
England to sell eight times the council homes it built last year, report finds
Right to buy is depleting council housing stock more quickly than public housing can be replaced, forcing people to spend more money on private market rents and obtain less secure tenancies, finds a report from the thinktank Common Wealth.
Its analysis of government data found that the most social homes constructed by the government was 38,170 in 2023-24, and 2,850 for council housing, which contrasts with sell-offs through right to buy which reached 13,966 homes in 2023-24 and 8,656 in 2024-25.
The report concludes that if the government wants to increase the supply of social rental housing quickly, it must invest in buying back and restoring homes sold off under right to buy, alongside more council housebuilding.
Adam Peggs, the report's author, said: 'We need to pull every effective lever we can find to expand public housing. Council housing gave people secure, low-cost homes in the past. With the right framework, it can give people high-quality, genuinely affordable homes, with real democratic voice in the future too. But we need to build the political will to make it happen.
'Every day of delay is another day families languish in squalid temporary accommodation. The government has the tools to turn this emergency around – and more quickly than they might admit – they just need to use them.'
The report, which is published on Thursday, is also calling for expanded 'right of first refusal' powers, enabling local authorities to be the preferred buyer when ex-social homes and private rental homes enter the market.
Since 1980, 2.4m council homes have been sold off under right to buy, at a discount that Common Wealth calculated was valued at £194bn, accounting for house price appreciation, with 41% now belonging to private landlords. As a result, council homes have collapsed from accommodating about 30% of households in the late 1970s to 6% today, a decline of about 80%.
Common Wealth's report analysed council buy-ups of existing homes for public and social housing in seven countries, and determined that funding and incentivising a national right to buy back scheme would be a cost-effective policy in the UK.
The Spanish government has granted powers for a right of first refusal to the country's new national public housing company after Barcelona acquired 1,500 homes – more than one-fifth of new affordable homes in the city – through right of first refusal powers since 2016, often below their market value.
The report also recommends a national rollout of a London scheme, in which the Greater London Authority bought 1,500 mostly ex-council homes in the first year of its right to buy back scheme. The New Economics Foundation (NEF) calculated that this would generate a net saving to the taxpayer within 16 years.
A 2024 report from the Joseph Rowntree Foundation (JRF) concluded that buyouts would offer better value for public money, rather than paying housing benefit to private landlords or private temporary accommodation.
Kwajo Tweneboa, a social housing campaigner and the author of Our Country in Crisis, said: 'Homes that were once publicly owned are now profit-generating assets for private landlords. That's the legacy of right to buy. Reversing that damage isn't just a nice idea. It's essential.
'Buying back ex-council homes and investing in a new generation of high-quality, genuinely affordable council homes must be the backbone of any serious plan to fix this crisis. That means central government stepping up with proper funding and power – not just warm words and weak targets.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BBC News
10 minutes ago
- BBC News
'Back Brendan' or the 'perfect excuse to leave'
We asked you for your thoughts on Celtic's summer transfer window and Brendan Rodgers' post-match comments after the 0-0 draw with Kairat a taste of what you had to Why do people think Brendan Rodgers negotiates the fees? If this rudderless, money-hungry board had done their business sooner those the players would have cost nowhere near 20m. Celtic cannot progress while the same faces run the show with their regular managed It's clear we have the money and winning two or three domestically is not what fans want or expect - they want a team that competes in Europe. We have to shop around but look at Bodo/Glimt - 5-0 winners tonight - who don't have our resources. Back Brendan!Kenny: Low-ball bids have resulted in gambling on the play-off. The disgust in Brendan Rodgers is the same as every fan. Signing projects hoping one out of five sells for £20m. Teflon Brendan: No matter what happens, it's always someone else's fault. Either the board or the The usual from Rodgers… blah blah The issue with signings is not fees, it's timing. Jota is long term out, Brendan said he wants Yang Hyun-jun out on loan, Nicolas Kuhn was sold weeks ago. The club are presumably singing two wingers, and yet we can't get one signed before the important games have The transfer dealing aren't good enough but maybe we also need to look at Rodgers' failure to evolve in terms of team set up. It's a team of players who go side-to-side with no one willing to break rank and try something different to create space for shots or forward That one is on Rodgers and the players. Should have beaten them with what we Rodgers has the perfect excuse to leave after this season. Lack of urgency and quality about this team. The board have rolled the dice and failed, this is on Brendan working his ticket again? Fans going to hound out Lawwell again? We're just lucky Rangers haven't got their act together. Sack the Not nearly good enough. Kyogo and Kuhn are long gone and Adam Idah is not anywhere near the standard we Lack of re-investment of the transfer revenue clearly demonstrates the lack of ambition of the club.


The Independent
12 minutes ago
- The Independent
Proposed ‘mansion tax' makes ‘no economic sense', expert says
The Chancellor is reportedly planning to introduce capital gains tax on the sale of primary residences above a certain value. This proposed measure aims to help plug a reported £40 billion hole in the public purse. Under the mooted plans, higher-rate taxpayers could face a 24 per cent levy on gains, while basic rate taxpayers would pay 18 per cent, a significant departure from current tax-free sales. Property experts warn that such a tax, potentially starting at a £1.5 million threshold, would stall high-value housing sales and disproportionately affect older homeowners and those in London. Critics also suggest the change could lead to an exodus of wealthy individuals from the UK and create disincentives for homeowners to sell, disrupting the housing market.


The Independent
12 minutes ago
- The Independent
Badenoch urges Tory councils to challenge asylum hotels in court
Kemi Badenoch has called for more Conservative councils to launch legal challenges over asylum hotels as the Government faces a potential revolt from its own local authorities. In a letter to Tory councils, Mrs Badenoch said she was 'encouraging' them to 'take the same steps' as Epping Council 'if your legal advice supports it'. Labour dismissed her letter as 'desperate and hypocritical nonsense', but several of its own local authorities have already suggested they too could mount legal action against asylum hotels in their areas. Epping secured a temporary injunction from the High Court on Tuesday, blocking the use of the Essex town's Bell Hotel as accommodation for asylum seekers on planning grounds. The decision has prompted councils controlled by Labour, the Conservatives and Reform UK to investigate whether they could pursue a similar course of action. These include Labour-run Tamworth and Wirral councils, Tory-run Broxbourne and East Lindsey councils and Reform's Staffordshire and West Northamptonshire councils. But Labour's Newcastle City Council and Brighton and Hove City Council have both ruled out legal action. Tuesday's High Court decision has also caused a potential headache for the Home Office, which has a legal duty to house destitute asylum seekers while their claims are being dealt with. If planning laws prevent the Government from using hotels, ministers will face a scramble to find alternative accommodation, potentially in the private rented sector. In her letter, Mrs Badenoch praised Epping Council's legal challenge and told Tory councils she would 'back you to take similar action to protect your community'. But she added that the situation would 'depend on individual circumstances of the case' and suggested Tory councils could pursue 'other planning enforcement options'. She also accused Labour of 'trying to ram through such asylum hotels without consultation and without proper process', saying the Government had reopened the Bell Hotel as asylum accommodation after the Conservatives had closed it. The hotel had previously been used as asylum accommodation briefly in 2020 and then between 2022 and 2024 under the previous Conservative government. A Labour spokesperson said Mrs Badenoch's letter was a 'pathetic stunt' and 'desperate and hypocritical nonsense from the architects of the broken asylum system', saying there were now '20,000 fewer asylum seekers in hotels than at their peak under the Tories'. The letter comes ahead of the publication on Thursday of figures showing how many asylum seekers were being temporarily housed in hotels at the end of June this year. Home Office figures from the previous quarter show there were 32,345 asylum seekers being housed temporarily in UK hotels at the end of March. This was down 15% from the end of December, when the total was 38,079, and 6% lower than the 34,530 at the same point a year earlier. Figures on those staying in hotels date back to December 2022 and showed numbers hit a peak at the end of September 2023, when there were 56,042 asylum seekers in hotels. Data is not released on the number of hotels in use, but it is thought there were more than 400 asylum hotels open in summer 2023. Labour has said this has since been reduced to fewer than 210.