Berger Textiles Wins EcoVadis Platinum for Sustainability
Berger Textiles has been awarded the Platinum certification from EcoVadis, placing the company in the top 1% globally among over 130,000 rated businesses. This milestone recognizes Berger's strong and ongoing commitment to sustainability across its European operations.
A pioneer in sustainable textile solutions, Berger Textiles was among the first to integrate recycled PET fabrics into its product range through the EVO series. In a bold move announced at this year's FESPA Global Print Expo, select textile products will now only be available in their EVO (sustainable) versions.
Berger's dedication to sustainable practices is also reflected in its certifications, including GRS, OEKO-TEX, and GOTS. Its holistic sustainability framework, the 'we.respect' manifesto, guides every aspect of the business—from sourcing and manufacturing to delivery—prioritizing both environmental and social responsibility.
CEO Alessandro Lanfranconi shared:
'This Platinum certification affirms our belief that product performance and sustainability go hand-in-hand. It reflects how deeply we've integrated responsible practices into our core operations and workplace culture.'
EcoVadis evaluates companies across 21 criteria in four key areas: Environment, Labour & Human Rights, Ethics, and Sustainable Procurement, based on leading global standards including the UN Global Compact, ILO, GRI, and ISO 26000.
In addition to soft signage, Berger Textiles also offers architectural, home, and fashion textiles, all organized in a visually intuitive periodic table-style catalogue to simplify application-based selection.
Learn more: Berger Textiles Sustainability
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Magnet mayhem! Number of Indian companies awaiting licences from China for rare earths doubles; industry supplies hit hard
52 India-based companies depend on Chinese magnets for supplying to automobile manufacturers across the country. (AI image) China's hold on rare magnets sends Indian industry supply in tailspin! The count of Indian firms seeking permits from China's commerce ministry for rare earth magnet imports has risen to 21 from 11 in a fortnight. This development follows China's April 4 directive requiring exporters of medium and heavy rare earth magnets to obtain a commerce department licence after securing an end-user certificate from the purchaser. The certificate requires specific assurances from buyers. According to an ET report, the applicants include Bosch India, Marelli Powertrain India, Mahle Electric Drives India, TVS Motor and Uno Minda. Following a procedural rejection, Sona Comstar has submitted a fresh application and is now amongst the 21 companies awaiting approval, confirmed a senior industry official. Data from the Society of Indian Automobile Manufacturers shows that 52 India-based companies depend on Chinese magnets for supplying to automobile manufacturers across the country. Also Read | 'No basis to seek…': US disagrees to India asking for WTO consultations on auto tariffs; calls it 'essential security exception' An official was quoted as saying, "These companies have duly filled in and got endorsed the end-user certificate and shipped the requisite documents to their suppliers for procuring rare earth magnets from China, but licences are yet to be awarded by the government there." Sticky situation on rare magnets The certificates stipulate that these materials will not be utilised for storing, manufacturing, producing or processing weapons of mass destruction and their delivery systems. Rare Earth Problem: India hit due to US-China tariff friction Indian diplomatic officials are attempting to engage with Chinese authorities to address the issue through dialogue, but progress remains limited thus far, according to sources. Despite originating as a response to US President Donald Trump's tariffs, the US has now secured a bilateral agreement with China for rare earth magnet supply. European automotive component manufacturers have received approval for rare earth magnet sourcing, but their Indian counterparts still await clearance from China's commerce ministry. Experts note that strained political and business relations between the two countries complicate the situation. Industry participants are concerned about potential production disruptions if licensing delays continue, as inventory levels are expected to deplete by early July. India's imports of rare earth magnets totalled 870 tonnes, valued at ₹306 crore in 2024-25. "While the value of imports compared to the industry size is minuscule, vehicles cannot be manufactured even if we are short of one component where a rare earth magnet is being used," said an executive. Also Read | Big worry! China's grip over rare earth magnets sends Indian auto industry into a spin; delegation of industry people eye China visit Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays and public holidays . AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
Mint
2 hours ago
- Mint
It's a scary world, but investing abroad has new attractions
The ECB, headed by Christine Lagarde, has cut rates, though higher energy costs from Mideast hostilities might give it pause. It's easy to think of Europe as the investment that time forgot. Even after this year's strong performance, European investments have lagged far behind the U.S. for the past decade and more. But it would be wrong to regard Europe as having been a disaster forever: Look backward, and it matched American stock returns for decades before the euro crisis and the rise of Big Tech in the U.S. Investors might question the current mania for investing outside the U.S., when stocks in the rest of the world gained 14% this year against the U.S.'s 2% (about half of the rest of the world's gain was due to the plunging greenback—all figures in dollar terms). And Israel's strikes on Iran, with the potential economic hit to Europe from higher oil prices and disrupted shipping lanes, highlight the geopolitical risks in investing abroad. But too many people focus on the dismal returns since 2010, when the Greek crisis began, and forget that once Europe was a viable investment alternative. The scary stat: Since 2010 the S&P 500 is up more than 500%. European stocks are up less than 150%. The reminder: In the previous 15 years, from 1995, the S&P made only 130% while Europe gained 220%. The important question is what changed in the past decade and a half to make investors believe in U.S. exceptionalism—and might it change back? The simplest answer is the rise of the so-called Magnificent Seven, part of a dominance of new technology by the U.S. that swept the world. The original seven-largest U.S. stocks—Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, Meta, Microsoft, Nvidia and Tesla (the carmaker has since been overtaken by chip maker Broadcom)—spent heavily on research and development and now dominate several highly profitable emerging industries. That propelled them to end last year collectively worth more than all listed European companies, as measured by LSEG Datastream. R&D is a strong predictor of future earnings and last year, for the first time, today's Mag7 companies (including Broadcom, rather than Tesla) spent more on R&D than all European listed companies combined, according to Michel Lerner, head of UBS HOLT research. The result is that U.S. corporate R&D spending soared from 1.3 times as much as in Europe in 2007 to three times as much last year. 'It's somewhat sobering for Europe, since there is a lot of evidence that R&D spend typically creates barriers to entry that support higher [return on investment] and growth for longer," he said. Europe's failure to keep up with emerging tech shows up in big U.S. companies having far higher profit margins than big European ones. Among smaller companies, though, profit margins are about the same. Strip out the skew toward the biggest by putting equal weight on each S&P stock—rather than putting more weight on the more valuable, as the basic index does—and U.S. and European returns were roughly the same from the end of 2021 until the November election. It isn't so much U.S. exceptionalism, as Mag7 exceptionalism. Yet, the difference isn't all about Big Tech. Europe's economy has been sluggish ever since its currency crisis of the early 2010s, while inflexible labor law combined in some cases with political pressure meant companies were slow to cut back on capacity. The result is less intense use of factories and other assets, meaning an even bigger advantage for U.S. return on investment than the gap in margins implies. These differences were compounded from 2017 onward by a sharp rise in U.S. valuations that wasn't matched in Europe. Again, this was about the biggest companies; U.S. smaller companies trade at a premium to Europe, but about the same as they always have. So, back to what's changed. On R&D the signs are that European governments have realized they have an issue, but have yet to do anything about it. At least they accept they have a problem, however, both with R&D and with the stultifying effects of too much regulation. On the economy, Europe has decided for the first time since the euro crisis that it needs to let rip with government spending. Germany is leading the way, plowing money into defense and infrastructure, which ought to reflate its economy—and help lift corporate capacity utilization and profits. The European Central Bank has been cutting rates, too, though higher energy costs after Israel's strike on Iran might give it pause. 'There's a rotation going on," says Jim Caron, chief investment officer of the portfolio solutions group at Morgan Stanley Investment Management. 'Europe's got monetary policy stimulus, and it's got fiscal policy stimulus. It has a currency tailwind." The trade-off confronting investors: The U.S.'s biggest stocks are more innovative and profitable but also far more expensive, while Europe's are much less interesting but are cheap and have stimulus, plus an appeal to investors looking to diversify away from their highly concentrated U.S. holdings. Europe just has to close the performance gap with the U.S. a little to make it an interesting investment—again. Write to James Mackintosh at
Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
Global aviation forecast dips slightly: Boeing sees fleet nearing 50,000 by 2044; cites post-pandemic supply chain woes
The Boeing worldwide commercial aircraft fleet is projected to reach nearly 50,000 aircraft by 2044, with the majority manufactured during the upcoming two decades, as indicated in Boeing's latest forecast published on Saturday. The total fleet will increase to 49,600 aircraft, slightly lower than Boeing's previous yearly prediction, the company announced before the commencement of the Paris Air Show on Monday. Developing markets "with expanding middle classes, dynamic and competitive airline networks and sustained aviation investment" will constitute over half of the commercial fleet by 2044, increasing from about 40 percent in 2024, according to Boeing. The report highlights the impact of post-pandemic supply chain challenges. "The supply chain has probably had a small role in our slight reduction in deliveries over the next 20 years," said Boeing vice president of Commercial Marketing Darren Hulst during a briefing last week, as quoted by AFP. This announcement preceded the Air India Boeing 787 Dreamliner crash in Ahmedabad on Thursday. In response to the incident, which claimed 279 lives, Boeing CEO Kelly Ortberg and commercial aircraft division head Stephanie Pope withdrew from the event. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Thị trường có dấu hiệu suy thoái không? IC Markets Đăng ký Undo Boeing anticipates yearly passenger growth of 4.2 percent, surpassing the 2.3 percent annual GDP growth. "New aircraft deliveries haven't been able to keep up with the demand," Hulst said, estimating a "cumulative shortage" of approximately 1,500 to 2,000 aircraft. However, Hulst believes delivery rates to improve through the remainder of this decade. Of the 43,600 new aircraft needed through 2044, about 21,100 will substitute existing aircraft whilst 22,500 will address increasing demand in China and emerging markets. These statistics demonstrate substantial growth from 2004's global fleet of 16,780 aircraft. The industry's transformation is evident as the top 10 aviation firms in 2004 represented 45 percent of the global fleet, predominantly North American and European companies. Currently, the leading 10 companies comprise only 30 percent of the market, with increased representation from Asian and Middle Eastern organisations - regions previously unrepresented in the 2004 top rankings. Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays and public holidays . AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
