
Student loan caps could hit minorities, low-ranked law schools the hardest
June 23 (Reuters) - Aspiring attorneys who can't afford full law school tuition could end up paying more for their degrees while some might get shut out of law school altogether under a pending Republican proposal to cap student loan borrowing, according to three legal education finance experts and three law deans.
The budget reconciliation bill was passed by the U.S. House of Representatives in May and is currently under consideration by the U.S. Senate, with proposed annual caps ranging from $50,000 to about $77,000 and aggregate borrowing caps of $150,000 to $200,000 for professional degrees. The House and Senate proposals differ slightly.
The current federal loan system allows students to borrow the total amount of their tuition and living expenses at fixed interest rates. An earlier federal cap on graduate loans was eliminated in 2006 under George W. Bush's presidency.
The proposed cap would require students who hit the limit to secure private loans if they need more money, which could mean higher interest rates for borrowers. It would apply to all professional degree programs, but students pursuing high-cost programs including law and medical degrees would feel its impact most heavily, education experts said.
Law students on average borrowed $146,800 in 2020, the most recent data from AccessLex Institute shows — the highest outside of medical degree programs. The percentage of law students who took out loans for law schools was 76%, up from 71% four years earlier, according to AccessLex.
The average annual tuition at private law schools was $57,860 in 2024, while public school tuition was an average $31,431, the AccessLex data shows, though financial aid brings those totals down for many students.
Proponents of capping loans say the current system has incentivized colleges and universities to increase tuition and has made it too easy for students to enroll in programs with low employment outcomes at taxpayers' expense. Graduates are then saddled with decades of student loan payments.
"By capping inflationary graduate loan programs, we prevent students from overborrowing and put downward pressure on rising college costs," said U.S. Senator Bill Cassidy, chair of the U.S. Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions and a Republican, in an email to Reuters last week.
The cap would be felt most deeply at low-ranked and unranked law schools because some students will struggle to secure private loans, said AccessLex President Chris Chapman, whose organization previously issued private graduate loans but is now a nonprofit advocate for law school access and affordability.
Those law schools tend to have lower employment rates and higher borrowing — red flags for lenders. Lenders are likely to examine applicants' grades and scholarships in addition to their job prospects and finances, Chapman said, and those deemed too risky could be denied.
Particularly vulnerable are less-affluent students who may have trouble securing loan co-signers, said University of California, Irvine School of Law Dean Austen Parrish.
A 2023 analysis, opens new tab of law school debt-to-income ratios by Notre Dame law professor Derek Muller had found that at more than a quarter of American Bar Association-accredited law schools, graduates had a median cumulative debt that was more than twice their annual income one year after graduation.
For example, the median debt of graduates of unranked Cooley Law School, which has campuses in Lansing, Michigan, and Tampa, Florida, was $202,668, while their median earnings were $40,967, the study showed. Cooley did not respond to Reuters' requests for comment.
Atlanta's John Marshall Law School, also unranked, had a median debt of $193,041 and median $48,790 in annual earnings, the study found. The school declined to comment.
Lower-ranked and unranked law schools in general have higher minority and first-generation enrollment. A study, opens new tab by the Law School Admission Council found that minority students made up 42% of 2024's first-year class among the top quarter of schools when grouped by their selectivity, but 51% at the bottom quarter of schools. Cooley's most recent first-year class was 36% students of color — just below the national average of 37% — while Atlanta's John Marshall was much higher at nearly 76%, American Bar Association data shows.
If students at lower-ranked and unranked law schools hit the cap but can't secure private loans or enough financial aid, it could mean a decline in law student racial and socioeconomic diversity, said Ronald Weich, dean of Seton Hall University School of Law — a private law school with $67,300 in annual tuition and a first-year class that was nearly 38% students of color in 2024.
'This will make the profession less inclusive,' Weich said.
Read more:
US Education Department closure imperils law school finances, deans say
Stanford Law to fund student loan alternative based on grads' future earnings
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
24 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
MAGA loyalist Danica Patrick fires off message to Donald Trump after president's strikes on Iran
Donald Trump 's decision to bomb Iran after years of condemning America's involvement in Middle Eastern wars is being criticized by some MAGA faithful – just not Danica Patrick. Instead, the NASCAR and Indy Car trail blazer doubled down on her support for the President in a series of patriotic online posts following the controversial attack. The first post did not directly mention Trump, but rather addressed US soldiers stationed around the world – a group that could be impacted by a potential Iranian military response. 'Thank you to all that keep America safe and strong,' Patrick captioned the post, which shows her driving a speed boat with the US flag flapping away in the background. Patrick included Creedence Clearwater Revival's 'Fortunate Son' with her post, which is less of a patriotic anthem than a protest of privileged Americans avoiding Vietnam War service. But lest anyone think the song selection was a dig at Trump, who famously missed the Vietnam War with college and medical deferments, Patrick's subsequent post made her allegiance perfectly clear. 'Get in!' read the caption of above an AI-generated image of Trump dressed as a fighter pilot in a jet cockpit. 'We're making the world great again!' Although careful not to criticize Trump directly, conservative firebrands like Georgian Republican congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene and podcaster Tucker Carlson have slammed the US bombing of sites linked to Iran's nuclear program. Trump has since claimed Carlson called him to apologize for his commentary about the US involvement in Iran, Israel and the Middle East. 'He called and apologized the other day because he thought he had said things that were a little bit too strong, and I appreciate that,' Trump said. Both Vice President JD Vance and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth have stressed the US is not interested in another regime change in the Middle East. However, Trump contracted that message in a Sunday social media post. 'It's not politically correct to use the term, "Regime Change," but if the current Iranian Regime is unable to MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN, why wouldn't there be a Regime change??? MIGA!!!' Patrick had never voted before 2024, but came out strongly in favor of Trump during the last presidential election. 'Don't you guys find it amazing that you can say, 'I love this country,' and it means you're Republican,' the 42-year-old said at an event called 'AmericaFest' back in December. 'That you can wear an American flag and it means you're Republican. 'Why aren't these things American?


Reuters
26 minutes ago
- Reuters
US Supreme Court rebuffs Virginia's bid to scuttle felon voting ban challenge
WASHINGTON, June 23 (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court declined on Monday to hear Virginia's bid to scuttle a lawsuit challenging an 1869 state constitutional provision that imposes a lifetime voting ban on convicted felons, one of the toughest restrictions in the United States. The justices turned away an appeal by Virginia Attorney General Jason Miyares, a Republican, of a lower court's ruling that let the lawsuit led by two would-be voters in the state with felony records proceed. Virginia is one of just three U.S. states that imposes a lifetime ban on voting for all people with felony convictions unless the government restores an individual's ability to vote, according to the Brennan Center for Justice public policy institute. In 2023, Virginians Tati King and Toni Johnson, who were disenfranchised due to past felony convictions, and an advocacy group filed a class action lawsuit aiming to block state officials from enforcing the ban. King was convicted in 2018 of felony drug possession, according to court papers. Johnson was convicted in 2021 of multiple felonies including drug possession and child endangerment. The plaintiffs are backed by the American Civil Liberties Union. Their convictions triggered the disenfranchisement provision of Virginia's constitution adopted in the aftermath of the U.S. Civil War of 1861-1865 stating that no person who has been convicted of a felony "shall be qualified to vote unless his civil rights have been restored by the governor or other appropriate authority." The plaintiffs argued that their disenfranchisement violated an 1870 federal law known as the Virginia Readmission Act that restored the state's congressional representation after the Civil War. Virginia, which had allowed slavery, was one of the states that had seceded during the Civil War. While the 1870 federal law did allow Virginia to punish felons by stripping them of their vote, the statute said this penalty applied to "such crimes as are now felonies at common law." The plaintiffs, backed by the ACLU, argued that only crimes that were felonies at the time of the law's enactment can lead to disenfranchisement - which would exclude the convictions of the plaintiffs in the case. "The act's purpose was to prevent Virginia from manipulating statutory criminal law to disenfranchise Black voters - specifically, from convicting and disenfranchising newly freed Black residents based on statutory crimes that were not felonies at the time Virginia entered the Union," the plaintiffs wrote in court papers. Following the Civil War, policies of racial segregation and disenfranchisement of Black people were broadly enforced by white leaders in numerous U.S. states including Virginia using what were called Jim Crow laws. Virginia's attorney general sought to dismiss the lawsuit, arguing that it was barred by a legal doctrine called sovereign immunity that allows a government to be sued only if it has consented. A federal judge in a March 2024 ruling held that the lawsuit satisfied an exception to sovereign immunity and could proceed against state officials. The Richmond, Virginia-based 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals agreed that the suit could move forward, prompting state officials to appeal to the Supreme Court. The justices in January declined to hear a challenge to Mississippi's lifetime ban on voting by people convicted of a wide range of felonies.


Reuters
27 minutes ago
- Reuters
Exclusive: Iranian retaliation against U.S. forces could come soon, U.S. officials say
WASHINGTON, June 23 (Reuters) - The United States assesses that Iran could carry out retaliatory attacks targeting American forces in the Middle East soon, although the U.S. is still seeking a diplomatic resolution that would see Tehran forgo any attack, two U.S. officials said on Monday. One of the officials, who spoke to Reuters on condition of anonymity, said Iran's retaliatory attack could happen within the next day or two. Iran has threatened to retaliate after U.S. bombed its nuclear sites over the weekend.