
'NICE TOUCH': Spot where ex-NHL enforcer Nick Tarnasky pounded loudmouth gets commemorative marker
'At least figure out his name and do a quick Google search. You might think you're just fighting some random massive mutant who was going to kick your ass anyway. But next thing you know, you're dealing with a guy who was legitimately a professional ass kicker. Check the game notes, bud.'
Article content
Article content
In the wake of the fight, the man allegedly involved in the viral beatdown has since shared a selfie of himself.
Article content
'Just a tiny lil black eye,' the man wrote over the pic with his tongue sticking out. 'That's it, that's all, boys.'
Article content
⛳️😵🥊 #LOOK — A photo has emerged of the man who got tossed in the pond during the viral slow play fight.
(📸 - dustydave1971/reddit) pic.twitter.com/oY6Q59ptwG
— NUCLR GOLF (@NUCLRGOLF) July 10, 2025
Article content
Article content

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Toronto Sun
3 days ago
- Toronto Sun
Google ordered to pay Argentine pictured naked in his yard
This file photo shows a Google Street View vehicle on a road in the United Kingdom on May 31, 2017. Photo by Justin TALLIS / AFP Buenos Aires (Argentina) (AFP) — An Argentine captured naked in his yard by a Google Street View camera has been awarded compensation by a court after his bare behind was splashed over the internet for all to see. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors Don't have an account? Create Account The policeman had sought payment from the internet giant for harm to his dignity, arguing he was behind a two-meter (6.6-foot) wall when a Google camera captured him in the buff, from behind, in small-town Argentina in 2017. His house number and street name were also laid bare, broadcast on Argentine TV covering the story, and shared widely on social media. The man claimed the invasion exposed him to ridicule at work and among his neighbours. Another court last year dismissed the man's claim for damages, ruling he only had himself to blame for 'walking around in inappropriate conditions in the garden of his home.' Google, for its part, claimed the perimeter wall was not high enough. Appeals judges, however, concluded the man's dignity had been flagrantly violated, and awarded him an amount in Argentine pesos equivalent to about $12,500, payable by Google. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. 'This involves an image of a person that was not captured in a public space but within the confines of their home, behind a fence taller than the average-sized person. The invasion of privacy… is blatant,' they wrote. The judges said 'there is no doubt that in this case there was an arbitrary intrusion into another's life.' And they found there was 'no justification for (Google) to evade responsibility for this serious error that involved an intrusion into the plaintiff's house, within his private domain, undermining his dignity. 'No one wants to appear exposed to the world as the day they were born.' The judges pointed to Google's policy of blurring the faces and license plates of people and vehicles photographed for Street View as evidence it was aware of a duty to avoid harm to third parties. But in this case, 'it was not his face that was visible but his entire naked body, an image that should also have been prevented.' The court absolved co-accused telecoms company Cablevision SA and news site El Censor of liability for the image spreading, saying their actions had 'helped highlight the misstep committed by Google.' Sports Ontario World Wrestling Canada


CTV News
3 days ago
- CTV News
Google ordered to pay Argentine pictured naked in his yard
One of the cars that Google uses to periodically to photograph the millions of destinations covered in its digital maps is shown during a pit stop at its "Street View Garage" in Palo Alto, Calif., on Wednesday Oct. 30, 2024. (AP Photo/Michael Liedtke) An Argentine captured naked in his yard by a Google Street View camera has been awarded compensation by a court after his bare behind was splashed over the internet for all to see. The policeman had sought payment from the internet giant for harm to his dignity, arguing he was behind a two-meter (6.6-foot) wall when a Google camera captured him in the buff, from behind, in small-town Argentina in 2017. His house number and street name were also laid bare, broadcast on Argentine TV covering the story, and shared widely on social media. The man claimed the invasion exposed him to ridicule at work and among his neighbors. Another court last year dismissed the man's claim for damages, ruling he only had himself to blame for 'walking around in inappropriate conditions in the garden of his home.' Google, for its part, claimed the perimeter wall was not high enough. Appeals judges, however, concluded the man's dignity had been flagrantly violated, and awarded him an amount in Argentine pesos equivalent to about $12,500, payable by Google. 'This involves an image of a person that was not captured in a public space but within the confines of their home, behind a fence taller than the average-sized person. The invasion of privacy... is blatant,' they wrote. The judges said 'there is no doubt that in this case there was an arbitrary intrusion into another's life.' And they found there was 'no justification for (Google) to evade responsibility for this serious error that involved an intrusion into the plaintiff's house, within his private domain, undermining his dignity. 'No one wants to appear exposed to the world as the day they were born.' The judges pointed to Google's policy of blurring the faces and license plates of people and vehicles photographed for Street View as evidence it was aware of a duty to avoid harm to third parties. But in this case, 'it was not his face that was visible but his entire naked body, an image that should also have been prevented.' The court absolved co-accused telecoms company Cablevision SA and news site El Censor of liability for the image spreading, saying their actions had 'helped highlight the misstep committed by Google.'


National Post
4 days ago
- National Post
Jamie Sarkonak: Reddit's r/Teachers isn't proof of an Andrew Tate crisis in schools
Article content As for solutions, some teachers noted that girls in some classrooms will ridicule any boys who bring up Tate, and suggested letting the children police themselves. Other teachers, summarized the researchers, described 'violence' — but the researchers never reproduced any accounts of those. Article content Four paragraphs of discussion on misogyny, inceldom and Tate lament male supremacism and the 'machine of 'naturalized' male power.' Overall, it looks grim. Article content But what it lacks is a sense of context. The unverified accounts of classroom sexism were terrible, yes — something that no teacher or female pupil should have to go through. But they weren't quantified; and even if they were, a mere sample from Reddit wouldn't be statistically representative of the classroom experience. Self-reported tales of woe are more likely to be told in such spaces, as with any public message board since Roman times. We also have to assume there are false positives: cases when oversensitive teachers take grave offence to ironic humour typical of teens. Article content Article content Reddit discussions can be useful and informative, particularly in gauging a community's temperature — and for that reason, I cite them in columns from time to time — but they can't be the sole basis for academically gauging the prevalence of a problem. Article content So, is Tate-fuelled violence (by white boys in particular) really a problem in Canada? It's an objective fact that violence in school is a growing problem, with many major school boards reporting a statistical rise in incidents compared to before the pandemic. Teachers report having to deal with 'complex needs' without adequate supports; neglectful administrators; and, as a result, the normalization of violence. Compounding these problems are the minority of parent activists who campaign to keep police officers — one source of protection — out of the schools that need them most. Article content But these reports lack demographic information, and they don't include motive. The information that is out there throws the Reddit vignette into question: in the United Kingdom, one survey found that Tate was most likely to be viewed positively by Black youth aged 16 to 25 (41 per cent of whom approved of the man); and was also rated positively by 31 per cent of Asian (including South Asian) youth. Only 15 per cent of their white male counterparts felt the same — a group that, at the same time, has become the face of misogynistic violence through popular culture. Netflix's Adolescence, anyone? Article content Where it surfaces, Tate-fuelled misogyny is a problem. But we don't actually know where that is in Canada, or in which communities — at least, based on this six-month qualitative snapshot of a teachers' subreddit. Maybe that's something our social justice scholars can look into before they start another round of finger-pointing. Article content