
No other city is like Gurugram—'so mismanaged, yet so highly spoken of'
The crackdown itself hinges on absurd, manufactured hysteria. In recent days, over 250 suspected 'illegal immigrants' have been herded into holding areas for document verification. Bengali-speaking workers, even those with proper documentation like Aadhaar and PAN cards, are being harassed by police demanding more proof. In some cases, in the absence of the father's birth certificate, the authorities have demanded the grandfather's papers. The dragnet has terrorised an entire workforce into underground hiding or outright flight.
For days now, Gurugram's society WhatsApp groups and Reddit forums have buzzed with a slow-rising panic. The domestic workers have vanished. The cooks, the nannies, the food delivery executives, the sanitation workers—the invisible army that keeps Gurugram functioning—have fled in terror of the crackdown on 'illegal' Bangladeshi immigrants. As kitchen countertops remain dirty and impromptu garbage dumps appear on abandoned plots, the city's residents are discovering what their gleaming towers are actually worth, in the absence of the people who have summarily been branded as threats.
An impossible tenuousness defines working-class existence in Gurugram. Women who spend their days scrubbing marble floors in sprawling condominiums return to cramped hutments that could be vapourised overnight without warning. Often built on contested land, these 'unauthorised' settlements are tolerated only as long as they are convenient.
Anandita Kakkar, a leader for marketing, Asia and resident of Gurugram since the late 1990s, told me that several domestic workers complain about the system of exploitation in their quarters. Local landlords construct these structures, and then force tenants to buy their daily groceries at inflated prices from designated shops. Anyone who tries to question this system faces eviction. The safety of young girls and women is a source of persistent fear for local communities. Kakkar said that adolescent girls are often sent back to their villages, while older ones work punishing 12-hour shifts, in the belief that longer hours in employer homes might offer protection from the dangers lurking in their own neighbourhoods.
But here's the thing about Gurugram. The entire city lives in a state of precarity, just at different price points. Gurugram has a problem of structural abandonment, whether you're a domestic worker speaking an alien language, or the much-celebrated CEO of whatever hot startup is currently keeping the pink papers busy. Floodwaters and sanitation issues don't discriminate, whether your home is an unlit tenement in an unauthorised colony, or a Rs 100-crore apartment in India's toniest gated complex.
Also read: Gurugram or Kudagram? Elites are furious over the garbage emergency
Not ready for Disneyland
The city's news cycle follows a predictable seasonal calendar of crises: monsoon floods, festival traffic snarls, summer power cuts, winter pollution, year-round waste management failures. Yet real estate prices, spurred on by dangerous speculation (they have risen three times since 2021), continue their relentless climb in the face of complete civic breakdown. Meanwhile, as the Chief Minister announced plans for a Disneyland, eight people died in 24 hours during recent rains from electrocution, drowning, and accidents.
Writer and poet Manik Sharma moved to Gurugram only a year ago, and already fantasises about leaving the city. Sharma has lived in metros all around the country, but told me that he has yet to encounter a place that is 'so mismanaged, yet so highly spoken of'. In the last few weeks in Sector 56, where Sharma resides, sewage was overflowing everywhere. 'They used to say in my village that during an election, all broken roads get fixed. That does not hold true for Gurugram, where assembly and municipal elections have come and gone,' he said. 'You'd be hard pressed to find public hospitals and functioning public toilets. I can't understand how working women who don't own cars navigate the city.'
Sharma suggested that while plenty of Indian cities grapple with traffic, the condition of Gurugram's infrastructure is the absolute worst he has witnessed. All while the city's real estate lobby continues to sing a different tune. 'Gurugram's real estate PR does its own PR,' Sharma said, pointing to the giddy conversations around the prices and how that guides perceptions about the city. 'What anchors this city, other than the price of a DLF Camellias apartment, thekas at every corner, fancy cars, and a SonyLIV show? My respect for Noida has grown tenfold,' Sharma added.
Also read: What makes Gurugram's Camellias India's most exclusive pin code? It's not just about money
Built on wasteland narrative
This shared precarity is the inevitable outcome of a city designed around extraction—you only have to look at its foundational mythology to understand it. In the 1980s, KP Singh of DLF India pioneered the template for India's private city-making. In Planning the Millennium City: The Politics of Place-Making in Gurgaon, India (2019), Shoshana Ruth Goldstein writes: 'To assemble the roughly 3,500 acres he initially planned for his group housing projects, Singh and his associates dealt with nearly 700 families. His pitch involved harnessing the wasteland narrative, convincing farmers that their land was underproductive. If they sold to him, he would arrange for them to get a larger plot further out in the District or in Rajasthan with a better agricultural yield.' Singh, along with Sushil Ansal of Ansals, and Ramesh Chandra of Unitech—two of Gurugram's largest builders—lobbied for extensive changes to town planning laws.
In his memoir Whatever the Odds: The Incredible Story Behind DLF (2011), Singh wrote about convincing holders of small land parcels to sell their assets to DLF, and also become 'angel investors' in the company. 'I used to dress in a kurta pyjama, wrap a shawl around my shoulders, and wear a beret on my head. I would squat on the floor of their huts and drink the refreshment they offered. I even shared a few puffs of smoke from their hookahs as it would have been impolite to refuse,' he writes. Several of these deals would go on to sour, but that scarcely made a dent in DLF's profits.
The same logic that convinced farmers their fertile land was worthless, now convinces residents that paying Rs 100 crore for flood-prone apartments represents progress. Left in the lurch are upper-middle-class residents like Kakkar, who has witnessed the several facelifts that her city has undergone—from wheat fields to elevated metro lines, from abundant water supply to having to rely on water tankers full of worms. When her family first moved to then Gurgaon, the running joke was that one side of the highway, where the DLF properties were, was the 'gur' (sweetness) and the other side (Udyog Vihar's manufacturing units) was the 'gaon' (village). All that changed with the arrival of global firms, like Microsoft, Google, and the building of Cyber City.
Gurugram had plenty of opportunities to fashion itself in the image of, say, Chandigarh, but they've all flown by. Kakkar said the city suffers from a lack of vision.
'I wonder if it's because there are too many builders in the area, or that Gurugram's municipal authorities are just not bothered or cannot foresee the next crisis. The city is surviving on a wing and a prayer,' she told me.
Still, some of the optimism of the early days continues to abide. Kakkar said Gurugram offered millions of people from smaller towns in North India the chance to be upwardly mobile and to rewrite the course of their lives. 'People who moved here came with massive aspirations and Gurugram became the gateway to many other opportunities,' she said. 'Things have gotten worse, but they have also gotten better for so many. That too, is Gurugram.'
Perhaps that's one of the promises Gurugram has actually kept: That people will find ways to survive even systemic abandonment. If you can endure Gurugram's dysfunction, you can probably endure anything.
Karanjeet Kaur is a journalist, former editor of Arré, and a partner at TWO Design. She tweets @Kaju_Katri. Views are personal.
(Edited by Theres Sudeep)

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New Indian Express
24 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
Anti-'Miya' campaign continues in upper Assam, CM Himanta Sarma says protests should be democratic
Guwahati: Even as a campaign against 'Miyas' in parts of upper Assam is getting intensified, Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma appealed to people not to take law into their own hands. Miya is a pejorative term for Bengali-speaking Muslims in Assam. Sarma said places like Lakhimpur, Jorhat, Sivasagar are the 'borghar' (heartland) of the Assamese. 'If somebody enters our borghar and nobody speaks up, who will rescue the 'jati' (race)?' he asked. He called for raising a voice against it and agitating but within the law. 'The situation will deteriorate if somebody attempts to wipe out the Assamese. When somebody enters our borghar, it is natural that people will speak up against it,' he said. The Bengali-speaking Muslims are concentrated in southern, western, central and northern Assam. Upper Assam is the state's eastern part. Sarma said if people had encroached upon government land after being affected by riverbank erosion, they would have grabbed a small plot of land. He mentioned that people grabbed lands measuring up to 200 to 300 bighas in some places. The ongoing 'Miya Kheda Andolan' (movement to drive out Miyas) in upper Assam followed eviction drives carried out by the state government in Dhubri, Goalpara, Lakhimpur and Golaghat districts. Thousands of people, mostly Bengali-speaking Muslims, were evicted.


Mint
44 minutes ago
- Mint
Rethink policy: Let's take Trump's tariff tirade as an opportunity for tax reforms
Next Story Arbind Modi India's steep tariffs make up for local distortions that reforms can resolve. Let's axe trade-distortive GST exemptions, block profit-shifting paths for global businesses and let the rupee float freely. A level playing field for exporters will let us cut import duties. Continued reliance on tariffs risks trapping India in a cycle of inefficiency and retaliation. Gift this article India's tariffs are often described as 'excessively protectionist,' but the reality is more complex. India's tariffs are often described as 'excessively protectionist,' but the reality is more complex. They function less as blanket barriers and more as a response to distortions: an overvalued rupee that makes exports uncompetitive, goods and services tax (GST) exemptions that give imports an unfair edge and transfer-pricing practices that allow multinationals to shift profits abroad. Since tariffs are shaped by wider trade and fiscal policy, they serve to disguise rather than cure the structural weaknesses that limit India's competitiveness. They have been employed to protect domestic industry, encourage local manufacturing and cut import dependence. But continued reliance on tariffs risks trapping India in a cycle of inefficiency and retaliation, emphasizing the urgency of structural reforms. Instead of using high tariffs to counteract this, India should allow the rupee to depreciate sharply to its true market value. This would make Indian exports much more competitive and neutralize high US tariffs. As exports rise, the rupee will appreciate, creating a natural reset in its value without intervention by the Reserve Bank of India. The adjustment may create short-term price pressures as imports get costlier, but these would be outweighed by the long-term benefits of stronger export growth and a better balanced trade account. Another factor influencing India's trade prospects is the exemption of certain goods, including their imports, from GST. Eliminating these exemptions, with a single rate of 12% used across all goods and services, would create a level playing field, restoring fairness for domestic manufacturers and encouraging investment in local production. At the same time, concerns that ending exemptions might raise costs for the vulnerable can be effectively addressed through direct cash subsidies. India already has excellent digital infrastructure in place, undergirded by Aadhaar, Jan Dhan accounts and the Unified Payments Interface, that enables the government to make direct cash transfers to those in need of support. By using this system to protect low-income households from any cost rise, India can make the GST regime more equitable and efficient, supporting domestic industry without compromising social protection. Tariffs also serve as a blunt tool to counter profit-shifting by multinational corporations. Many of them manipulate intra-group trade prices to minimize their taxable income, undervaluing Indian exports or inflating imports to shift profits to low-tax jurisdictions. A destination-based cash flow tax (DBCFT) offers a clean and more effective solution. As opposed to corporate income tax, which is tied to where profits are reported, a DBCFT would be applied on the value of sales in India. Its border adjustment—taxing imports while exempting exports—would neutralize the incentive to shift profits abroad and safeguard the domestic tax base without relying on tariffs. While tariffs have helped offset such distortions, they carry heavy costs. Trading partners often retaliate, curbing India's export access, even as consumers pay more and industries reliant on imported inputs see their competitiveness eroded. High barriers also deter foreign direct investment, as global firms view India as a costly and less predictable market. A DBCFT paired with a truly free-floating rupee can deliver the same protection with far fewer side effects. A rupee allowed to find its natural value would make exports more competitive in the short term; as foreign demand strengthens, export earnings would eventually support a more stable and sustainable currency level. Also, such reforms would enhance our credibility in trade talks, showing that we are committed not to protectionism but to fair, modern and efficient frameworks that encourage open trade. We need a decisive shift away from tariffs as India's main line of defence to a more efficient system that corrects distortions without undermining growth. By adopting a DBCFT, ending GST exemptions and letting the rupee adjust to market forces, India would strengthen its export competitiveness, create a fair playing field for domestic producers and remove distortions caused by currency misalignment and tax loopholes. Such reforms would let us reduce our average tariff rate to a uniform band of 3-5% (without exemptions), with lower rates applied where free trade agreements call for it. This would not only dispel perceptions of India being a high-tariff economy, but also align our trade regime with global norms. Instead, by implementing the above reform measures as a comprehensive package, the country would be far better placed to seize opportunities that arise once the ongoing storm of tariff rhetoric subsides. The author is former member, Central Board of Direct Taxes, and former senior economist, International Monetary Fund. Topics You May Be Interested In Catch all the Business News, Market News, Breaking News Events and Latest News Updates on Live Mint. Download The Mint News App to get Daily Market Updates.


The Print
an hour ago
- The Print
Trump mocking PM Modi repeatedly; govt unable to give strong response: Uddhav
'Trump is mocking India and Narendra Modi. We are unable to respond to him, let alone seek answers from him. This government has failed on the foreign policy front. At a press conference, he alleged that Modi and Amit Shah were behaving like propaganda ministers of the BJP while the nation needed a prime minister and a home minister to deal with extant challenges. New Delhi, Aug 7 (PTI) Shiv Sena-UBT supremo Uddhav Thackeray on Thursday hit out at the BJP-led NDA government, saying US President Donald Trump was 'mocking' Prime Minister Narendra Modi, who was 'unable' to give a strong reply. 'The nation needs a strong prime minister, a strong home minister, defence minister and external affairs minister,' the former Maharashtra chief minister said. Thackeray's remarks came in the wake of Trump on Wednesday slapping an additional 25 per cent tariff, raising the total duties to 50 per cent on goods coming from India, as a penalty for New Delhi's continued purchase of Russian oil. 'Today, the prime minister, home minister, and defence minister function more as propaganda ministers for the BJP. Had Modi been the nation's prime minister, he would have visited Pahalgam, but he chose to visit Bihar,' Thackeray said. He said the Shiv Sena-UBT was committed to the opposition INDIA bloc grouping and dismissed suggestions that his party would go it alone after reuniting with his cousin Raj Thackeray, the founder of Maharashtra Navnirman Sena (MNS). 'There is no need to talk about Raj Thackeray. There are no conditions attached for being part of the opposition INDIA bloc. As far as Raj is concerned, we two brothers are steadfast in our approach. We both will take care of it,' Thackeray said. The Shiv Sena-UBT supremo is in the national capital to participate in the meeting of the opposition INDIA bloc convened by Congress leader Rahul Gandhi. This is the first in-person meeting of the opposition alliance since its defeat in the Lok Sabha elections last year. Thackeray refused to speculate on probable candidates for the vice presidential election, including whether Shiv Sena-UBT would support the NDA nominee if he or she is a Marathi-speaking person. 'We will talk about these possibilities when we know about it. Right now, we want to know why the vice president was removed from office. Where is the (former) vice president now? This is the issue that should be discussed,' Thackeray said. He slammed the Election Commission for rolling out the Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls and wondered whether the National Register of Citizens was being brought in through the back door. Thackeray also slammed the poll authority for declaring that VVPAT machines will not be used during the local bodies elections in Maharashtra later this year. 'VVPATs were introduced when doubts were raised about EVMs. Now, why should you even go through the process of holding an election? You can announce the winner straightaway. We do not know whom we have voted for, why hold elections,' he said. Thackeray refused to comment on Deputy Chief Minister Eknath Shinde, who is also in the national capital to meet the prime minister and the home minister. 'A traitor is a traitor. I do not give them much importance. He may have come to meet his masters,' Thackeray said. PTI SKU SKU NSD NSD This report is auto-generated from PTI news service. ThePrint holds no responsibility for its content.