High Court rejects Hindu side's plea to declare Shahi Idgah disputed structure
Application A-44 specifically urged the court to direct the concerned stenographer to replace the term "Shahi Idgah Mosque" with "disputed structure" throughout the ongoing case documents and future proceedings. However, the Muslim side submitted a written objection to this demand, opposing any such change in official references to the mosque.The High Court, after hearing arguments from both sides, rejected the petition and upheld the objection raised by the Muslim side.The case is among 18 petitions filed by various members of the Hindu side relating to the contentious land and religious claims surrounding the Sri Krishna Janmabhoomi and the Shahi Idgah mosque in Mathura. The mosque stands adjacent to what many Hindus believe is the birthplace of Lord Krishna.The next hearing in the case has been scheduled for August 2.- EndsMust Watch
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
39 minutes ago
- Indian Express
People in Assam need development, not guns
Assam Government has launched a scheme to issue arms licenses to its majority population (wherever they are in minority), which it terms 'indigenous'. This new step seems to be a part of a series of anti-Muslim policies taken up by the Himanta Biswa Sarma government. In the recent past, the Assam government has pushed the subaltern Miya Muslims to the brink through consecutive actions. From demolition drives in several districts, including Dhubri, Goalpara, Barpeta, Darrang, Nagaon, Golaghat, and Kamrup, to the death of a few protesters — mostly Miya Muslims — has made Assam politics fraught with communalisation. Reportedly, the names of evicted persons in places such as Charubakhra, Chirakuta, Sandeshpur of Dhubri district, and Kachutoli of Kamrup district have also been deleted from the electoral rolls. Hundreds of Miya Muslims who migrated to several districts of eastern Assam for work — mostly as labourers — have also been allegedly threatened and told to leave, in effect, restricting their mobility within the state. Additionally, the CM's use of hurtful comments against the Miya Muslims has also made life difficult for this marginalised community. Against this backdrop, the decision to give arms licenses to the indigenous people for their own 'safety' where they are 'less' in numbers sows the seeds of further confrontation and paves the way for what can be called 'competitive marginality'. In Assam, 'Khilonjiya' or the indigenous communities have been pitted against Miya subalterns by the majoritarian forces, mainly through the use of language. Use of offensive and exclusionary terms like 'outsiders' (in Assamese, 'bahiragoto'), 'push back', 'illegal immigrants', 'Bangladeshi', 'doubtful voters' in common political parlance, coupled with contemptuous words used against Bengali-speaking Muslims, nowadays, shapes the political contour of the state. Moreover, the definition of 'indigenous' remains fraught with many challenges. Unlike in other states, in Assam, it has long been an exclusionary term. Be it the movement in the 1980s or during the debates over the National Register of Citizens (NRC) — when another term, 'Original Inhabitants (OI)' was introduced — the political contest over insider-outsider has been part of Assam's body politic. But in this debate, what is undermined is the incredible heterogeneity of Assam's society. Among the social groups that have lived in the state for centuries are Ahom, Moran, Muttuck, Sonowal, Lalung, Brahmin and other upper caste Hindus, Karbi, Tiwa, Goria Muslim, Deshi Muslim, Bodos, Bengali, Adivasis (referred to as tea tribes) and Miya Muslims, among others. These social groups migrated to Assam in different historical periods. The situation has been further complicated since the government has started offering citizenship to undocumented Bangladeshis through the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA). However, now the discursive term 'indigenous' is used for almost all, except the Miya Muslims, despite them constituting the largest Muslim group in Assam. Such exclusionary vocabulary is against the rights of the citizens enshrined in the Indian Constitution. So, the move to allow these undefined 'indigenous' communities to arm themselves has the potential to further provoke social unrest. Civil society groups, both from the Hindu and Muslim communities, have come out against this divisive move. It is high time for the judiciary to intervene and halt this effort before it is too late. The arming of civil society is not the way to protect the 'indigenous' population, even when there is a credible threat — it is the responsibility of the government and its police to protect people. Such efforts amount to nothing but a dog whistle. The people of Assam need an egalitarian society, good educational institutions, a proper healthcare system, and employment, not guns. The writer teaches Sociology at Jamia Millia Islamia, New Delhi
Indian Express
42 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Jagan willing, BJP adds YSRCP to its numbers for vice-president elections
The NDA's vice-presidential pick, C P Radhakrishnan, has got a shot in the arm with the Y S Jagan Mohan Reddy-led YSR Congress Party (YSRCP) deciding to support his candidature in the September 9 poll. According to sources, the YSRCP made the decision after a call by Union Defence Minister Rajnath Singh to Jagan on August 13, seeking support for Radhakrishnan's candidature. The NDA only announced Radhakrishnan as its candidate on August 17. 'Subsequently, our party chief held discussions with the MPs and our Parliamentary Party leader Y V Subba Reddy conveyed his decision to us,' YSRCP Tirupati MP Maddila Gurumoorthy told The Indian Express. While the YSRCP has four MPs in the Lok Sabha, the party's Rajampet MP is currently in jail in connection with the alleged Rs 3,200 crore Andhra Pradesh liquor scam. The party has seven members in the Upper House. The MPs of both Houses vote in the vice-presidential election, and the NDA is comfortably placed to ensure a win for its candidate. Saying that the YSRCP had no plans to issue a whip for the election given its handful of MPs, Gurumoorthy said, 'We will abide by the party's decision and support Radhakrishnan in case an election is forced.' Given that Jagan's support does not account for much numerically, the move is being seen as an olive branch by the YSRCP to the BJP. Some others feel it is the BJP's bid to keep the Telugu Desam Party (TDP), the NDA's second-largest constituent, and the YSRCP's main rival in Andhra Pradesh, in check. 'Since the YSRCP's poor performance in the simultaneous Lok Sabha and Assembly elections last year, Jagan has maintained a friendly stance towards the BJP,' a source close to Jagan said, adding that this had become even more imperative for the party after the setback it faced in panchayat bypolls in Pulivendula, the backyard of the YSR family. The bypolls for the Pulivendula and Vontimitta zilla parishads were marred by violence and saw YSRCP Kadapa MP Y S Avinash Reddy as well as TDP MLC Ram Gopal Reddy being taken into preventive custody. However, another YSRCP leader said that seeking support from Jagan, especially when it was not really required, only shows that the BJP wants to ensure that the TDP is 'kept in line'. 'Why else would they reach out to us? We have a minimal presence in both Houses. It is just another way the BJP is using to send out a message to the TDP that it is not indispensable,' the leader added. Since its 2024 defeat, the YSRCP has been extending 'issue-based' support to the NDA. It also supported the ruling alliance's candidate in the election of Om Birla as Speaker of the Lok Sabha. In April, it left it to its 'MPs' discretion' how to vote on the Waqf (Amendment) Bill. However, it subsequently moved the Supreme Court against the Bill. Andhra has a substantial Muslim population which could be one reason for the YSRCP's caution on the matter.
The Hindu
2 hours ago
- The Hindu
U.P. school mergers: Supreme Court asks AAP MP to move High Court against order to merge low-enrolment schools
The Supreme Court on Monday (August 18, 2025) suggested to Aam Aadmi Party parliamentarian Sanjay Singh to approach the Allahabad High Court with his petition challenging Uttar Pradesh's 'arbitrary and unconstitutional' action of pairing and merging 105 Government primary schools through an executive action taken in June 2025. A Bench headed by Justice Dipankar Datta noted that the issue was related to thousands of students and was related to an Executive action. Ideally, an Executive move ought to be challenged in the High Court concerned. The court further noted that the right to education was a statutory right under the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009, while also being a Constitutional entitlement under Article 21A of the Constitution. The court remarked that in cases when a right was covered by a specific statute, aggrieved persons ought to move the High Court first under Article 226 of the Constitution before agitating the issue as a Constitutional one. Mr. Singh, represented by senior advocate Kapil Sibal, advocates Farukh Khan and Sriram Parakkat, withdrew his petition. He was given liberty to approach the High Court, which was requested to hear the case, if filed, expeditiously. The Rajya Sabha MP had said the State's order had adversely affected the educational access of numerous children. The State had, through an order of June 16, paired low-enrolment schools with proximate ones. A list issued on June 24 had identified 105 low-enrolment schools. 'As a result, several functioning schools have been closed or merged, forcing children to travel longer distances without transport, infrastructure, or prior notice. This violates Article 21A, Section 6 RTE Act, and Rule 4(1)(a) of the UP RTE Rules, since children are deprived of neighbourhood schooling… Closure or merger of schools, once established under Section 6 read with Rule 4, cannot be done by mere Executive order without legislative sanction,' the petition had pointed out.
