Refugee charity hits out at Glasgow's call for asylum seeker pause
Glasgow is the UK's most significant 'dispersal centre' for asylum seekers outside of parts of London and council bosses have said the numbers are putting a strain on its already stretched resources, especially in housing.
They have demanded that the Home Office, responsible for UK migration policy, stop sending asylum seekers to the city.
But Sabir Zazai (below), the chief executive of the Scottish Refugee Council said that the city must find an alternative solution which including continuing to welcome asylum seekers.
(Image: Eloise Bishop)
He said: 'We believe that any decision by Glasgow to pause receiving people seeking asylum in the city would do more harm than good, and potentially lead to a rise in people sleeping on the streets.
'We don't know how long a 'pause' Glasgow is seeking or what conditions the council would need to see met in order to restart welcoming people. There is currently no clarity around what the benefits of a decision like this would be.'
Zazai argued that migration had brought many benefits to the city, adding: 'Local areas have benefitted from new businesses, cultures, skills and expertise. Having supported refugees in Scotland for 40 years, we have seen first-hand how Glasgow and other parts of the country evolved to embrace people rebuilding their lives here. We don't want to lose that progress.'
And he said that his organisation understood the pressures facing councils, which he said were mirrored in the Scottish Refugee Council's work.
READ MORE: Piers Morgan stunned following American journalist's Gaza genocide response
Zazai added: 'Homelessness and housing make up a quarter of the calls to our helpline.'
However, the charity boss said that these pressures were not caused by the 'people themselves' but rather by 'bad political decisions' – the responsibility for which lay both with local and central government.
He added: 'Glasgow and other cities declared a housing emergency several years ago, yet the chronic lack of social housing in the city remains inadequately addressed.
'Hundreds of people, many of whom have been traumatised by the asylum process, are still living in unsuitable temporary accommodation with no path to somewhere safe and settled to live.
'The UK Government fails to meaningfully engage on this issue, despite a clear and pressing need for action. The current asylum system creates social and economic barriers for people trying to rebuild their lives.
'It does not allow people to provide for themselves and their families, and it does not recognise the vital role that local communities play in supporting people. A piecemeal approach to problems and no desire to fundamentally improve an inhumane and ineffective asylum system is what has led us to this point.'
Zazai said that a 'failure to protect vulnerable people at risk of homelessness' would be a 'devastating dereliction of duty for all government officials', adding: 'We hope that an alternative solution is given the attention that it is urgently required.'
Glasgow City Council and the Home Office were approached for comment.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
42 minutes ago
- The Independent
Labour braced for wave of legal action over migrant hotels as immigration crisis deepens
Labour is bracing for a wave of legal action that could displace thousands of asylum seekers after councils across England signalled they could seek to ban hotels for migrants. Home Office minister Dan Jarvis has said that the government is working on contingency plans for housing asylum seekers after Epping Forest District Council was granted a temporary High Court injunction, forcing the removal of the 136 migrants who live there, in a landmark ruling on Tuesday. The order blocks asylum seekers from being housed at The Bell Hotel in Epping, Essex, which has been the site of a series of violent protests that have seen police officers injured and multiple people arrested for disorder in recent weeks. Former Tory immigration minister Robert Jenrick called for 'all patriotic councils to follow Epping's lead and pursue injunctions', and deputy leader of Reform, Richard Tice, urged residents to protest at hotels housing migrants to force their removal. Shadow home secretary Chris Philp has demanded Labour hold an emergency cabinet meeting to address the 'migrant crisis', and called on home secretary Yvette Cooper to commit that none of the asylum seekers in The Bell would be moved into hotels, houses, apartments or social housing. He cited Tory plans to use larger sites to house asylum seekers, despite the National Audit Office finding use of former military bases to be significantly more expensive than paying for hotel accommodation. Analysis of Home Office figures by The Independent shows that the government has already made progress on cutting the asylum backlog, with the number of people waiting for initial decisions on their applications dropping to 78,000 from its peak of 133,000 in 2023 under the Tory government. While over 100,000 asylum seekers are being housed by the government as they wait for their claims, just a third - 32,345 people - are in hotels. In London, as many as 65 per cent of asylum seekers are housed in hotels as the government scrambles for limited accommodation. Hotels cost the government up to £170 a night per asylum seeker – around six times higher than other forms of accommodation, according to the Migration Observatory. At least eleven district or borough councils – including some Labour-led ones – have now said that they will assess their legal options after the Epping ruling, two more are in conversation with the Home Office about changes to hotels in their area, and a further four said they would monitor developments in the legal bid. Reform-run county councils have also said they will push for legal action against any hotels in their areas, however, decisions to bring a legal challenge over planning restrictions will be down to individual districts. Charity Refugee Council said that 'everyone agrees that hotels are the wrong answer' and called on the Home Office to resolve asylum applications quickly, so 'people can either rebuild their lives here or return home with dignity'. Steve Smith, CEO of Care4Calais, said that ministers had 'failed in its first duty to protect the residents of The Bell Hotel' and subjected them to 'weeks of hate'. He added: 'It's the government's failure to protect the residents that opened the space for a challenge on planning grounds, which has handed the far-right something to claim victory on'. Mr Jarvis, the security minister, said that asylum seekers in Epping would be 'appropriately accommodated' at other sites – but failed to rule out that they would not simply be moved to other hotels. He added that 'we'll see over the next few days and weeks' whether more legal cases will follow. Spelthorne borough council said it was 'working closely with legal counsel in light of the recent High Court ruling', which it said 'may have significant implications' for a hotel in Stanwell. A Labour council leader in Tamworth, Staffordshire, where violence broke out against asylum seekers in hotels during the riots last year, said that they were reviewing legal options in light of the Epping judgement. Carol Dean said the council hadn't sought an injunction against the hotel in its area when it was first used in 2022 because other legal challenges had been unsuccessful, but that they would be 'reviewing our legal position in light of this significant ruling'. Labour-led Wirral council also said it was considering its options after being told by the Home Office at the end of June that a former hotel in the area will soon be used to house single male asylum seekers. The former hotel is currently being used to house asylum-seeking families, and no planning application has been made to change the use of the hotel, the council said. In South Ribble, Lancashire, the council said that use of asylum hotels in its area had been 'imposed on us by government', and it would 'explore all of our options'. Simon Tagg, leader of Newcastle-under-Lyme Borough Council, said that while there are no asylum hotels in their area, they had continuing concerns about the use of Houses of Multiple Occupation and short-term lets for migrants. Leader of Newcastle City Council, Cllr Karen Kilgour, said that the use of hotels for asylum seekers was 'not appropriate or sustainable' and added that the council were in 'active discussions with the Home Office' about getting more control over the placement of asylum seekers in the city. In South Norfolk, the council said it had already issued an enforcement notice on the owners of an asylum hotel in early August, requiring them to submit a planning application for a change of use. In the Epping case, the hotel's owners Somani Hotels Ltd failed to apply for a change of use after they received advice that it would not be necessary. Mr Justice Eyre ruled against them on Tuesday, saying that there was an arguable case that The Bell was no longer a hotel. Several councils contacted by The Independent said that while they had asylum hotels in their area, they had no intention of seeking legal action to move refugees out.
The Guardian
43 minutes ago
- The Guardian
England to sell eight times the council homes it built last year, report finds
England will sell off more than eight times as many council homes in 2025-26 as were constructed the previous year, research has found. Right to buy is depleting council housing stock more quickly than public housing can be replaced, forcing people to spend more money on private market rents and obtain less secure tenancies, finds a report from the thinktank Common Wealth. Its analysis of government data found that the most social homes constructed by the government was 38,170 in 2023-24, and 2,850 for council housing, which contrasts with sell-offs through right to buy which reached 13,966 homes in 2023-24 and 8,656 in 2024-25. The report concludes that if the government wants to increase the supply of social rental housing quickly, it must invest in buying back and restoring homes sold off under right to buy, alongside more council housebuilding. Adam Peggs, the report's author, said: 'We need to pull every effective lever we can find to expand public housing. Council housing gave people secure, low-cost homes in the past. With the right framework, it can give people high-quality, genuinely affordable homes, with real democratic voice in the future too. But we need to build the political will to make it happen. 'Every day of delay is another day families languish in squalid temporary accommodation. The government has the tools to turn this emergency around – and more quickly than they might admit – they just need to use them.' The report, which is published on Thursday, is also calling for expanded 'right of first refusal' powers, enabling local authorities to be the preferred buyer when ex-social homes and private rental homes enter the market. Since 1980, 2.4m council homes have been sold off under right to buy, at a discount that Common Wealth calculated was valued at £194bn, accounting for house price appreciation, with 41% now belonging to private landlords. As a result, council homes have collapsed from accommodating about 30% of households in the late 1970s to 6% today, a decline of about 80%. Common Wealth's report analysed council buy-ups of existing homes for public and social housing in seven countries, and determined that funding and incentivising a national right to buy back scheme would be a cost-effective policy in the UK. The Spanish government has granted powers for a right of first refusal to the country's new national public housing company after Barcelona acquired 1,500 homes – more than one-fifth of new affordable homes in the city – through right of first refusal powers since 2016, often below their market value. The report also recommends a national rollout of a London scheme, in which the Greater London Authority bought 1,500 mostly ex-council homes in the first year of its right to buy back scheme. The New Economics Foundation (NEF) calculated that this would generate a net saving to the taxpayer within 16 years. A 2024 report from the Joseph Rowntree Foundation (JRF) concluded that buyouts would offer better value for public money, rather than paying housing benefit to private landlords or private temporary accommodation. Kwajo Tweneboa, a social housing campaigner and the author of Our Country in Crisis, said: 'Homes that were once publicly owned are now profit-generating assets for private landlords. That's the legacy of right to buy. Reversing that damage isn't just a nice idea. It's essential. 'Buying back ex-council homes and investing in a new generation of high-quality, genuinely affordable council homes must be the backbone of any serious plan to fix this crisis. That means central government stepping up with proper funding and power – not just warm words and weak targets.'
Reuters
43 minutes ago
- Reuters
U.S. Senator Sanders favors Trump plan to take stake in Intel, others
WASHINGTON, Aug 20 (Reuters) - Liberal U.S. Senator Bernie Sanders on Wednesday threw his support behind President Donald Trump's plan to convert U.S. grants to chipmakers, including $10.9 billion for Intel, into government stakes in the companies. "If microchip companies make a profit from the generous grants they receive from the federal government, the taxpayers of America have a right to a reasonable return on that investment," Sanders, an Independent who caucuses with Democrats, said in a statement to Reuters. The awards were part of the 2022 Chips and Science Act, which sought to lure chip production away from Asia and boost American domestic semiconductor output with $39 billion in subsidies. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick is looking into the government taking equity stakes in Intel and other chipmakers in exchange for the grants, sources told Reuters on Tuesday. Much of the funding for companies such as Micron (MU.O), opens new tab, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co ( opens new tab and Samsung ( opens new tab has not been dispersed.
