logo
India casts wider net for seafood exports as US tariffs bite

India casts wider net for seafood exports as US tariffs bite

Mint3 days ago
New Delhi: Faced with steep tariff barriers in the United States, India is turning to fresh export markets for its seafood.
Union minister for fisheries Rajiv Ranjan Singh said the government is looking at the United Kingdom, the European Union, Japan, China, Korea, and West Asia to widen the reach for India's seafood exports.
'We have asked them (seafood exporters) to face the current challenge bravely. There are alternative markets available…," Singh said during a press briefing on Monday. 'The EU, Japan, South Korea, UK, Russia, Australia, West Asia, South East Asia, and many countries are available for export of Indian seafoods."
India exported marine products worth $7.39 billion in 2024-25, of which $2.68 billion, or about 36%, went to the US, according to the Marine Products Export Development Authority. Frozen shrimp accounted for a major share of these shipments.
But Indian seafood shipments to the US are set to attract a total tariff of 59.7%, comprising countervailing and anti-dumping duties of 9.7%, up from 9.7% earlier, after US President Donald Trump announced additional levies of 25% effective 7 August and another 25% from 27 August.
The burden is expected to be particularly heavy on shrimp, India's biggest seafood export.
The Seafood Export Association of India has approached the commerce and finance ministries seeking emergency financial support, including a 30% increase in working capital through soft loans, news agency PTI reported on Sunday.
Meanwhile, India's seafood exports to the United Kingdom are expected to increase after the two nations signed a landmark free trade agreement in July, eliminating tariffs on 99% of Indian exports. Under the FTA, the UK's import duties on Indian marine products will fall to zero from 20%.
'India's share in the UK's $5.4 billion seafood import market is just 2.25%. With CETA (the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement) now in force, industry estimates project a 70% surge in marine exports to the UK in the coming years," India's ministry of fisheries, animal husbandry and dairying said in a statement after the India-UK FTA was announced.
A wider net
Rama Shankar Naik, commissioner of fisheries in Andhra Pradesh, said while India's seafood has significant scope in the domestic market, there is an urgent need to tap new overseas buyers.
'We have to look at new markets such as the Middle East, Russia, South Korea, and Europe," he said, noting that India's share in seafood exports to European countries had dropped to 11% from above 35% earlier.
Andhra Pradesh leads India's seafood exports with nearly a 70% share, followed by Tamil Nadu, Kerala, Gujarat and Odisha.
The US's 40% transhipment duty on Vietnam has added another woe for Indian exporters, traders said. The Southeast Asian country sources a significant volume of raw and semi-processed shrimp from India for value addition before re-exporting to the US. If Vietnam's shrimp export market contracts due to the US's duty, demand for Indian shrimp would also drop.
In FY25, India exported marine products worth $381.77 million to Vietnam, down from $392.55 million in the year before, according to the commerce ministry data.
India is preparing to counter the US's stiff tariffs on Indian goods by targeting new markets and offering incentives for exporters, Mint reported on 8 August. Prime Minister Narendra Modi is particularly focused on protecting the interests of India's farmers and fishermen.
As part of those efforts, the government is looking to set up trade desks in regions like Africa, Latin America, and Eastern Europe, which could unlock more than $60 billion in untapped export potential.
India is also exploring new markets for agricultural and processed food products, including Nigeria, Switzerland, and Lithuania, Mint reported on 2 August.
While the US has announced a 50% tariff on Indian goods, it has reduced the tariff for Vietnam from 46% to 20%, for Indonesia from 32% to 19%, and for Bangladesh from 37% to 20%.
Indian exports in sectors such as apparel, auto components, leather goods, and certain foods are expected to be the worst hit by Trump's tariffs on India.
India exported goods worth $86.5 billion to the US in FY25, or about 20% of the country's total merchandise exports of $433.56 billion.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Derek O'Brien writes: 79 suggestions for the Union government on 79th I-Day
Derek O'Brien writes: 79 suggestions for the Union government on 79th I-Day

Indian Express

time15 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

Derek O'Brien writes: 79 suggestions for the Union government on 79th I-Day

As India celebrates its 79th Independence Day, here are 79 suggestions for the Union government. Unemployment 1. Reduce unemployment. Eight out of 10 unemployed are youth. 2. Create jobs for the youth. Youth unemployment is over 15 per cent. 3. Introduce urban employment guarantee schemes. 4. Increase wages of rural workers— real average annual growth is just 0.2 per cent. 5. Increase the female Labour Force Participation Rate. Among youth, this is around half that of men. 6. Boost skill training. Only 4 per cent of the youth workforce have formal vocational training. Health 7. Remove 18 per cent GST on health and life insurance. 8. Increase spending on public healthcare, currently less than 2 per cent of GDP. 9. Strengthen AIIMS. Over 18,000 positions are vacant in AIIMS hospitals. 10. Provide free medical and psychological treatment for acid attack survivors. Education 11. Restart discontinued minority scholarship schemes like the Maulana Azad National Fellowship. 12. Stop partisan changes to NCERT textbooks 13. Provide quality education to ST kids. A third of Eklavya schools are non-functional. Children 14. Bring down student suicides. 15. Eradicate child labour. 16. Fight drug addiction among children. 1.5 crore children aged 10-17 are addicted. 17. Focus on child health. Two out of five children up to five years of age are stunted. 18. Bring down number of zero-food children. Three out of 10 infants aged between six and 11 months are classified as such. Gender 19. Pass stronger laws for time-bound resolution of cases of crime against women. 20. Amend the Women's Reservation Bill, delink it from the census and delimitation. 21. Harmonise punishment for sexual violence against transgender persons with penalties under the BNS for women. 22. Legalise same-sex marriage. 23. Criminalise marital rape. Federalism 24. Make cess and surcharge a part of the divisible pool, to be shared with states. 25. Resolve ongoing unrest in Manipur. 26. Stop using the ED as a political weapon. Its conviction rate is 0.25 per cent. 27. Stop Hindi imposition. 28. Give full statehood to J&K. 29. Stop squeezing non-BJP states for funds. Bengal alone is owed over Rs 15,000 crore under MGNREGA and PMAY-G. Policy 30. Admit demonetisation was a failure. 31. Roll back Agnipath and bring back permanent recruitment in the Armed Forces. 32. Introduce a framework to reduce financial frauds, which increased by 97 per cent between 2020 and 2024. 33. Introduce a national elder care policy with support services and pension. 34. Ensure a five-year cooling-off period before retired judges can take up any other constitutional post. 35. Increase the judiciary's strength. Over five crore cases are pending across courts. 36. Delink MGNREGS payment from Aadhaar, which makes over 28 per cent of MGNREGS workers ineligible. 37. Strengthen RTI and include institutions like PM CARES under its purview. 38. Improve data privacy. The DPDP rules have not been framed. More than 81 crore citizens' data was leaked in 2023. 39. Improve press freedom, in which India is ranked 161 out of 180. 40. Strengthen the Armed Forces. There are 1.09 lakh vacancies in paramilitary forces. 41. Strengthen banking access. One in five Jan Dhan accounts is inactive. 42. Increase PM Kisan funds to Rs 12,000 43. Stop manual scavenging. Between 2014 and 2023, 736 people died cleaning sewers and septic tanks. 44. Reduce plastic pollution. 3.5 million tonnes of plastic waste is generated each year. 45. Build dedicated legislation for AI. Do not wait to take the cue from other countries. 46. Withdraw the SIR exercise in Bihar. 47. Implement a national bail reform policy to reduce the undertrial population. 48. Conduct the census, due since 2021, in 2026 instead of 2027. 49. Standardise gig/contract worker rights, including social security. 50. Increase the wages of MGNREGS and ASHA workers. Economy 51. Reduce poverty. Four out of five people earn less than Rs 171 a day. 52. Improve GDP growth, which was at a four-year low in 2024-25. 53. Increase value added by manufacturing. Manufacturing GVA was at 4.5 per cent in FY 2025, lower than FY 2013. 54. Reduce agriculture household debt. The average outstanding loan per agricultural household is over Rs 74,000. 55. Strengthen MSMEs. Between 2020 and February 2025, over 75,000 MSMEs were shut down. 56. Boost industrial growth, which in June was at its lowest in 10 months. 57. Create high-value jobs. Forty-six per cent of the workforce is in agriculture. 58. Reduce household indebtedness. Household savings touched a 50-year low in 2022-23. 59. Reduce per capita external debt, which rose by 132 per cent in 2014-2025. Infrastructure 60. Develop air connectivity. Of 619 routes operationalised under UDAN, only half are currently operational. 61. Improve internet access. Over 21,200 villages don't have internet connections. 62. Expand expressways. Twenty-five per cent of Bharatmala project isn't yet awarded. 63. Boost railway safety. There are over one lakh vacancies in the railways. 64. Expand KAVACH. In four years, it was installed in just 2 per cent of rail routes. 65. Ensure road safety. About half of unnatural and untimely deaths are due to road accidents. 66. Improve infrastructure. Work for only eight per cent of Amrit Bharat stations has been completed. Parliament 67. Give more time to the Opposition. Seventy per cent is used by the government. 68. Appoint a deputy speaker of the Lok Sabha. The post has been vacant since 2019. 69. Have a fixed parliamentary calendar with a minimum 100 days of sittings. 70. Stop bulldozing bills. The 500-plus-page Income Tax Bill was passed in under five minutes in the Lok Sabha this week. 71. Stop mass suspension of MPs — 146 were suspended in one session in 2023. Bad Laws 72. Repeal CAA. 73. Ban anti-conversion laws. 74. Scrap sedition and the UAPA law, which has a conviction rate under 3 per cent. 75. Repeal the Waqf (Amendment) Act. 76. Criminalise marital rape. For the Prime Minister 77. Answer a question in Parliament. 78. Hold a press conference. 79. Visit Manipur The writer is MP and leader, All India Trinamool Congress Parliamentary Party. Research credit: Ayashman Dey, Chahat Mangtani, Dheemunt Jain, Varnika Mishra

Best of Both Sides: SC order on stray dogs overlooks that compassion is what makes a city a home
Best of Both Sides: SC order on stray dogs overlooks that compassion is what makes a city a home

Indian Express

time15 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

Best of Both Sides: SC order on stray dogs overlooks that compassion is what makes a city a home

A month ago, I carried five tiny kittens home from the street. They were stranded in a house about to be demolished, shivering, hungry, and still too young to eat on their own. Today, they are healthy, curious, and very sure they own my home. It is astonishing how quickly an animal can change when it is given care. This week's Supreme Court order that every street dog in Delhi be relocated to a shelter within eight weeks is, at its heart, about care — or rather, the lack of it. Yes, the threat of rabies is real. Yes, we need solutions to incidents of aggression and population growth. But there is a difference between solving a problem and sweeping it out of sight. Even if the order were legally sound, the reality on the ground makes it impossible to execute. To begin with, we don't know exactly how many dogs there are in Delhi. There hasn't been a count in 10 years. The 'estimate' offered by the Municipal Corporation of Delhi is around 8 lakh. Against those numbers, Delhi has just 20 temporary shelters, none of them government-run. Building and running enough facilities to house every dog would cost crores. We struggle to build bridges for decades, yet we are expected to build and staff thousands of shelters in two months. Ironically, the same MCD that has already failed to meet sterilisation targets and hasn't supplied anti-rabies vaccines in the numbers needed is now being tasked with the creation of humane shelters. Not once has the Court asked the civic body for accountability. But the most important reason to doubt the effectiveness of this order is neither legal nor logistical, it's logical. Mass removal simply doesn't work. We know this from Turkey, where a similar programme descended into mass culling, only for the stray population to rebound. The sterilise-vaccinate-return approach, enshrined in Indian law, exists because it works. Remove the dogs who already have a place, and you create space for new ones who don't. If the intent is to curb rabies cases in Delhi, then this order does more harm than good. To start with, panic fanned by WhatsApp messages declares that 2,000 people die of rabies every day in the national capital. Yet, the government's own figures — given in a reply to a question in the Lok Sabha just months ago — tell a very different story. According to official data, in 2024, there were 54 'suspected human rabies deaths' in the entire country — none from Delhi. The root cause of death by rabies is the shortage of rabies vaccines at government hospitals. Sending every single stray to a shelter cannot be a one-stop solution to India's rabies crisis. Look at Romania, where, after shelters were filled and streets emptied, unsterilised and unvaccinated dogs moved into the emptied territories. Beyond the failures of policy and denial of science, though, there is something more troubling: The absence of care. Article 51A(g) of our Constitution, which asks us to show compassion to all living creatures, is meant to shape how we live and the principles we live by. The persistent caricature of those who oppose this verdict is the elite South Delhi aunty, feeding pedigreed dogs in her gated colony. In truth, most community dogs live in less privileged neighbourhoods, sustained by families who cannot keep them inside their small homes but still take responsibility for them. I think of a friend who found a dog abandoned outside his home. He took the dog in, not into his house but into his life. Neighbours feed him. Someone else covers the cost of vaccinations. In winter, children in the lane make sure he has a blanket. This is what a community of care looks like: Fragile, improvised, but deeply human. The real cause of Delhi's stray population is abandonment. What happens when the dog bought for a child's birthday is dumped a year later? When he mates with another discarded pet, producing a litter born into homelessness? The owners face no penalty. But the puppies will be rounded up, sent to overcrowded shelters, where they will disappear. Even if Delhi somehow found the space and money overnight, removing sterilised, vaccinated dogs from their territories will undo years of rabies control and leave the streets more unsafe. The alternative is not a mystery. It is in our laws already: Large-scale sterilisation and vaccination, strict enforcement against illegal breeding and abandonment, public education on responsible pet ownership, and support for communities that care for animals where they are. The Supreme Court may have, in all its wisdom, passed the order that it has. Yet, the Chief Minister still has the chance to step in and stop an unworkable, unlawful order from taking effect — and to choose care over cruelty disguised as efficiency. Inhumanity is easy. It is also a sign of our times. But care — for each other, for the animals who live alongside us — is what makes a city worth calling home. The writer is national spokesperson, NCP (SP)

India does not have the economic leverage vis a vis the US that China does
India does not have the economic leverage vis a vis the US that China does

Indian Express

time15 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

India does not have the economic leverage vis a vis the US that China does

Between December 2022 and July 2025, China accounted for about 47 per cent of all crude oil and 44 per cent of the coal exported by Russia, as against India's corresponding purchase shares of 38 per cent and 20 per cent. Despite that, US President Donald Trump has slapped India with a 25 per cent 'penalty' for buying Russian energy. This rate, to be effective from August 27, would take the total tariff on Indian goods imported into the US to 50 per cent. China has not only escaped such punishment, but has actually seen a lowering of the duty on its goods from 145 to 30 per cent since May 12. On Monday, Trump extended his trade truce with China for a further 90-day period till November 10. At the same time, his Treasury Secretary, Scott Bessent, has threatened additional 'secondary tariffs' on India if the outcome of Trump's Friday meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin isn't favourable. This blatantly divergent treatment, further eroding the credibility of the current Western sanctions regime, has significantly to do with relative economic leverage — China is seen to possess much more of it. The most visible demonstration of that was when, in early April, it imposed export restrictions on rare earth elements and magnets that are indispensable, whether for auto, aerospace, defence, semiconductor, renewable energy or consumer electronics manufacturing. China could use its virtual global monopoly over the mining and processing of these critical minerals to bring Trump to the negotiating table. Rare earths apart, China also played the trump card of being a massive buyer of US agricultural produce — from soyabean, cotton and coarse grains to beef, pork and poultry meat — sharply reducing the imports of these to signal its capacity for retaliation in any unilateral trade war. On the face of it, India does not have that sort of economic leverage. Barring, say, pharmaceutical products, much of what it exports to the US — readymade garments, gems and jewellery, frozen shrimps, basmati rice or even steel and aluminium — aren't items for which there are no alternative suppliers. Nor are Indian imports of California almonds comparable to the humongous quantities of Midwest US soyabean and corn that China was, until recently, sourcing to feed its swine and poultry birds. Given how much it stands to lose in any prolonged trade war — the worst-affected industries are also the most employment-intensive — the best approach for India to adopt is strategic patience. What the Indian foreign policy establishment and its trade negotiators should emphasise is the country's importance to global economic and regional stability, which aligns with the US's own long-term interests.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store