter-Ministerial Committee have no authority to set up alternative governance platforms with public funds. This is not citizen-led, it is ANC-led, and the DPME's silence shows that it has been reduced to a rubber stamp for the Presidency's pet projects,' the MK Party said through its spokesperson, Nhlamulo Ndlela. The party further highlighted the neglect of essential services in various provinces while funds are being poured into the National Dialogue. Some of the issues cited include rural clinics closed due to medicine shortages and unpaid staff, communities in eThekwini going weeks without clean water, schools without desks forcing children to sit on the floor, and ambulance response times stretching beyond four hours, among other concerns. The VF Plus believes the ANC-led government is not ready for genuine dialogue and has refused to abandon its failed economic and foreign policies. "A political party with such a mindset and approach cannot act as a credible facilitator for the Presidency or a participant in a national dialogue," the party said. ActionSA said that while they would not fully participate, they would deploy two senior Members of Parliament as observers to monitor and exercise oversight over the convention. "We will not participate in or lend legitimacy to a process under these circumstances," ActionSA said. Solidarity Movement and AfriForum said the ANC had hijacked the National Dialogue and would not participate. "The ANC wants to hijack the intended National Dialogue to try to win back lost support, rather than to find answers to the crisis," said Flip Buys, chairperson of the Solidarity Movement. Afrikaner Leadership Network (ALN) expressed concerns about the lack of transparency and openness in the planned process and will not participate in the National Convention. However, the Presidency has confirmed that the inaugural National Convention of the National Dialogue will proceed on August 15-16, saying it would be formally launching a constitutionally mandated process aimed at developing a national compact for transformation, despite all concerns. The ANC has noted the decision by several National Legacy Foundations and organisations to withdraw from the Preparatory Task Team of the National Dialogue and urged the government to urgently address the concerns raised. Without outright saying it was in support of the event, the party said it believed the National Dialogue must be rooted in inclusive participation, guided by the spirit of the Constitution and liberation values. 'The ANC reaffirms that the process is about building trust, healing social divisions, and forging national unity through broad-based societal engagement.'
The Citizen
2 hours ago
- The Citizen
‘We are truly sorry': Open Chats Podcast issues apology to coloured community after backlash
This is the second apology the Open Chats Podcast issued, after the first failed to calm the storm. The Open Chats Podcast team has released an apology to the coloured community and all South Africans after intense backlash over racist remarks made during episode 128. The controversy sparked national outrage, legal action and calls for cancellation. Now, the hosts are taking public steps toward accountability and education. Backlash over episode Episode 128 of the Open Chat Podcast ignited a firestorm. Remarks made about the coloured community were widely condemned as racist, sexist and deeply offensive. The clip quickly went viral, drawing outrage across social media. This prompted the Patriotic Alliance (PA) to file charges against the hosts. The controversy escalated when old tweets from PA leader and sports minister Gayton McKenzie were shared, showing him using the K-word. This sparked renewed debate and even calls for his resignation. The fallout spread far beyond the original podcast audience. It turned into a national talking point. ALSO READ: Zuma's former fiancée LaConco makes acting debut in Mzansi Magic's 'Genesis' Previous apology rejected The podcast's initial apology failed to calm the storm. Many South Africans viewed it as insincere, with TikTok users posting videos criticising the tone and delivery. The backlash only deepened calls for cancellation and heightened demands for genuine accountability. This week, in episode 131, the hosts released a new apology. They say it is 'serious, unreserved, and from the heart'. 'We take full accountability' 'We wish to unconditionally and unreservedly apologise for the hurt and harm we caused to the coloured community and South Africa at large. Our statements in episode 128 were racist, sexist, unfortunate, irresponsible, reckless, and unAfrican. We take full accountability for our utterances,' the Open Chats team said. The team acknowledged that their words had caused 'outrage and offence' across racial lines. They recognised that their right to freedom of expression could not be exercised in ways that stripped others of their dignity. Content removed and call for calm Episode 128 has since been removed from all official platforms. However, the hosts expressed regret that clips continue to circulate independently. They urged the public to stop sharing the content to prevent further harm. They have also committed to undergoing formal education on race relations at a reputable higher-learning institution, to ensure such incidents are not repeated. Working with the Human Rights Commission While the team had initially intended to approach the South African Human Rights Commission (SAHRC) on their own, several political parties had already taken that step. The podcast's legal team is now liaising with the SAHRC to reach a resolution. They said they will comply fully with any directives issued. In a direct appeal to political parties critical of the podcast, the hosts invited open dialogue. They suggested a recorded discussion could take place in the future. Plea for forgiveness Closing their statement, the Open Chats Podcast hosts expressed remorse. 'We are disappointed with ourselves and the blatant disregard we showed when talking about a vulnerable group of people. We remain remorseful and request the forgiveness of the coloured community of South Africa. We are truly sorry for the damage we've caused.'
IOL News
3 hours ago
- IOL News
ANC defends B-BBEE as DA pushes to dismantle empowerment policies
African National Congress (ANC) stands firm in defending B-BBEE policies, highlighting their role in empowering millions and urging beneficiaries to protect transformation gains against the DA's push to dismantle these initiatives. Image: IOL / Independent Newspapers The African National Congress (ANC) has accused the Democratic Alliance (DA) of seeking to dismantle South Africa's transformation policies, which the ANC says have brought tangible change to the lives of the majority. The party has called on all beneficiaries of Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment (B-BBEE) to defend the gains made under democracy. This comes after the DA announced a set of reform proposals aimed at empowering state-owned entities (SOEs), which it claims offer a better alternative to B-BBEE, employment equity, and the Expropriation Act, policies the party insists must be scrapped. Speaking at a media briefing in Johannesburg, DA leader John Steenhuisen said the three laws are major obstacles to economic growth. 'BBBEE and racial quotas have failed, and together with expropriation without compensation, create an environment that deters investment, growth and job creation for the majority of South Africans,' he said. Steenhuisen added that the DA is not against transformation, but argued that current empowerment policies have failed ordinary South Africans. 'These policies are simply not fair. They don't help the millions of South Africans who just need the government to get out of the way. These policies must go,' he said. He called for the replacement of B-BBEE and employment equity with measures based on need and merit. In response, the ANC said that transformation policies must be continuously evaluated and discussed by all South Africans to ensure they remain aligned with the goals of democracy, social justice, and equality, as outlined in the Constitution. 'The ANC recognises that these conversations and debates must be held among all South Africans, particularly to address concerns that such policies may be unintentionally creating a new form of elitism,' said ANC spokesperson Mhlengi Bhengu-Motsiri. 'To effectively tackle any unintended consequences, the ANC believes that the discussion must be guided by scientific findings.' The ANC said it supports the BEE Commission's call for focused evaluation studies to assess the impact of B-BBEE, stating that such research will help ensure the policy achieves its intended purpose of building a more equitable society. The party highlighted the recent findings of the 2023–2024 Analysis of Major B-BBEE Transactions report, which it says confirms that B-BBEE is delivering measurable benefits to ordinary South Africans. According to the ANC, companies invested R7.2 billion in enterprise development, enabling thousands of black-owned and managed small businesses and cooperatives to grow. Supplier development reached R40.7 billion, while R64 billion was spent on skills development, with a focus on young people, women, and rural learners. Bhengu-Motsiri said B-BBEE is rooted in the democratic framework and is designed to benefit 'black South Africans, that is Africans, Coloureds and Indians, and further extends benefits to white women, who were also historically marginalised in economic participation.' 'These empowerment measures have opened pathways for millions of South Africans into business ownership, corporate leadership, and skilled employment,' she said. 'We call on all South Africans who have benefitted from these measures, including those appointed to various positions in the private sector, to stand in defence of their own gains and reject any political agenda aimed at reversing the progress made.' As the leader of society, the ANC added that it will continue to evaluate all transformation policies to ensure they serve their intended purpose. 'Where these policies are found not to benefit those who were previously oppressed and marginalised, they will be reviewed and strengthened,' the party said. [email protected] Get your news on the go, click here to join the IOL News WhatsApp channel. IOL Politics
