logo
Chinese researchers suggest lasers to counter Musk's Starlink satellites

Chinese researchers suggest lasers to counter Musk's Starlink satellites

Stealth submarines fitted with space-shooting lasers, supply-chain sabotage and custom-built attack satellites armed with ion thrusters. Those are just some of the strategies Chinese scientists have been developing to counter what Beijing sees as a potent threat: Elon Musk's armada of Starlink communications satellites.
Chinese government and military scientists, concerned about Starlink's potential use by adversaries in a military confrontation and for spying, have published dozens of papers in public journals that explore ways to hunt and destroy Musk's satellites, an Associated Press review found.
Chinese researchers believe that Starlink a vast constellation of low-orbit satellites that deliver cheap, fast and ubiquitous connectivity even in remote areas poses a high risk to the Chinese government and its strategic interests.
That fear has mostly been driven by the company's close ties to the US intelligence and defence establishment, as well as its growing global footprint.
As the United States integrates Starlink technology into military space assets to gain a strategic advantage over its adversaries, other countries increasingly perceive Starlink as a security threat in nuclear, space, and cyber domains, wrote professors from China's National University of Defense Technology in a 2023 paper.
Chinese researchers are not the only ones concerned about Starlink, which has a stranglehold on certain space-based communications. Some traditional US allies are also questioning the wisdom of handing over core communications infrastructure and a potential trove of data to a company run by an unpredictable foreign businessman whose allegiances are not always clear.
Apprehensions deepened after Russia's 2022 full-scale invasion of Ukraine made clear the battlefield advantages Starlink satellites could convey and have been exacerbated by Musk's proliferating political interests.
Musk pumped tens of millions of dollars into President Donald Trump's reelection effort and emerged, temporarily, as a key adviser and government official. As Musk toys with the idea of starting his own political party, he has also taken an increasing interest in European politics, using his influence to promote an array of hard-right and insurgent figures often at odds with establishment politicians.
Musk left the Trump administration in May and within days his relationship with Trump publicly imploded in a feud on social media.
SpaceX, the rocket launch and space-based communications company that Musk founded and that operates Starlink, remains inextricably linked with core US government functions.
It has won billions in contracts to provide launch services for NASA missions and military satellites, recuperate astronauts stranded at the International Space Station and build a network of spy satellites for the National Reconnaissance Office.
Starlink's space dominance has sparked a global scramble to come up with viable alternatives. But its crushing first-mover advantage has given SpaceX near monopoly power, further complicating the currents of business, politics and national security that converge on Musk and his companies.
Starlink dominates space Since its first launches in 2019, Starlink has come to account for about two-thirds of all active satellites, according to Jonathan McDowell, an astronomer at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, who writes a newsletter tracking satellite launches.
SpaceX operates more than 8,000 active satellites and eventually aims to deploy tens of thousands more.
Beijing's tendency to view Starlink as tool of US military power has sharpened its efforts to develop countermeasures which, if deployed, could increase the risk of collateral damage to other customers as SpaceX expands its global footprint.
The same satellites that pass over China also potentially serve Europe, Ukraine, the United States and other geographies as they continue their path around the earth.
Starlink says it operates in more than 140 countries, and recently made inroads in Vietnam, Niger, Somalia, the Democratic Republic of Congo and Pakistan.
In June, Starlink also obtained a license to operate in India, overcoming national security concerns and powerful domestic telecom interests to crack open a tech-savvy market of nearly 1.5 billion people.
On the company's own map of coverage, it has very few dead zones beyond those in North Korea, Iran and China.
No other country or company is close to catching up with Starlink. Amazon billionaire Jeff Bezos has taken aim at rival Musk with Project Kuiper, which launched its first batch of internet satellites into orbit in April. So far Amazon has just 78 satellites in orbit, with 3,232 planned, according to McDowell, and London-based Eutelstat OneWeb has around 650 satellites in orbit, a fraction of the fleet it had initially planned.
The European Union is spending billions to develop its own satellite array called the IRIS2 initiative but remains woefully behind. EU officials have had to lobby their own member states not to sign contracts with Starlink while it gets up and running.
We are allies with the United States of America, but we need to have our strategic autonomy, said Christophe Grudler, a French member of the European Parliament who led legislative work on IRIS2. The risk is not having our destiny in our own hands.
China has been public about its ambition to build its own version of Starlink to meet both domestic national security needs and compete with Starlink in foreign markets.
In 2021, Beijing established the state-owned China SatNet company and tasked it with launching a megaconstellation with military capabilities, known as Guowang. In December, the company launched its first operational satellites, and now has 60 of a planned 13,000 in orbit, according to McDowell.
Qianfan, a company backed by the Shanghai government, has launched 90 satellites out of some 15,000 planned. The Brazilian government in November announced a deal with Qianfan, after Musk had a scorching public fight with a Brazilian judge investigating X, who also froze Space X's bank accounts in the country.
Qianfan is also targeting customers in Kazakhstan, Malaysia, Oman, Pakistan and Uzbekistan and has ambitions to expand across the African continent, according to a slide presented at a space industry conference last year and published by the China Space Monitor.
Russia's invasion of Ukraine supercharges concerns Concerns about Starlink's supremacy were supercharged by Russia's 2022 full-scale invasion of Ukraine. The war was a turning point in strategic thinking about Starlink and similar systems.
Ukraine used the Starlink network to facilitate battlefield communications and power fighter and reconnaissance drones, providing a decisive ground-game advantage.
At the same time, access to the satellites was initially controlled by a single man, Musk, who can and did interrupt critical services, refusing, for example, to extend coverage to support a Ukrainian counterattack in Russia-occupied Crimea.
US-led sanctions against Moscow after the full-scale invasion also curtailed the availability of Western technology in Russia, underscoring the geopolitical risks inherent in relying on foreign actors for access to critical infrastructure.
Nearly all of the 64 papers about Starlink reviewed by AP in Chinese journals were published after the conflict started.
Assessing Starlink's capabilities and vulnerabilities Starlink's omnipresence and potential military applications have unnerved Beijing and spurred the nation's scientists to action. In paper after paper, researchers painstakingly assessed the capabilities and vulnerabilities of a network that they clearly perceive as menacing and strove to understand what China might learn and emulate from Musk's company as Beijing works to develop a similar satellite system.
Though Starlink does not operate in China, Musk's satellites nonetheless can sweep over Chinese territory. Researchers from China's National Defense University in 2023 simulated Starlink's coverage of key geographies, including Beijing, Taiwan, and the polar regions, and determined that Starlink can achieve round-the-clock coverage of Beijing.
The Starlink constellation coverage capacity of all regions in the world is improving steadily and in high speed, they concluded.
In another paper this one published by the government-backed China Industrial Control Systems Cyber Emergency Response Team researchers mapped out vulnerabilities in Starlink's supply chain.
The company has more than 140 first-tier suppliers and a large number of second-tier and third-tier suppliers downstream, they wrote in a 2023 paper. The supervision for cybersecurity is limited.
Engineers from the People's Liberation Army, in another 2023 paper, suggested creating a fleet of satellites to tail Starlink satellites, collecting signals and potentially using corrosive materials to damage their batteries or ion thrusters to interfere with their solar panels.
Other Chinese academics have encouraged Beijing to use global regulations and diplomacy to contain Musk, even as the nation's engineers have continued to elaborate active countermeasures: Deploy small optical telescopes already in commercial production to monitor Starlink arrays.
Concoct deep fakes to create fictitious targets. Shoot powerful lasers to burn Musk's equipment.
Some US analysts say Beijing's fears may be overblown, but such assessments appear to have done little to cool domestic debate. One Chinese paper was titled, simply: Watch out for that Starlink.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

India doesn't need more linguistic nationalism — it needs scalable AI-powered classrooms
India doesn't need more linguistic nationalism — it needs scalable AI-powered classrooms

Indian Express

time18 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

India doesn't need more linguistic nationalism — it needs scalable AI-powered classrooms

Sridhar Vembu, co-founder of Zoho, has been calling for Indians to work in native languages, claiming India's talent, including in tech, is held back by linguistic barriers. '95 per cent of Indians are not fluent in English,' he states. The case for linguistic confidence has merit, but Vembu's myopic argument stems from nationalistic sentiment rather than the path to opportunity. An innovator is gate-keeping AI's capacity to immediately and affordably overcome all language challenges. When leaders with the means to effect on-ground change tell students they don't need to learn English or gain foreign degrees, they omit to mention that both are what got them a seat at the negotiating table of the $4.9 trillion global tech industry. It is not that our students have an inherent inability to learn, but that our techno-educational pipeline cannot teach them. They have not been provided with credible, available, and meritorious learning opportunities. In the 2009 Programme for International Student Assessment (which tests & ranks global education systems), India ranked 72nd out of 73. By boycotting subsequent assessments, we abdicated accountability that undermines showy calls for AI-driven reform. Claiming students don't need the positioning resurrects feudal structures that keep the oppressed reliant on those who do have the currency and negotiability of a global lingua franca. India faces a staggering teacher shortage of approximately 1.5 million educators, leading to overcrowded classrooms; 1.2 lakh schools operate with a single teacher, 89 per cent located in rural areas. Tech leaders citing China's linguistic nationalism forget it has a single script with idiomatic dialect variations. Government-funded scholarships enable their students to conduct research overseas and repatriate their learnings. India has 780 languages and 68 scripts. China has over $1 billion invested in AI education, with 99 per cent of Chinese university faculty and students now using AI tools, 60 per cent frequently. Through the USA's robust public library system, internet access, laptops, sometimes even MacBooks, are made accessible. Instead of enabling such innovations, our techbros are caught in nationalistic debates rich with excuses. Today, what matters more than anything is how we leverage AI immediately. India's Sarvam AI models process code-mixed content in 10 languages with 97 per cent accuracy, including the open-source Shuka v1 audio model. Its content can reflect real-world Indian language usage, handle complex educational terminology, and run efficiently on edge devices, including smartphones. Sarvam is already tasked with building India's sovereign foundational model under the IndiaAI Mission. Organisations like Rocket Learning are already using AI in childhood education, with 75 per cent of children becoming school-ready, while the AICTE's 'Anuvadini' tool supports 22 regional languages. Such progress removes needless linguistic divisiveness. Integrating multiple emergent open-access agentic technologies can transform our education systems overnight with political will and industry focus. There is no longer any excuse for not implementing widespread education reform. From public information messaging to highly specialised technical education, it is possible to customise lessons, automate recursive testing, standardise grading and disseminate it widely. All any village in India needs is electricity, wifi and a smartphone. Regionality is a cocoon of caste and class divisions. AI disrupts this. Real-time translation capabilities offer learners multilingual capacity, and the artificial scarcity of access disappears. Just as English historically offered a neutral modality, thousands of Indians took to the binary coding language precisely because it enabled them to adopt a vocabulary that was mathematically impersonal and logically freeing. Such neutrality is what enables unprecedented social mobility. India needs hypermobility, not hyperregionality. We need to eliminate the false choice between cultural authenticity and educational advancement. AI-powered Intelligent Interactive Teaching Systems (IITS) can personalise learning, generate educational content, and eliminate knowledge gaps dynamically. UNICEF India's research confirms that AI-powered tools can adapt to each child's pace regardless of linguistic background. Unlike human teachers, AI systems can also work 24/7 and reach remote villages with a consistent quality for India's 1.5 million schools. While 60 per cent of school children in India cannot access online learning, mobile penetration is fast-paced: 58 per cent of higher-class students have smartphone access. This creates the opportunity for leapfrogging traditional educational infrastructure. The National Education Policy 2020 explicitly calls for AI integration at all educational levels. What we lack is the urgency to deploy at scale, and what we are getting are excuses galore. India can chuck the outdated Government-school model and switch to a digital library model. Equipped with internet and wifi, students of all ages can teach themselves with pre-loaded modules. An 80-year-old housewife, a 40-year-old farmer or a 20-year-old mechanic can go back to 'school' at any time of day and grab opportunities they never had. AI can provide feedback in real-time, freeing limited human teachers to mentor. India's youth don't need to be told what they don't need to learn or be advised to stay in their villages by those who had the choices to learn, leave, grow, and return. The power brokers who gained influence through access to knowledge don't get to construct barriers to prevent others from following suit. Critics cite infrastructure, data privacy, and implementation challenges. These are the problems to solve while deploying, not reasons to delay deployment. The question is no longer whether AI will transform Indian education, but whether we will act swiftly enough to push enough of our populace through on the momentum of this age, before they get left behind. Das is a Mysuru-based author, therapist, independent AI researcher & co-founder of Project Shunyata, a group that examines AI through the lens of Buddhist Philosophy

Trump calls India's economy ‘dead', but Trump Towers earn thousands of crores from Gurgaon, Mumbai, Pune and other cities
Trump calls India's economy ‘dead', but Trump Towers earn thousands of crores from Gurgaon, Mumbai, Pune and other cities

Economic Times

time22 minutes ago

  • Economic Times

Trump calls India's economy ‘dead', but Trump Towers earn thousands of crores from Gurgaon, Mumbai, Pune and other cities

While US President Donald Trump has criticised India's economy as 'dead' and hinted at higher tariffs, his family-run business continues to expand its real estate footprint across Indian cities, particularly in the National Capital Region (NCR), a TOI report stated. The Trump Organisation has partnered with Indian developers for premium real estate projects, including the Trump Towers Delhi NCR in Sector 65, Gurgaon. Developed in collaboration with Tribeca and M3M, the project has recorded bookings of over ₹2,000 crore since its launch in 2018, sources said. The project features 250 luxury apartments priced between ₹5 crore and ₹9 crore. On the day of its launch, the project sold 20 apartments worth ₹150 crore. The development was marked by a high-profile event attended by Donald Trump Jr. Possession of the apartments is expected in the coming this success, the Trump Organization announced a second venture in Gurgaon this May – Trump Residences in Sector 69. The project, a joint effort by Tribeca and M3M subsidiary Smartworld, comprises two 51-storey towers with 298 for these apartments range from ₹8 crore to ₹15 crore, while premium penthouses are priced as high as ₹125 crore. The companies involved have claimed the project is completely sold out, with total revenue of ₹3,250 crore. This development will make Gurgaon the only city apart from New York to host two Trump-branded residential towers. Plans are underway for a third project – Trump Towers at Sector 94 in on the second Gurgaon launch, Eric Trump, executive vice president of The Trump Organisation, said, 'We're incredibly excited to launch our second project in Gurgaon, and even prouder to be doing it once again with our amazing partners at Tribeca, M3M & Smartworld. The fact that we're expanding in this remarkable city speaks volumes — not just about the strength of the Trump brand in India, but also about the exceptional partnership we've built and the tremendous confidence The Trump Organization has in Gurgaon's future. With this new development, we've pushed the boundaries of luxury like never before. I'm confident that Trump Residences Gurgaon will stand among the most iconic and spectacular properties in our global portfolio.'Tribeca handles branding, design, quality, and sales for all Trump projects in India. Smartworld is managing development and customer experience for the Sector 69 project, while M3M is the execution partner for the Gurgaon and planned Noida projects. Under this joint venture model, Indian firms manage construction and operations, while the Trump Organization contributes branding and global visibility. A buyer of a Trump Residences home told TOI, 'This cost a steep ₹30,000 per square foot. But when you look at the trajectory of the first Trump Tower in Gurgaon, which launched at ₹16,000 per sq ft and is now reselling at ₹30,000 per sq ft, it becomes clear that this brand carries serious equity. It's a statement of both lifestyle and foresight.' Apart from the NCR, The Trump Organisation has residential and commercial projects in Mumbai, Pune, Kolkata, and Hyderabad. Earlier this year, it launched its first commercial venture in Pune. India is currently the largest overseas market for the Trump real estate brand.

No direct impact on JSW biz, but sentiment in India will be hit: Parth Jindal on Trump's tariff
No direct impact on JSW biz, but sentiment in India will be hit: Parth Jindal on Trump's tariff

Economic Times

time24 minutes ago

  • Economic Times

No direct impact on JSW biz, but sentiment in India will be hit: Parth Jindal on Trump's tariff

There would be no impact on the USD 23 billion-JSW Group's business due to the 50 per cent tariff imposed by the Trump administration, but sentiments in India may be hit, Jindal Cements MD Parth Jindal said on the imposition of additional tariffs of 25 per cent by the Trump administration on Wednesday, Jindal said it was "very unfortunate", and the industry should stand with "whatever route the government of India wants to take" in the national interest."We have to worry about 1.4 billion people here; we don't have to worry about what's happening in other parts of the world," said Jindal on the sidelines of an event statement came a day after Trump ratcheted up tariffs on Indian goods to 50 per cent, even as the two nations discuss a bilateral trade deal. The trade deal has been stuck over the US demand for greater access to India's agricultural and dairy market. When asked about the development, Jindal said: "No, there is no direct impact on either the steel industry or the cement industry or the power industry or the paint industry, there is no impact" due to the tariff. However, the managing director, who also heads the paints business of the group, said the "sentiment will take a hit for sure".The export from India to the US is around USD 86 billion, of which around USD 10 billion is pharma, which has an exemption."So, you are looking at about USD 76 billion getting impacted, which is mainly gems and jewellery, textile and a bit of the toy industry and some of the auto component guys," he added. When being asked if the high tariff persists, what would be the industry's demand from the government, Parth said: "I think the government, in their wisdom, is already taking steps to boost the gems and jewellery industry, to boost the textile industry. They are acutely aware of what's going to happen if the tariffs stay and the government machinery is "working double time" on finding a solution."I am sure, Ficci, CII, and Assocham are also working with the government very diligently, and I am sure steps will be taken, but we have to stand by whatever route the government of India wants to take. They are taking the route which is in the interest of 1.4 billion Indians," he the India-US relationship, Parth said It's been three decades of hard work by India and the US to get the relationship back to where it needs to be. "India has spent a lot of time and effort as well on improving the relationship, which started improving under President Clinton and improved with every successive president," Parth who had attended the Howdy-Modi event in 2019 in Houston, said: "I saw the bonhomie between Prime Minister Narendra Modi and President Donald Trump. So, I really don't know what's changed". The oldest democracy in the world and the largest democracy in the world are natural allies, and this is just an aberration.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store