Australia says US missile purchase shows commitment to defence spending
Minister for Defence Industry Pat Conroy on Thursday (Jul 3) confirmed the purchase of AIM-120C-8 and AIM-120D-3 missiles, developed by American defence company Raytheon Technologies.
They will be used by Australia's F/A-18 and F-35 fighter jets and a new army brigade focused on striking aerial targets up to 500km away, he added.
Albanese, who is yet to meet President Donald Trump, has rebuffed a US request to agree to lift long-term defence spending to 3.5 per cent of gross domestic product. It's forecast to rise to 2.3 per cent by 2033.
Foreign Minister Penny Wong, who met with her US counterpart Marco Rubio on Tuesday in Washington, said Australia took a "capability approach" and had already committed to the largest peacetime increase in defence funding.
"I know there will be more capability required, I think we all understand that, and we will fund the capability Australia needs," she said on Thursday in a television interview with Sky News Australia.
Albanese's scheduled meeting with Trump on the sidelines of the G7 was cancelled when Trump left the summit early due to tensions between Israel and Iran.
Wong said the security allies were working to reschedule a leaders' meeting.
Seeking to respond to China's build-up of its military, Albanese pledged A$74 billion (US$47 billion) last year to buy missiles from Europe and the US, including A$21 billion to establish a Guided Weapons and Explosive Ordnance Enterprise in Australia.
The sale of 400 missiles to Australia through the US foreign military sales program was notified to the US Congress in April. A further US$2 billion proposed sale of US electronic warfare systems and equipment for Australia's F/A-18 Super Hornet and EA-18 Growler fighter jets was notified in June.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNA
5 hours ago
- CNA
Global Property Expo: Helping investors navigate international real estate
Investors in the Asia Pacific region play a major role in cross-border property transactions, contributing US$48.1 billion (S$61.8 billion) in 2023, according to international real estate services firm JLL. Singapore alone accounted for US$25.3 billion, second only to the United States. The growing appetite for overseas residential assets reflects a broader shift towards portfolio diversification. By spreading investments across markets, currencies and economic cycles, investors can reduce exposure to domestic risks. 'We're seeing increased demand, particularly from high net worth families and professionals looking to diversify into markets such as Australia, Japan, the United Kingdom and the Middle East,' noted Mr James Puddle, head of international residential (Southeast Asia), JLL. To support investors in exploring such opportunities, JLL is launching the inaugural Global Property Expo 2025 in Singapore. Taking place at Sands Expo & Convention Centre from Jul 18 to 20, the event will serve as a one-stop destination, featuring a curated showcase of properties, alongside panel discussions offering regional insights and practical guidance on buying property abroad. Investing in residential property abroad can be complex, often involving remote negotiations across time zones with foreign developers, banks and legal advisers. The Global Property Expo aims to streamline this process by bringing together trusted developers from key markets – including Australia, Japan, the Middle East and Europe – while offering investors research-backed insights into emerging hotspots, rental yields and ownership rules. Senior private banking partners, JLL capital markets specialists and financial industry professionals will weigh in on trending topics such as co-investment structures, fractional ownership models and risk-adjusted return benchmarks. Sessions like International Residential Investment 101 will cover cross-border due diligence, comparative yield profiles and currency-hedging strategies. 'These topics reflect questions often raised by high net worth and institutional investors – how to navigate emerging markets, structure debt, access residency programmes and optimise returns,' said Mr Puddle, who will moderate a panel titled Buying a Property Abroad: What to Look For in an Agent. He recommends that attendees come prepared with a focused list of questions to get the most out of their conference experience. The conference will also tackle property ownership laws, tax regimes and residency-by-investment criteria. On-site legal experts will be available to offer guidance on jurisdictional requirements, tax implications and investment opportunities in cities such as Brisbane, Tokyo and Lisbon. 'What might normally take weeks of remote research is condensed into a three-day programme,' said Mr Puddle. 'Investors will leave with a clear roadmap, whether that's pursuing a specific development, engaging legal support or arranging financing.' The curated showcase offers investors peace of mind by ensuring the credibility of participating developers and projects. 'Every exhibitor is vetted through JLL's network – including Leading Real Estate Companies of the World – so investors engage only with trusted names,' said Mr Puddle. Ahead of the event, JLL's Asia-Pacific research teams identified jurisdictions with strong fundamentals – high rental yields, stable governance and transparent regulations – and extended invitations to leading developers. These include Gurner Group in Australia, Escon in Japan and Emaar from the United Arab Emirates. The expo's one-stop format benefits developers as much as investors. With mandatory pre-registration, developers meet only serious buyers with verified purchasing capacity. At the same time, the investor pool is broadened as attendees discover accessible entry points such as fractional ownership and tokenisation. Real-time feedback from participants at panel discussions and booths will help developers finetune their follow-up strategies during the event, in line with buyers' interest in areas such as debt structures, yield expectations and ownership models. 'Our goal isn't just to host a transactional event, but to create Asia's flagship annual real estate investment forum – a single platform where curated projects, accessible financing and actionable market intelligence converge,' said Mr Puddle.
Business Times
7 hours ago
- Business Times
Bigger Brics club faces challenges amid opportunities
FOR years, the emerging-market club of Brics appeared to lack momentum at successive summits. But that perception changed last year, with the club welcoming new members from the Global South, alongside its growing global economic footprint and efforts at non-Western innovation, including in artificial intelligence (AI). Brics leaders are preparing to meet for their two-day summit in Brazil hosted by President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva on Sunday (Jul 6), at an event for a club that has doubled in size in the last 12 months. Egypt, Ethiopia, Indonesia, Iran and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) have become members, alongside longstanding members Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa; Saudi Arabia is mulling an invitation to join as a full member of the club. As the new members bring diversity to the club, the number of Brics 'partner countries' has also grown; these now include Belarus, Bolivia, Malaysia and Thailand. Diversity aside, a second source of enhanced appeal of Brics membership is the club's growing global footprint, a point highlighted by Russian President Vladimir Putin at the St Petersburg International Economic Forum in June. He noted that in 1992, the G7 industrialised countries accounted for 45.5 per cent of global growth, while the original Brics members were at 16.7 per cent. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up By 2023, these figures were dramatically different – at 29.3 per cent and 37.4 per cent, respectively. With the expansion of the Brics in 2024 and 2025, Putin said last month that Brics now accounts for around 40 per cent of the world economy. He also asserted that it was inevitable the growth gap would widen. 'In recent decades, the entire global economic dynamics came from the Brics countries.' He noted, for instance, that trade between Brics countries had now passed US$1 trillion and cited the dominance of corporations headquartered in the Brics bloc, in industries such as energy resources, metals and food. A third area of attractiveness for the Global South is innovation from a non-Western perspective. For example, the club last year agreed to a 'Charter on Responsible AI'. This initiative is promoting culturally sensitive AI development, to reduce the Global South's reliance on Western cloud providers and foundational models. Financial support is coming from the New Development Bank (NDB), which launched a US$5 billion digital sovereignty fund this year to boost AI infrastructure. China, India and Russia are developing their own large language models (LLMs); last year, Brazil and China launched a joint project to build a Portuguese-Spanish LLM. Efforts are ongoing to cultivate a Brics-based compute stack. China's Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corporation and India's Centre for Development of Advanced Computing are reportedly accelerating 7-nanometre chip production, and Iran and the UAE are investing in quantum computing and national AI entities. Another aspect is development finance and alternative currencies, including a joint cross-border payments system and a reinsurance company. Putin described the NDB, set up in 2015 by the founding Brics members, as an alternative forum to the World Bank and International Monetary Fund. A key driver for the bank is to finance infrastructure and technology projects across the Global South. One priority for many Brics members, including Russia, is advancing the use of national currencies in trade between member states and away from the US dollar. Following increased Western sanctions since 2022, after Russia's invasion of Ukraine, Moscow has been particularly keen to continue to lead the push to create alternative non-Western economic platforms that rely less not only on the US dollar, but also other currencies like the euro. This includes a proposal for a new payments system, based on a network of commercial banks linked to each other through Brics central banks. This would reportedly use blockchain technology to store and transfer digital tokens backed by national currencies, reducing the need for US dollar transactions. Russia, the world's top wheat exporter, is also promoting a Brics grain-trading exchange backed by a pricing agency. The goal is to develop an alternative to key Western bourses where international prices for agricultural commodities are commonly set. Challenges Yet, despite having more 'wind in its sails', the reality is the Brics bloc faces challenges, too. Part of the reason is the heterogeneity of the membership. Even among the original five members, there are key differences. Take the example of China's periodic tensions with India, including over border issues. This rivalry may be one of the reasons Chinese President Xi Jinping will not attend Sunday's summit. While Beijing has officially cited a scheduling conflict, the fact that Brazil issued a state dinner invitation to Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi may have discouraged Xi, in case it gave the appearance of him being less important than Modi. These differences are likely to mean that, for the foreseeable future at least, Brics would probably not decisively move beyond an increasingly institutionalised forum for emerging-market cooperation. The growing size of Brics has raised fears that the bloc could ultimately become a unified anti-Western alliance. This concerns many, given that the founding members alone encompass over a quarter of the world's land area and 40 per cent of its population. This Western fear is partly why Argentina President Javier Milei, an ally of US President Donald Trump, turned down an invitation to join the bloc. There is also a wider economic challenge for Brics. While Putin, who will also not attend the Brazil summit, has highlighted the economic dynamism of many of its members, there is vastly different performance even among its original members. China and India have delivered a generally robust economic performance over the past two decades, in contrast with disappointing results in Brazil, Russia and South Africa. The result is that the group is unbalanced. For instance, China's economic output is around 50 times that of South Africa's. Still, Brics is likely to continue growing in appeal among others in the Global South, even as some pro-Western states like Argentina have declined to join. While some see geopolitical cooperation rising to the fore in coming years, the bloc's centre of gravity remains as an increasingly institutionalised forum for emerging-market cooperation. The writer is an associate at LSE IDEAS at the London School of Economics
Independent Singapore
18 hours ago
- Independent Singapore
Shocking inquiry uncovers British role in genocide of indigenous Australians
A powerful 'accountability' movement is in progress in Australia. The Yoorrook Justice Commission, the country's first official 'truth-telling' review, released a trailblazing report disclosing that British settlers committed carnage against Aboriginal peoples in the state of Victoria. According to the latest BBC report, the final verdict was drawn from more than 1,300 submissions and two months of public hearings. The report touches on the distressing effects of colonisation, from mass assassinations and cultural obliteration to systemic xenophobia that continues today. With 100 endorsements for reparation, the report signifies a pivotal moment in Australia's journey towards fairness, truth, and resolution. A dark chapter revealed The Yoorrook Justice Commission's report leaves no uncertainty about what took place in Victoria after colonisation commenced in the 1830s. In just about twenty years, the Indigenous inhabitants decreased from approximately 60,000 to 15,000, a 75% reduction caused by what the commission directly labelled as genocide. Contributing factors included aggression, sickness, child eliminations, environmental squalor, and cultural expurgation. See also Man escapes 4th-floor hotel quarantine by tying bedsheets together 'These were not isolated incidents or accidents of history,' the report stated. 'This was genocide.' The conclusions draw an unswerving connection between British colonist practices and the 'near-complete physical destruction' of the state's Aboriginal population. Narratives collected during the investigation talked of ordeal and suffering in different generations, from sexual aggression and forced land acquisitions to compulsory integration and the loss of language and cultural individuality. A call for redress: Education, health, and recognition The commission dispensed 100 endorsements intended to repair the unfathomable wounds left by colonial violence. Among the most noteworthy suggestions are a total overhaul of the educational structure to reflect more Indigenous viewpoints and history, augmented investment in Aboriginal health amenities, and formal admissions of guilt for historical wrongs, including the barring of Aboriginal armed forces from post-war land endowments. The report also concluded that systemic bigotry remains widespread in Victoria's health structure, calling for additional Indigenous representation in the labour force and steadfast guidelines to expand healthcare. It also recommended that amends could be in the form of compensation, a theme that has been politically controversial but is now gaining traction. See also 65-year-old man dies from a blood clot after Moderna Covid-19 jab Jill Gallagher, head of Victoria's Aboriginal health peak body, said the genocide outcome is 'indisputable,' adding: 'We don't blame anyone alive today for these atrocities, but it is the responsibility of those of us alive today to accept that truth.' Australia at a crossroads: Truth-telling or turning away? The Yoorrook Commission's verdicts came at a decisive moment in Australia's broader national discourse about justice for First Nations individuals. Whereas some states, like Victoria, are proceeding with truth-telling initiatives, others have stopped advancements. For example, in Queensland, a truth review was negated following a change in political administration. Nationwide, work towards resolution underwent a major impediment when Australians voted against a 2023 plebiscite to create an Indigenous Voice to Parliament. Notwithstanding political struggle, the Yoorrook report stands as a substantial, yet painful, breakthrough. It challenges Australians to meet painful realities and to admit that resolution and compromise demand more than emblematic gesticulations. It calls for structural modification, acknowledgement, and the daring to face the country's history. As Premier Jacinta Allan said, the report 'shines a light on hard truths.' Whether those realities will lead to meaningful action remains the question confronting Australia today.
